Katzenberg Divulges the "Shrek 3" Plot
Comingsoon.net's Edward Douglas attended a "Madagascar" press event, and it was there that DreamWorks' co-head honcho Jeffrey Katzenberg spilled some extensive beans regarding the plot of "Shrek 3." How's this sound? "When 'Shrek 3' opens, Shrek and Fiona are having to take on the duties of being the active king and queen of Far, Far Away. When we left him, the King was quite literally croaking. They're not very comfortable in these roles, so ...
... the King says to them, "If you can find the heir to the throne and bring him back, the Kingdom will be in good hands, then you can return to swamp and live your lives." Which is what they want to do. Shrek, Donkey and Puss go to the far side of the Kingdom of Far, Far Away where young "Artie", who is the nephew of Queen Lilian, is about to graduate school. Artie turns out to be young King Arthur and Shrek and Donkey and Puss have to convince this extremely rebellious young man, who's being voiced by Justin Timberlake, to come back and assume the throne." "Shrek 3" opens May 2007.
... the King says to them, "If you can find the heir to the throne and bring him back, the Kingdom will be in good hands, then you can return to swamp and live your lives." Which is what they want to do. Shrek, Donkey and Puss go to the far side of the Kingdom of Far, Far Away where young "Artie", who is the nephew of Queen Lilian, is about to graduate school. Artie turns out to be young King Arthur and Shrek and Donkey and Puss have to convince this extremely rebellious young man, who's being voiced by Justin Timberlake, to come back and assume the throne." "Shrek 3" opens May 2007.
Related Items
| Movie: | Shrek |
| Celeb: | Jeffrey Katzenberg |
|
loudharley writes: on May 06 2005 01:49 AM Sounds good. (Reply to this) |
|
Aoiboy writes: on May 06 2005 02:01 AM I was expecting the third one to be about a baby ogre on the way, but this sounds a bit more original... (Reply to this) |
|
slamex writes: on May 06 2005 04:12 PM This plot is a good idea! (Reply to this) |
|
Stankton writes: on May 07 2005 10:59 AM Why? What did I do to deserve this? (Reply to this) |
|
Roadhg67 writes: on May 07 2005 07:28 PM stop it! jesus christ... no more pointless sequels... they are killing cinema as we know it! (Reply to this) |
|
kwelladakid writes: on May 08 2005 08:39 AM The story idea is okay, but no Justin Timberlake! He's gonna end up ripping off the girl ogre's bra. The height of his career was dressing as an omelette on SNL, kill him now. (Reply to this) |
|
loudharley writes: on May 08 2005 09:56 PM Nothings wrong with sequals as long as they are done well.Look at shrek 2,spiderman 2 and xmen 2 . (Reply to this) |
|
Banana Kid writes: on May 09 2005 06:08 PM Well, Shrek 2 was just as good as Shrek. So, if we stay lucky, and Dreamworks doesn't lose the magic they kept through two Shreks, this should be quite enjoyable. I'll be there. (Reply to this) |
|
sideburnz writes: on May 10 2005 01:35 AM nobody can convince me to see this now that justin timberlake is in this. (Reply to this) |
|
loudharley writes: on May 11 2005 03:20 AM I am in no way a timberlake fan,but the shrek movies are very well made movies .Id say it will be good no matter who they decide to cast for the sequal. (Reply to this) |
|
Buddha's Belly writes: on May 11 2005 12:47 PM Bring it on in to Omletteville! (Reply to this) |
|
Now it's dark writes: on May 12 2005 09:07 AM Tired. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |






