Exclusive: The Fall - Tarsem's Visual Companion - Part 2

Click here for a full version
Tarsem:
There's a movie called Baraka and these guys to me are very funny because people look at these as a very cultural thing. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing and people will say, "He ripped this from Baraka." If you've seen Baraka hopefully you'll do a little bit more research and you'll find out what a joke it is. People look at it as a very big cultural thing, but how they evolved was that in the 1920s a German guy went there and said, "You need some sort of gimmick to get tourists." He taught them this! But what they've done is taken this idea of storytelling and made it their own, which I love.
I wanted to take it that step further. I said, "You can't speak, but you have to tell me the directions around the world." I just wanted to turn it into a language. It's a musical interlude like they always do in Hindi movies. When you see a Hindi movie they just shoot everything in this shitty little corner in India and then to show the production value in the trailer they'll send these guys to Trafalgar Square and all these clichéd points where they'll sing in front of pigeons and all that and suddenly it's in the fucking trailer. I just wanted that as a joke so that we could say, "Hey, we travelled everywhere!"
For most people when the movie doesn't work it's because of its meandering, but the movie is about meandering. We're using one person as a storyteller and you don't cut to the agenda. You don't go from here to the third act - what he's doing is using his body language to make things more interesting. Hitchcock said, if two people have to have a conversation, let's cut to the bomb underneath. For me, I thought it'd be great not to show the bomb and to get people interested in the boring conversation. And, actually, in the second act you discover that there is a bomb underneath and it's all the more powerful then.
I wanted to take it that step further. I said, "You can't speak, but you have to tell me the directions around the world." I just wanted to turn it into a language. It's a musical interlude like they always do in Hindi movies. When you see a Hindi movie they just shoot everything in this shitty little corner in India and then to show the production value in the trailer they'll send these guys to Trafalgar Square and all these clichéd points where they'll sing in front of pigeons and all that and suddenly it's in the fucking trailer. I just wanted that as a joke so that we could say, "Hey, we travelled everywhere!"
For most people when the movie doesn't work it's because of its meandering, but the movie is about meandering. We're using one person as a storyteller and you don't cut to the agenda. You don't go from here to the third act - what he's doing is using his body language to make things more interesting. Hitchcock said, if two people have to have a conversation, let's cut to the bomb underneath. For me, I thought it'd be great not to show the bomb and to get people interested in the boring conversation. And, actually, in the second act you discover that there is a bomb underneath and it's all the more powerful then.
|
tomwaitsjr writes: on Oct 06 2008 03:20 PM It's one of the few films that I'd pay for in picture-book form. Stunning. (Reply to this) |
|
dreamworks21 writes: on Oct 06 2008 04:53 PM a great movie (Reply to this) |
|
dahluzz writes: on Oct 07 2008 07:04 AM isn't it kind of stupid that he refers to himself by one name though? he's not as bad as catwoman director "pitof" or anything, but he's also no cher or madonna. you really have to earn single name status, and two mildly received films, however gorgeous they are, doesn't warrant that. (Reply to this) |
|
peanutbrittle50 writes: on Oct 13 2008 06:50 AM Isn't his name Tarsem Singh, or did he ditch the Singh? (Reply to this) |
|
PETER C. writes: on Jul 18 2009 08:21 AM after watching this moview I was curious to read what the critics have said. Many thought is was visually interesting but otherwise empty of content. While there are some problems with contruction of the film which can leave the viewer confused, I thought it was an original and creative effort aimed at capturing the power of the imagination and how our life stories are not just our own, but interwoven with others as well. The little girl Alexandria was convincing and her relationship with Ron was what enabled him to turn himself around. The weakest part of the film was the scene where he is being held down by his enemy (a part of himself) and chose to fight back. Too bad. But otherwise I think the film should be getting more attention. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |



