Exclusive: The Fall - Tarsem's Visual Companion - Part 2

Click here for a full version
Tarsem:
This is the transformation of the guy going in from one scene to another and this one is the effect shot. This ended up in the windiest corner of the world. They say a good trick is when you fake someone into thinking one thing and then do the opposite. You know, by this time, they're thinking, "Wow, there's no CGI, everything is real," so you go and use it in the one place they're not expecting it. And it's for practical reasons only, because this is one of the windiest places in the world.
We built it to about twenty feet and we realised that the fabric was parachuting so heavily it couldn't be any bigger. But we actually used duplication, not CGI, so I thought that was fine. As long as the technology had been around for a hundred years I thought it was OK to do this trick. Whenever you ask people to point out the effects they'll always point to the blue city or here or there but they'll never point to the few I actually did as effect shots! This was just impossible to achieve and aesthetically doing it this way it looked exactly how I wanted it to.
I really did approach the effects in the film from the point of view of the time period the film is set in - the silent movie era. It was about what technology was available to them then. That's all I used. But look at the archive footage at the end - believe me, they didn't have unions back then, they used to kill these guys left, right and centre.
We built it to about twenty feet and we realised that the fabric was parachuting so heavily it couldn't be any bigger. But we actually used duplication, not CGI, so I thought that was fine. As long as the technology had been around for a hundred years I thought it was OK to do this trick. Whenever you ask people to point out the effects they'll always point to the blue city or here or there but they'll never point to the few I actually did as effect shots! This was just impossible to achieve and aesthetically doing it this way it looked exactly how I wanted it to.
I really did approach the effects in the film from the point of view of the time period the film is set in - the silent movie era. It was about what technology was available to them then. That's all I used. But look at the archive footage at the end - believe me, they didn't have unions back then, they used to kill these guys left, right and centre.
|
tomwaitsjr writes: on Oct 06 2008 03:20 PM It's one of the few films that I'd pay for in picture-book form. Stunning. (Reply to this) |
|
dreamworks21 writes: on Oct 06 2008 04:53 PM a great movie (Reply to this) |
|
dahluzz writes: on Oct 07 2008 07:04 AM isn't it kind of stupid that he refers to himself by one name though? he's not as bad as catwoman director "pitof" or anything, but he's also no cher or madonna. you really have to earn single name status, and two mildly received films, however gorgeous they are, doesn't warrant that. (Reply to this) |
|
peanutbrittle50 writes: on Oct 13 2008 06:50 AM Isn't his name Tarsem Singh, or did he ditch the Singh? (Reply to this) |
|
PETER C. writes: on Jul 18 2009 08:21 AM after watching this moview I was curious to read what the critics have said. Many thought is was visually interesting but otherwise empty of content. While there are some problems with contruction of the film which can leave the viewer confused, I thought it was an original and creative effort aimed at capturing the power of the imagination and how our life stories are not just our own, but interwoven with others as well. The little girl Alexandria was convincing and her relationship with Ron was what enabled him to turn himself around. The weakest part of the film was the scene where he is being held down by his enemy (a part of himself) and chose to fight back. Too bad. But otherwise I think the film should be getting more attention. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |



