IGN.com|AskMen.com|Rotten Tomatoes|GameSpy|FilePlanet|TeamXbox|CheatsCodesGuides|GameStats|Direct2Drive
RottenTomatoes.com
Register | Log In | What is RT?
Home Movies DVD Celebrities News Critics Trailers & Pictures The Vine Forums
Features | Columns | Guides
RT Search Powered by Google
help icon Enhanced RT
searches on Google
Click here to turn on enhanced search results from RT on your Google searches by subscribing to our Google Subscribed Links profile.
 
News
Brian De Palma on Redacted: The RT Interview
by Tom Toro
Discuss Article | Blog Article | Email To A Friend
Page | 1 2


The uncomfortable reactions to the movie must be coming from not only the disturbing subject matter, but also from the fact that it's a new language. A normal theatergoing audience can't quite comprehend it yet.

De Palma: Exactly correct. To me it's almost atonal. Suddenly you're playing atonal music and people don't know what to make of it. That's what I noticed when I screened it at the beginning, is people had nothing to say afterwards. Basically they were struck dumb. They couldn't process the material. Then the first thing, of course, when you don't understand something, you attack it. "It's not this, it's not this, it's not this." I'll never forget the first time I saw Barry Lyndon, I just wasn't ready to process the way Stanley Kubrick did the movie, and I reacted very strongly against it. The way he told this particular story, with this particular technique. But over the years it's become one of my favorite movies of Kubrick's. Once it gets you into the temporal sense, and the pictorial sense, of the period, of the piece, it all makes perfect sense to you. But when you first see it, you go, "Why all these endless shots, why these zoom-ins -- what's going on here?"

Like Redacted, Barry Lyndon is also a movie where the filmmaker imposed very stringent technical limitations on himself.

De Palma: Exactly correct.

Is there any other reason besides your admiration for Barry Lyndon for why you wanted to use the same music in your movie?

De Palma: I think what was so instructive about Barry Lyndon was how Kubrick slowed down time; using very classical, measured music, he used very elaborate pull-backs. Of course I didn't have the beautiful pictorials that he did. You make the audience study the frame; something that I think people have completely forgotten about.



Redacted


I'd like to dig a little bit deeper, if we can, into what you discovered about the language of digital storytelling. It's such a new phenomenon, and I think Redacted is one of the few films that really prods at the edges of what's possible -- ultra long takes, handheld consumer cameras, relationships developed over the internet, everyone allowed a voice -- it's fascinating. And the other thing about digital media, which is why this war is a perfect topic for it, is the immediacy and the responsiveness of it. You can produce images like a reflex. That's the raw nerve that this film strikes.

De Palma: It's a great new way to deal with narrative forms. It's like things you discover in video games; the way they tell their stories. And of course video games emulate films a lot, and television shows, with their little story sequences within the games. But there was a really big breakthrough when they started to have games where you could approach the world from any place. It didn't go linearly. It was more like a mosaic. You could discover the story from the north, the south, the east, the west, and I said, "Wow."

I remember when I saw my first video game where it was played from a point-of-view shot. It was Colony and this must have been twenty years ago. I was knocked out by it. I said, "Oh my God." The players were perceiving all of this space through a point-of-view shot. And of course that's one of the main building blocks of moviemaking; it's totally cinematic, it doesn't exist in any other art form. I'm always fascinated by what the video games are doing. I truly believe that the creative forces in my generation, instead of being filmmakers, they wanted to be game programmers. They're literally creating spaces and stories. They're constantly discovering new forms. Every six months there's a new game where they push the envelope into something else. And this is also very true of the internet. The other day I discovered BloggerTV, where you have two guys talking about a subject, like an iChat, and it's any topic they want to talk about, like talking heads on television, except it's a discussion about a specific subject instead of people screaming at each. In any event, all this stuff is changing every day. And as I think about doing another film in this form, I'm constantly amazed at the new things that crop up.

Is it a coincidence that you've been influenced by video games, and quite often the "video game mentality" of modern warfare is cited? Is that something you brought into the film, this idea of soldiers being trained by virtual simulation and how that might affect their actions on the battlefield?

De Palma: Yeah, people say that, but the reality of on-the-ground has nothing to do with a videogame. As soon as soldiers get over to Iraq, they get it real fast. You can play every one of the most violent videogames in the world, and it doesn't give you a clue about what it's like to really be deployed in Iraq. A comparison is ridiculous.



Redacted


As far as the actors whom you chose to portray the soldiers, none of them will be recognizable faces to an audience, but I thought all of their performances were convincing. Private Flake was an incredibly frightening character.

De Palma: It's interesting that you say that, because that's one of the main criticisms I get all the time, "Oh, these actors are overacting; they're a bunch of amateurs." Ridiculous! I mean, they're acting in relationship to what situation they're in. When they're in barrage, they behave like warriors at the post, because that's what they're supposed to look like; that's how the director wanted them to look, and the actors take on a personae and an acting style appropriate for that form. When they're being filmed by Salazar, they're mugging and confused and spontaneous, which is exactly what it's like if you're taking a home video. When people react against Redacted so strongly, they don't understand the context of what the actors are doing. People are used to movies where the actors are always the same because the point of view never shifts. But when you change the form, the acting has to adjust.

So instead of a classical "character arc" you were going for a more prismatic study of people.

De Palma: Yes, but there's still very much a sense of character progression. Flake is a little tweaked when he gets over to Iraq, but you can see him sort of changing as the movie goes forth. People just don't understand how the form affects character presentation.

My immediate reaction after seeing the film, and what I did, was to view it a second time. In thinking about why that was, I got the notion that it was almost too much to absorb in one sitting -- to learn how to view the film, and then to appreciate it at the same time -- and so it resists a sense a resolution.

De Palma: The resolution is very much how I feel. I very much identify with McCoy; I feel frustration at not being able to stop the war, of being a participant in it, but being unable to do anything about it, just like McCoy can't do anything about the girl being raped. He carries that guilt with him. The other thing we'll be living with for decades is all of these soldiers coming back from Iraq harboring what they've been through. It's going to be like Vietnam but ten times worse. And it's going to go on for decades. I live near a V.A. hospital in California and I see these guys all the time, wandering around with that aimless stare on their faces, and of course everyone forgets about them. This is going to be going on for decades.

Redacted is in limited release this Friday.

Related Items
Movie: Barry Lyndon
Casualties of War
Celeb: Brian De Palma
Bookmark and Share
Page | 1 2
Comments (1-20 of 34 posts) | Reply
473897
kinghlg writes:
on Nov 15 2007 05:31 AM

Am I the only who is completely shocked by this interview. This Tom Toro guy is just as crazy as Brian Depalma. Look at what he said. "its rich, textured, and honest depiction of how the Iraq war is being waged for an audience." Is this suppose to be a joke? Yes, this incident actually took place and the men involved have been charged and sent to prison. So, if a couple of soldiers rape a 15 year old girl that means that the entire military is raping 15 year old girls? I am sick of this propaganda bull****."all this material is out there! It's like they assume I dreamt this up. It's all there. The problem is, it's not in your mainstream media, so nobody knows about it." Trashing the war isn't mainstream media? Where has this guy been for the past 6 years? God forbid CNN of the New York Times reports on the surge actually working or the navy seal who received the medal of honor for sacrificing his life for his men. I would rather see a movie about a navy seal kicking some insurgant *** and sacrificing his life. I don't know if Brian DePalma realizes that his movies is going to be shown to terrorist. This kind of propaganda is going to get soldiers killed. There is no doubt in my mind about that. This **** is used against us by our enemies. There is a serious problem with hollywood depicting a false reality of war. And its not right. I hope to God the rest of the people reading this interview agree with me.

(Reply to this)
473897
kinghlg writes:
on Nov 15 2007 05:31 AM

Am I the only who is completely shocked by this interview. This Tom Toro guy is just as crazy as Brian Depalma. Look at what he said. "its rich, textured, and honest depiction of how the Iraq war is being waged for an audience." Is this suppose to be a joke? Yes, this incident actually took place and the men involved have been charged and sent to prison. So, if a couple of soldiers rape a 15 year old girl that means that the entire military is raping 15 year old girls? I am sick of this propaganda bull****."all this material is out there! It's like they assume I dreamt this up. It's all there. The problem is, it's not in your mainstream media, so nobody knows about it." Trashing the war isn't mainstream media? Where has this guy been for the past 6 years? God forbid CNN of the New York Times reports on the surge actually working or the navy seal who received the medal of honor for sacrificing his life for his men. I would rather see a movie about a navy seal kicking some insurgant *** and sacrificing his life. I don't know if Brian DePalma realizes that his movies is going to be shown to terrorist. This kind of propaganda is going to get soldiers killed. There is no doubt in my mind about that. This **** is used against us by our enemies. There is a serious problem with hollywood depicting a false reality of war. And its not right. I hope to God the rest of the people reading this interview agree with me.

(Reply to this)
DarthRage writes:
on Nov 15 2007 05:57 AM

The movie was on HDNet yesterday, total garbage. It wasn't even a good war movie, just preaching to the world that America is a nation of rapists and murderers. The worst part was how he tried to make it appear as a documentary. Must have been his pathetic ode to that useless piece of human trash M Moore. What a great recruiting tool for Al-Quaida.

(Reply to this)
Jen Yamato writes:
on Nov 15 2007 10:28 AM

I think it's easy to miss the point on this film. Tons of people who saw it at festivals couldn't get past the form (mixed media, faux documentary, news reports, home videos, etc.) long enough to really think about it. Yes, it is decidedly anti-war. But to let the fact that it has a bias -- like every film, book, and piece of art does -- immediately close your mind to the film, obscures your exposure to how De Palma is experimenting with cinema and ideas.

Of course you hated it, DarthRage. First of all, your name is DarthRage.

Kinghlg, where to begin. I assume you haven't seen the film you're so passionately trashing. Please correct me if I'm wrong.


(Reply to this)
cmonsteve writes:
on Nov 15 2007 10:45 AM

looks like we got a couple of fresh recruits...i say sign up and ship off, no need to rush we'll be there for years.

and as far as this film being a recruiting tool for terra-ists, right, like any iraqi needs extra motivation to kill the occupiers after abu garib. i've got friends and family serving over there right now, and the last time my cousin was back, he just drank and cried...


(Reply to this)
473897
kinghlg writes:
on Nov 15 2007 10:52 AM

In reply to this comment (#1278341)
No I have not seen the film. There is no way I am paying to see this movie. I might steal it once when I can get it on bit torrent. And what exactly is your point going to be? I have seen Platoon. I have seen Casualties of War, Apocalypse Now, Born on the 4th of July, The Deer Hunter, Fahrenheit 9/11, Full Metal Jacket, Jarhead, Rendition, Tigerland, My issue is the false reality that these movies portray. These movies show the average movie watching American that war and the military are bad. And the media nowadays is not helping anything. They want this war lost and they will do anything report it that way. I am sick of it. And please explain to me what the POINT of this movie is. Since its so easy to miss it.

(Reply to this)
Jen Yamato writes:
on Nov 15 2007 11:15 AM

In reply to this comment (#1278350)
I'd really like for you to figure it out yourself. It's more enriching that way. But watch it, then I'd love to talk!

(Reply to this)
473897
kinghlg writes:
on Nov 15 2007 02:01 PM

In reply to this comment (#1278394)
No. I am not going to watch it. I want you to tell me what the point of this movie is. It must be something great because you make it sound like I am not capable of understanding the point. How deep can this movie be. Just answer the question please.

(Reply to this)
473897
kinghlg writes:
on Nov 15 2007 02:19 PM

In reply to this comment (#1278345)
It's a shame you feel that way. Especially since you have friends and family serving in Iraq. What is wrong with you? You bring up Abu Ghraib as if it a reason for these people to kill our troops. Do you remember what these people did to the hostages they took a few years ago. THEY CUT THEIR FREAKING HEADS OFF!!!! and you bring up an incident that involved only seventeen soldiers beating up some prisoners of war. Everyone knows that what those soldiers did was wrong, but you and people like you only deal in generalizations and absolutes. And anyone who supports this film and I can assume from your comment that you do, should be held accountable for supporting the killing of our troops. You really don't understand how serious this is. This film, along with other America hating films WILL be shown to our enemy. It's called propaganda and you are a victim of it.

(Reply to this)
Ashron writes:
on Nov 15 2007 03:38 PM

I hesitate to jump into this, but what the hell. You talk about people dealing in generalizations and absolutes, yet you claim to already know exactly what this film is about and what the point is without having even seen it. Me senses a little pot calling kettle action going on here.

(Reply to this)
473897
kinghlg writes:
on Nov 15 2007 07:20 PM

In reply to this comment (#1278971)
I don't claim anything. I KNOW what the movie is about. I have heard Brian De Palma say what the movie is about. Brian De Palma himself has said what the purpose of this movie is. Watch some real news or read something. It's not that hard.

(Reply to this)
Elixor writes:
on Nov 16 2007 05:55 AM

Would you care to explain your false reality claim?

It sounds to me like this movie is depicting some negative aspects of the war and your upset because you believe that these negative aspects are going being extrapolated out to become a view of what America is and/or what its soldiers are all like. This sort of thing happens when movies are made about the positive or negative aspects of any topic or subject. It can all be used as propaganda, but it doesn't mean that the movies shouldn't be made. I think that you have a valid point about movies and other coverage about America and its soldiers becoming increasingly more negative. More balance should occur, but exposures to the positives and negatives should both occur. Movies like this shouldn't be stopped because the could be used as propaganda. Movies generally take a positive or negative stance and can always be used as propaganda to either side. I'd like to see both sides. Sounds to me like you want to just see positive propaganda. Once again, I agree with you that we're seeing much more negative than positive views in movies lately. Which side of the issue we as viewers need to see more of is an opinion that's going to vary from person-to-person.


(Reply to this)
473897
kinghlg writes:
on Nov 16 2007 09:36 AM

Thank you for understand most of point. I didn't mean to use the term false reality to specifically describe this film. But even though this movie depicts factual events it will still encourage people to believe that this bad behavior goes on all the time. And it doesn't. And I can't place all of the responsibilty of teaching society the truth on hollywood, but we all know that the news isn't doing a very good job of that. These guys completely have to right to choose what kind of film they want to make, but Brian De Palma is no stranger to this bad behavior. Do you remember Casualties of War. The story of Redacted is almost identical. Brian De Palm has an agenda. He has said it himself. Let's get back to this false reality thing. Why do you think that most of society believes that the government and the military are hiding alien technology, or that the FBI, CIA and NSA are wire taping everyone. Most of society relys on basic media for their information. Someone who doesn't watch credible news or reads a credible newspaper will watch a thousand movies that depict the military or the government as the bad guy. It's everywhere, just open your eyes. You will find it in the most unlikely movies. And your probably saying to yourself that no one in their right mind can believe what they see in a movie. But your wrong. Over time, the average moviegoer will develope a crazy politicial viewpoint without even picking up a newspaper. No offense to anyone on here, but most people aren't too bright. Thats why the media can get away with this false depiction of the truth, because they know that most people will fall for it. But I am happy to see that alot of people have rejected this movie and others like it. That gives me hope for the future. I'm sure everyone can tell that I am a supporter of the war and our troops and I am also a supporter of Mr. Bush, and it doesn't bother me that much that people hate President Bush. Hate Bush all you want, but leave the troops alone. Our military will take care of the bad ones. These soldiers who raped that poor girl have been dealt with. The story has been reported many times and these people are now in prison. But don't comment on here telling me that a director who obivously has an agenda to spread a bad word is JUST making a movie about a factual event. He is making this movie to make a point. And his point is false and despicable.

(Reply to this)
381826
Johnny Rainbow writes:
on Nov 16 2007 09:45 AM

What the hell? Aren't interviewers supposed to at least pretend that they're objective?

And to address the third paragraph, a lot of critics seem to feel that the acting in the faux-documentary parts isn't good enough to convinve you that you're not seeing a faux-documentary. How do you back up your claim that the performances are "misjudged?" How can you claim that most movies suffer from "flaws in the dramatic logic?"


(Reply to this)
230550
slapy101 writes:
on Nov 16 2007 02:00 PM

This movie is total garbage. This wasn't even as good as a sci-fi original. De Palma, go back to film school if this nonsense is the best you can do. The movie was a mess and I'm quite sure you found those "actors" doing dinner theater in Green Bay.

(Reply to this)
434603
justice_rehnquist writes:
on Nov 16 2007 06:24 PM

In reply to this comment (#1277640)
Kinghlg, you wrote "This kind of propaganda is going to get soldiers killed. There is no doubt in my mind about that. This **** is used against us by our enemies." You also mentioned that anyone who supports this film needs to be held accountable for the deaths of our soldiers.

Where is the evidence that De Palma's film is going to cause soldiers to get killed? And by a moviegoer paying to see this film, such moviegoer should be held accountable for the deaths of our soldiers?

Kinghlg, I support De Palma's choice to make this film and any other film he chooses to make. I find your comments above to be unreasonably inflammatory, unfounded, and motivated by feelings of powerlessness and victimization. Thankfully, filmmakers will continue to make films that people find offensive and disagreeable, and that anger political conservatives into using film forums like Rotten Tomatoes to vent their increasing frustrations and feelings of incompetency.

My advice to you is to calm down, turn off Fox News and Rush Limbaugh, cancel your subscription to National Review, and refrain from making such utterly irresponsible remarks.

In the end, "Redacted" is just another piece of film entertainment. Grow up and get over your conservative righteousness - I'll gladly send a copy of "Redacted to the suspected terrorists and insurgents - just provide me with their addresses.


(Reply to this)
474405
dawson81 writes:
on Nov 16 2007 07:48 PM

The problem with this movie is not that it was made. It is WHEN the movie was made.
You wanna make this kind of treasonous garbage, you have the right to make it. Atleast have the decency to wait until said war is over though.
These acts occured and they were horrible. Guess what though. As Americans they were tried ,convicted, and punished for what they did. I am sitting in Iraq as I write this so unlike most of you idiots I actually have a clue what is going on here. I don't have to watch garbage films or listen to MSNBC and that scumbag Harry Reid. If I had been present or had any prior knowledge of these events or even seen the Soldiers that did it I could easily put a bullet in their head and not lose sleep over it. There will never be an excuse for what they did.
Please spare us anymore talk about Abu Garib. A few soldiers smacked around some detainees and made some stupid pictures. Bottom line is you have no ideal what happened there and you obviously don't have the stomach to come to Iraq and find out for yourself.
To those of you who are truly so naive as to think that films which portray US Forces in a negative way are not used as propoganda and recruiting tools for our enemies. Take your heads out of the sand and try to get a clue how War and propoganda work.
kinghlg thanks for your support.


(Reply to this)
474595
Phil3355 writes:
on Nov 17 2007 11:47 AM

your wrong.

(Reply to this)
454651
julianerik writes:
on Nov 17 2007 06:40 PM

If films like DePalma's aren't allowed to be made then the terrorists have won. Oh yeh Dawson wait till the war is over in ten years when another 200 thousand Iraqis and countless US forces have been killed in a pointless war of aggression and imperial conquest. Dawson81 I don't care if you serve. Just because someone is willing to risk there life doesn't mean they deserve endless praise, like everyone else they have to justify the killing they partake in not just assume the higher ups are morally just and follow any orders.

Dawson81 how does propaganda work? Terrorists have regular screenings of anti war polemics, do they, at which point they draw what conclusion, that both their actions and the actions of those trying to kill them are pointless. The machine of war destroys lives, particularly because those involved, as is the nature of war, have little time to reflect on the bigger picture like what is the F>**ing point of all this! Why are we here?! What is actually being achieved?! Why do all these people have to die isn't a question many people on either side get to ask when they're busy trying to kill and avoid being killed.

By the way the only thing the war has achieved so far is to create a whole new generation of young muslim men who feel like the US is an imperial power bent on destroying their lives. How do you think they are going to respond, it's well documented that the "war on terror" more like the "war on freedom" has actually augmented the levels of terror in the world. If you don't win hearts and minds you don't win full stop. If you kill someone's family, or destroy their house, or take away their job they're unlikely to consider you an ally.

Don't invade someone's country and expect to be greeted as liberators. What if someone invaded the US toppled the government and said 'now we're gonna tell you exactly how you're gonna do things'. Every American with a gun would become an insurgent. Have a little empathy.


(Reply to this)
474405
dawson81 writes:
on Nov 17 2007 07:01 PM

In reply to this comment (#1284507)
At what point did I ask for praise or in any way imply I am better than anyone. All I said was don't sit at home in your nice little comfort chair watchin TV and act like you have some idea what the Hell is going on 6000 miles away. Its easy for you to sit there with your " War doesn't achieve anything and why can't we get along and stop slaughtering thousands of Iraqis" attitude.Fact is you don't know Sh##. If you really give a damn about the Iraqi's then come over here and do something to help them.
F**k you and your empathy. I empathize with the guys/ gals who are here on the ground sacrificing to make a difference here. What have you sacrificed? A few min. on the computer.
Try taking the time to see how Iraqi civilians have been killed by US Forces and how many have been killed by Insurgents.
One last thing. You may not care that I or anyone else serve but we will be here anyway.


(Reply to this)
Read More Comments
Page | 1 2
Post Your Comment
You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register.
Related Links
Redacted
  • Pictures
  • Posters
  • News
  • Forum
Related Articles
  • Cannes 2008: De Palma Prints the Legend 0
  • Guide of the Dead - An RT Romero Retrospective 17
  • RT on DVD: Cram For The Oscars With Michael Clayton, In The Valley of Elah, And More Out This Week 20
  • Critical Consensus: Beowulf is Certified Fresh; Magorium Short on Magic; Cholera is Under the Weather 14
  • Brian De Palma on Redacted: The RT Interview 34
  • De Palma Fights Redacted Edits 66
  • Toronto Film Fest: The Good, The Bad, and The Better So Far 13
  • Ang Lee, Brad Pitt, Cate Blanchett Earn Venice Festival Honors 7
Most Discussed
  • Total Recall: Bill Murray's Best Movies 46
  • Critics Consensus: Express Scores, Body of Lies Falls Flat 34
  • Weekly Ketchup: Steve Carell to Get Smart again. 32
  • RT on DVD: The Future of Watchmen, Plus Sleeping Beauty, Touch of Evil Remastered 30
  • Box Office Guru Preview: Audiences Surrounded by Lies 9
  • Exclusive: Alexandre Aja talks Mirrors and Piranha 3D 7
  • Box Office Wrapup: The Dogs Rule Once Again 4
  • Exclusive: The Fall - Tarsem's Visual Companion - Part 2 3
Latest News
  • Box Office Wrapup: The Dogs Rule Once Again 4
  • Weekly Ketchup: Steve Carell to Get Smart again. 32
  • Exclusive: Alexandre Aja talks Mirrors and Piranha 3D 7
  • Critics Consensus: Express Scores, Body of Lies Falls Flat 34
  • Box Office Guru Preview: Audiences Surrounded by Lies 9
  • Total Recall: Bill Murray's Best Movies 46
  • RT on DVD: The Future of Watchmen, Plus Sleeping Beauty, Touch of Evil Remastered 30
  • Exclusive: The Fall - Tarsem's Visual Companion - Part 2 3
  • Box Office Guru Wrapup: Chihuahua is Top Dog 42
  • Weekly Ketchup: Branagh directs Thor, Seagal vs. aliens? 45
Latest Interviews
  • Exclusive: Alexandre Aja talks Mirrors and Piranha 3D 7
  • RT Interview: Jason Statham Chats Death Race, Crank 2 and The Sweeney 9
  • Video Exclusive: Gerard Butler talks RocknRolla and 300 sequel with RT 13
  • Video Exclusive: Maria Bello, Brendan Fraser and the Mummy 3 Cast Talk to RT 14
  • RT goes behind the scenes on Stargate: Continuum 4
  • Starship Troopers' Casper Van Dien Shares His Five Favorite Films 48
  • RT Interview: Philippe Petit on Crossing the Twin Towers on a Wire 2
  • RT Interview: David Duchovny on The X-Files, Californication and Directing 11
  • RT Interview: Ben Barnes on Taking on the Journey of Prince Caspian 1
  • RT Interview: William Moseley on His Last Narnia Adventure in Prince Caspian 2
Latest Features
  • Exclusive: The Fall - Tarsem's Visual Companion - Part 2 3
  • Exclusive: The Fall - Tarsem's Visual Companion - Part 1 12
  • Five Favorite Films with Paris Hilton 146
  • Exclusive: Brand New The Children Photos and Director Introduction 5
  • Five Favorite Films with Chuck Palahniuk 38
  • Five Favorite Films with Dane Cook 106
  • Five Favorite Films with Eva Mendes 51
  • What The Hell Happened To ... Cuba Gooding Jr.? 86
  • RT's Summer in Review: The Best, The Worst, and Our Favorite Films! 77
  • What The Hell Happened To Shannon Elizabeth? 101

 
 
About| Site Map| Help| RT To Go| Contact Us| Critics Submission| Linking to RT| Licensing| Movie List| Celebs List| Newsletter
IGN Logo

IGN.com | GameSpy | Comrade | Arena | FilePlanet | ModCenter | GameSpy Technology
TeamXbox | Planets | Vaults | VE3D | CheatsCodesGuides | GameStats | GamerMetrics
AskMen.com | Rotten Tomatoes | Direct2Drive


By continuing past this page, and by the continued use of this site, you agree to be bound by and abide by the User Agreement.
Copyright 1998-2008, IGN Entertainment, Inc. About IGN | Support | Advertise | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | Subscribe to RT's XML feed! IGN RSS Feeds
IGN's enterprise databases running Oracle, SQL and MySQL are professionally monitored and managed by Pythian Remote DBA
Certain product data ©1995-present Muze, Inc. For personal use only. All rights reserved.