Gambling is a great central theme for a film, if for no better reason it's full of drama, deceit, and the occasional reason to look at someone (hopefully someone hot) under a table. With the appearance of 21 in theaters, we thought it time to run through some of our personal highlights in the universe of gambling movies.
Sure, you can throw a rock and hit an iffy gambler or thug at the tables (Scorsese's Casino made that point perfectly clear) but the enduring lure of the gambler revolves around his (or her) prowess at the game -- which, if we remember Rounders, has little to do with luck and lots to do with being one step ahead. Card players (especially sexy ones) are the intellectual equivalent of the football player: They have to see the plays coming from yards away but when the play approaches their move should be liminal and give nothing away. The gambler's tricks mingle the cool of social skill and the intellect of strategy with monk-like intensity. It's no wonder James Bond played Baccarat -- icons are always enigmatic.
The
titular character of the
Fritz Lang classic
Dr. Mabuse, Der Spieler (1922, 89 percent on the Tomatometer) is a master of magnetism, a hypnotist, an actor, an
impersonator with multiple identities and, of course, a gambler. The most common
translation of the title is Dr. Mabuse the Gambler, but "spieler"
literally means "player" -- and that implies all Mabuse's acts, not simply what
he does at the card table. While dealers in the upper-class vice dens of Weimar
Germany dole out cards, Mabuse (in crosscut) is shown playing his own game of
solitaire with a stack of IDs. This isn't just about poker face -- Mabuse is one
man playing a thousand and that puts a twist on his game. Lang constructs this
treatise on identity and the image while fully entrenched in his own, time
tested anxieties (death, authenticity, modernity).
Though its four-hour
running time (there are multiple versions on DVD) might seem daunting, the pic
is as magnetic as Mabuse himself, full of complex intrigue and ideas to untangle
-- which is probably why it became such a successful serial in Germany, spawning
continuations. Keith Ulrich of Slant said, "Mabuse is a true bogeyman, a
hollow shell of surface tics with a terrifying dead-eyed stare." Well, that's
one way to describe a poker face.

Not
all iconic movie gamblers are menacing. Take
Maverick (1994, 69 percent), for
example. The New York Times' Caryn James said, "You don't have to know
anything about poker to guess that even away from the table, everyone in Maverick
is bluffing all the time." James' quote strikes two major chords: Firstly, the
film is as much about gambling as
Margot at the Wedding is about floral
arrangements. Secondly, while the highest drama in Maverick happens at
the tables, bluffing and raising are practices just as actively pursued without
cards at play.
Inspired by the TV show of the same name,
Richard Donner's direction big-ups all
the conventions Westerns turned to cliché -- but Donner does it in a gently
ironic way that makes all the Wagon-hanging, garter-gun-hiding hi jinx play well
for the megaplexes. Best of all is the way
Mel Gibson (then at the post-Lethal
Weapon height of fame) plays dumb to get his way. It's an easy game that he
doesn't do as well as his adversary/love-interest
Jodie Foster (sporting an off-southern accent) but it's charming, and what's a poker game without a little
flirtation?
The
tension between the players is what drives
Rounders (1998, 64 percent). Right
after Good Will Hunting,
Matt Damon was a hot commodity with everywhere
to go -- not unlike his character in
John Dahl's neo-noir. Damon's Mike
McDermott was years reformed from a career in poker when he opts to return in
order to help a friend pay off a loan shark. Time Out said, "Powerhouse casting
is the film's strong suit," but its abundant Indiewood cast isn't its lone claim
to fame.
Rounders did for poker picture what
The Asphalt Jungle did
for heist movies: it proves the specifics can be interesting. Most gambling
films skate right past gambling into the intrigue of cold reading or the quippy
play of bluffing, but not Rounders. Advised by a small army of
professional poker players, McDermott's line, "it's a game of skill," echoes as
much in the dank corridors of New York's underground dens than in the cavernous
halls of Las Vegas' Bellagio. More famous is his incantation: "If you can't spot
the sucker in the first half hour at the table, then you are the sucker."
If you need more to get your gambling fix, consider watching John Garfield take a punch in Robert Rossen's Body and Soul (100 percent), or see Elliot Gould and George Segal get dicey in Robert Altman's California Split (90 percent). If you'd rather root for some sexy criminals maybe consider some vintage Redford and Newman in George Roy Hill's The Sting (93 percent), Sterling Hayden in Kubrick's The Killing (1956, 96 percent) or Sharon Stone in Scorcese's Casino (83 percent).
Related Items
| Movie: | Maverick |
| Rounders | |
| Dr. Mabuse the Gambler |
|
walkingdead09 writes: on Mar 26 2008 06:34 PM Rounders in my opinion is the ultimate gambling movie as Worm gambles his friendship, Mike gambles his relationship and in the end they play for money, and ultimately his life, kinda, not only that but it shows the noble causes for gambling and the not so noble. All good movies, good list, of course a bunch of retards are going to come on here and argue about why something is on here and why something isn't. JD (Reply to this) |
|
AnthonyDidge writes: on Mar 26 2008 07:14 PM Well let us "retards" continue what you, the OR, started WalkingDead. Rounders is a damn good movie. I generally end up watching it at least once every couple, few months. But how 'bout a little Cincinnati Kid, Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels, and Snatch. I'm just saying, but of course we all are just "retards." (Reply to this) |
|
mouse_clicker writes: on Mar 26 2008 08:08 PM I love how RottenTomatoes is doing all of these list articles instead of things that are interesting! Keep it up! (Reply to this) |
|
LinoBrocka writes: on Mar 26 2008 09:58 PM In reply to this comment (#1654770) what do you mean mouse_clicker? I thought the artile was interesting and it wasn't a straight up list where al you see are titles of films. Thanks RT! (Reply to this) |
|
danielfrohlich writes: on Mar 26 2008 11:24 PM In reply to this comment (#1655016) It's a list just without the numbering. (Reply to this) |
|
unbreakable_samurai writes: on Mar 27 2008 08:50 AM The Killing was a pretty damn solid film, one of Kubrick's best. Just watched Even Money which I thought was pretty good, better than the horrible critical response it got that's for sure. (Reply to this) |
|
vitajex writes: on Mar 27 2008 10:21 AM Yeah, "Cincinatti Kid"! Great gambling movie. What about 'Shade'? I actually liked that film. "Owning Mahowny", a fantastic (true) story starring Philip Seymour Hoffman as a gambling loser. "The Cooler" Maria Bello? Bellisima! "The Hustler" and "The Color of Money" for gambling on pool. And didn't "The Good Thief" have a bunch of gambling in it? Oh, what about "Hard Eight"? That's a great one, too. This list is just not fleshed out enough. (Reply to this) |
|
RT-Ryan writes: on Mar 27 2008 01:17 PM The list is sort of the point of Total Recall. Each week we take one of the movies that are opening and use one of its themes or distinguishing characteristics to highlight some older films that are similar in those respects. For example, for moviegoers who might be interested in watching 21, this list is a way to introduce them to a few related movies that they may have either never known about or forgotten about completely. We try to toss in some variety, but we also don't want the list to be overwhelming, so there will inevitably be a handful of movies that will be left out. Simply take it as a mere sampling of similarly themed films, not a comprehensive compendium. (Reply to this) |
|
vitajex writes: on Mar 27 2008 01:29 PM In reply to this comment (#1655916) *It should be noted that I am willfully being an a-hole in this post... for comic effect... yeah, that's the ticket...* If it's not a comprehensive compendium, then wouldn't the title, "TOTAL Recall", be inaccurate? Damn, where's my smileys? (Reply to this) |
|
RT-Ryan writes: on Mar 27 2008 01:47 PM In reply to this comment (#1655980) Touche, good sir. Touche. But if we called it Partial Recall, it would lose that snazzy association to Ahnuld's crazy movie. (Reply to this) |
|
mouse_clicker writes: on Mar 27 2008 02:12 PM In reply to this comment (#1655916) So it's actually someone's job to make these lists? Every week someone picks a new release and then goes through the Rotten Tomatoes database and finds some movies that are sort of tangentially related, and then puts it up on the front page with the tagline "Hey, these movies are sort of cool, too!" How much does that job pay? (Reply to this) |
|
RT-Ryan writes: on Mar 27 2008 02:28 PM Yep, we've got people who do it, but there's nobody whose sole job it is to write each week's Total Recall. It's just one of a thousand things we all do here. (Reply to this) |
|
alsanali writes: on Mar 27 2008 02:51 PM In reply to this comment (#1656110) Stop complaining about people who have more fun jobs than you. For the record, I think Total Recall is a great feature. Cinema Obscura on the other hand...... (Reply to this) |
|
schwal writes: on Mar 27 2008 07:19 PM there was only boxing betting in snatch, which in my opinion just didn't have the effortless style of lock stock and two smoking barrels. not that it's a bad movie, just not as good. (Reply to this) |
|
schwal writes: on Mar 27 2008 07:25 PM there was only boxing betting in "snatch", which in my opinion just didn't have the effortless style of "lock stock and two smoking barrels". not that it's a bad movie, just not as good. "rounders" and "casino" were classics of course (i didnt even realize it was john malcovitch playing kgb in rounders until the credits he was that good). but how could you leave out "the hustler" and "the color of money", they were far more about gambling than "the sting" all staring paul newman. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |






