News » Columns » Weekly Ketchup » Weekly Ketchup: Tron Team to Remake The Black Hole

Weekly Ketchup: Tron Team to Remake The Black Hole

Plus casting news for Johnny Depp, Leonardo DiCaprio, and Taylor Lautner

This week's Ketchup include news of plans to remake The Amityville Horror (again) and Disney's The Black Hole, a new project for acclaimed director Paul Thomas Anderson and new roles for Johnny Depp, Leonardo DiCaprio, Gwyneth Paltrow and one of the stars of The Twilight Saga: New Moon.


FRESH DEVELOPMENTS


#1 TRON: LEGACY TEAM TO REMAKE ANOTHER DISNEY SCI-FI CLASSIC: THE BLACK HOLE

We're still over a year away from the 12/17/10 release of Tron: Legacy, but the producer and director of this sequel to a classic Disney science fiction movie are reuniting to remake the other classic Disney sci-fi movie: The Black Hole. Joseph Kosinski (who is making his feature debut with Tron: Legacy) will direct from a script by Travis Beacham, cowriter of another upcoming remake, this spring's Clash of the Titans. The Black Hole has a number of distinctions, including being Disney's most expensive movie ever at the time (1979), Disney's first PG-rated movie and one of the first movies ever to use CGI special effects. The story of The Black Hole revolves around a group of explorers aboard the spaceship USS Palomino who discover a lost ship, the USS Cygnus, floating outside a black hole. Inside the Cygnus, they discover a scientist who controls an army of robots, and are challenged to resolve the mystery of what happened to the rest of the Cygnus' crew. This remake of The Black Hole is one of the first expensive projects for Disney's new regime, and replaces for its production company the shelved plans to produce the Captain Nemo: 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea prequel. Although this column is often skeptical of remakes, the idea of remaking The Black Hole for the 21st century is one that this writer can support, at least at this early stage. 1979's The Black Hole was an ambitious attempt at fairly serious outer space science fiction, but the film is hindered by the technical limitations of the time. If the remake tries to stay faithful to the original film (as Tron: Legacy appears to be doing to Tron), then we could be in for a really cool space adventure movie. I should also note that this movie is not to be confused with David Fincher's plans to adapt the Black Hole graphic novel, which is a completely different sort of story.


#2 PAUL THOMAS ANDERSON HAS FOUND HIS MASTER

Frequent collaborators Paul Thomas Anderson and Philip Seymour Hoffman are reuniting once again for Anderson's sixth film, The Master, and this time, Hoffman will have the starring role. Set in the 1950s, The Master will tell the fictional story of a charismatic and intellectual founder (Hoffman) of a new religious organization. He has a fervent lieutenant in the form of a 20s-something drifter named Freddie who finds himself questioning his new faith and the mentor that he has embraced. The Master is currently set up at Universal Pictures, but the studio will not give a greenlight on the $35 million project until Anderson turns in the script. Given the subject matter, Universal might be nervous about whether the story might inflame members of real life religious organizations, but considering Anderson's track record (Boogie Nights, Punch-Drunk Love, Magnolia, and There Will Be Blood), what they're likely not to get is a bad movie.


#3 WILL THE ENTOURAGE MOVIE DEBUT AT THE 2013 SUNDANCE FILM FESTIVAL?

At the premiere of The Lovely Bones this week, Mark Wahlberg revealed that HBO's Entourage (which Wahlberg executive produces) could someday become a movie, much in the same way as Sex and the City did. Wahlberg says that the show, which starts its seventh season in the summer of 2010 should have at least two more seasons, and then after that, a movie is possible. Entourage is loosely based upon Wahlberg's experiences as a young Hollywood actor surrounded by a close group of friends, and the show has satired a variety of Hollywood trends and concepts, including the Sundance Film Festival (Queens Boulevard), Oscar bait biopics (Medellin) and big budget superhero movies (James Cameron's Aquaman). If the movie does someday happen, it's likely that the show's five main cast members will continue on for the movie as well, and they are: Adrian Grenier (heartthrob actor Vincent Chase), Kevin Dillon (his older brother Johnny Drama), Kevin Connolly (Vincent's manager), Jerry Farrara (Vince's personal driver) and Jeremy Piven (agent Ari Gold, who is patterned after real life agent Ari Emanuel, brother of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel).


#4 ONCE UPON A TIME IN MEXICO, PANCHO VILLA WAS PLAYED BY JOHNNY DEPP

Serbian director Emir Kusturica (Black Cat, White Cat) is getting a head start on his plans to film a movie in 2011 by negotiating with his stars way ahead of time. Johnny Depp and Salma Hayek are in talks to star in Seven Friends of Pancho Villa and the Woman with Six Fingers, a biopic of the early 20th century Mexican revolutionary that is based upon the book The Friends of Pancho Villa by James Carlos Blake (though normally movies shorten the title, not the other way around). Rather than focusing on just Villa's battle efforts, the movie will depict "how Villa and his compadres had a great time fighting and robbing the rich, but also dancing, partying and making love." If Johnny Depp does indeed sign on, this will be a rare case where Depp will speaking a language other than English, as Kusturica intends to shoot the movie in the location- and character-appropriate Spanish. Filming is scheduled to start in 2011, with at least part of the production to be done in Mexico.


#5 EXCUSE ME WHILE I KISS THIS SLIDE

Producer Don Murphy and Angryfilms (Shoot 'Em Up, The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen) is coproducing Slide, a fictional indie drama that about a late 1960s "lost weekend" in the life of famed rock guitarist Jimi Hendrix. This project is not to be confused with the long-in-development plans for a full Jimi Hendrix biopic, and Slide will not feature any actual music by Jimi. Instead, it is the story of two gangsters on the run from a mob boss that they double-crossed who accidentally kidnap Hendrix "at the height of his career and drug addiction. Along the way, Hendrix teaches the gangsters about honesty, and Hendrix learns to clean up his act." Hendrix's "lost weekend" is supposedly the subject of "several articles and even a graphic novel," but I've searched the web on the subject, and all I've found are reprints of the Slide news, and without that word, I'm seeing no evidence of any actual articles anywhere about Jimi Hendrix having a "lost weekend." Slide was written and will be written by Ray H. Greene, the director of the 2001 documentary Schlock! The Secret History of American Movies. The producers are currently looking for actors and hope to start filming sometime in 2010.


#6 JACK DAWSON STILL AS FROZEN AS JACK FROST

Leonardo DiCaprio has signed to make his debut as voice cast in an animated film in DreamWorks Animation's The Guardians, voicing the character of Jack Frost. Based on an upcoming series of children's books called The Guardians of Childhood, the movie is an adventure in which a group of heroes with holiday (and other) themes, including Santa Claus, Jack Frost, the Easter Bunny, the Sandman and the Tooth Fairy, must band together to stop an evil spirit called Pitch from filling the hearts of kids everywhere with fear and dread. The director of The Guardians is Peter Ramsey, who made his debut with the Halloween TV movie Monsters vs Aliens: Mutant Pumpkins from Outer Space. The title of The Guardians may yet change, and the movie is scheduled for release on November 2, 2012.



#7 GWYNETH PALTROW AND TIM MCGRAW HOPE LOVE DOESN'T LET THEM DOWN

Gwyneth Paltrow, country singer Tim McGraw, Garrett Hedlund (star of next year's Tron: Legacy) and Leighton Meester (Gossip Girl) have all signed on with Screen Gems to star in Love Don't Let Me Down, which is also being produced by Tobey Maguire's production company. Paltrow will star as a country singer whose star has fallen, and who sets out on a comeback tour with a young singer/songwriter (Hedlund), her husband (McGraw) and a beauty queen-turned-singer (Meester). Love Don't Let Me Down is the second film from writer/director Shana Feste, whose first film The Greatest premiered this year at Sundance and is still awaiting release. Filming starts in Nashville in January, 2010. It's also worth noting that this will not be the first time in which Gwyneth Paltrow has played a singer, as she also starred in 2000's Duets, a movie about karaoke singers that was arguably hurt by coming out two years too early, before American Idol turned the bar game into a national obsession.


ROTTEN IDEAS OF THE WEEK


#3 JACOB MAY SET HIS SHARKBOY TEETH INTO... MAX STEEL?

Taylor Lautner, who costarred in The Twilight Saga: New Moon as Jacob the werewolf (and who also starred in The Adventures of Sharkboy and Lavagirl in 3D), is looking for a big movie to take advantage of his new fame. It appears that might just be Max Steel, the Paramount movie based upon a Mattel action figure line (and animated TV series). If the 17 year old Lautner does sign on, he'd be playing a 19 year old "extreme sports athlete" who is accidentally exposed to nanotechnology that gives him increased strength, invulnerability and other powers. The Max Steel script is currently being worked on by the writing team of J.P. Lavin and Chad Damiani, who don't yet have a produced script to their credit, but they are also writing two movies based on comic books by Rob Liefeld (Youngblood and Capeshooters), to give you an idea of their taste in comics, I guess. The reason this is a "Rotten Idea" this week is that Paramount's other recent movies based on toys (G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra and Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen) were flawed, and so the potential for a Max Steel film being a quality movie doesn't seem particularly great either.


#2 THE THIRD BIGGEST WEEKEND IN BOX OFFICE HISTORY MEANS THREE MORE TWILIGHT MOVIES

Congratulations, Summit Entertainment, your relatively inexpensive teen-friendly vampire sequel New Moon just made half a kajillion dollars, you're already at work on the third movie for the summer of 2010, and there's a fourth movie yet to be made based on Stephenie Meyer's last book in The Twilight Saga. What can be better than that? The answer, of course, would be to split that fourth book into two movies. Summit has hired Melissa Rosenberg, the screenwriter of the first three movies to work on adapting Breaking Dawn, but they have not yet told her whether she should be working on one script or two. First, Summit has to figure out if they will be able to get the film's cast (which is only signed for four movies) to return, as well as whether they can convince New Moon director Chris Weitz to sign on to film two movies back to back. And now, let's spend some brief time looking at what Breaking Dawn is actually about, but to avoid spoilers, I will use Smurf names, so you don't know what characters I'm talking about. Smurfette gets pregnant with Gargamel's baby, but the mutant half-smurf/half-wizard baby... oh, even with Smurfs, it sounds ridiculous. Anyway, at the speedy pace Summit has been making these movies, it's possible you could be seeing the first Breaking Dawn movie in theaters as soon as 2011, with the fifth movie to follow in 2012.


#1 HOLLYWOOD CONTINUES REMAKING CLASSICS FROM WAY BACK IN THE MID-2000S: THE AMITYVILLE HORROR

One of my April Fools Days jokes this year was the idea of a remake of 2008's The Strangers, but unfortunately in Hollywood, today's joke is tomorrow's reality. To add to the irony, the movie in question is not just less than 5 years old, but it was itself a remake: 2005's The Amityville Horror, which was a remake of the 1979 movie that spawned several sequels as well. Sequels, however are so 20th century. Why bother with sequels and all that new story you have to come up with, when you just keep telling the same story every five years or so, right? That is apparently the plan for Dimension Films, which codistributed the 2005 version starring Ryan Reynolds that grossed over $100 million worldwide. All of these movies have their origin in a 1977 book (of the same title) by Jay Anson that purported to tell the "true story" of a haunted house on Long Island that has been the basis of great dispute ever since. There's no word yet as to who might just be writing or directing this third version of the same story, but unless it's someone really kooky and unexpected like David Lynch or Woody Allen, does anyone really care?


For more Weekly Ketchup columns by Greg Dean Schmitz, check out the WK archive, and you can contact GDS through his MySpace page or via a RT forum message.

Playboy Slim

Playboy Slim on 12-4-2009 05:51 PM

I wouldn't say "The Black Hole" remake is a good idea...

Randy H.

Randy H. on 12-6-2009 11:33 AM

I agree. The original had 3 things going for it. John Barry's score, some very impressive matte work and the exterior design of the Cygnus. Sadly, it also had embarrassingly bad dialouge, wooden acting, inferior special effects, a "sometimes" laughable production design and an unsatisfying ending. I suppose a good remake could be seen as an apology for the first one.

Kami no Shi

Kami no Shi on 12-4-2009 06:00 PM

i agree .

Gareth of Texas

Gareth of Texas on 12-4-2009 06:17 PM

Are you kidding, "Black Hole" was decent. DECENT! If it was great I would say they shouldn't remake it, but merely being okay makes it that much more improvable. It's about time "Black Hole" resurfaced. Too many mediocre films fall to the wayside while great films and bad films live in fame and infamy.

Also, "Black Hole" had an evil robot that turned a Bible into pulp before frappeing someone's heart. How many Disney movies have done that?

MADDAZ

MADDAZ on 12-4-2009 09:15 PM

I agree. I loved The Black Hole as a kid but after watching it not so long ago I realised that if there was a movie that could do with a remake then this movie would be perfect. Aslong as they keep to the main premise of the story with the added effects of today it could be a really good move by Disney.

AntonChigurh

AntonChigurh on 12-4-2009 06:21 PM

Rosenberg's dialogue in Twilight makes the dialogue in the Star Wars prequels sound Mamet-Esq. On another thought, a talking vampire wizard baby would be a great vehicle for Mamet dialogue. You hear that Summit entertainment, get David Mamet on the phone fast!

Bed Head

Bed Head on 12-4-2009 07:57 PM

Also, not to be a stickler, but ...

The technical word is "Mametian"*, Anton. Thought you might want to know that in case you ever run into him.


* He spoke at my school.

August M.

August M. on 12-4-2009 06:26 PM

Snurffette gets pregnant with Gargamel's baby.

I rather see that than Twilight without Rifftrax.

Rifftrax.com

Bed Head

Bed Head on 12-4-2009 07:38 PM

Never heard of "Tron" or "The Black Hole" ... but Charles Burns' graphic novel rules. Can't see it working on the screen, though.

Oh, and there are actually people who still watch/care about "Entourage"?

Coach McGuirk

Coach McGuirk on 12-4-2009 10:22 PM

Entourage is still a great show. Is there anyone that still cares about your opinion?

Bed Head

Bed Head on 12-5-2009 03:56 AM

Yes ... but only those of tremendous intellect and good breeding.

JettaJameson

JettaJameson on 12-4-2009 08:33 PM

Oh brother. Why is Summit so in love with Melissa Rosenberg? She is a terrible screenwriter. The dialogue she writes is absolutely cringe worthy. Breaking Dawn is the weakest book of the entire Twilight Saga and if it has a shot in hell of not being a complete and total trainwreck, it needs to be in more capable hands.

Taylor Lautner is not a good actor. He could never carry a movie on his own. I could care less about Max Steel, but for the sake of it's fans, I hope they get a better actor for the role. And on a side note, am I the only one that gets a VERY strong gay vibe from the young lad? I mean, he's "dating" Taylor Swift, the least threatening female around. She's totally safe. It just seems like a front to maintain his heartthrob status. I may be overthinking things.

I've generally not really cared about all the remakes coming out in recent years. It doesn't bother me. But, seriously, The Amityville Horror? That's just downright stupid!

The Guardians sounds fun, as does The Black Hole. I'll be keeping tabs on those two.

Throw An Onion

Throw An Onion on 12-4-2009 09:25 PM

@JettaJameson

A gay vibe? What tipped you off? He was in a film for junior high girls or that he runs around shirtless in a rainy forest with three other men?

Bed Head

Bed Head on 12-4-2009 09:34 PM

Well, in fairness ... it WAS sorta his job, and all. I mean, it's not like he "runs around shirtless with three other men" in his spare time or anything. (At least not that I know of.)

Meanwhile, you do hear a lot that Robert Pattinson might be gay. However, I think that's probably just cause he's British.

JettaJameson

JettaJameson on 12-4-2009 10:26 PM

As Bed Head already pointed out, that's a movie role. It's irrelevant. As was bringing it up to begin with. Forget I mentioned it.

Ze Blue Canary

Ze Blue Canary on 12-4-2009 09:05 PM

Black Hole is a perfect movie for a remake. A very good story that was hampered by a lack of tech to pull off the special effects. Although if you pitch it like this: Think Apocalypse Now in space with a worse director. Then it looks like a rotten idea of the week.

Alexson Philip

Alexson Philip on 12-4-2009 09:28 PM

nothin interesting..

King Thor

King Thor on 12-4-2009 11:48 PM

I'll be the first one to say that I love Entourage. But, I honestly don't think it would work at all in a movie format. It's not designed to be on screen for much more than 30 min, and a story line takes place over a season's worth of shows. Please don't let it end up like freakin Sex and the City...

Speakin of Sex and the City...Bed Head, go watch your hookers and their mom slut around NYC some more and complain about pointless ****. I realize you probably don't like Entourage because your a female (some females like it I know), but it's still a great show. It's had a couple rough patches, but so do most shows. Relax girl.

King Thor

King Thor on 12-4-2009 11:48 PM

Oh, and yeah, **** Twilight, and such.

Stepping Razor

Stepping Razor on 12-5-2009 12:52 AM

Great, more remakes. More and more remakes from Holly-baad.

I'll just go watch the original Tron, and then the original Black Hole. I'm not going to watch the remakes. They're both likely going to be overloaded with CGI, and be heavy on action and bad acting, and light on subtlety, light on purpose, light on true drama, light on pure emotion.

As for any horror movie remakes. Hollywood's bad enough remaking any horror flicks. But now they're going to remake based on an American remake? Just how bad could that be? Wait, I don't want to know.

saicam

saicam on 12-5-2009 12:21 PM

Tron's a sequel not a remake...

Flash T.

Flash T. on 12-5-2009 02:17 AM

The Black Hole remake could be good, always liked the original but felt that it could be much better.

I'd much rather see a remake of this & Tron than Zombies blobless remake of the (ahem) The Blob.

Also, does anyone know how to track your posts? I've been on RT for months and haven't figured it out :(

Thats No MooN

Thats No MooN on 12-5-2009 07:13 AM

Entourage is a good show but I don't think it would make good movie, I would rather see a deadwood movie. which i think can be done at this point cause none of the actors are getting much work.

Throw An Onion

Throw An Onion on 12-5-2009 07:32 AM

Robert Pattison was in Little Ashes so people thinking he's gay shouldn't be that big a surprise. As for Taylor Lautner I was merely making a joke fanboys. My apologies if it didn't come off as such.

Bed Head

Bed Head on 12-5-2009 08:45 AM

While I can't speak for Jetta Jameson, I certainly wasn't offended. (Except maybe by the "fanBOYs" part.)

re: "Entourage"

It was more of a rhetorical question, actually. I never really watched it that much, anyways. (Even when it used to be popular.)

And yeah, I too am surprised Ian McShane (in particular) hasn't found more work. I mean, I know he's not exactly "leading man" material, but at least as, like, a villain or something.

LividEmerald

LividEmerald on 12-5-2009 08:54 AM

Why not just digitally erase all the cables that ruin the flying effect of the robots in "The Black Hole" and re-release the movie on DVD? Those cables, the cutesy robot, and the idea that black holes are portals to heaven and hell (making this more fantasy than sci-fi) ruined this film for me. I would not be interested in a remake, but at least digital removal of the cables would improve the original and would boost DVD sales enough to cover the costs of digital editing. There are tons of science fiction books out there that could be developed into a fresh film. Can't Hollywood try something new?

Gordon Franklin Terry Sr

Gordon Franklin Terry Sr on 12-5-2009 11:03 AM

THE BLACK HOLE will be MUCH FUN
--
The kid interested in MAX STEEL (Lautner) was on TV a few weeks ago caught calling another actor a "cu&t" because she took his seat.
--
With the ANERSON/HOFFMAN project; every movie coming out of Hollywood is "cynical towards religion"

and this is going to be just another movie that's "cynical towards religion" where "The Master" is found to be corruptible and corrupted by power.

FIREPROOF, on the other hand, is not "cynical towards religion" and was made for $500,000.00 and grossed $33,000,000.00.

"cynical religious films" are nothing new--everybody in HOLLYWOOD seems to be cynical towards religion and that's why there are so many divorces and reports of addictions.

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-stein19-2008dec19,0,4676183.column

Less than a year ago THE LOS ANGELES TIMES (12/19/08) said that HOLLYWOOD'S STILL RUN BY JEWS . . .

but the films produced by HOLLYWOOD seem totally anti-religious.

THE JEWISH "Torah" (Hebrew: %u05EA%u05BC%u05D5%u05B9%u05E8%u05B8%u05D4, "teaching" or "instruction", sometimes translated as "law"[1]) that's supposed to be read in synagogue by Jews says the opposite of the films HOLLYWOOD is producing.

So if HOLLYWOOD appears to be so anti-religious and pervasively "cynical towards religion" in the films it produces and the behaviors of the people making the films, how can the LA TIMES say HOLLYWOOD is run by JEWS when there appears to be no religion in HOLLYWOOD to begin with.

If HOLLYWOOD is so "JEWISH" according to the LA TIMES, why aren't HOLY FILMS produced regularly.

from WIKIPEDIA: The Torah is the most holy of the sacred writings in Judaism.[4] It is the first of three sections in the Tanakh (Hebrew Bible), the founding religious document of Judaism,[5] and is divided into five books, whose names in English are Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy, in reference to their themes (Their Hebrew names, Bere****, %u05D1%u05E8%u05D0%u05E9%u05D9%u05EA, Shmot %u05E9%u05DE%u05D5%u05EA, Vayikra %u05D5%u05D9%u05E7%u05E8%u05D0, Bamidbar %u05D1%u05DE%u05D3%u05D1%u05E8, and Dvarim %u05D3%u05D1%u05E8%u05D9%u05DD, are derived from the wording of their initial verses).

In other words, HOLLYWOOD cannot be "run by Jews" as the LA TIMES reports because nobody in HOLLYWOOD seems to act or be practicing JUDAISM.

As a result, "dumb," ill-informed movies about religion are produced by HOLLYWOOD yearly.

So, if the LA TIMES is wrong in saying "Jews Run Hollywood," because The Torah isn't read or respected in HOLLYWOOD, who is running HOLLYWOOD.

HOLLYWOOD itself seems to embody antisemitism in its attitude towards religion overall.

and meanwhile, the guys who aren't "cynical towards religion" made $32,000,000.00 in profit.

and The Torah, read in the Jewish synagogues attended by the "Jews running Hollywood (says the LA TIMES)," says Jews are God's chosen people

and then the "Jews running Hollywood" (according to the LA TIMES) turn around and say "God is a bunch of bunk" evidenced by the "cynical" religious movies" HOLLYWOOD constantly produces.

so, if "HOLLYWOOD is JEWISH" like the LA TIMES says, why are HOLLYWOOD films anti-religious and even anti-Semitic (i.e. discarding The Torah) in tone?

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-stein19-2008dec19,0,4676183.column

(I don't think HOLLYWOOD really is "JEWISH" is what I am saying

--because HOLLYWOOD routinely "puts-down" [discounts] anything Holy and acts in manners that are anti-God A Lot of the time)



Thats No MooN

Thats No MooN on 12-5-2009 11:23 AM

You know what Bed Head I was just thinking that. Ian McShane does play a very good bad guy

Thats No MooN

Thats No MooN on 12-5-2009 11:38 AM

You took my breath away Gordon. On another note they can remake all the pointless movies they want as long as they don't remake the story of the jedi in which I see being done in the next 5 years or so.

Throw An Onion

Throw An Onion on 12-5-2009 01:50 PM

@Gordon

How long did it take you to type that all out? Wait on second thought I really don't want to know.....

What's Hot On RT

Critics Consensus
Critics Consensus

Journey 2 Not Worth the Trip

Luis Guzman
Luis Guzman

What are his 10 best movies ever?

<em>Amazing Spider-Man</em>
Amazing Spider-Man

See the all-new action-packed trailer!

The Avengers!
The Avengers!

Five new Marvelous pictures

Help | About | Jobs | Newsletter | Critics Submission | API | Licensing | Blog | Developers | Mobile