Marvel Movie Madness! Part 32: Captain America (1944)
Was Hollywood's first attempt at the character a success?
Enter Marvel Movie Madness, wherein Rotten Tomatoes watches all of the significant Marvel movies ever made. Full Marvel Movie Madness list here. Tune in! We give you our thoughts, and you give us yours.
Part 32: Captain America (1944, N/A Tomatometer)
Directed by Elmer Clifton and John English, starring Dick Purcell, Lorna Gray, Lionel Atwill, Charles Trowbridge
Alex: Captain America: Perhaps Republic's most popular serial ever! 15 chapters, a massive budget, and only Republic's finest seven serial screenwriters worked on it!
...Which means absolutely zero to anyone watching Captain America in close approximation to the year 2011.
Captain America is a 243-minute collection of 15 serial episodes produced in 1944. The DNA of the story has been altered as to be completely unrecognizable: Gone are Steve Rogers and his military origins, along with the Nazis and Cap's trademark shield. In their place is District Attorney Grant Gardner, who moonlights as Captain America, battling crooks and punching his way through local government bureaucracy. His main villain is The Scarab, a museum curator looking to scoop up mysterious artifacts, killing people left and right.
Naturally, it's easy to mock a serial from the 1940s. And it's really easy when Gardner (played by a porky Dick Purcell) puts on the Captain America suit and one can see Purcell's glorious paunch of justice. Then it becomes less funny when you do some research and discover Purcell died from a weakened heart mere weeks after finishing the grueling shoot. As was the style of the time, Captain America was shot fast and quick. The fight scenes, of which the serial cobbles together about five minutes' worth per episode, have a sort of ruthless workmanship you'd never see today. It's all hokey and people throw chairs in the general direction of people, as opposed to directly at them, but these guys are really bouncing around with the speed set to "Three Stooges."

Overall, yes, the serial sent the Rotten Tomatoes office into bouts of laughter (one cannot resist in the face of such flippant use of the word "vibrator"), but if you ever found yourself exiled by Red Skull into some infinite nebulous void between time and space, and have four hours to kill, here you go.
Tim: There's something incredibly charming about this Captain America. Nothing he does bears any resemblance to the comics (we joked that he should call himself "Captain Connecticut," because of his thick New England accent and the fact that his crime-fighting priorities are bereft of global scope). I'm mostly unfamiliar with the serial medium, so it was fun to watch this form of pre-television entertainment. Illuminating, too: anyone who complains that modern movie audiences are only interested in mindless sensation should give this stuff a look. It's shot with little artistic care, the dialogue is mostly stiff and colorless (save for a stray line like "That dame is wise to our setup!"), and the special effects are hilariously bargain basement, even for the period; everything here is in the service of non-stop action. It's also really violent -- as Alex noted, our hero kills a lot of people, and there are car wrecks and explosions galore. With the Star Wars and Indiana Jones movies, George Lucas and Steven Spielberg borrowed all they could from Republic Pictures serials -- the swashbuckling, the rope-swinging, the classic archetypes - and reassembled them with considerably more stylistic flair. Still, Captain America is worth checking out for a goofy example of the kind of stuff that thrilled the kiddies in the decades before more sophisticated superhero fare hit the big screen.

Luke: Ha ha, well it was, in the very least, entertaining. This Captain America wouldn't look out of place as a washed-up member of Watchmen's Minutemen -- the lucha libre outfit, leery smirk and low-rent thuggery seem less associated with patriotic justice than they do a D.A. exorcising his vigilante demons by thrashing some bad guys from central casting. (On a side note: can someone bring back villains with monocles?) The perils are obviously laughable by today's standards (as I'm sure future audiences will guffaw at 21st-century CG spectacle), but what's surprising is how quickly they hook you in once you're adjusted to the style. And as Tim mentioned, there are so many portents of the Spielberg/Lucas adventures: one episode alone boasted a leap onto, and in through the door of, a moving truck, plus those old clifftop car plunges -- both mirrored clearly in Raiders of the Lost Ark. It's fitting that one of their old colleagues, Joe Johnston, should be taking the reins of the 2011 Captain America.
More Marvel Movie Madness:
Thor
Hulk
The Incredible Hulk
FantasticFour (1994)
FantasticFour
Fantastic Four:Rise of the Silver...
Blade
Blade II
Blade: Trinity
X-Men
X2: X-Men United
X-Men 3: The Last Stand
X-Men:First Class
X-Men Origins: Wolverine
Ghost Rider
Ghost Rider: Spirit of...
The Punisher (1989)
The Punisher (2004)
Punisher:War Zone
Man-Thing
Red Sonja
Howard the Duck
Spider-Man
Spider-Man 2
Spider-Man 3
TheAmazing Spider-Man
Kick-Ass
Men in Black
Men inBlack 2
Men inBlack 3
Daredevil
Elektra
Iron Man
Iron Man 2
Captain America (1944)
Captain America (1990)
Captain America: The First Avenger
Marvel's The Avengers



Matthew Younker
The many inherent problems with serials:
1) Probably their greatest drawback is the running time. With over 15 chapters Captain America is over 4 hours long, which is about the equivalent of watching two films back to back or watching just about every Buster Keaton and Charlie Chaplin short ever made. Both are better options than watching this or any serial. If you have four hours to kill you should watch the directorâ??s cut of Dances With Wolves, youâ??ll feel better.
2) Their selling point is style over substance (spectacle over story). Since most serials are over 60 years old the action scenes do not stand the test of time. Seeing Captain America grasping to the roof of a speeding train was probably a sight to behold in its day, but weâ??ve seen this scene performed better in more recent films like U.S. Marshals, Speed, Mission Impossible, etc.
3) As stated before there is not much, if any, story or character development. The bad guys have a nefarious plot; just in the nick of time Captain America shows up and repeatedly decks them in fight scenes reminiscent of Adam Westâ??s Batman, without the campy fun or the Wham! & Bang!â??s. Just when it looks like our heroâ??s about to meet his maker, Cliffhanger! At the start of the next scene he eludes the fatal danger, often by just jumping out of the way.
Captain America is an average, perhaps above average, serial for the 1940â??s, but serials are an art form that has died off and what we were left with are long, hokey, uninteresting tales that simply do not stand the test of time.
Jul 20 - 05:40 PM
Matthew Younker
YES!!! I've done it! I'm First!, life has meaning again! Bow down before me for I truely know what it is to have seen the light of god!
Jul 20 - 05:48 PM
Sean Pak
Hell, we saw Buster Keaton do more things on a speeding train almost 20 years before this serial, and it still holds up today. Even for the time, those serials were low-budget.
Jul 21 - 05:54 AM
Andreas Babs
Two words: Fuck. Yes.
Buster Keaton was awesome and risked his life in most of his movies just for shits and giggles. Plus his movies had simple but fun and great storylines. I'd much rather put on The General or Sherlock Jr. right now than 1944's Captain America
Jul 21 - 04:03 PM