• Dune
    1 minutes 36 seconds
    Added: May 9, 2008


34% The Other Woman Apr 25
44% Brick Mansions Apr 25
48% The Quiet Ones Apr 25
89% Locke Apr 25
77% The Machine Apr 25

Top Box Office

89% Captain America: The Winter Soldier $25.6M
50% Heaven Is for Real $22.5M
47% Rio 2 $22.2M
19% Transcendence $10.9M
9% A Haunted House 2 $8.8M
62% Draft Day $5.7M
40% Divergent $5.6M
71% Oculus $5.2M
77% Noah $5.0M
89% Bears $4.8M

Coming Soon

76% The Amazing Spider-Man 2 May 02
—— Walk Of Shame May 02
100% Neighbors May 09
—— Godzilla May 16
—— X-Men: Days of Future Past May 23

Premieres Tonight

44% Bad Teacher: Season 1
56% Black Box: Season 1
—— Moone Boy: Season 2

New Episodes Tonight

—— Anger Management: Season 2
100% The Big Bang Theory: Season 7
100% Elementary: Season 2
100% Grey's Anatomy: Season 10
46% The Millers: Season 1
100% Parks and Recreation: Season 6
100% Portlandia: Season 4
55% Reign: Season 1
0% Saint George: Season 1
73% Sirens: Season 1
68% Surviving Jack: Season 1
—— Two and a Half Men: Season 11
100% The Vampire Diaries: Season 5
92% Vikings: Season 2

Discuss Last Night's Shows

72% The 100: Season 1
97% The Americans: Season 2
100% Arrow: Season 2
—— Baby Daddy: Season 3
—— Hot in Cleveland: Season 5
100% Legit: Season 2
—— Melissa & Joey: Season 3
—— The Middle: Season 5
36% Mixology: Season 1
83% Modern Family: Season 5
—— The Soul Man: Season 3
—— Suburgatory: Season 3

Dune Reviews

Page 2 of 211
June 6, 2007
Dune is an agonizing piece of filmmaking that serves as an example of what happens when a film has been in development hell for decades and when you try to cram a particularly dense book into 2 hours. There's a reason this flim has been all but disowned by David Lynch: It's fucking terrible. The plot plays like a speed readers Cliff's Notes version of Frank Herbert's novel and by the film's last half hour it plays like someone going down a checklist of major plot points. Even though they cover most of their bases in the ugliest way possible, the film is still totally incomprehensible. The characters have no depth and the best parts of the movie were the parts that were so hilariously bad and brimming with 80s cheese (the scene where Paul rides the sandworm and the cock rock guitars come in out of nowhere? Priceless. Or how about the scene where Hawat is told he has to milk a cat to survive? Totally absent from the book and the only original thing Lynch added seemingly to fuck with people).
April 15, 2014
Interesting film with a good cast, sets and effects. Can only wonder what Lynchs'
own version would have been like without the studio hinderance.
April 1, 2014
One of my favourite books, one of my favourite movies! It have some problems but after all the climate, characters, music, costumes, sets make up for them.
December 6, 2012
Since the slow and meticulous production of Dune resulted in Ridley Scott dropping out as director and being replaced with David Lynch whose usual kind of film clearly isn't a project like Dune, the production of the film is notably troubled. He later took his name off the film's credits after it was cut against his request by film producers. Really, there is a lot of trouble that went towards making Dune and its success wasn't sufficient so I didn't know what exactly to expect from it.

It's obvious that Dune had a troubled production because the three hour cut of the film inserted in a previously unseen prologue to clarify a lot of the story which isn't explained by the rest of the film and leaves certain twists in the story to be inexplicable. The narration continues throughout the film because instead of explaining who characters are in a natural manner, voices are interspersed over imagery to clarify their relevance to the story. The only way this would ever be put in a film is out of total desperation, and clearly with a film like Dune that was the case.
To understand much of Dune, I think you'd have to read the 412 page epic novel of the same name because the story context is desperately clarified through its opening narration but barely touches upon its universe for the remainder of the feature. It focuses on a group of characters which keeps expanding and becomes more and more convoluted and confusing. It's a long, tedious, incomprehensible and ugly mess which teaches less about science fiction and filmmaking than anybody could hope for. The experience is like a camp music video for Duran Duran, and if you can tolerate three hours of that then Dune may just be your feature. But if your interest is more in legitimate cinema then you have other places to look in.
I would go into detail about problems with the story, but I simply didn't understand it enough to write about it. I guess all I can say was it had potential with an interesting universe setup, but it has ultimately flawed execution. The story is a hard one to tell, and the filmmakers of Dune simply failed to do it so it ends up being an extensively long trippy feature with few qualities to boast about.
The pacing is ridiculous. In the end of one hour, the film has developed as much as a normal science fiction film would take 10 minutes to achieve. By the end of two hours, it's reached the 40 minute point for the usual science fiction film. By the end of the full three hours, viewers are likely to wonder what the hell happened and why the wasted so much time watching the entire feature. Its pacing begins as glacial and later speeds up slightly less glacial, but it never has the pace that a 3 hour science fiction epic would need to maintain viewers and their interests at a constant rate. It reinforces the boring qualities of the film since it can't tell a story or even pace one properly. Frankly, Dune was made in an age that couldn't understand how to successfully adapt the novel to film and so while it's an ambitious effort, it's a misfire from David Lynch and is certainly streets behind being a good film.
For a film with a budget of $40 million, the film looks cheap and campy without having the kind of camp humour which usually would allow it to be funny. Instead, the feature which is intended as a serious science fiction epic is merely questionable. I mean, for a film with a budget of $40 million which mostly went into set creation, costumes, visual effects and aesthetic makeup, it's weird that Dune comes out looking so cheap, silly and lifeless. From a visual perspective, Dune is very cheap and clearly shot on sets without bringing out a real universe. The artificiality of Dune is too prominent, and it is a very technically flawed film. One of the problems is that the universe feels excessively fake. The cinematography shoots the sets a lot, but it barely ever films the intended exterior universe. When it does, the cinematography is pulled back too much so that the only things in perspective are more sets and props. The whole film feels like it was shot on proscenium, and it lacks the intense noir characteristics that David Lynch is known for as a filmmaker. The cinematography is infinitely inferior to David Lynch's many better works and it makes the whole feature feel like an episode of a cheap 1970's science fiction TV show. Dune is more of a 3 hour camp theatre production than any kind of epic science fiction film.
As it is the visual quality of the cinematography is very rough and doesn't have a lot to capture because the excessively dark lighting of Dune results in many scenes leaving viewers uncertain of what is in the visual perspective.
And the visual effects which attempt to create legitimate backgrounds and enforce a believable universe reinforce the poor quality of Dune and makes audiences wonder how much of the $40 million actually went into visual effects when it looks so weak like some kind of joke that isn't even funny.
The film presents minimum opportunities for David Lynch to implement his signature surrealism, and so it is clearly not his film. It would have been better if it was kept to Ridley Scott because as he proved when he made Blade Runner instead, he is more adept at making science fiction cinema. David Lynch, like Neil Jordan, proves that he is more skilled at making smaller scale and more personalised projects because material written by someone else is out of his control and the production of the film is too. And while he attempts to distil a real chilling atmosphere into the film, it just doesn't work. Dune is one of David Lynch's worst efforts, and while the problem isn't all because of him, he was miscast as director of the project. His surreal elements make a decent touch from time to time, but they are overshadowed by the overkill of senseless storytelling and incomprehensible and convoluted plot dynamics.
The only film element with any real success in it is the cast.
Kyle MacLachlan's effort isn't his finest and doesn't match up to their better collaborations on Blue Velvet and Twin Peaks, but as a lead in Dune he is ok. His youthful charm reveals itself to be sprouting, and since then he had done nothing but grow in talent. I think it's safe to say that Dune is an example of his early talents that were beginning to flourish, and his confident line delivery ensures that he does successfully tie himself into the science fiction atmosphere of the film well enough to pass off as a good lead. And as it started out a series of collaborations between Lyle MacLachlan and David Lynch, Dune did at least do something good by pairing the two together to work on a feature.
Francesca Annis gives a strong performance though as she really creates a sense of mystery to surround her character which ties well into the complicated and mysterious universe that Dune takes place in. She crawls her way into the atmosphere well and gives a performance with the charm and attractiveness of Sean Young who coincidentally is in the film as well. Both actresses give well-meaning and strong performances which have viewers curious about who they are and what their mysterious natures entail.
Patrick Stewart's performance is a strong one because he uses the same essential kind of strength he put into the role of captain Jean-Luc Picard on every season of the long-running Star Trek: The Next Generation, and the result is fairly effective. He's a great member of the massive cast in Dune and he makes the experience more watchable.
Kenneth McMillan's performance is a decent one as well since he has a lot of natural villain charisma in his acting endeavour.
Sting's performance is very reminiscent of the kind of charm that David Bowie presented in films in the 1980's and his performance is a very energetic and captivating one. Sting is an awesome cast member to have on board in Dune and he gives a fairly effective performance.
Lastly, considering Max Von Sydow's awesome performance in the 1980 science fiction classic Flash Gordon, to see him playing a prominent role in another science fiction film is fairly nostalgic, and considering that his performance is a lot more serious in this one it reminds us just how good he is as a serious actor.
And the musical score in Dune is another quality which is superior to the rest of the film since it combines orchestral sessions which capture the large scale of the film with some 80's guitar riffs which make it sound very timely and at least manage to make the experience of Dune a very nostalgic one.

In the end, Dune is potentially the most expensive B-Movie ever made and lacks almost every feature it would need to be good since it looks cheap and dull as well as stretching on for too long and moving too slow, and in the end it is simply David Lynch's worst effort as a film director.
February 26, 2014
It's so confusing it's boring!
February 22, 2014
I like turning the color all the way down and watching this in B&W.
March 15, 2009
A really underated film but really good.
February 18, 2014
Très bon, malgré le côté kitsch! Du coup, je dois vraiment lire les bouqins!!! et me faire le jeu XD
February 18, 2014
Dune is a luxurious recreation of one of the best Sci-Fi novels ever written and has a great cast, wonderful costumes and sets and a fantastic plot line. Why then is it so criticised? Well, Dune fell prey to that most destructive of forces - the Hollywood editing process. The three years Lynch spent making this film produced enough content for a movie that would have been six (yes, six) hours long, which, of course, was unacceptable. To make the film more suitable for the mass audience the film was cut down to just over two hours and most of the remaining footage was destroyed. Arrrggghhh! Hence, the greatest sci-fi film ever made will never be seen and all we have left is an abridged version. Imagine the Star Wars trilogy cut down to a single two-hour film, or Gone with the Wind whittled down to 90 mins! Anyway, you see my point. The two faults of this film: the mangled ending and the oft disjointed plot duct-taped together with voice-overs were a result of the slash and burn policy this film suffered. So, when you next watch this film, instead of thinking 'that just doesn't work', think instead of what could have been!
February 17, 2014
Unable to understand how this whole superfabulatastroph got so much audience, whereas the starting idea was so appealing...
February 1, 2014
David Lynch's adaptation is a visually cool but ultimately a complete mess. It tries to jam in way too much story in a short runtime making it downright confusing if you haven't read the book. It adds downright bizarre style choices that serve no purpose but to make the film weird and ugly. It also ruins what little good will it had with an outright idiotic ending that comes out of nowhere and makes no sense whatsoever.
February 1, 2014
Amazing design, casting and soundtrack. The rest doesn't follow unfortunately, but the underlying universe and the unique atmosphere are so strong that it remains a very enjoyable experience.
andrew t.
January 19, 2014
Incomprehensible if you haven't read the book, and a disappointment if you have. The type of sweeping, beautiful disaster when a creative team tries to condense an epic, zillion page novel into a two and a half hour movie...and everyone is so exhausted they go with the first re-write. A flawed screenplay adaptation that takes itself even more seriously than the book.
While it is visually stunning and sometimes feels ahead of its time... its also big and goofy, like most of the cast's hair.
Kenneth McMillan, as the evil Baron Harkonnen, would occasionally shock life into a movie of dull, uncomfortable performances by people we don't care about doing things we don't care about.
Lynch captures the cold, grim, dark-ages feel of this futuristic empire; but most of his tweeks don't work and come off as spoon-fed maniacal and cartoonish, i.e. the Baron Harkonnen is evil because he is oozing puss, not from McMillan's stand-out portrayal. Lynch misses the mark with the witches, the Fremen, the Mentats, Alia, the Guild members, and the hilariously fake looking worm-riding. (Yes, that's pretty much everything!)
If you are a fan of the novels and trying as hard as I was to love this movie, Lynch's final stake in the heart adaptation is a beyond corn-ball "Messiah none of us care about has come" rainfall ending that confirms the entire experience as ridiculous and ultimately prevents Dune from attaining a kind of dark sci-fi classic status.
January 12, 2014
A decent sci-fi flick. It is definitely not Lynch's best work, but I do rather enjoy the mind-warping plot as opposed to most who hate it. The special effects are good, not great, but good. A lot of the acting is over the top as well.
January 10, 2014
I'm a bit mixed. On one had, it has a great climax and decent enough characters with a neat sci-fi setting. On the other hand, it's confusing as hell and doesn't slow down enough, and yet manages to be rather dull throughout. In the end, it's a enjoyable hollow film.
December 20, 2013
Okay, I waited 30 yrs to watch Dune and all I can say is.. I'm not sure what I just watched. Incomprehensible at times, laughably bad at others ("remember the tooth.. THE TOOTH"), gorgeously awe-inspiring at others. Dune is everything I thought it would be as the massive mess of a film I'd heard that it was... the only thing missing was for Sting to sing over the ending credits, or during a trippy space montage. Dune holds up as the ultimate art house sci-fi flick of all time. Brilliant and awful all at once.
December 19, 2013
I don't care what the so-called critics say, but none of us really do as a rule. This film was, and in my opinion, still is a classic. I saw this film as a child (possibly slightly under the suggested age), but found it inspiring and by far the most imaginative portrayal of it's time. The plot line wasn't difficult to follow in any way. I can only assume those critics who found it complicated were simpletons. Brilliant film.
george b.
May 23, 2013
another contender for best movie ever, by possibly the best director ever, this movie is so mile byeond the average holywood bs, in craftsmanship, theme, plot, execution, story, which for a change actually follows one of the great science fiction series of all time, and the cast holy sh-t sting??? kyle mclaughlin? the mom is a foriegn star and megahot, max von sydow, and duncan who get so little airtime, and baldo from star trek the ruined crappy onnorigial generation before he sucked or was profesor X, and that doesnt even get to the harkonnens or the mentats or the dad!! just outstanding nad more than that succesfful worldbuild where nothing you ever saw before can match
November 30, 2013
Dune was just terrible. The storyline made absolutely no sense, and not in the great way that David Lynch usually does it. The acting was bad and the visual effects were God awful even by 1984 standards. If it weren't for the atmospheric directing, this movie would be utter garbage.
November 27, 2013
one of my favorite sci-fi films of all time!!!!
Page 2 of 211
Find us on:                 
Help | About | Jobs | Critics Submission | Press | API | Licensing | Mobile