The Jazz Singer Reviews

Page 2 of 15
September 17, 2015
This film takes place in New York in the early 1900-1920's. I believe this presents an accurate depiction of the times of the culture in the 1920's that does not look created or manufactured but looks real.

This was a really good movie for a film that is a silent film with a few places that incorporate songs. In some cases I felt like complete silence made the scene much stronger than having music at all.

I liked how some of the text slides had background images. That was a pleasant surprise.

What I liked about this film is how the locations set decorating all looked very real and believable rather than looking staged which I found impressive for a film made in this era.

The acting in this film I was also impressed with because there was something very believable about this film. Like some of the motions and body movements made this look so believable. It did not look fake.

There is something real about how this film presents the sets, acting reactions, set decorating

I think it is interesting how some of this is speed up and others are filmed or presented at a normal pace.

The singing has voices while the rest has just background score music.

This film is a strong as it is because this film touches and ask questions about choices about dealing with life issues, Rebellion from the culture you were born from, love, redemption, comedy, success, escape, finding own way, religion, race, culture and even Death. This film has a Realism that I can not explain why it all works together.

This film brings up how to deal with following culture acceptance verse family acceptance, verses relationships to family and religion and how far do you go before crossing moral issues.
This film touches on choices of Job carrier doing the play April Follies vs. religion and family.

What I found ironic for its time was a Jewish person putting on make-up to dress as an African American which seemed odd since they were both considered not the best to be considered in America back in the 1920's. They were considered undesirable or not preferred races of the day.
½ September 12, 2015
The Jazz Singer has a terrific, standout performance from Al Jolson, well developed characters, engaging story, a couple of famous moments and iconic quotes and it is an interesting half-sound, half-silent experiment, but it is just so problematic in terms of storytelling with an overreliance on excessive melodrama and overly simplistic dialogue. It is an interesting film and a groundbreaking one for sure, but still a troublesome one because the script is so-so and it is way over-the-top.
June 14, 2015
A landmark film that should be appreciated for its historic value and technical advancements. For that reason I recommend viewing it. From a story standpoint it falters into melodramatic silliness. The ending disappoints in that it doesn't allow the lead character to hold yrue to his convictions, by allowing a selfish old man to get his way without himself provideing any redemption.
October 21, 2014
Starring Al Jolson and Warner Oland. The first film to make use of recorded dialogue, "The Jazz Singer" is a rather mundane, predictable story of a cantor's son who wants to pursue popular music rather than sing in the synagogue. But it is worth viewing for the technological innovations the film offers, and for Al Jolson's dynamic performance. You ain't heard nothin' yet. Directed by Alan Crosland.
½ February 11, 2015
It has much historical significance, but its story is one for the ages as well. We must learn to balance the things that really in matter in life with our dreams. No man should have to sacrifice either one.
Super Reviewer
½ January 17, 2015
Back in the 1930's Al Jolson was the highest paid entertainer in the business. In the USA he was a massive massive star (the biggest!) but he was also hot stuff around the world having hit after hit alongside international tours with many movies to his name. Let me put it this way, Jolson was the Michael Jackson or Elvis Presley of his time.

Now admittedly many of his movies were never really much cop due to changing tastes over the years and the fact his movies tended to be very samey. It was always that first talkie movie he starred in that really stuck out, probably because it was the first...well actually the second but 'A Plantation Act' was more of a selection of songs and not an actual movie. The Jazz Singer is based on Jolson's life growing up in New York. The story was actually written by Samson Raphaelson after interviewing Jolson on his upbringing, he later adapted the story for the theatre and it became a hit. Warner Bros then acquired the rights to the play and naturally wanted to make a movie out of it, at first Jolson wasn't in line to star in the movie but eventually, long story short, he obviously got it and the rest is history.

I guess you could say this film is a biography of sorts, I'm not entirely sure how much is accurate but I thinks its pretty close to Jolson's early years and beyond. The story follows a young Jolson (in the film Jakie Rabinowitz...can't get more Jewish than that folks) getting in trouble with his strict Jewish father for singing in local beer gardens and acting the fool. His father is a cantor at the local synagogue on the Lower East Side of Manhattan, a fully Jewish area. I'm sure you can guess what goes down here, Jakie's father wants his son to be a good religious boy and follow in his footsteps as a cantor, following family tradition and following his destiny. Unfortunately the rebellious young Jakie wants to do other things and ends up running away to choose his own destiny. Over the years Jakie becomes a talented budding singer with a very bright future but as you can guess all this conflicts with his father and eventually he must choose between his career and his family roots and heritage.

Now I won't lie and say this film is amazing simply because it is historically very important (the film was chosen for preservation in the US Library of Congress's National Film Registry), in all honesty most of the story is rather dull. Hold your horses let me explain, the film is of course black and white but that's not a problem for me. There is of course no sound or dialog for the most part accept for Jolson singing (silent film remember), this means we have lots of rather bland full screen old fashioned subtitles that explain very little. They are also rather limited in appearance so half the time your kinda guessing what's going on by the musical score and peoples expressions. It doesn't help at times that the language of the age is also slightly different, the way people wrote, certain words used etc...a different era. The acting is naturally a bit crappy throughout with the odd exception, Otto Lederer is easily the most entertaining character in the movie with his cheerful comedic turn. You can relate to his feelings on what's happening around him whilst everyone else is deathly serious and boring, plus he has an amusing face which helps.

Of course the real highlight of the entire feature is seeing and hearing Al Jolson hammer out his legendary tunes (only six though). This is really why you watch the movie, the plot is extremely predictable and basic (taking into account the age of the film of course) and its not really that gripping, you're here for the jazz singer himself and he doesn't disappoint. As I was growing up my dad would play Al Jolson every Christmas, it was a family tradition to have old Al singing in the background while our little family would enjoy the festive period. So I know how Jolson sounds, I know most of his hits and some of the famous lyrics, but its something else to actually watch the man perform for real.
A small quirky fella with big bright eyes, highly animated and amusing to watch as he bobs his head around like crazy whilst clapping, mugging at the camera and generally showing off. His routines are full of energy and his voice is loud, bold and pitch perfect, the man is clearly getting a buzz enjoying every second. Its all so very charming and delightful you can't help but smile seeing how people enjoyed the simple things back then. There is even a small sequence where Jolson improvises a lot of dialog with Eugenie Besserer (who plays his old mother) which shows the mans sky high confidence in what he could do both musically and verbally. Besserer clearly has trouble keeping pace and shows us one reason why many actors/actresses back then were scared of talkies...their voices sounded terrible!

Towards the finale we do see the famous blackface routine which was commonplace at the time. These days of course it would be frowned upon and admittedly its hard to watch without feeling a tad awkward. I found myself wondering why on earth they did it in the first place, how did it make their performances any better? why hide away behind the makeup? I think it derives from centuries old history where people would perform theatrical shows, plays or skits and perform as black people simply because there weren't any black people around to do so. Anyway the blackface performance by Jolson is really the central part of the film, everything builds up to this one outstanding performance, the moment he cracks the big time. I believe it is displaying how both Jolson (in reality) and his character broke away from the burdens of a heavily religious Jewish life and made their mark in America, both in show business and personally. The blackface performance, his all helps him prove to himself that he can be something other than a Jewish immigrant...but naturally for the sake of the movie there is a happy ending honouring his family traditions.

It does feel weird knowing you're watching the first ever talkie movie...despite the fact its only the songs that have sound. It is a real gem of a time capsule seeing old 1920's New York, the people, the attire etc...its very interesting in more ways than one. Its funny even at the time the critics said it was a simple schmaltzy affair and they weren't wrong. Its cram-packed full of sickly sentimental family customs, rituals and traditional short...its all very Jewish (and I know about that). Honesty its not really a movie as such, you could almost say it was a bit of a gimmick to both promote Jolson and at the same time use him to promote talking pictures in the best way possible. More of an experiment with talking pictures which at the same time takes the opportunity to capture the greatest performer of the age.

'wait a minute, wait a minute, you ain't heard nothin' yet!'
½ September 28, 2014
Mostly remembered for being the first feature film to have audible dialogue, however, it still looks fresh after watching it almost a century later.
April 26, 2012
horrible movie that just doesnt hold up well
Super Reviewer
September 2, 2014
Notable for being the first feature film with audible dialogue and touching as it shows a man torn apart by a difficult decision, it however becomes a disgusting melodrama in the last fifteen minutes, when its two possible endings are thrown in together and the character makes a most unacceptable choice.
August 22, 2014
If it weren't for being the first movie with audible dialogue this movie wouldn't be remembered at all. One of the more tedious and boring movies I have seen.
August 10, 2014
As history, this film is a must-see; as an early part-talkie film, the story is tripe, but Jolson is electrifying.
½ March 21, 2014
Disregarding the history, "The Jazz Singer" is a mildly entertaining film. That is the first feature length film to feature synchronized dialogue. Sound had been synced to film before...dialogue in some shorts, and a full synced music track on a feature...but this was the first feature to use dialogue, and it was a huge hit...sound made it's make on film. Filmgoers didn't quite know it, but they ain't heard nothin' yet. Al Jolson plays a guy dying to get his big break as a jazz singer, but his father, a Jewish Cantor, disowns him for not following his father and his ancestors into being a Cantor for the Synagogue. Jolson portrays the anguish of being torn between his passion for jazz and his past of being Jewish well, but most of the acting in this is over the top. No restraint like in some of the better silent films, which this film mostly is (only a few scenes feature sound). Sure the blackface stuff is dated, but I honestly expected it to be more inflammatory. An important landmark in cinema history, but certainly a tad dated.
March 15, 2014
History in the making, coupled with a serviceable storyline and wonderful performances by Al Jolson.
March 15, 2014
History in the making, coupled with a serviceable storyline and wonderful performances by Al Jolson.
February 10, 2014
Talkies/Vitaphone feat since this film with its supernal perfornances by Jolson.
January 6, 2014
Not particularly memorable, apart from it being the first movie to use audible dialogue.
½ November 16, 2013
I finally watched this film after hearing about it all my life - but, it wasn't what I thought or expected. I had seen the Neil Diamond version when it came out over 30 years ago, and didn't care for it much at all. However, I figured it had to be better than the original - and since that version was so corny I assumed the original was even cornier . . . and it is - although it is also quite a significant film on several levels.

I've always known that this film was the first "talky" - however, I had no idea that it is still essentially a silent film, with the same styles of over-emphasized acting, dialog cards & editing. The only sound is during the songs, and one short scene of dialog. It has very stereotypical, and even insulting, portrayals of Jews and jazz singers - as well as the infamous black face scenes . . . however, it is an interesting peek into cultural perceptions in the 1920's. Faith vs. art, culture vs. tradition, values vs. success, race vs. public perception, musical styles in transition vs. establishment, etc. I found it quite fascinating & entertaining, with some genuine thematic depth - albeit overwrought, corny, and racist in places. It is certainly a treasured time capsule with historical significance that is worth analysis and discussion.
October 11, 2012
For being one of the most important films in history, its easily one of the least entertaining films I've ever seen.
½ August 28, 2013
Regardless of its actual quality, its official status as the first talkie has made it one of those historical monuments that's effectively beyond criticism. (For the record, it wasn't the first picture with synchronized sound, nor the first without title cards, but never mind.) It's certainly true that its plot was old hat even upon its actual release, and the actors are caught awkwardly between acting for silent cinema and acting for theatre. But the drama between fathers and sons, old and new, tradition and innovation is occasionally quite affecting, and the constant switching between sound and silence unintentionally embodies that conflict. And Al Jolson has enormous presence up on screen, and undoubtedly has the tear in his voice. And how many moments in cinema are more prophetic than the first line of dialogue spoken in American film, heralding the sounds of the future? Indeed, we ain't heard nothin' yet.
Page 2 of 15