Phantom Of The Opera (1925)

Phantom Of The Opera



Critic Consensus: Decades later, it still retains its ability to scare -- and Lon Chaney's performance remains one of the benchmarks of the horror genre.

Movie Info

Lon Chaney stars as Erik, the Phantom, in what is probably his most famous and certainly his most horrifying role. Produced by Universal, the film shot in 1923 and shelved for nearly two years, and was subjected to intensive studio tinkering. While many expected a disaster, the film turned out to be a rousing success. It was both the stepping off point for Chaney's run as a superstar at MGM and the prototype for the horror film cycle at Universal in the 1930s. The story concerns Erik, a … More

Rating: Unrated
Genre: Drama, Horror, Classics
Directed By: , ,
Written By: Raymond L. Schrock, Elliott J. Clawson, Frank M. McCormack, Tom Reed
In Theaters:
On DVD: Oct 15, 1997
Universal Pictures


as The Phantom

as Christine Daae

as Raoul de Chagny

as Florine Papillon

as Philippe de Chagny

as Philippe de Chagny [...

as Mama Valerius

as Prompter

as Joseph Buguet

as La Sorelli

as Mons. Ricard

as Mons. Moncharmin

as Mephistopheles

as Count Ruboff

as Valentine

as M. Richard, manager

as Director of Opera Or...
Show More Cast

News & Interviews for Phantom Of The Opera

Friend Ratings

No Friends? Inconceivable! Log in to see what your friends have to say.


Critic Reviews for Phantom Of The Opera

All Critics (42) | Top Critics (11)

The atmosphere matches Chaney's performance perfectly. His grotesque appearance is achieved with wires, cotton balls, and eye-dilating chemicals, but his character, as usual, is animated from within.

Full Review… | August 16, 2013
AV Club
Top Critic

Lon Chaney's performance as the hideous organist prowling the sewers beneath the Paris Opera is still a cornerstone of gothic horror.

Full Review… | August 16, 2013
Chicago Reader
Top Critic

A grand, pulpy potboiler of a suspense melodrama.

Full Review… | November 24, 2011
Boston Globe
Top Critic

Though Mr. Chaney wears a more grotesque make-up than ever, the film play seems only pretty good.

Full Review… | October 19, 2008
TIME Magazine
Top Critic

The main inducement to watch remains Chaney's tragic, ineffably sad figure.

Full Review… | August 12, 2008
Entertainment Weekly
Top Critic

Kerry is a colorless hero, Philbin contents herself with being pretty and becoming terrorized at the Phantom, and Chaney is either behind a mask or grimacing through his fiendish makeup.

Full Review… | August 12, 2008
Top Critic

Audience Reviews for Phantom Of The Opera


Lon Chaney is so incredibly expressive that he makes the rest of the film's cast look lifeless in comparison. Along with the incredible make-up job, Chaney brings out the un-predictable behavior and confused nature of the title character. He was truly one of the quintessential silent actors. Not only is Chaney's turn as the Phantom incredibly memorable, the film's sets are also something to behold. The production value shows off the big budget that was spent on this movie, especially with sets like the ballroom, grand opera house, and the Phantom's dark dungeon. During the ballroom sequence the movie mysteriously turns into color for a brief time, which does a great job in highlighting the Phantoms red costume. A huge hit in its initial release, "The Phantom of the Opera" set the standard for other Universal horror flicks to come. The film may not be able to scare as much as it did back in 1925, but it still retains a fun chilling atmosphere throughout. A definitive silent horror classic.

Christopher Heim
Christopher Heim

Super Reviewer

Well, at least I can say I have seen the original now.

Jennifer D

Super Reviewer

Remember that musical you grew up with that was made into a pretty good movie by a pretty bad director? This is that but without all the good music, pretty girls, or characteristic mask.
I guess the reason this is considered a horror classic is Lon Chaney's ugly face; he's got a big, toothy sneer, and he moves like an animated skeleton. Maybe I've seen too many modern horror films in which the makeup effects are so advanced that they put the older stuff to shame, but no effect registered in me during Chaney's famous reveal scene.
More to the point, the Andrew Lloyd Webber/Tim Rice version turns Christine's ultimate rejection of the Phantom into a question of the seduction of darkness versus the purity of Raoul's romantic affection, evidenced by the first lines of "All I Ask of You": "No more talk of darkness; forget these wide-eyed fears; I'm here." In this version, Raoul struts and prances like he's constantly posing for a bronze to be erected at the entrance of the theater, and his attachment to Christine is more about possession than affection.
And I think we're to understand that The Phantom's ugly exterior is supposed to be evidence for an uglier interior that Christine discovers once she sees his face. Of course, it's true that The Phantom is truly unhinged, dropping chandeliers on people and drowning invaders of his underground hideaway, but Christine's judgment of his seems premature and superficial. Even though it's true that I rarely see hot women with men that ugly, as far as the story is concerned, Christine comes off as unlikable - to the film's detriment.
Overall, this is a case in which the remake is much better than the classic.

Jim Hunter

Super Reviewer

Phantom Of The Opera Quotes

– Submitted by Adam O (2 years ago)
– Submitted by Adam O (2 years ago)
– Submitted by Adam O (2 years ago)
– Submitted by Adam O (2 years ago)

Discussion Forum

Discuss Phantom Of The Opera on our Movie forum!