Article Ratings & Comments
(1-5 of 5 posts) | Reply
on Dec 14 2008 07:43 PM and for that horrible reason you spoiled a perfect movie and a perfect rating on RT... thanks a Bunch. (Reply to this) |
|
on Jan 20 2009 03:33 PM In reply to this comment (#2183900) ...but he is absolutely right that the movie is too long, probably by about 1/2 an hour. All the critics in the world aren't going to convince me that I need to spend 3 mins watching 5 men passing a whiskey bottle around and then laughing about it! (Reply to this) |
|
on Jun 13 2009 08:19 PM In reply to this comment (#2269210) Gotta agree. There is tons of stuff that could be cut out without hurting the movie. And the editing during the slow-motion is a bit overdone. I'm not sure I would necessarily give it a rotten rating for that, though. (Reply to this) |
on Aug 13 2009 01:01 PM In reply to this comment (#2269210) Peckinpah doesn't make movies in the fashion of other, faster-paced directors like Leone. He creates a unique atmosphere through visual observation and dialogue-based interaction between the characters. It works for some but not for others, personally I'm even happier with the director's cut. (Reply to this) |
on Dec 07 2009 07:08 PM to think that this movie is too long is a travesy... the picture has a drawn out, picturesque quality that cannot be repeated in any other western picture. it is one of the greatest pictures of all time, and one of the greatest western pictures of all time. saying the wild bunch is too long is like saying once upon a time in the west, or the good the bad and the ugly are too long. when all 3 of them are masterpieces (Reply to this) |
IGN RSS Feeds