Anna Karenina Reviews

Page 1 of 2
Top Critic
Roger Ebert
Chicago Sun-Times
January 1, 2000
Bloodless and shallow adaptation.
Full Review | Original Score: 1.5/4
Top Critic
James Berardinelli
ReelViews
January 1, 2000
A copy of the paperback book should cost about as much as a movie ticket, and will provide a more lasting and worthwhile investment.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
Jeffrey Westhoff
Northwest Herald (Crystal Lake, IL)
July 26, 2002
You're better off reading the Cliff's Notes.
| Original Score: 1/5
Top Critic
Stephen Holden
New York Times
January 1, 2000
This sleek, Cliffs Notes version of a masterpiece is ... glossy and picture perfect on the surface and hollow at the core.
Top Critic
Stanley Kauffmann
The New Republic
January 1, 2000
[Rose's] screenplay is a ragbag, nothing like a tragedy in which the nemesis is Time. And his casting!
Kim Williamson
Boxoffice Magazine
January 1, 2000
Like its opening, Leo Tolstoy's Anna Karenina is half-successful.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/5
Angie Errigo
Empire Magazine
January 1, 2000
This version manages to be both the most pretentious and anaemic yet.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5
Top Critic
Susan Stark
Detroit News
January 1, 2000
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
Chris Hicks
Deseret News, Salt Lake City
January 1, 2000
Marceau and Bean have no chemistry, which is essential to a film like this.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
Top Critic
Ruthe Stein
San Francisco Chronicle
January 1, 2000
When [Anna and Vronsky] first lay eyes on each other at the train station in St. Petersburg, the only steam between them comes from the engine.
Top Critic
Kevin Thomas
Los Angeles Times
February 21, 2001
Only die-hard romantics are likely not to come away disappointed.
Emanuel Levy
EmanuelLevy.Com
July 12, 2005
| Original Score: 2/5

E! Online
January 1, 2000
Doesn't build strong relationships between the characters, relying instead on overheated words and performances to generate false intensity.
Full Review | Original Score: C+
Top Critic

Globe and Mail
April 12, 2002
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
Philip Martin
Arkansas Democrat-Gazette
October 30, 2002
| Original Score: 3/5
Liz Braun
Jam! Movies
January 1, 2000
Provided you have a burning interest in pretty visuals and less regard for the whys and wherefores of human behavior, this latest adaptation of Tolstoy's classic is a pleasant watch.
| Original Score: 3/5
Russell Smith
Austin Chronicle
January 1, 2000
Full Review | Original Score: 3.5/5
Matt Easterbrook
Matt's Movie Reviews
January 1, 2000
Sumptuous cinematography, glorious sets and costumes dominate throughout the film.
| Original Score: 8/10
Barbara Shulgasser
San Francisco Examiner
January 1, 2000
In Sophie Marceau ... [Rose] has a fine young Anna.
Top Critic
Todd McCarthy
Variety
May 1, 2009
Top Critic
Geoff Andrew
Time Out
June 24, 2006
Urban Cinefile Critics
Urban Cinefile
January 1, 2000
Margaret A. McGurk
Cincinnati Enquirer
October 15, 2002

Boston Phoenix
January 1, 2000
Top Critic

Entertainment Weekly
November 6, 2009
Page 1 of 2