Opening

76% Fast & Furious 6 May 24
44% The Hangover Part III May 23
100% Epic May 24
96% Before Midnight May 24
67% We Steal Secrets: The Story Of Wikileaks May 24
83% Fill the Void May 24
—— A Green Story May 24
—— Alyce Kills May 24

Top Box Office

86% Star Trek Into Darkness $70.2M
78% Iron Man 3 $35.8M
49% The Great Gatsby $23.9M
46% Pain & Gain $3.2M
69% The Croods $3.0M
77% 42 $2.8M
56% Oblivion $2.3M
98% Mud $2.2M
37% Peeples $2.2M
8% The Big Wedding $1.2M

Coming Soon

—— After Earth May 31
—— Now You See Me May 31
100% The Kings of Summer May 31
88% The East May 31

Psycho (1998)

tomatometer

37

Average Rating: 5.2/10
Reviews Counted: 75
Fresh: 28 | Rotten: 47

Van Sant's pointless remake neither improves or illuminates Hitchcock's original.

38

Average Rating: 5/10
Critic Reviews: 16
Fresh: 6 | Rotten: 10

Van Sant's pointless remake neither improves or illuminates Hitchcock's original.

audience

35

liked it
Average Rating: 2.8/5
User Ratings: 66,326

My Rating

Movie Info

Independent film director Gus Van Sant attempts a first in American film history: a shot-by-shot remake of the classic 1960 Alfred Hitchcock film Psycho. With a few minor, modern-day changes (including filming it in color), his version is essentially the same film with a different cast and the same Bernard Hermann music. Psycho was and still is the story of Marion Crane (previously played by Janet Leigh and now by Anne Heche), an adulterous woman who steals a stack of money from her boss and

R,

Mystery & Suspense, Horror

Joseph Stefano

Jun 8, 1999

Universal Pictures - Official Site External Icon

Watch It Now

Cast

ADVERTISEMENT

All Critics (80) | Top Critics (18) | Fresh (29) | Rotten (47) | DVD (16)

Contains nothing to outrage or offend partisans of the original, yet neither does it stand to add much to their appreciation.

March 26, 2009 Full Review Source: Variety
Variety
Top Critic IconTop Critic

Hitchcock probably wouldn't tell this story if he was making films today, and he certainly wouldn't tell it this way, with internal 'voices', back projection, minimal nudity and violence.

February 9, 2006 Full Review Source: Time Out
Time Out
Top Critic IconTop Critic

The movie is an invaluable experiment in the theory of cinema, because it demonstrates that a shot-by-shot remake is pointless; genius apparently resides between or beneath the shots, or in chemistry that cannot be timed or counted.

January 1, 2000 Full Review Source: Chicago Sun-Times
Chicago Sun-Times
Top Critic IconTop Critic

The movie lacks the chutzpah to even be a travesty.

January 1, 2000 Full Review Source: Village Voice
Village Voice
Top Critic IconTop Critic

So much of Van Sant's 'new' version of the classic remains the same that you sit there shaking your head, mumbling, why, oh, why?

January 1, 2000
Film.com
Top Critic IconTop Critic

failed project

April 25, 2013 Full Review Source: Old School Reviews

What Van Sant's film does, tremendously well, is make the material foreign again.

December 1, 2012 Full Review Source: Antagony & Ecstasy
Antagony & Ecstasy

a true labour of love, an homage in such deliriously infatuated thrall to its inspiration that it seems more arthouse folly than studio cashcow - or, to cite the psychiatrist near the end of Psycho, "these were crimes of passion, not profit."

October 22, 2012 Full Review Source: Little White Lies
Little White Lies

A futile, soulless shot-by-shot remake of Hitchcock's masterpiece.

August 7, 2012
EmanuelLevy.Com

Already my mother and I mourn the day when some AVID editor will dare to digitally tweak Vertigo, spinning it into a virtual romantic comedy starring computer-directed replicas of Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan.

August 21, 2009 Full Review Source: City Pages, Minneapolis/St. Paul | Comment (1)

...the Hitchcock film relied for its effects on originality and creativity. Van Sant's remake substitutes rote repetition and cliches that have long since lost their value.

September 16, 2008 Full Review Source: ESplatter
ESplatter

Psycho doesn't do much for Van Sant, and he doesn't do much for Psycho.

September 22, 2007 Full Review Source: eFilmCritic.com
eFilmCritic.com

Vaughn's Norman Bates is much inferior because he lacks the natural neurosis of Anthony Perkins.

August 13, 2007 | Comment (1)
FulvueDrive-in.com

Deserves closer consideration than it received.

May 26, 2006 Full Review Source: Combustible Celluloid
Combustible Celluloid

The movie doesn't stink. The performances are good, potentially great, especially Vince Vaughn as Norman Bates, but he owns a scene just for doing that psychotic giggle of his.

December 6, 2005 Full Review Source: Film Threat
Film Threat

A lot of people may not get the point of recreating a work such as Psycho. I didn't get it, until I saw the film.

April 9, 2005 Full Review Source: Reeling Reviews
Reeling Reviews

Audience Reviews for Psycho

Horror fans really should thank Gus Van Sant for his experimental "copy exactly" approach to re-making the horror classic Psycho. Just modernizing the original with a bigger budget takes no creativity and falls into the tedium and redundancy which most horror fan's hate. Gus Van Sant's Psycho remake, where nearly every scene is "copied exactly," is a perfect example of this. It was simply BORING.

Even for those that never saw this first, the pacing is just too slow for the high-octane generations of the 90's and beyond.

For a re-make to resonate with an audience that knows the original by heart, it has to deliver a new and different version while staying within the bounds of the original framework.

We should be thankful because no director will try this again. For the secret formula to successful horror re-makes, watch 2012's The Evil Dead, 2004's Dawn of the Dead or David Cronenberg's The Fly (1986).
April 6, 2013
Mark Beckford

Super Reviewer

A remake can be a good thing, though oftentimes they infringe on the original content and don't make a statement themselves. The 1998 remake of the classic Hitchcockian "Psycho" is not trying to make any bold statements throughout its run. Instead Van Sant decides to do a shot for shot remake of the film, using the same camera angles, cinematography, and only updating technology and references, yet not reinvisioning the characters. Still, none of the actors comes across as their original characters. Norman Bates was such a huge presence in the film, and he is the namesake of the film, so the other major characters came off as minor caricatures in Bates' little game of self-hatred and psychosis. Van Sant put in a lot of work trying to make his A-list stars recreate the tension and exhausting thrill of the original. Heche is so timid throughout, especially those shots of her headlong in the car which make her seem so small. Between her and Vaughan, the two of them seem like kids playing in their parents too big clothes. Vaughan also is wrong for this, but not because his performance was such a change from the original. Vaughan is wrong, wrong, wrong for this part in so many ways it boggles the mind. Besides not being able to pull off a serious role, he can't embody creepy. Perkins was creepy because of his slight, lean frame, his clawed fingers around that knife, buggered eyes, and though he was so quiet and calm throughout, the ending is only slightly a surprise, only lightly out of the realm of possibility. Moore is far too forceful, Macy stayed true to the original character but barely resonates, and Mortensen is clumsy as a let loose pig. The colors in this are post-modernist and glaring, as the blood dribbles onto white tiles, the Navajo sun over the desert stretch of highway, the deep red of the bathroom walls. It's disgustingly gluttonous and that's all because the original was in black and white Van Sant does do an impressive job of recreating the original sets, but it's just another instance of a complete copy. Some key scenes, including the disposal of the body, showing Marion slashed and torn apart by knife wounds, lost the insidious edge the film was at least trying to cultivate. Also, the fact that we never see Vaughan use the mother's voice, and it's off camera, was an obvious ploy to keep the heavy baritone of Vaughan's voice from coming off as cheesy in a fake old woman's croon. It's trying too hard to be the original, and even as an experiment it is beyond exhausting.
October 23, 2010
FrizzDrop

Super Reviewer

    1. Norman Bates: We all go a little mad sometimes. Haven't you?
    – Submitted by jared s (20 months ago)
    1. Norman Bates: A boy's best friend is his mother.
    – Submitted by Chris P (2 years ago)
    1. Norman Bates: We all go a little mad sometimes.
    – Submitted by Chris P (2 years ago)

Discussion Forum

There are no discussion threads for Psycho yet.

Latest News on Psycho

November 29, 2012:
Gus Van Sant Working on Superhero Movie
It'll focus on a group of Los Angeles residents who develop superhuman crime-fighting skills.

Foreign Titles

  • Psycho (1998) (DE)
  • Psycho (1998) (CA)
Help | About | Jobs | Critics Submission | API | Licensing | Mobile