Psycho (1998)
Average Rating: 5.2/10
Reviews Counted: 75
Fresh: 28 | Rotten: 47
Van Sant's pointless remake neither improves or illuminates Hitchcock's original.
Average Rating: 5/10
Critic Reviews: 16
Fresh: 6 | Rotten: 10
Van Sant's pointless remake neither improves or illuminates Hitchcock's original.
liked it
Average Rating: 2.8/5
User Ratings: 66,326
My Rating
Movie Info
Independent film director Gus Van Sant attempts a first in American film history: a shot-by-shot remake of the classic 1960 Alfred Hitchcock film Psycho. With a few minor, modern-day changes (including filming it in color), his version is essentially the same film with a different cast and the same Bernard Hermann music. Psycho was and still is the story of Marion Crane (previously played by Janet Leigh and now by Anne Heche), an adulterous woman who steals a stack of money from her boss and
Watch It Now
Cast
-
Vince Vaughn
Norman Bates -
Anne Heche
Marion Crane -
Julianne Moore
Lila Crane -
Viggo Mortensen
Sam Loomis -
William H. Macy
Milton Arbogast -
Robert Forster
Dr. Simon -
Philip Baker Hall
Sheriff Chambers -
Anne Haney
Mrs. Chambers -
Chad Everett
Tom Cassidy -
Rance Howard
Mr. Lowery -
Rita Wilson
Caroline -
James Remar
Patrolman -
James LeGros
Car Dealer -
-
-
ADVERTISEMENT
Psycho Trailer & Photos
All Critics (80) | Top Critics (18) | Fresh (29) | Rotten (47) | DVD (16)
Contains nothing to outrage or offend partisans of the original, yet neither does it stand to add much to their appreciation.
Hitchcock probably wouldn't tell this story if he was making films today, and he certainly wouldn't tell it this way, with internal 'voices', back projection, minimal nudity and violence.
The movie is an invaluable experiment in the theory of cinema, because it demonstrates that a shot-by-shot remake is pointless; genius apparently resides between or beneath the shots, or in chemistry that cannot be timed or counted.
The movie lacks the chutzpah to even be a travesty.
So much of Van Sant's 'new' version of the classic remains the same that you sit there shaking your head, mumbling, why, oh, why?
failed project
What Van Sant's film does, tremendously well, is make the material foreign again.
a true labour of love, an homage in such deliriously infatuated thrall to its inspiration that it seems more arthouse folly than studio cashcow - or, to cite the psychiatrist near the end of Psycho, "these were crimes of passion, not profit."
A futile, soulless shot-by-shot remake of Hitchcock's masterpiece.
Already my mother and I mourn the day when some AVID editor will dare to digitally tweak Vertigo, spinning it into a virtual romantic comedy starring computer-directed replicas of Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan.
...the Hitchcock film relied for its effects on originality and creativity. Van Sant's remake substitutes rote repetition and cliches that have long since lost their value.
Psycho doesn't do much for Van Sant, and he doesn't do much for Psycho.
Vaughn's Norman Bates is much inferior because he lacks the natural neurosis of Anthony Perkins.
Deserves closer consideration than it received.
The movie doesn't stink. The performances are good, potentially great, especially Vince Vaughn as Norman Bates, but he owns a scene just for doing that psychotic giggle of his.
A lot of people may not get the point of recreating a work such as Psycho. I didn't get it, until I saw the film.
Audience Reviews for Psycho
Super Reviewer
-
- Norman Bates: We all go a little mad sometimes. Haven't you?
-
- Norman Bates: A boy's best friend is his mother.
-
- Norman Bates: We all go a little mad sometimes.
Discussion Forum
There are no discussion threads for Psycho yet.
Latest News on Psycho
November 29, 2012:
Gus Van Sant Working on Superhero MovieIt'll focus on a group of Los Angeles residents who develop superhuman crime-fighting skills.
What's Hot On RT
The Last Stand, Side Effects
Trailer for new Coen Bros movie
Fast & Furious cars gallery
Blockbusters ranked!
Featured on RT
- In Pictures: The Cars of Fast & Furious 0
- Digital Multiplex: Warm Bodies and Aftershock 5
- Discover the Best-Reviewed Films in Summer Movie Scorecard 2013 0
- RT on DVD & Blu-Ray: The Last Stand and Side Effects 16
- Box Office Guru Wrapup: Star Trek Softer Than Expected at #1 86
- Weekly Ketchup: Will Smith to Star in Wild Bunch Remake? 39
- Critics Consensus: Star Trek Into Darkness is Certified Fresh 107
Top Headlines
-
Which Film Franchise Has Been the Best for Female Characters?
3
-
Damon Lindelof Talks Tomorrowland
0
-
10 Movies About Really Fast Cars
1
-
Poltergeist Remake Synopsis Hints at Plot Differences
7
-
Kristen Wiig Says Welcome to Me
1
-
David Fincher's 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea Gets Bumped
0
-
Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance Remake in the Works
0
Foreign Titles
- Psycho (1998) (DE)
- Psycho (1998) (CA)


Top Critic
Even for those that never saw this first, the pacing is just too slow for the high-octane generations of the 90's and beyond.
For a re-make to resonate with an audience that knows the original by heart, it has to deliver a new and different version while staying within the bounds of the original framework.
We should be thankful because no director will try this again. For the secret formula to successful horror re-makes, watch 2012's The Evil Dead, 2004's Dawn of the Dead or David Cronenberg's The Fly (1986).