Average Rating: 4.8/10
Reviews Counted: 148
Fresh: 43 | Rotten: 105
This Machine has all the razzle-dazzles of modern special effects, but the movie takes a turn for the worst when it switches from a story about lost love to a confusing action-thriller.
Average Rating: 5/10
Critic Reviews: 32
Fresh: 6 | Rotten: 26
This Machine has all the razzle-dazzles of modern special effects, but the movie takes a turn for the worst when it switches from a story about lost love to a confusing action-thriller.
liked it
Average Rating: 2.7/5
User Ratings: 154,095
The classic science fiction novel by H.G. Wells becomes this big-budget adventure directed by the author's great-grandson Simon Wells. Guy Pearce stars as Alexander Hartdegen, a scientist, professor, and inventor in 1895 New York City who believes that time travel is possible. The sudden and unexpected death of his fiancée spurs Alexander to build a time machine, which he hopes to use in an effort to change the past. When he is unable to change the past, Alexander hurls himself more than 800,000
Mar 8, 2002 Wide
Jul 23, 2002
$56.7M
DreamWorks SKG
All Critics (163) | Top Critics (33) | Fresh (45) | Rotten (106) | DVD (27)
If H.G. Wells had a time machine and could take a look at his kin's reworked version, what would he say? 'It looks good, Sonny, but you missed the point.'
One of those staggeringly well-produced, joylessly extravagant pictures that keep whooshing you from one visual marvel to the next, hastily, emptily.
If it's remembered at all, it will be as a time capsule of early-21st-century blockbuster cowardice and redundancy.
They gave The Time Machine a major overhaul and ended up with a clunker.
Amazingly stilted before accelerating into its exciting finish.
The film is weirdly disjointed and uncertain as to tone.
A good movie based on H.G. Wells' classic novel.
The Time Machine is harmless, if ineffectual fun.
This remake of the 1960 sci-fi feature (based on Wells famous novel) fails to take advantage of the new technology to make the tale more effective.
Dishwater: 10, Wells: 0
If I had a time machine that could take me back only four hours, I'd take my nine dollars, find the original movie at a video store, and spend the rest on an In N'Out Burger.
...The computer-generated wizardry is certainly present and accounted for, even if the opportunity for social commentary or literary integrity has been left largely untapped.
Entertaining, but missing a suitable point.
Great special effects, but as for the script and acting, well, it could surely have been a lot better. It's a shame how much potential is lost here, due to lazy writing. Because while the time traveling bits are pretty awesome, the storyline per se goes into B-movie territory. Had they skipped the parts with the
April 8, 2007Super Reviewer
I remember reading a book that was pretty similar was this movie. I was happy to see this. It's a good movie.
June 8, 2010
Super Reviewer
| 35% | The Hangover Part II |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 81% | Kung Fu Panda 2 |
| 44% | Cowboys & Aliens |
| 83% | Rise of the Planet of the Apes |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 88% | Lady and the Tramp |
| 69% | A Very Harold & Kumar Christmas |
| 21% | Fireflies in the Garden |
| 45% | The Rebound |
What are his 10 best movies ever?
See the all-new action-packed trailer!
Five new Marvelous pictures
Unconventional Superheroes