Average Rating: 2.8/10
Reviews Counted: 19
Fresh: 0 | Rotten: 19
No consensus yet.
Average Rating: 3.8/10
Critic Reviews: 6
Fresh: 0 | Rotten: 6
No consensus yet.
liked it
Average Rating: 2.8/5
User Ratings: 1,111
Actor and comedian Harry Shearer makes his directorial debut with this mock documentary about the slightly sordid pastimes of some of America's wealthiest and most powerful men. Zambesi Glen is a private resort in Northern California whose highly exclusive membership rolls includes high-echelon politicians, leaders of America's military, owners of the nation's biggest corporations, renowned and respected political thinkers, and a handful of celebrity guests; the club's membership is
Mar 29, 2002 Wide
Feb 24, 2004
Magnolia Pictures
All Critics (20) | Top Critics (6) | Fresh (0) | Rotten (19)
Pic lacks the development needed for a full-length feature and, following a hilarious opening sequence, it becomes tiresomely one-note.
Most of the film feels conceived and shot on the fly -- like between lunch breaks for Shearer's radio show and his Simpson voice-overs.
The satire is unfocused, while the story goes nowhere.
It is supremely unfunny and unentertaining to watch middle-age and older men drink to excess, piss on trees, b.s. one another and put on a show in drag.
A beyond-lame satire, Teddy Bears' Picnic ranks among the most pitiful directing debuts by an esteemed writer-actor.
Too much of it feels unfocused and underdeveloped.
Low fidelity comedy all around.
Doesn't quite work as a comedy but a buried level of satire makes a good target out of the news media.
When one hears Harry Shearer is going to make his debut as a film director, one would hope for the best
Very much like its title, the movie is too cuddly and frolicking to get a satirical grip on its rich and powerful characters, or their real life targets.
Hardy har har.
The real shame is that such a talented ensemble cast is so badly wasted in this lame attempt at political discourse.
An ugly, pointless, stupid movie.
What could and should have been biting and droll is instead a tepid waste of time and talent.
The satire is just too easy to be genuinely satisfying.
There are just too many characters saying too many clever things and getting into too many pointless situations. Where's the movie here?
Despite a who's-who cast of comedians, virtually all the characters are uninteresting, unappealing and, worse, unfunny.
The film has the thrown-together feel of a summer-camp talent show: hastily written, underrehearsed, arbitrarily plotted and filled with crude humor and vulgar innuendo.
Dignified CEO's meet at a rustic retreat and pee against a tree. Can you bear the laughter?
Dear God, what on earth happened? How could this much talent make such a horrendous film? It is totally not funny, stupid and ridiculous and insulting. A complete waste in all senses of the word.
November 25, 2009Starring Morgan Fairchild?.. what gives her top billing she's only in it for 3 minutes!Well, I am surprised I hadn't heard of this.. I noticed it sitting on the shelf at work and decided to see if it was any good.. Now, I'm really into the other films that Harry Sheerer made with Christopher Guest, so.. it was a
September 23, 2007| 35% | The Hangover Part II |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 81% | Kung Fu Panda 2 |
| 44% | Cowboys & Aliens |
| 83% | Rise of the Planet of the Apes |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 88% | Lady and the Tramp |
| 69% | A Very Harold & Kumar Christmas |
| 21% | Fireflies in the Garden |
| 45% | The Rebound |
Journey 2 Not Worth the Trip
What are his 10 best movies ever?
See the all-new action-packed trailer!
Five new Marvelous pictures