Warner Bros. Butchering Sweeney Todd?
Because nothing says "family fun" like a musical about cannibalism!
You would think any studio that greenlighted an adaptation of Sweeney Todd -- the classic musical about a homicidal barber -- would be prepared for plenty of blood and guts. And, as it turns out, you'd be wrong: The Sunday Mail is reporting that Warner Bros. has ordered significant, um, cuts to Tim Burton's grisly take on the story.
According to the article, Warners is aiming for a PG-13 rating, and after viewing some bloody footage from the film, executives handed down the edict to trim some of Sweeney's more graphic murder scenes. From the article:
During filming at Pinewood studios, prosthetic lookalike limbs were used (obviously the real thing would have been taking realism too far!) and they were so gruesomely lifelike that some of the crew became nauseous and had to take fresh air breaks...those on set were further spooked because there were piles and piles of sliced-up 'corpses', plus several spare 'necks' in case Burton wanted to shoot several takes of the same throat-cutting scene.
Sounds appropriately sordid, given the source material, but it's called the movie business for a reason, and it really isn't surprising that Warners would do anything possible to broaden the marketability of a musical opening near Christmas. Of course, by trying to get everyone in the theater, studios frequently seem to wind up attracting no one at all. We'll find out how much of Burton's vision survived when Sweeney Todd arrives on screens December 21.
Source: The Sunday Mail
According to the article, Warners is aiming for a PG-13 rating, and after viewing some bloody footage from the film, executives handed down the edict to trim some of Sweeney's more graphic murder scenes. From the article:
During filming at Pinewood studios, prosthetic lookalike limbs were used (obviously the real thing would have been taking realism too far!) and they were so gruesomely lifelike that some of the crew became nauseous and had to take fresh air breaks...those on set were further spooked because there were piles and piles of sliced-up 'corpses', plus several spare 'necks' in case Burton wanted to shoot several takes of the same throat-cutting scene.
Sounds appropriately sordid, given the source material, but it's called the movie business for a reason, and it really isn't surprising that Warners would do anything possible to broaden the marketability of a musical opening near Christmas. Of course, by trying to get everyone in the theater, studios frequently seem to wind up attracting no one at all. We'll find out how much of Burton's vision survived when Sweeney Todd arrives on screens December 21.
Source: The Sunday Mail
Related Items
| Celeb: | Tim Burton |
|
mjolson20 writes: on Aug 27 2007 08:19 AM warner bros. sucks (Reply to this) |
|
JUDGE DREDD writes: on Aug 27 2007 08:29 AM In reply to this comment (#1075854) I agree! warners do suck! I will wait a few years and watch the DIRECTORS GORY CUT of the film instead! If they release one that is, I hope so. I will give this watered down patronizing moneymaking version a miss at cinemas. Thanks warners, for still consistantly sucking as you did in the batman and robin days! (Reply to this) |
|
Jugger writes: on Aug 27 2007 08:45 AM oh come on! PG-13 Sweeney Todd??? It is because is Johnny Deep on it??? Pirates is not Sweeney Todd!!! (Reply to this) |
|
witherwings writes: on Aug 27 2007 08:46 AM Um, it's makeup people... it's not real... (Reply to this) |
|
PopeAndrewPaul writes: on Aug 27 2007 09:18 AM Johnny depp lost all R-rated appeal to studios once he did Pirates. the actor now has a loyal teenage following, the studio realizes that and doesn't want to lose cash just because of some old-fashioned blood. (Reply to this) |
|
taran72 writes: on Aug 27 2007 09:26 AM I cut my lip once, on a sharp Dorito. Blood all in my teeth. I got a little woozy, and I had to go outside to get some fresh air. (Reply to this) |
|
Mr. Jamal Everette Foxx writes: on Aug 27 2007 09:34 AM I don't care much for Tim Burton at all, but what WB is doing is just wrong. A director should be allowed to express his vision. (Reply to this) |
|
Typhoon20 writes: on Aug 27 2007 09:38 AM So does this mean that I Am Legend is gonna be PG13 too ? Cause that's the first thing that came to my mind reading this news. (Reply to this) |
|
FourthWall writes: on Aug 27 2007 09:42 AM It's supposed to be, what was the word? "Sordid". It's ****ing Sweeney Todd. It's about a guy who kills people and bakes them into pies, and they want to make it some watered down pansy pg-13 flick? I was never much of a fan of Sondheim or this musical, but still... (Reply to this) |
|
tiger woods writes: on Aug 27 2007 09:43 AM In reply to this comment (#1075903) this is so stupid, and yes typhoon I am legend is definetly going to be PG-13, its being marketed as a blockbuster, and blockbusters are not R(usually) (Reply to this) |
|
jeremyd4 writes: on Aug 27 2007 09:49 AM An episode of CSI (or any cop show these days for that matter) would be equally, if not more graphic than this film. However, I think the mixing of a musical with graphic violence (blood, guts, etc) would seem to be targeting two conflicting audiences. I'm not saying there aren't people out there who'll be into this mish-mash, but Warner Bros. might struggle to find a profitable number of musical/showtune loving patrons who'll dig the whole violent part; and on the flip side, enough people who like twisted macabre stuff who'll get into the musical side. Honestly, find me a large bunch of guys who really get into musicals these days, ones who haven't been dragged along by their Fu (Reply to this) |
|
foolofatook writes: on Aug 27 2007 09:54 AM This makes me a sad boy. (Reply to this) |
|
zodkin writes: on Aug 27 2007 09:57 AM Is this movie even a Warner Bros. movie? I thought it was Dreamworks... (Reply to this) |
|
Jeff Giles writes: on Aug 27 2007 10:05 AM In reply to this comment (#1075946) You are correct, Zodkin -- DreamWorks and Paramount are handling distribution in the US. This article is from a British paper, however, and it looks like the European rights are being handled by Warners... (Reply to this) |
|
KubrickIsG-d writes: on Aug 27 2007 10:10 AM The same thing probably happened when Burtan made "Sleepy Hollow", but that definitly retained its gore and much deserved R-rating (Reply to this) |
|
~*Admiral Snowstorm*~ writes: on Aug 27 2007 10:14 AM I just recently read a story about how movies these days are being made to appeal to as many audiences as possible rather than just aiming for one target audience. The toning down of this movie is just about the perfect example of that complaint, I'd say. Most people going to see this movie will be Sweeney Todd fans anyway; does a million dollars or so of extra profit really make that much of a difference to you, Warner Bros? Can't we just have a good, faithful adaptation rather than a watered down and mostly likely subpar version of the story? (Reply to this) |
|
DIABLUSX writes: on Aug 27 2007 10:28 AM Johnny Dep and Tim Burton created a bloody movie? No, not the two men behind Sleepy Hollow. I guess this can not be helped though due to the fact that it all comes down to the money. If mroe people (teens fans from the Pirates) will pay more money to see Depp the studios will hack a film to due so. (Reply to this) |
|
koktengri writes: on Aug 27 2007 10:39 AM warner brothers.go to hell (Reply to this) |
|
Gimy writes: on Aug 27 2007 10:40 AM yaaaay! who cares about creativity or entertainment?!!? lets just make money!! woo hoo (Reply to this) |
|
unbreakable_samurai writes: on Aug 27 2007 10:44 AM This is crap, they shouldn't mess with Burton's vision. I'm sure the R rated version would be better. What happend to just making a good movie and having faith that people would come. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |










