News » Columns » Weekly Ketchup » Weekly Ketchup: Third Da Vinci Film May Happen

Weekly Ketchup: Third Da Vinci Film May Happen

Plus the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles return to live-action

This week's Ketchup has sequel news for The Da Vinci Code, relaunch news for Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles and potential new movie franchises to follow for lovers of Angelina Jolie and post-apocalyptic first person shooter video games.


#1 THE DA VINCI CODE 3: THE SEARCH FOR MORE MONEY

Although Angels & Demons, the second movie starring Tom Hanks as author Dan Brown's Robert Langdon character, isn't in theaters until May 15th, the author has already written a third novel and Columbia Pictures is trying to secure the rights. Unlike Angels & Demons, which was actually the first book featuring Langdon (adapted as a film sequel after The Da Vinci Code proved so popular), Brown's next book, entitled The Lost Symbol, is a true sequel to The Da Vinci Code, or the second sequel to Angels & Demons, to state it most accurately. The Lost Symbol will be published by Doubleday, with an amazing 5 million copies being shipped out for the book's September 15, 2009 release, although with Angels & Demons selling 39 million copies and The Da Vinci Code selling 81 million copies, those 5 million copies are probably just the tip of the religious conspiracy investigating iceberg. There's no word yet about whether director Ron Howard or star Tom Hanks will be returning for The Lost Symbol. What The Lost Symbol is actually about isn't known either, except that Freemasonry is the latest secret society on Langdon's check list, and it is set in Washington, D.C.


#2 TEENAGE MUTANT NINJA TURTLES RETURNING TO LIVE ACTION

After three live-action movies in the early 1990s, the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles returned in 2007 in TMNT, an all-CGI-animation movie. Rather than another CGI movie, however, the Turtles will next be seen on the big screen in a return to their live-action roots, in an origin story aiming for a 2011 release date. In addition to the expected turtle suits, producer Scott Mednick speculated that "face replacement technology" may also be used to make the Ninja Turtles' faces more expressive. The movie will be based upon the original 1984-1987 black and white comics by Peter Laird and Kevin Eastman, which were actually spoofs of the "gritty comics" trend at the time exemplified by titles like Frank Miller's work on Daredevil and Ronin. About them, Mednick said, "the original dozen comics created by Peter Laird and Kevin Eastman are some of the best source material one could hope for." As someone who remembers quite well the cultural sense of horror I felt 1987 when those cool comics had been "kiddiefied" into a cartoon series that seemed to be the exact opposite of what TMNT was about, I'm completely on board with the idea of the Turtles being returned to their roots. There's no word yet on whether any of the original Turtle voices like Corey Feldman will be invited to return, but I hope not.


#3 IS FALLOUT COMING TO A MOVIE NEAR YOU?

Bethesda Softworks, the video game company also responsible for the epic Elder Scrolls fantasy role-playing franchise, has filed trademarks for its other big franchise, the Fallout series, set in a violent post-nuclear apocalyptic future tinged with a retro-futuristic gallow's humor. The trademarks cover both "motion picture films about a post-nuclear apocalyptic world" and "entertainment services in the nature of an on-going television program." This column obviously doesn't cover TV shows, but the idea of either/both a Fallout movie or TV show is still worth noting, no doubt. Fallout 3 was released in October, 2008 on three formats, and sold over 600,000 copies in its first month, as well receiving spectacular reviews and lots of "Best of the Year" awards. There are also rumors that Bethesda is developing a Fallout MMORPG, which might be what these possible TV and movie plans are connected to.


#4 THE HOBBIT: TWO MOVIES, BUT NO BRIDGE TO LORD OF THE RINGS

Ever since Guillermo del Toro was announced as the director of The Hobbit, we've heard that the plan was for two movies; one based on The Hobbit, and one "bridge movie" that would show what Tolkien's characters were doing in the sixty years between The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings. That plan has apparently been scrapped, with only the events of The Hobbit to now be split into two movies, in a fashion similar to how Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows is being split in half. Talking to Empire, Del Toro said, "We've decided to have The Hobbit span the two movies, including the White Council and the comings and goings of Gandalf to Dol Guldur." The Hobbit Parts One and Two are still scheduled for releases in December, 2011 and December, 2012.


#5 ANGELINA JOLIE JOINS THE CSI AS SCARPETTA

Angelina Jolie has signed with Fox 2000 to star in what is hoped to be the first of a new franchise of movies based upon the medical examiner character Dr. Kay Scarpetta, as featured in 16 popular novels by Patricia Cornwell. The first film will not be based on any one particular Patricia Cornwell novel, and is only described as "a suspense thriller in the vein of Silence of the Lambs and Seven," which I believe could be said to describe most of the Kay Scarpetta novels. There's no director attached yet, and Fox is currently looking for a writer. Angelina Jolie could be said to be in the market for a healthy film franchise, following the news that the next Tomb Raider movie will be a rebooting with a new actress as Lara Croft. Variety mentions Wanted 2 as a potential project for her, but that somehow seems unlikely to me. Speaking of that project, Evan Spiliotopoulos was announced this week as the Wanted 2 screenwriter, which sent websites into a tizzy because his filmography is mostly kids movies like Pooh's Heffalump Movie and the upcoming Battle for Terra. Mark Millar, creator of Wanted, was quick to defend Spiliotopoulos on his official forum, mentioning that he had heard the writer had done great work on an unproduced action script. Doing some research, it appears that the action movie Millar is referring to is probably The Last Call, a comic book adaptation for Universal or The Box, a supernatural action thriller that director Barry Sonnenfeld is attached to at Fox (and not the movie that Richard Kelly of Donnie Darko fame has coming out in October).


#6 CHRISTIAN BALE JOINS MARK WAHLBERG IN THE FIGHTER

The long story of making The Fighter, a biopic about modern day boxing half-brothers "Irish" Mickey Ward and Dicky Eklund, seems to be finally coming to an end. The title is singular because it was Mickey who made it to the big time, while Dicky gave up boxing for a life of crime and drugs, but eventually becoming Mickey's trainer. Christian Bale has signed on to costar as Dicky with Mark Wahlberg, who has been long attached to star as Ward, with the previous potential Eklunds being first Matt Damon, and then Brad Pitt. Another significant change in the project is the departure of director Darren Aronofsky, who had long been expected to make this his next project after The Wrestler. In his place is David O. Russell, who has worked with Wahlberg twice previously (Three Kings and I Heart Huckabees). The most recent script drafts were by Scott Silver (8 Mile; cowrter of the upcoming Battle: Los Angeles) and Lewis Colick (Ladder 49, October Sky). An interesting coincidence is that both David O. Russell and Christian Bale have been YouTube sensations because of bouts of anger on movie sets. If they don't get along, any angy outbursts on set will likely be recorded, maybe this time as a duet. Production is scheduled to start in July, 2009, possibly in Boston.


#7 SOFIA COPPOLA'S LOS (ANGELES) IN TRANSLATION

Director/writer Sofia Coppola's next project is Somewhere, which like Lost in Translation, is primarily set in a hotel: Hollywood's famous Chateau Marmont. Stephen Dorff stars as a "bad-boy actor stumbling through a life of excess at the Chateau Marmont. With an unexpected visit from his 11-year old daughter, he is forced to reexamine his life." Elle Fanning costars as Dorff's daughter. Filming will take place in Los Angeles and Italy in June and July, 2009. Somewhere will be distributed by Focus Features, which also distributed Lost in Translation, which they describe as "among Focus' most beloved movies, so we have long looked forward to making another picture with Sofia." Sofia Coppola's first film was 1999's The Virgin Suicides, and in between Lost in Translation and Somewhere, she also directed the ambitious but flawed Marie Antoinette; both films starred Kirsten Dunst.


#8 JASON STATHAM HAS OVER A DOZEN WAYS TO KILL AS THE MECHANIC

Jason Statham (Crank, The Transporter) is set to star in a remake of the 1972 Charles Bronson thriller The Mechanic, about a veteran hit man training a young man to take his place when he retires, who then becomes the assassin hired to kill off his mentor. Simon West (Con Air, Lara Croft: Tomb Raider) is in talks to direct. Charles Bronson and his Mechanic director, Michael Winner, went on to work together again two years later on Death Wish, the huge hit which launched a five-film franchise for Bronson. At one point, Michael Douglas had also been involved in a possible Mechanic remake.


#9 STATE OF PLAY DIRECTOR FINDING ISAAC ASIMOV'S THE END OF ETERNITY

The week after State of Play opened at #2 and $14 million at the box office, that film's director, Kevin MacDonald, has been signed to direct the big budget sci-fi project The End of Eternity, based upon the classic 1955 novel by Isaac Asimov. The End of Eternity is about an organization of time cops called Eternals from the far future who travel back in time to make changes to human history for the better, and one Eternal who discovers that he is a pawn in a scheme within the Eternals. The End of Eternity is being produced by New Regency, which has a distribution deal with 20th Century Fox, the studio that also handled the 2004 adaptation of another Asimov project, I, Robot. Kevin MacDonald also directed The Last King of Scotland and Touching Void, and is currently filming Eagle of the Ninth, a historical mystery drama about the search for a missing Roman Legion in Scotland in the 2nd Century.


#10 ANDY SERKIS IS INTO SEX & DRUGS & ROCK & ROLL

Andy Serkis, who's most famous for being the CGI model of Peter Jackson's King Kong and Gollum in the Lord of the Rings movies, will be starring as the late British punk rocker Ian Dury in the biopic Sex & Drugs & Rock & Roll. Ian Dury contracted polio at the age of 7, which he struggled with his whole life, but was still able to lead Ian Dury and the Blockheads as a successful early New Wave band, and as a solo artist, until his death from colorectal cancer in 2000. The rest of the ensemble cast includes Ray Winstone (Sexy Beast), Naomie Harris (28 Days Later), Olivia Williams (Rush Hour), Toby Jones (Truman Capote in Infamous) and Mackenzie Crook (Ragetti the Pirate in the Pirates of the Caribbean movies). Sex & Drugs & Rock & Roll is being directed by Mat Whitecross (codirector of 2006's The Road to Guantanamo) from a script by Paul Viragh, who also wrote a movie called Dark Blue Rising, in which Andy Serkis will also star and make his directorial debut. Sex & Drugs & Rock & Roll starts filming in London on May 3, 2009.


ROTTEN IDEA OF THE WEEK: VANESSA HUDGENS AS BEAUTY IN BEASTLY

High School Musical's Vanessa Hudgens has signed to star in Beastly, a teen supernatural romance based upon the young adult novel of the same name by Alex Flinn. Beastly is a retelling of the classic Beauty and the Beast fairy tale, set in 21st century New York City. Alex Pettyfer, who starred as Alex Rider in 2006's Stormbreaker, is in talks to star as an arrogant 17-year-old who is magically transformed by a witch in his English class into a disfigured "beast," forcing him to find romance, without his good looks, with a "beauty" who might be able to break the spell. Daniel Barnz (Phoebe in Wonderland) is directing and adapting the script for CBS Films, with filming scheduled to start in June, 2009. Other CBS Films projects include Crowley, a medical drama starring Harrison Ford and a remake of My Fair Lady.


For more Weekly Ketchup columns by Greg Dean Schmitz, check out the WK archive, and you can contact GDS through his MySpace page or via a RT forum message. Greg also blogs about the TV show Lost at TwoLosties.Blogspot.com.

VenomRitual

VenomRitual on 04-24-2009 08:12 AM

NOOOOOO FALLOUT IS AMAZING! dont mess up a great franchise by making a movie of it. ugh

arendr

arendr on 04-24-2009 08:49 AM

Ugh...more Dan Brown drivel?

Jason C Wilkerson

Jason C Wilkerson on 04-24-2009 09:11 AM

You haven't read the book for Angels and Demons have you? That book is amazing, and I'm still holding out hope that they do it justice. I know you can do it Ron Howard!

arendr

arendr on 04-24-2009 10:50 AM

I have read Angels & Demons. It's the same poor writing as The Da Vinci Code, and eerily similar in structure.

The guy knows how to write compellingly, he just writes such predictably. Every time I read Dan Brown I kick myself because it's almost insultingly terribly written, yet I can't put the book down.

arendr

arendr on 04-24-2009 04:23 PM

And I realize the irony of my typo. Dan Brown has an editor, though.

danrice56

danrice56 on 04-24-2009 04:19 PM

i HAVE read it, and no, it's not amazing. it is drivel.

collex

collex on 04-24-2009 04:58 PM

Angels and Demons was a good thriller, by a very by-the-number one. At least, the Da Vinci Code ends in a different way than all is other prior books (including A&D): the main male character doesn't end up having sex with the main female character.

When you use this cliche James Bond ending once, ok. When you use it three times: you don't have enough ideas to write three books.

What I also hate about Dan Brown is that he always posits, at the beginning of its books, that "every religious/scientific elements in this book is real and accurate", when everybody with a little bit of common sense knows it's bogus. At least, Micheal Crichton didn't claim is depiction of cloning and dinosaurs were accurate.

askingseven

askingseven on 04-24-2009 09:13 AM

"The Search for More Money" That had me cracking up. Seriously though. "What The Lost Symbol is actually about isn't known either, except that Freemasonry is the latest secret society on Langdon's check list, and it is set in Washington, D.C." I'm pretty sure they did this movie in 2005 and called it National Treasure. Hey, maybe they can get Diane Kruger to play the female lead, and Nic Cage can make a cameo as the President! Or they could make a movie that's actually entertaining to watch! Da Vinci code sucked BTW.

the train

the train on 04-24-2009 10:03 AM

hollywood should stay away from asimov. they've ruined everything by him they've touched.

Clayton S.

Clayton S. on 04-24-2009 12:43 PM

Dan Brown is to literature what Britney Spears is to music. Unfortunately the LCD audiences that they both appeal to will continue to let them keep selling drivel in mass quantities. At least Tom Hanks is doing his part to help out the less fortunate by keeping a blind hair stylist employed.

Playboy Slim

Playboy Slim on 04-24-2009 02:15 PM

Wow, who's going to see "Angels vs Demons"? I mean, we all saw "The Da Vinci Code"!

I'm in a bad mood, WHY? Because why can't they make "The Hobbit" into one damn movie?!!?!?!?!?!?!? It's not that hard.

"Fallout 3" is a blast, that I' still playing, but a movie isn't required. Or wanted.

willywonkanobi

willywonkanobi on 04-24-2009 06:02 PM

so let me get this straight... "The Hobbit", the shortest and simplest of Tolkien's book gets made into TWO MOVIES, while they had to cram LOTR rings into just 3... sounds like that was more of a financial decision than an a creative one.

I was intrigued at the idea of a "bridge movie", guess they are going to include "bridge" elements into both halves of "The Hobbit". I will see them both, probably more than once.

Joshua G.

Joshua G. on 04-24-2009 08:50 PM

In reference to #1

Wow it doesnt get anymore obvious does it? If this one and the 3rd one make a ****load of money they'll 50 of them like the Bond films.

Joshua G.

Joshua G. on 04-24-2009 08:52 PM

Beastly sounds bad even as a kids book. And you guys think they ran out of stuff to make movies about.......

tdk1212

tdk1212 on 04-28-2009 04:17 PM

Lol, didn't twilight make you realize something? It doesn't matter what the subject matter is or how its pursued. All you need to make massive amounts of money off a movie series is a few teenage actors who appeal to the teenage audience and a marketing scheme that involves the systematic brainwashing of every teenage girl it can get its hands on. I'm in high school and believe me I'm not exaggerating, it takes a special kind of crazy to make waiting outside in the cold for two days worth it, just to see your favorite movie star in person.

Joshua G.

Joshua G. on 04-24-2009 08:57 PM

#4 nothing but a blatant tool to get every penny out of something that they can. Actually the Hobbit being 2 movies makes more sense than Harry Potter and I frankly dont give a **** about any of the Harry Potter films or books all I am saying is by the time they get done with the second Deathly Hollows of money grubbing **** wont the "kids" be 25 or something?

Joshua G.

Joshua G. on 04-24-2009 09:00 PM

RE #2

Its about damn ****ing time someone made a Turtles movie based on the great comic NOT that piece of crap cartoon. Bravo!! I can only hope its as good as the source material was. Especially since they kill Shredder at the end of the original run.

Odd Persona

Odd Persona on 04-24-2009 10:53 PM

Fallout 3- Hollywood, why even bother? Big budget games these days such as Fallout or Metal Gear Solid already contain a movies worth of story and characterization woven into a interactive experience. Therefore why would I fork over 12 dollars to watch a movie when I can stay home and play a game that is more compelling with a narrative, characters, music, etcetera?

As for The Hobbit, man am I over it. I recently watched the Ring Trilogy again and it hasn't aged very well in my opinion. It certainly has wonderful and effective moments but on the whole.... I%u2019d rather see del Toro work on an original story such as Pans Labyrinth then be stifled by Tolkiens work. Well, here%u2019s hoping it proves imaginative and moving.

Playboy Slim

Playboy Slim on 04-25-2009 09:50 AM

It's not an opinion that "The Lord of the Rings" films are among the greatest ever. It's a cold hard fact!

toats m.

toats m. on 04-25-2009 02:14 PM

2011 is going to be a great year batman spiderman 4 and the hobbit

Playboy Slim

Playboy Slim on 04-25-2009 09:15 PM

Yeah 2011 will be legendary. I'm a bit on the fence about "Spider-Man 4" after "Spider-Man 3", but the "Bamtan 3" and "The Hobbit" are certain to be great.

Premo Beat

Premo Beat on 04-25-2009 05:42 PM

Not aged well? Interesting...

Odd Persona

Odd Persona on 04-25-2009 07:47 PM

What I mean by 'not aged well' is that at the time I initially watched it what seemed magical and epic now seems stilted and silly. But hey, if you still love it then thats cool too, thats simply my perspective.

screwhead100

screwhead100 on 04-25-2009 11:53 PM

i agree with the odd 1......i recently watched most of the trilogoy again and i just wasnt as moved as i was say, 4 years ago.......

Celso G.

Celso G. on 04-26-2009 08:48 AM

They need to not make any more "Davinci" related books, with ludicrously miscast Tom Hanks as Robert Langdon and go on to some of Brown's other unrelated books. Deception Point would make a kick *** movie.

mjprogue

mjprogue on 04-26-2009 10:02 AM

Hobbit should be two movies if they're going to include the Gandalf stuff...in the novel, it was just a quick recap of what he had been up to...if they actually progress through that at story pace, it could add a lot. Really there were so many great visual and potentially long scenes (Smaug attacking Laketown, the riddle game) that it really needs to be longer than a couple of hours.

Fallout? Sounds great! If they mess it up...so what? Will that make the games suck somehow? No...but if they get it right it could be fantastic...really is no down side to this news if you're a fan.

zaphod67

zaphod67 on 04-26-2009 11:40 PM

I once read The Hobbit, cover-to-cover, on a two hour plane flight. This means that watching the movie (stretched out over 2 features, meaning it would probably be at least 4 fours, if not more) would take longer than reading the book. I think I'll stick to the book.

quietus28

quietus28 on 04-27-2009 02:52 PM

I don't understand why everyone keep crediting the movie I, Robot to Asimov. My understanding was that the script for I, Robot had been around for some time under a different name (hardwired or something like that), and they just licensed the Asimov book so they could essentially steal the title and use it for the movie. The movie certainly wasn't representative of Asimov's work.

What's Hot On RT

Critics Consensus
Critics Consensus

Journey 2 Not Worth the Trip

Luis Guzman
Luis Guzman

What are his 10 best movies ever?

<em>Amazing Spider-Man</em>
Amazing Spider-Man

See the all-new action-packed trailer!

The Avengers!
The Avengers!

Five new Marvelous pictures

Help | About | Jobs | Newsletter | Critics Submission | API | Licensing | Blog | Developers | Mobile