Total Recall: Across the Universe And The Beatles On Film
Beatlemania at RT: A Hard Day's Night, Help!, Magical Mystery Tour, Yellow Submarine, Let It Be
This week, Across the Universe hits theaters. Julie Taymor's film, starring Evan Rachel Wood and Jim Sturgess as a young couple in the midst of the heady, chaotic 1960s, utilizes the Beatles' music to evoke the time period. With that in mind, it's a good time to take a closer look at the Beatles' cinematic legacy.
A number of films have attempted to distill the influence and essence of the Fab Four, some from the perspective of their fans (I Wanna Hold Your Hand, 82 percent on the Tomatometer), others from the enduring appeal of the group's music (the notorious Sergeant Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, 17 percent); still others poke mild fun at Beatle history (The Rutles: All You Need is Cash, 88 percent). Even the group's first bassist, Stu Sutcliffe, was the subject of a biopic (Backbeat, 74 percent). Ultimately, though, it's the films in which the Beatles themselves star that remain the best testament to the group's legend; like their records, the Beatles' best movies are replete with bold innovation, a mischievous sense of humor, and a sheer joie de vivre.

The first Beatles film, A Hard Day's Night (100 percent), is also the greatest. The famous opening scene of the group running down the street, chased by crazed fans, sets that tone; it's a headlong rush that instantly changed the synthesis of music and film forever. Utilizing quick-cut editing techniques, director Richard Lester created musical interludes that act as proto-music videos (the sequence in which the boys horse around in a field, to the tune of "Can't Buy Me Love," is probably the best, but "I Should Have Known Better," "She Loves You," and "All My Loving" also get memorable treatment as well) and remain influential to this day. A Hard Day's Night went a long way toward establishing a public perception of the individual Beatles that, however unfairly, carried over into the general consensus of their musical contributions: John, sarcastic and witty; Paul, the showman; George, quiet but inquisitive; Ringo, always up for a laugh.
It's the personalities of the Beatles that keep the rest of A Hard Day's Night from aging. The movie follows a day in the life of the young Beatles on their way to a television performance; it sounds simple enough, but the group must outwit its rabid fans, management, and the police, as well as overcoming the dissent sewn by Wilfrid Brambell as Paul's crotchety grandfather. A Hard Day's Night has a sophistication and formal daring that remains unmatched in the world of rock film; it's "a comedy classic that cross-pollinated Jean-Luc Godard with the four Marx brothers," wrote John Anderson of Newsday.

After the mold-breaking brilliance of A Hard Day's Night, the Beatles' second film, Help! (89 percent), is far less consequential. Once again, Lester is at the helm, and once again, the film is a virtually plotless assortment of gags and musical performances. The narrative centers around a religious cult that needs a ring to perform a human sacrifice. Unfortunately for Ringo, he's just added some new bling to his collection; the band goes on the run, raising some (gentle) Cain in the Alps and the Caribbean.
But something's missing this time out. Despite the Beatles' good humor, reasonably funny jokes, and several remarkable songs (including "Ticket to Ride," "You've Got to Hide Your Love Away," and the title tune), Help! lacks the easy charm and stylistic daring of Night. (And in this age of political correctness, some may find the exotic religious cult plotline a bit questionable). Still, Help! makes for moderately pleasant viewing; the Austin Powers films would later draw from this swingin' spy movie parody. "While it's true that it's more Richard Lester's vision than the group's, it must be noted that Lester's anarchic absurdity and quick cut camera gags make for a pretty good whole," wrote Brad Laidman of Film Threat.

Magical Mystery Tour (60 percent), on the other hand, doesn't really work as a whole; this hour-long, made-for-TV flick is generally considered to be the weakest Beatles film. Inspired by the antics of Timothy Leary and the Merry Pranksters, Magical Mystery Tour finds the Beatles driving across the English countryside in a bus full of magicians, family members, and oddballs. The jokes are dated, the antics shapeless, and the plot nonexistent. Still, any film in which the Beatles simply play music is of interest, and the proto-videos for "I Am the Walrus," "Your Mother Should Know," and "Blue Jay Way" are stunning, showing a formal discipline lacking in the rest of the movie. "I would recommend a new generation of Beatle fans to put [Magical Mystery Tour] near the bottom of their to-do list, but never to scratch it off entirely," wrote Colin Souter of eFilmcritic.com. "It remains a necessary curiosity item and slightly ahead of its time." Mystery gets bonus points for Lennon's storybook-esque narration; even at their trippiest, the Beatles maintain a sense of innocent wonder.

That childlike essence was brilliantly distilled in the Beatles' next film, the dazzling, richly inventive Yellow Submarine (94 percent). Unenthusiastic about making another live-action film, the Fab Four utilized the cartoon medium in order to fulfill their three-picture deal with United Artists (none of the Beatles performed their voice roles for the movie). However, the result was a swirling phantasmagoria of colors and inspired animation techniques; Director George Dunning and a crack team of artists utilized psychedelic visuals and some heavily-stylized live action footage to bring such Beatles classics as "Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds," "Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band," "Nowhere Man," and "All You Need Is Love" to vivid life. The plot is simple: The music-hating Blue Meanies attack the colorful Pepperland, rendering it a cold, joyless place. One resident, Old Fred, escapes in the titular craft and collects the Beatles, who travel through a series of dreamworlds to save the town with their songs. (The group liked the final result so much they agreed to appear in the flesh for the movie's coda).
Though some of the animation may seem somewhat dated by today's standards, the sense of daring contained within Yellow Submarine still seems fresh; the film exerted an influence on the films of Wes Anderson, particularly The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou. (Those who see it as a stoner film miss the point; as the Beatles themselves knew, children are often unconscious surrealists). The film embodies "exactly what the Beatles represented emotionally and philosophically in the mid-'60s: artistic daring, cheeky non-sentimentality, a new generation taking over, naively confident the world was 'getting better all the time,'" wrote William Arnold of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer.

Evidence of the Beatles' exuberance would be in short supply in their next film, Let It Be (73 percent). A documentary about the making of the album of the same name, Let It Be finds the group (with Billy Preston sitting in on organ) going through the motions. The exuberance and communal spirit of A Hard Day's Night appears to be long gone (even Ringo seems dour throughout the proceedings). It comes as something of a shock when one remembers the fact that none of the Beatles had yet turned 30; they seem ravaged, exhausted, and not particularly happy to be in each other's company. Hints of domestic concerns seep in; Yoko Ono is often seen at John's side, and Paul's stepdaughter Heather provides some fleeting moments of levity, dancing with happy abandon to the Beatles' jam sessions.
In fact, it's only when the band is playing that the old spirit of excitement and teamwork is revived; the group runs through its new material, which includes "Get Back," "Two of Us," and the title track, as well as some loose, ragged covers of R&B classics like "Kansas City" and "Lawdy Miss Clawdy." And the famous rooftop concert that concludes Let It Be has a giddy, raucous air; you can feel the excitement of the crowd that gathers on the street below, and the brief respite for the Beatles from the bad feelings in the studio. (The rooftop concert was memorably recreated for U2's "Where the Streets Have No Name" video.) Even though it ends on a note of triumph, Let It Be is a document of the dissolution of the Beatles, and as a result, it's a bittersweet experience. "This was the only time the Beatles were not working for the camera in the characters associated with their respective personalities," wrote Phil Hall in Film Threat."The raw emotion on screen makes for unsettling yet hypnotic viewing."

Apart from the group, the Beatles' film work was almost as disparate as the members' solo albums. Lennon starred in Lester's anti-war satire How I Won the War (55 percent); though he disliked the experience of making the film, Lester thought Lennon could have made it as an actor nonetheless. As a solo artist, McCartney was twice nominated for an Oscar (for "Live and Let Die" and "Vanilla Sky"). His best-known movie as an actor is Give My Regards to Broad Street (23 percent), in which he plays a version of himself. Ringo lent his amiable personality to oddities like The Magic Christian (46 percent), Frank Zappa's 200 Motels (67 percent), and Caveman (15 percent). Ironically, it was George, the "quiet Beatle," whose work in film was most memorable. As co-founder of Handmade Films, Harrison helped produce such edgy, important work as Monty Python's Life of Brian (98 percent), Time Bandits (94 percent), and Withnail & I (94 percent).
Time will tell if Across the Universe sets off another wave of Beatlemania. But one thing's fore sure: when it comes to rock movies, nobody can top the Fab Four.
A number of films have attempted to distill the influence and essence of the Fab Four, some from the perspective of their fans (I Wanna Hold Your Hand, 82 percent on the Tomatometer), others from the enduring appeal of the group's music (the notorious Sergeant Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, 17 percent); still others poke mild fun at Beatle history (The Rutles: All You Need is Cash, 88 percent). Even the group's first bassist, Stu Sutcliffe, was the subject of a biopic (Backbeat, 74 percent). Ultimately, though, it's the films in which the Beatles themselves star that remain the best testament to the group's legend; like their records, the Beatles' best movies are replete with bold innovation, a mischievous sense of humor, and a sheer joie de vivre.

It's the personalities of the Beatles that keep the rest of A Hard Day's Night from aging. The movie follows a day in the life of the young Beatles on their way to a television performance; it sounds simple enough, but the group must outwit its rabid fans, management, and the police, as well as overcoming the dissent sewn by Wilfrid Brambell as Paul's crotchety grandfather. A Hard Day's Night has a sophistication and formal daring that remains unmatched in the world of rock film; it's "a comedy classic that cross-pollinated Jean-Luc Godard with the four Marx brothers," wrote John Anderson of Newsday.

But something's missing this time out. Despite the Beatles' good humor, reasonably funny jokes, and several remarkable songs (including "Ticket to Ride," "You've Got to Hide Your Love Away," and the title tune), Help! lacks the easy charm and stylistic daring of Night. (And in this age of political correctness, some may find the exotic religious cult plotline a bit questionable). Still, Help! makes for moderately pleasant viewing; the Austin Powers films would later draw from this swingin' spy movie parody. "While it's true that it's more Richard Lester's vision than the group's, it must be noted that Lester's anarchic absurdity and quick cut camera gags make for a pretty good whole," wrote Brad Laidman of Film Threat.


Though some of the animation may seem somewhat dated by today's standards, the sense of daring contained within Yellow Submarine still seems fresh; the film exerted an influence on the films of Wes Anderson, particularly The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou. (Those who see it as a stoner film miss the point; as the Beatles themselves knew, children are often unconscious surrealists). The film embodies "exactly what the Beatles represented emotionally and philosophically in the mid-'60s: artistic daring, cheeky non-sentimentality, a new generation taking over, naively confident the world was 'getting better all the time,'" wrote William Arnold of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer.

In fact, it's only when the band is playing that the old spirit of excitement and teamwork is revived; the group runs through its new material, which includes "Get Back," "Two of Us," and the title track, as well as some loose, ragged covers of R&B classics like "Kansas City" and "Lawdy Miss Clawdy." And the famous rooftop concert that concludes Let It Be has a giddy, raucous air; you can feel the excitement of the crowd that gathers on the street below, and the brief respite for the Beatles from the bad feelings in the studio. (The rooftop concert was memorably recreated for U2's "Where the Streets Have No Name" video.) Even though it ends on a note of triumph, Let It Be is a document of the dissolution of the Beatles, and as a result, it's a bittersweet experience. "This was the only time the Beatles were not working for the camera in the characters associated with their respective personalities," wrote Phil Hall in Film Threat."The raw emotion on screen makes for unsettling yet hypnotic viewing."

Time will tell if Across the Universe sets off another wave of Beatlemania. But one thing's fore sure: when it comes to rock movies, nobody can top the Fab Four.
Related Items
|
arendr writes: on Sep 12 2007 06:48 PM I am a huge fan of "Help". I grew up with watching that movie constantly. It's way underrated. There's so much great slapstick humor in it. Not to mention I think that period in Beatles music is severely overlooked. As I said before in a previous thread though, Across the Universe turns me off every time I see it's trailer. The plot looks incredibly cliche and the writing and acting seem so 2nd rate. "Hold on, I just want to get the eyes right"??? No, I haven't seen the movie, nor do I plan to since the trailer aggravates me so. However, from what I've seen, I get the feeling that John Lennon would have really disliked this film. (Reply to this) |
|
digitalrelic writes: on Sep 12 2007 09:37 PM across the universe looks awesome to me, i don't know. (Reply to this) |
|
Scarborough Fair writes: on Sep 12 2007 09:38 PM I also look forward to this upcoming film. (Reply to this) |
|
I Am Remote writes: on Sep 12 2007 09:52 PM Seriously? Wow. I've never seen such a heavy handed ploy to get people to come see a movie: "we'll sing beatles songs! Everyone likes the beatles!" Sorry, but as much as I'm a movie fan, I'm a rock fan as well. Michael Jackson is profiting from this somewhere, and while the film looks visually impressive, banking on classic, proven songs that everyone loves to make emotional impacts is a cheap trick. Everyone involved with this film should be ashamed. (Reply to this) |
|
yowazup13 writes: on Sep 12 2007 10:15 PM In reply to this comment (#1119953) Is it really shameful being idealistic nowadays? Its a movies about the sixties. Its a movie about the the youth of the sixties. And its a movie about the counter culture of the sixties. If any music has the ability to draw the emotion of that time period its The Beatles. They were apart of it. And I find it hard to believe that even half of the people who claim to like The Beatles, actually understand The Beatles. I feel this a good way for people understand that time and its importance, and understand that music and its importance. Whether or not this movie entertains the masses I'm pretty certain that many people are going understand and appreciate a lot more about that time period. And who knows, maybe today's youth will recognize today's issues in the same way the youth of that time period did. (Reply to this) |
|
DaHypr1 writes: on Sep 13 2007 04:47 AM I think acorss the universe looks fantastic! I can't wait to see it (Reply to this) |
|
dracus writes: on Sep 13 2007 05:12 AM Never mind Across the Universe, when is Let it Be going to be released on DVD? (Reply to this) |
|
Jesus McNasty writes: on Sep 13 2007 06:55 AM Words can't describe how excited I was (and really still am) to see this movie, It might be heavy handed and cliche, But I can't imagine it being boring. However, if I have to read one more interview w/ Evan Racheal Wood that revolves around the "She's 19, he's 38 and he's Marilyn Manson, It's WACKY" crap I'm gonna scream. Not to mention the publicity whoring musical equavalent of "They did all their own stunts" with the "They sung... most of their songs". AND BONO! Micheal Jackson, BONO! Don't get me started on the Micheal Jackson catalog ransom. (Reply to this) |
|
arendr writes: on Sep 13 2007 07:35 AM In reply to this comment (#1120128) Damn straight. (Reply to this) |
|
drtruebl writes: on Sep 13 2007 08:09 AM Yeah I can't wait to see a movie with a bunch of Beatles songs not sung by the Beatles. But you know, the songs weren't very good the first time the Beatles did them so I'm glad someone else will be singing them all. (Reply to this) |
|
smartmoviekid writes: on Sep 13 2007 11:30 AM In reply to this comment (#1120177) yea say that to the hundreds of millions of Beatles fans around the world that are still avid fans of them even today jackass. yeah there songs weren't much good at all, which is why the Beatles were named "best band of the milleneum" in 2000? ok yeah they are mediocre at best sure. (Reply to this) |
|
simplekindoflovely writes: on Sep 13 2007 04:33 PM It's a great movie, I don't know why everyone keeps bitching about it. (Reply to this) |
|
omelette writes: on Sep 13 2007 05:29 PM It irritates me that so many people are going on about how crappy Across the Universe looks...it looks fantastic and original to me, I'm very excited. (Reply to this) |
|
I Am Remote writes: on Sep 13 2007 08:53 PM Yowazup, About the 60s? guess what? the beatles never "intended" a counter culture, they were popular during it. People did more drugs as they did more drugs. How many beatles songs about the counter culture? Hmmm oh yeah, one. "Revolution" in which Lennon blasts hippies. This is also the "Counter culture" which is now using today's youth (their children) as financial cattle and selling they're beloved music to sell cars and sneakers. This movie is bullsh*t and anyone who sees it is sheep. (Reply to this) |
|
mjh1589 writes: on Sep 13 2007 09:56 PM "This movie is bullsh*t and anyone who sees it is sheep." "Everyone involved with this film should be ashamed." "I get the feeling that John Lennon would have really disliked this film" Are you people serious? Do you guys know something about the beatles the rest of us dont? I didnt know thirty second clips could cause so much bazzar anger. I love the beatles music, i like julie taymor, sounds like a good combination to me. So baa baaa this sheep is going to see this film and take comfort in knowing that The Beatles music will be remembered for many generations to come, no matter how painful for you this movie that none of you have seen is. "Living is easy with eyes closed, misunderstanding all you see.." Dont be so ignorant and give this a chance. (Reply to this) |
|
yowazup13 writes: on Sep 13 2007 11:26 PM I Am Remote, About your comment. Number one, no one person, or one band, has the ability to create a counter culture. I never said that, and I love how you put the word 'intended' in quotations when I didn't even once use that word. Number two, you don't have any understanding of the meaning of counter culture at all. So please don't use it. The song in which the movie is based on is a counter culture song. Yeah it sounds like an acid trip, but I think the line, "nothing's going to change my world," is a pretty important part of how the youth then felt. And those aren't the only two. Don't take my word for it, go actually listen to some Beatle's Albums. And, no, greatest hits don't count. And thirdly, the "counter culture" of today of which you speak of isn't a counter culture at all. Once you fall into the norm you can't be called counter culture. And I'm sorry but I don't see Lennon running around asking his music to played in the next pontiac commercial. Or Harrison. Or McCartney. Or Starr. I think you might be thinking of the Beach Boys. Or maybe Zepplin. Or perhaps Bob Seger. Yeah, and even if there was a Beatle song playing in a commercial, its because Micheal Jackson owns the rights to their library. And he never stood for anything that countered popular culture. Except that everyone liked his natural skin better. (Reply to this) |
|
yowazup13 writes: on Sep 13 2007 11:31 PM Oh, and as far as being sheep. Well lets just speak logically. Its a musical. A fairly weird musical at that. Its not going to sell well to all types of moviegoers. If they wanted to sell well to everyone they would've made an action movie, or a comedy, or just a plain ol' drama shooting for that academy award. But they didn't. And if you meant "sheep" in a different way other than those animals that get herded, you wear cotton too, don't act likce you don't. (Reply to this) |
|
drtruebl writes: on Sep 14 2007 05:58 AM In reply to this comment (#1120854) That was sarcasm... (Reply to this) |
|
Jesus McNasty writes: on Sep 17 2007 08:09 AM One more comment and then I'm done, promise. Right on SmartMovieKid. I have that arguement with my friends all the time. Maybe, just maybe the Beatles aren't the greatest band of all, just MAYBE every authority writing for SPIN, or Rolling Stone ect., are all old farts who grow up being obsessed with the Beatles and they're the ones writing the greatest 100, rock, whatever list. I'll take the Beach Boys anyday, musically they were lightyears ahead of The Beatles. However, the genius can't be denied and I'm talking about Julie's. (Reply to this) |
|
pflagdebbie writes: on Sep 18 2007 10:05 AM In reply to this comment (#1121769) You completely misunderstood "Revolution" if you think it's blasting hippies. With lyrics like, "But when you talk about destruction Don't you know that you can count me out," "But when you want money for people with minds that hate All I can tell is brother you have to wait," and, "But if you go carrying pictures of chairman Mao You ain't going to make it with anyone anyhow" hippies are clearly not the target of the song. Hippies were lots of things, but never were they violent supporters of fascist dictators. Also, the best evidence that Lennon was a major part of the counterculture, besides the fact that the American government and the CIA were really nervous about him, is the admittedly non-Beatles song, "Imagine," which corporate radio stations in America have banned. Seriously, they won't play it. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |







