Battle Royale II (2003) - Rotten Tomatoes

Battle Royale II (2003)

Battle Royale II (2003)

Battle Royale II

TOMATOMETER

——

AUDIENCE SCORE

Critic Consensus: No consensus yet.

Battle Royale II Trailers & Photos

Movie Info

(2003) Channel 4's world cinema season continues. Initially helmed by Kinji Fukasaku, who died during production, and finished by his son Kenta, this sequel picks up the story three years on from the original. Survivor Shuya Nanahara (Tatsuya Fujiwara) is now leading an international terrorist gang. When he's tracked down to an isolated island after his latest atrocity, the Japanese authorities punish another rebel high-school class. Takuma Aoi (Shugo Oshinari) leads them on a suicide mission to attack the island and kill the terrorists, or die trying. In Japanese with English subtitles.more
Rating: R
Genre: Drama, Action & Adventure, Art House & International
Directed By: ,
Written By: Kenta Fukasaku
On DVD: May 4, 2004
Runtime:
Gaga Productions

Watch it now

Cast

Tatsuya Fujiwara
as Shuya Nanahara
Ai Maeda
as Shiori Kitano
Natsuki Kato
as Natsuki Kato
Shgo Oshinari
as Takuma Aoi
Ayana Sakai
as Nao Asakura
Ai Iwamura
as Smiling Winner from ...
Haruka Suenaga
as Haruka Kuze
Yuma Ishigaki
as Mitsugu Sakai
Aki Maeda
as Noriko Nakagawa
Sonny Chiba
as Shinji Mumura's Uncl...
Show More Cast

News & Interviews for Battle Royale II

Critic Reviews for Battle Royale II

All Critics (11) | Top Critics (1)

Full Review… | March 27, 2009
Variety
Top Critic

It's meant to be provocative, but it's muddled and nonsensical, with none of the liveliness or cleverness of its predecessor.

Full Review… | March 30, 2012
Commercial Appeal (Memphis, TN)

If the original film flirted with controversy, the sequel has sex with it on the first date.

Full Review… | July 23, 2007
eFilmCritic.com

A film in which the heroes are al Qaeda surrogates.

Full Review… | May 3, 2005
Lessons of Darkness

Requiem is stupid to the point of aggravation and long enough to qualify as torture under the Geneva Convention.

Full Review… | February 17, 2004

Full Review… | December 7, 2007
Eye for Film

Audience Reviews for Battle Royale II

This film had the potential of being a great, memorable follow-up to Battle Royale.Instead it's a mess, one that is boring, poorly constructed and has a poor cast. The idea for this sequel was interesting, but the execution was poor, and offers nothing to appeal to fans of the first film. Battle Royale 2 just doesn't have anything going for it to make for a worthwhile viewing. If you're expected a great sequel, you'll be sadly disappointed as it is a tiresome, uninspired sequel to a great film. The original should have been a standalone film. The film could have been better than it turned out to be because it had as good idea, but the script and subsequent execution failed to deliver an accomplished sequel that would match the original. Unfortunately, this film fails and ends up missing the mark. I really was disappointed in the result and I felt it could have been much better than this. The aspect of the film that really doesn't do it justice, and brings it down significantly is that it tries to accomplish too much in two hours. Thus the plot is unfocused, there are too many things going on at once, and you lose interest in the film. Battle Royale 2 is a mediocre sequel, and could have been much better than what it turned out to be. If you watch this, don't expect much out of it, as it is a mess from start to finish and really doesn't offer anything to appeal film fans. This sequel is simply put a missed opportunity to follow up a great film and considering the idea of children rebelling against the adults, I'm surprised they weren't able to deliver anything better. A really shame and Battle Royale 2 is not worth checking out. Stick with the first film.

TheDudeLebowski65
Alex roy

Super Reviewer

½

"Imagine the stirring sight of 42 youthful, passionate deaths!"

How do you squander all the good things the original Battle Royale had going for it? By replacing the brutality and intimacy of it with long, monotonous firefights and empty political rhetoric. That's what Battle Royale II: Requiem does, and as a result, it's a shell of the first movie.

I can understand the desire to move the overall story forward and not make the sequel a mere retread of the original, but this wasn't the way to do it. The new characters are almost universally unmemorable, compared to the several in the first movie that stuck in my mind after the very first viewing. The plot attempts to interject "big ideas" into the narrative, but instead makes the whole film tiresome, incoherent, and almost impossible to maintain interest in. The pacing is terrible, with long stretches where nothing happens, followed by long stretches where faceless soldiers endlessly fire across a room at characters you don't care about.

In short, Battle Royale II can (and should) be skipped. It's not even worth seeing to find out the fates of the surviving characters from the first movie. Just watch Battle Royale again and pretend that's the end of it all.

lewiskendell
Lewis C.

Super Reviewer

Started off well but the main character with blonde hair was incredibly annoying with his constant bulging eyes and shaking in anger. It was far too long, far too many SFX shots and so many false endings. Half way through it could have finished. It was too much of a coincidence that the two men survived at the end and just simply a total mash up of the original. The bigger budget certainly has not worked to its advantage.

StarCrossedVoyager
Sophie Burgess

Super Reviewer

Battle Royale II Quotes

There are no approved quotes yet for this movie.

Discussion Forum

Discuss Battle Royale II on our Movie forum!