Boogeyman II (Revenge of the Boogeyman) Reviews
April 25, 2014
Vad i helvete var det jag just såg!? haha!
October 11, 2013
Friday, October 11, 2013
(1983) Boogeyman II
Without seeing the first "Boogeyman" this is still common stuff for theirs no consistency which regards people telling stories involving a piece of a cursed mirror making people doing horrible acts as well making inanimate objects such as scissors, and barbecue utensils floating by themselves killing people similar to the "Final Destination" movies or "The Exorcist". This is yet another another horror movie with no logic.
Actually, to tell you the truth, I had absolutely had no clue what this movie was about until I read the back of this video case. The reason is that the production values are so bad that I barely couldn't make out what some of the characters were saying and doing.
2 out of 4 stars
September 20, 2013
Going With The So-Called Director's Cut (Titled Redux In The UK). This Version Of The Film Is Just The First Film With Segments Every So-Often Of Ulli Lommel (Director Of The First Film), As Mickey Lombard, Being Interrogated As A Suspect To The Murders Of The First Film.
I Would Love To See The Original Version By Director Bruce Starr As Some Segments Of The Original Were Used At A Sped Up Pace & You Couldn't See What Was Happening. Sadly This Original Has Been Apparently Destroyed.
April 3, 2012
It was a decent follow-up.
July 9, 2010
Okay seriously, this is weird. The original Boogeyman was a decent horror flick. Then egotistical director Ulli Lommel decided to make a sequel that also gets banned. This sequel is 50% new material and 50% flashbacks of the original. Lame you might say. Things get worse. Years later he decides to release a Director's Cut, where he inserts even more footage of the original, plus pretentious and boring footage of himself talking, and ironically the only footage we get of the actual Boogeyman 2 is shown in fast-forward. What the fuck? Bottom line is: if you want to see Boogeyman 2, avoid the Director's Cut at all costs. Hunt down the hard-to-find original sequel and then be underwhelmed by the silly deaths involving electric toothbrushes and car tail-pipes. The new deaths begin at 54 min into the picture. They try and be clever with their self-referential approach but end up being ultra cheap in their effects and execution.
November 22, 2011
Im not overtly a fan of the first Boogeyman mostly because the pacing is a bit whack but it's sequel is a piece of shit. Strictly a cash in on the original there is hardly a movie here. Clocking in @ less then 80 minutes half of this is flashbacks & what remains is so low budget, poorly written, acted & structured it makes Wes Craven (who pulled the same bullshit) w/ The Hills Have Eyes 2 look respectable. Now I shouldn't shit on a movie too much that is riddled w/ flashbacks because I love Silent Night Deadly Night 2 but that movie is high entertainment gold. Boogeyman 2 is like diarrhea in a film can. Ulli Lommel is a whore that takes it in the shitter. He may think that he's thumbing his nose @ Hollywood but you know he really wants to give them a blow job just for the money
September 28, 2011
Awful, just fucking awful, filled with recycled footage from the first film.
February 23, 2009
Bought but not yet watched
November 10, 2010
Didn't mind it actually.
November 10, 2010
Not needed and it's just pointless.
November 10, 2010
i watched this together with my friends on cinemas i'd treat them. the twist of the story is good. major lesson is to overcome your fears.. the person who'd is think is good ..is the person responsible for all the creepy stuff happened on the hotel/ apartment. thats the twist and the mask oh the mask is quite scary.
|● Nate &||
July 2, 2008
i cant say it was better then the first one but i cant say it was worse either. i guess it was about the same. i liked it though! =D
December 3, 2008
didnt know there was an older version, gotta find it to see if its good
July 2, 2009
It was good and a freaky Thriller for a Saturdae Night~ Liked the idea~ it was cool~
|Diego, Martín P||
May 4, 2009
Para ver como continua después de la 1, esta Buena, tiene mas sentido , porque no es imaginario
March 20, 2009
atleast it was better than the third....