IGN.com|AskMen.com|Rotten Tomatoes|GameSpy|FilePlanet|TeamXbox|CheatsCodesGuides|GameStats|Direct2Drive

RottenTomatoes.com

Register | Log In | What is RT?
It's our 10th birthday, so you get presents!
Home Movies DVD Celebrities News Critics Photos & Trailers The Vine Forums
Features | Columns | Guides
RT Search Powered by Google
 
RT News / Columns / Weekly Ketchup
Weekly Ketchup: Damon to Be Bourne Again, Statham to Make Another Trip as The Transporter
Plus news about more superheroes jumping to the big screen.
by Greg Dean Schmitz | February 29, 2008
Blog Article | Discuss Article
THE THRILLING FOURTH ENTRY IN THE BOURNE TRILOGY

Way back in the 1990s when it was first announced that Robert Ludlum's Bourne trilogy was being licensed by Universal, it seemed to me like one of those situations where either a) they would never actually make The Bourne Identity or that even if they did, it probably wouldn't lead to Supremacy and Ultimatum. There are many, many cases of studios buying the rights to properties that could become a series of movies, but they don't actually happen (recent examples: Sahara, The Golden Compass, etc). However, with the movies proving to be huge hits, and their popularity only increasing with each new release, quite the opposite has happened, in relation to the original deal. See, Robert Ludlum only wrote three Bourne novels, but the economics of Hollywood suggest more of an interest in continuing to churn Bourne movies until people stop paying to see them. So, the news came out this week that Universal recently got Matt Damon and director Paul Greengrass to agree to return for a fourth Bourne movie.

Which brings me back to my set up: a fourth Bourne movie based on... what? It turns out that the Bourne series did indeed continue in novel form after Ludlum's trilogy (written by Eric van Lustbader, not Ludlum, who died in 2001), starting in 2004, which not-so-coincidentally was the year Supremacy was such a hit. So, I guess, they can base the 4th and 5th movies on van Lustbader's books. But, to me, it really does seem like the Bourne trilogy was a definite trilogy, and anything past what Ludlum actually wrote is just going too far. I would suggest instead that Universal find other Ludlum novels of a similar bent, and adapt those (with Matt Damon playing other Ludlum characters, if he's the secret ingredient), but that would require a level of risk easily avoided by riding the Bourne property into the ground until people start hating them, by movie #8 or so, I guess. The counter argument might be that the James Bond character has inspired 20+ movies, but there were also a lot more James Bond books actually written by Ian Fleming, with the majority of Bond movies actually being based on those novels. If Robert Ludlum had actually written a dozen Bourne books, this would be a moot point, but he didn't.


THE TRANSPORTER: SEXIER THAN FED EX, COOLER THAN "THE BROWN"

Speaking of action trilogies involving guys who kick people in the face a lot, Jason Statham will start filming soon on The Transporter 3, although this time with a new director, since Louis Leterrier has moved on to much, much bigger action heroes (The Incredible Hulk). Leterrier's replacement has such an extremely awesome name, Olivier Megaton, that it sort of doesn't matter that this is his first movie. It's a name that will seriously come back to haunt him in bad review puns if the movie sucks, though. Apparently, there is also a Crank 2 movie in the works too, which should surprise no one because like the Transporter series, Crank is a very easy concept to franchise, within a budgeting scale that is nicely relative to their box office and DVD potential. Plus, Jason Statham is just a cool guy to watch in action movies (that don't involve the words Dungeon Siege, at least). Transporter 3 will film in France and Russia, aiming for a 2009 release date.


FOX STEPS IN THE RING WITH THE WORLD RASSLIN'... WHATEVER THE "E" STANDS FOR

20th Century Fox announced this week a deal with WWE Films, which will produce at least one theatrical movie a year (and up to 4 direct-to-video titles) starring entertainers from the World Wrestling Entertainment lineup. The deal will start with an action movie called 12 Rounds, starring John Cena, and directed by Renny Harlin (Die Hard 2, Deep Blue Sea, and lately, several movies that were not as awesome). I'm not a professional wrestling fan, but as a comic book fan, I can "get" the appeal of the form. The thing that is interesting to me about this deal is how it continues the pattern by which the WWE has handled and/or represented its stars in their transition to feature films for the last 10 years or so, is how it focuses on the wrestler as a personality, but not as their actual character (for the most part). What I mean is that a guy like, say, Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson has starred now in many movies, but he never actually made a "The Rock" movie so we can, you know, smell what he's cooking. I don't know that avoiding making movies about "rasslers" as their characters is necessarily a bad idea, but it's just something I notice that they are visibly steering away from. The WWE (and the other wrestling groups) are regularly populated with fictional characters that are probably at least as viable creatively as a lot of comic books, video games, action figures and now, board games, plus they have actual people who already play these characters. Of course, now I have to take responsibility if they actually do make an Undertaker or Gran Luchadore movie, and they, well, suck. So, perhaps Fox does know what they're doing, heh.


VERILY, THOU DOTH ATTEST TO THE AWESOMENESS OF THOR?

Comics2Film ran a script review of Thor, which may be the next of Marvel's Avengers after Iron Man to get his own big screen treatment, and I have to say that it really reads as a treat to someone who grew up reading Thor's adventures as a kid, both in Midgard (Modern Earth) and in Asgard (the mythical home to Norse gods, trolls, dwarves, elves, dragons, etc). Rather than going a "fish out of water" route, showing Thor in our modern world, this script focuses on Thor's life as a Norse god, fighting his half-brother Loki and other evils of Norse mythology, and it sounds huge and awesome. Filming is hoped to start in late 2008 in the United Kingdom, directed by Matthew Vaughn (Stardust), from a script by Mark Protosevich (I Am Legend), with casting for Thor, Loki, Odin, the Warriors Three and various other Asgardians not yet announced.


BILLY BATSON AND THE TITLE THAT DOESN'T AT ALL RIP OFF HARRY POTTER

Comedy director Peter Segal has been doing a lot of talking to the nerd press corps this week at Wonder Con and elsewhere about Get Smart, and they've been tripping over their Mary Marvel action figures to ask him about the Shazam! movie that he's been attached to for several years, and which appears to possibly be his next project. One might suspect the movie could be in trouble with New Line's recent closing and redefinition as a "genre" branch of Warner Bros, but Warner Bros and DC Comics are corporate kin, so I suspect that will solve that problem. Anyway, a lot of what Segal is saying is stuff that we've already heard (that he wants Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson to play Captain Marvel's sort of evil mirror opposite, Black Adam, for example) and P.R. babble about how Captain Marvel is such an iconic character, blah blah blah. I should note that my cynicism stems not from a dislike of Captain Marvel and the Shazam legacy, but indeed, because I am a fan, and don't really look forward to seeing its movie version being a "kids comedy", even if the main character is indeed a pre-teen boy. Anyway, Segal revealed to IESB.net that the new title of the project previously just referred to as Shazam! is now Billy Batson and the Legend of Shazam!, which to me just seems like a way of marketing the movie as "Harry Potter... but as a superhero", which I guess works in a cynical way, but since Billy Batson has never been the title character in 60+ years of publishing, it just seems weird. Ideally, I'd love the movie to just be called Captain Marvel, but they can't use that title because of decades long legal problems with Marvel Comics. Peter Segal also mentioned at the Wonder Con press conference that he thinks Steve Carell would make a great Captain Marvel, and I really, really hope he was kidding. Captain Marvel is a huge, buff guy (arguably bigger, physically, in the comics than Superman). Steve Carell... is not.


THE GREATEST AMERICAN HERO... OF 1981

A few weeks ago, Moviehole.net ran a story that casting was underway for a Greatest American Hero movie, with filming to start in July in Arizona. Well, I've received a tip that Ian Ziering (from 90210 and Dancing with the Stars) has apparently let slip that he recently went to a casting call to star as Ralph Hinkley, the goofy blonde teacher who is the beneficiary of the red alien-designed suit with all the wacky powers. While I suppose it's possible Ian Ziering could make the transition from a career mostly spent on the small screen, I'm thinking instead that perhaps this Greatest American Hero movie is actually a TV movie, sort of in the spirit of the recent Knight Rider TV movie. Having said that, in the past (and the project has been bubbling around for many years), it always seemed like the goal was a big screen Greatest American Hero movie, but that's also what they used to say about Knight Rider.


THIS SUBTITLE WILL NOT MAKE ANY INSENSITIVE FAIRY JOKES

Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson is continuing to make kids movies instead of the awesome action movies one might imagine he would be perfect for, right now, before his weight shifts from his pecs to his six pack, his guns to his guts, oh, I could go all day with these puns. Anyway, Disney's Witch Mountain remake and the kid-friendly Shazam! movie mentioned above will be joined by The Tooth Fairy, a family comedy from the director of the last two Santa Clause movies, and it will attempt to give the Tooth Fairy concept a big Hollywood visual treatment, complete with a mythical land of tooth fairies, etc. Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson will play the everyman hero of the movie, if "everyman" looked like he could rip the Los Angeles phone book his bizarrely bright teeth.


NO ONE WILL EVER MAKE AN I'M F***ING GREG DEAN SCHMITZ VIDEO

Following up on the hooplah of the Sarah Silverman/Matt Damon and Jimmy Kimmel/Ben Affleck videos which I'm sure most of our readers are well familiar with by now, Kevin Smith got into the game this week, with a song/spoof featuring Seth Rogan and Elizabeth Banks (looking a LOT like Parker Posey), the stars of his next movie, Zack and Miri Make a Porno. Unlike the ABC-sponsored spoofs, Smith's song has no bleeps over the F***s, and honestly, isn't quite as funny (probably more of a symptom of the joke getting old by the third version), but... it does get you into the spirit of the movie, I think.


SHAKING OUT THE REST OF THE KETCHUP IN THIS WEEK'S BOTTLE

  • The next Step Up movie, will not just be Step Up 3, it will be Step Up: 3D, aiming for a 2009 release. I can't help but imagine a theater of creepy middle-aged guys wearing 3-D glasses ogling this movie's young stars. But hey, they paid for their tickets, right?

  • Casting is underway for De2cent (does an "S" really look like a "2"? really?), which will apparently feature one of the girls from the first movie returning to the cave, looking for survivors, which of course, is a plan that always works out just great in horror movies featuring man eating beasties.

  • Likewise, Jeepers Creepers 3: The Creeper Walks Among Us is casting up for a summer, 2008 start, with the frequently awesome Ray Wise (AKA Laura Palmer's dad, the devil from Reaper) reprising his role from the second movie the first to be announced. Director Victor Salva is apparently making his case with MGM that the first two movies were cheap to produce, and did well theatrically in their Labor Day slots, so hey, why not go for a three-peat instead of direct-to-video like so many horror sequels do these days (*cough*LakePlacid2*cough*).

  • The remake of The Stepfather is also casting up, with Dylan Walsh from Nip/Tuck taking on the challenge of being as creepy and terrifying as Terry O'Quinn (John Locke from Lost) was in the original version.

  • Casting is underway for a Julianne Moore-starring thriller called Shelter, and the specificity for people with "unique" looks is upsetting people in West Virginia, who are (rightly) tired of once again being stereotypically associated with "inbreeding" and "freaks."

  • The voice cast for Hoodwinked 2: Hood vs Evil, the sequel to the relatively-low-budget CGI Shrek-ish 2005 comedy has been announced, and it is headed by Hayden Panettiere (replacing Anne Hathaway), and also includes Glenn Close, Martin Short, Andy Dick, Patrick Warburton, Joan Cusack, Brad Garrett, Wayne Newton, David Alan Grier, Bill Hader and Amy Poehler.

  • Lindsay Lohan and Jack Black will be costarring in Ye Olde Times, a romantic comedy about two couples competing against each other somehow in the hound-eateth-hound world of renaissance faires. Expect lots of jousting-leading-to-groin-injuries and girls with comedically plunging necklines, I would guess.

  • The all-CGI version of Astro Boy (from the same company that made the recent TMNT movie) landed its star this week, in the form of British child star Freddie Highmore (The Spiderwick Chronicles).

  • Justice League of America appears to still be in the works, aiming for a 2009 release instead of 2010, with AICN reporting this week that George Miller may be casting one of his Mad Max actors, Hugh Keays-Byrne as the Martian Manhunter. And there are reports that filming may shift to Canada and Australia, and that additional work is being done on the script that may insert Batman and/or Superman back into the cast after all.

  • Script work is also underway for a Green Lantern movie, but it sounds (thankfully) like the focus will be on Hal Jordan, the "Silver Age" version which I think remains the most iconic, creating a situation where Common plays one version in the JLA movies, and another actor will play a different one in the GL movies. I professed my love for Hal Jordan in a recent column, so obviously, I'm perfectly FINE with this news in a week that has sort of battered me with downers.

  • Gerard Butler (300) confirmed this week that he is indeed working on Watchmen, in the form of providing lead voice work for the Tales of the Black Freighter animated short that will be produced as a side project. In the world of Watchmen, superhero comic books never became popular because who needs them, when they exist in real life? Instead, pirates are extremely popular comic book characters, with the Black Freighter story parallelling elements of the Watchmen narrative. Expect the short on the DVD for sure, and hopefully online or something as well, timed with the release, I would hope.

  • A movie tip from the New York Post's Page Six should always be taken with a grain of salt, but they are reporting that Leonardo DiCaprio and Mark Wahlberg may be costarring together a third time (after The Basketball Diaries and The Departed) in a dramatic version of Cocaine Cowboys, a documentary about the drug/crime scene in early 1980s Miami, which arguably is what inspired Michael Mann to create a TV show called Miami Vice. I think they're both great actors, and will probably be perfect for this movie, if it's a real project, but Leo and Marky Mark should probably avoid the temptation to don pastel suits and five day stubble.

  • On the set of another movie, CHUD.com got the scoop this week of how casting is going on Cadillac Records, which is actually a multi-biopic about the founding of seminal blues record label Chess Records, with Adrien Brody playing Leonard Chess himself, and his musician friends including Muddy Waters (Jeffrey Wright), harmonica legend Little Walter (Columbus Short), Willie Dixon (Cedric the Entertainer), Etta James (Beyoncé Knowles) and the as-yet-uncast Chuck Berry (who you would think would be a pretty major character).


And that was the week that was. I felt like it was sort of one of those clunkers where I felt cynicism ruling over my reactions to the news a lot more than I would like. Really, only Thor and Cadillac Records strike me as movies I'm legitimately count-the-days looking forward to, and most of the other stuff ranges from optimistic ambivlence to... less than that. I remain basically a half-full kind of movie fan though, and hope that early March movie news will be, if just a little bit, less... whatever this week was.

Write me via my MySpace page with any hot news or whatever you want to share: http://www.myspace.com/gregdean88.

Greg Dean Schmitz

Bookmark and Share
Comments (1-20 of 41 posts) | Reply
510801
cahbauer writes:
on Feb 29 2008 05:13 PM

I'm interested to see in which direction they take Bourne. So I'm somewhat looking forward to a fourth Bourne movie. And about time with Transporter 3 and Crank 2. Statham is the most under-rated action star in Hollywood, in my opinion.

(Reply to this)
519024
rambo- killer #2 writes:
on Feb 29 2008 05:19 PM

I didn't like any of the Bourne movies, but respected the ground they broke. Making a fourth is an incredibly stupid idea especially after ultimatum was such a hit. Only further proof of how hollywood is ready to run any series into the ground.

(Reply to this)
523114
Teh_Director writes:
on Feb 29 2008 05:30 PM

Statham is the new age jean claude van damme when it comes to kick *** action movies. The movies he does don't have to be awesome, but he has been awesome in them!

as for bourne... lets not try and make gold out of bronze


(Reply to this)
523122
Ghost_Dog writes:
on Feb 29 2008 06:06 PM

Greg, the second and third Bourne films have nothing to do with Ludlum's sequels and are actually a lot more coherent (and, in my opinion, engaging) as a series. So the "based on what?" angle is maybe not the best basis for criticism. How about based on three very high quality hit movies? That seems like a pretty solid foundation.

As for milking the franchise, who cares as long as they're good? I mean, how many Bond movies are there? Granted, quality hasn't exactly been consistent across the last 20 films, but history proves movie audiences--like television, novel, and comic book audiences--are willing to go back to the same characters and universes for decades as long as the entertainment value is there.


(Reply to this)
427266
mouse_clicker writes:
on Feb 29 2008 06:12 PM

The thing is, only the first Bourne movie was even remotely based on anything Ludlum wrote, the other two were just rather effective in their immitation of the style. Considering they've been doing just fine coming up with entirely original plots for the Bourne movies, I see no reason for the 4th one to suddenly be directly adapted from any novel, by Ludlum or anyone else.

-Moses


(Reply to this)
441398
ilovemygoatee writes:
on Feb 29 2008 06:12 PM

Why can't Hollywood come up with original ideas. Bourne was amazing but leave it at the trilogy. And I'm so sick of trilogies anyway. Why can't we get an awesome one time movie and then people can move on to something else. Stop making sequels to superhero movies, stop making sequels period. Oh well no one important will ever read this post so it doesn't mean anything. Stupid sequels.

(Reply to this)
229906
ZiGyStRdUsT writes:
on Feb 29 2008 07:13 PM

Same director and Matt Damon, check. Now they just need a good script and I will not complain.

(Reply to this)
Shadowflare writes:
on Feb 29 2008 09:11 PM

While I'm sure they'll find a way to make the next Bourne movie awesome, I don't think they should make another one. I loved the trilogy, but I'm fatigued and I'm not a fan movie series' that stretch past three, because sometimes, even two is too many. I know these were exceptional movies, but whatever happened to the concept of going out on top? They only risk running the franchise into the ground.

And really, Bourne has unraveled his past already and knows who he is and everyone involved in wronging him is either dead or in prison. Where else is there to go?


(Reply to this)
17116
lpbreeze writes:
on Feb 29 2008 11:17 PM

nice writeups. A Thor movie will be tough to pull off but I was a big fan of Stardust and if the script is good then perhaps. As for Bourne whatever. Even though the third got great reviews I didn't bother seeing it until it got to dvd. You can't have him run around asking what is going on anymore. been there done that.

(Reply to this)
~*Admiral Snowstorm*~ writes:
on Mar 01 2008 06:49 AM

Well, I just hope the fourth Bourne won't be terrible. All three of the movies were quite well-received, and I'm impressed that it managed to maintain the acclaim all the way through. My only fear is, even if the fourth one does happen to be good and make a lot of money, that's just paving the way to a fifth Bourne, which could lead to a sixth, which could...yeah. However, Matt Damon strikes me as a rather smart guy. The moment he senses that this franchise is being run into the ground, I bet he'll quit. And no one will see a Bourne movie with Matt Damon, hopefully. The fact that he signed on at all shows me that he has hope that the fourth will be good, and, until I get confirmation that it will be terrible, I'll remain optimistic.

S = 2? They're completely backwards from one another. The 2 makes it look more like DeZcent than DeScent. But oh well, gotta find ways to work numbers into titles, haven't we? And anyhow, I'm more concerned about the movie than its title. The Descent impressed a lot of people with how good it was, so I hope the sequel doesn't ruin everything the original gave us. I'm not too hopeful, though, it sounds a lot like it will be a subpar teen slasher movie starring a blonde male lead and a blonde female lead who will fall in love sometime in the last twenty minutes.

The Creeper Walks Among Us...Now there's a pretty cool modification to a franchise name. I have to admit, Jeepers Creepers is a guilty pleasure of mine. The first hour is terrifying and I have no problem admitting it. I see occasional flashes of a good movie in the rest of the first movie and the entirety of the second, but I don't think I'd call either objectively good movies. I just like watching them. I expect the third will meet the same criteria, but hey, it could end up actually good if we're lucky. I don't expect it, but it would be cool.

Step Up 3D. Well that's killing two birds with one stone alright; a sequel in 3D and a continuous milking of an already abominable now-franchise.

No desire at all to see Hoodwinked 2.

Could Ye Olde Times actually be good? I doubt it, but it would be interesting to see Lindsay Lohan in a good movie. That hasn't happened since 2004 with Mean Girls.


(Reply to this)
459117
walkingdead09 writes:
on Mar 01 2008 07:10 AM

strathman is a douche bag

(Reply to this)
Uradik Smoke writes:
on Mar 01 2008 07:33 AM

The only reason I am on board with the idea of a 4th Bourne movie is the fact that the studio was able to get Damon AND Greengrass to commit to coming back ...

If one of them had said yes and the other no this would be a travesty of a film . But Greengrass has such an amazing grasp on these movies visual tone and concepts and Damon has made himself into the Bourne character that this will be another great chapter in the series ...

The last 2 movies were so loosely based on the books plots anyway that it became more about the concepts and ideals of The Bourne character and the style and visuals anyway .


(Reply to this)
282294
Fozzybear writes:
on Mar 01 2008 07:36 AM

Did anyone actually READ the Bourne novels? The movies - specifically Supremacy and Ultimatum bear little to no resemblance to Ludlum's trilogy. Still, I'm a little concerned since I thought the series was wrapped up pretty well in Ultimatum and I'm not sure if the whole "Bourne gets chased by a corrupt CIA" storyline will feel as exciting the fourth time. Oh well, I still know that whatever it's about, with Greengrass directing we'll get more of those bitchin' action sequences that made the sequels so much fun to watch.

(Reply to this)
519375
rayfinkle4 writes:
on Mar 01 2008 08:47 AM

the bourne news s perhaps the worst ive heard relating to movies in a long time. they ended the series, and well at that. whose going to be chasing bourne,and wheres the mystery since he already found out his name? dont sabotage a good thing. this is retarded.

(Reply to this)
thereign writes:
on Mar 01 2008 08:54 AM

I agree with Ilovemygoatee about making great one-shot films. Such a film was The Descent--which definitely does not need a sequel!!! The ending of the film(either theatrical or DVD) doesn't lend itself to a sequel, and this is just one more pathetic example of Hollywood trying to make a quick buck off of ANYTHING that was a financial success the first time around!

So impossibly f.ucking sad.


(Reply to this)
476834
Ghoulette writes:
on Mar 01 2008 10:02 AM

If I didn't know better, I'd think they were training John Cena to fill the stoic, unstoppable action hero void left by Steven Seagal. The Marine had a lot of the trademarks of a classic Seagal flick, except Cena lets himself take a hit every once in a while.

(Reply to this)
508104
wingnut171 writes:
on Mar 01 2008 10:08 AM

Considering that the Bourne movies didn't follow the plot of the books AT ALL, I don't think it'll be a problem. I never minded the total plot deviations much...it was just like I was watching movies not based on anything at all. On the other hand, they could just as well go back and make movies based on the actual plots. That would be cool.

(Reply to this)
429182
skankndaddy writes:
on Mar 01 2008 12:11 PM

The first bourne movie was similar to the first bourne book... the next two movies were nothing like the books... so they could make a fourth and fifth movie based on the 2nd and 3rd books... the problem there is that the 3rd book sucked. oh, and the two bourne books by vanlusterburgenhoover, whatever his name is, really suck!

(Reply to this)
107234
pinkincide writes:
on Mar 01 2008 01:43 PM

Damon joked the next Bourne movie would have to be called The Bourne Redundancy.

(Reply to this)
Eat.Before.We.Eat.You writes:
on Mar 01 2008 03:59 PM

In reply to this comment (#1609945)
I won't argue with you if you say Jason Statham is a douche bag, but "Strathman"? That's not even close.

(Reply to this)
Read More Comments
Page | 1 2 3
Post Your Comment
You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register.
Related Links
The Bourne Ultimatum
  • Posters
  • News
  • Forum
Related Articles
  • Fourth Bourne Movie Around the Corner 26
  • 2008 MTV Movie Award Nominations Announced 39
  • Total Recall: The 20 Greatest Fights Scenes Ever 266
  • Rush Hour 3 Takes '07 DVD Rental Crown 25
  • Weekly Ketchup: Damon to Be Bourne Again, Statham to Make Another Trip as The Transporter 41
  • Exclusive: Doug Liman Has Designs on Bond 36
  • Amy Ryan and Greg Kinnear Join Paul Greengrass and Matt Damon in the Green Zone 15
  • Awards Mania: Spirits, SAGs Get Waivers, Announce Nominations; Uncertainty Surrounds Golden Globes 10
  • Atonement, Control Lead London Film Critics Noms 8
  • RT on DVD: Take Harry Potter, Jason Bourne Home for the Holidays 4
Most Discussed
  • Holy Box-Office, Batman! Dark Knight Makes $66M On Record-Breaking Opening Day 144
  • Box Office Guru Wrapup: Kapow! The Bat Slams The Box Office 74
  • Review Revue: The Dark Knight vs. ABBA, Chimp Flicks 59
  • Box Office Guru Preview: Dark Knight Set For Gargantuan Grosses 41
  • Critics Consensus: The Dark Knight Is One Of The Year's Best-Reviewed 37
  • XXX3 to Revive Vin Diesel 26
  • Weekly Ketchup: Wanted, Monster Squad, and the New Watchmen Trailer 21
  • Transformers 2 Scribe Sets Record Straight 21
  • Clone Wars Series Details Revealed 16
  • RT on DVD: Geek Alert! Spaced Exclusive, Robot Chicken Star Wars 14
Latest News
  • Party with the Masters of the Web at Comic-Con! 0
  • Total Recall: Our Favorite Conspiracies 3
  • RT Photo Preview: What To Watch at Comic-Con 0
  • Exclusive: Death Race International Poster Revealed 10
  • RT on DVD: Geek Alert! Spaced Exclusive, Robot Chicken Star Wars 14
  • Transformers 2 Scribe Sets Record Straight 21
  • Brush Up On Your Shakespeare With Our List Of The Bard's Best Films 0
  • Brendan Fraser Geeks Out Over G.I. Joe Cameo 10
  • XXX3 to Revive Vin Diesel 26
  • Clone Wars Series Details Revealed 16
Latest Interviews
  • RT Interview: Ben Barnes on Taking on the Journey of Prince Caspian 0
  • RT Interview: William Moseley on His Last Narnia Adventure in Prince Caspian 2
  • RT Interview: Jack Black on Kung Fu Panda 6
  • RT Interview: Skandar Keynes on the Action Challenge of Prince Caspian 1
  • RT Interview: Anna Popplewell on a Different Side to Narnia in Prince Caspian 10
  • RT Interview: Keira Knightley on Welsh Accents and Life After Pirates 15
  • RT Interview: Sienna Miller on Dylan Thomas, G.I. Joe and Nottingham 2
  • RT Interview: Ben Affleck Goes After the Critics for a Change 34
  • Interview: Uwe Boll Talks Postal, Kevin Costner, and Answers Reader Mail 43
  • RT Interview: Joan Cusack on War, Inc., the Unofficial Sequel to Grosse Point Blank 6
Latest Features
  • Exclusive: Ben Burtt's WALL-E Sound Masterclass 1
  • Exclusive: The Storyboards of WALL-E 6
  • Exclusive: The World of WALL-E 10
  • Exclusive: Inside Pixar - A Photo Tour 14
  • Exclusive: Pixar's and Stars' Favourite WALL-E Moments 23
  • Guillermo del Toro - RT's Dinner and the Movies Interview 28
  • Total Recall: The 25 Best Action Heroines of All Time 125
  • Exclusive: Hellboy II Edit Suite Visit and Concept Art 7
  • Total Recall: The Best of Stan Winston 14
  • Exclusive Interview: Angelina Jolie Talks Wanted 31


About| Site Map| Help| RT To Go| Contact Us| Critics Submission| Linking to RT| Licensing| Movie List| Celebs List| Newsletter

IGN.com | GameSpy | Comrade | Arena | FilePlanet | ModCenter | GameSpy Technology
TeamXbox | Planets | Vaults | VE3D | CheatsCodesGuides | GameStats | GamerMetrics
AskMen.com | Rotten Tomatoes | Direct2Drive


By continuing past this page, and by the continued use of this site, you agree to be bound by and abide by the User Agreement.
Copyright 1998-2008, IGN Entertainment, Inc. About IGN | Support | Advertise | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | Subscribe to RT's XML feed! IGN RSS Feeds
IGN's enterprise databases running Oracle, SQL and MySQL are professionally monitored and managed by Pythian Remote DBA
Certain product data ©1995-present Muze, Inc. For personal use only. All rights reserved.