LQ Jones on A Boy and His Dog: The RT Interview
The veteran Sam Peckinpah player on his 1975 sci-fi classic.
Last week RT had the pleasure of visiting Western movie legend LQ Jones in his Hollywood home, shooting the breeze for a leisurely few hours in the subterranean office beneath his house. Out back, somewhere within the sweeping canyon below, Jones grows his own tomatoes -- or as he calls them, his "tomaters." With a soft Southern twang and an unusual openness about him, Jones sounds like a gentleman cowboy -- not surprising, if you've seen any of his supporting roles in classic Westerns like Hang 'Em High, Lone Wolf McQuade, or the five films he did for Sam Peckinpah: Ride the High Country, Major Dundee, The Wild Bunch, The Ballad of Cable Hogue, and Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid.
With such a career connection to the guns n' ponies genre, Jones -- who changed his name from Justus McQueen to that of the character he played in Battle Cry, his first film -- may have surprised some when in 1975 he wrote and directed the science fiction film A Boy and His Dog. Based on Harlan Ellison's novella of the same name, Boy tells the story of Vic (a baby-faced Don Johnson, on the brink of Miami Vice stardom), a teenage loner fighting for survival in the barren wastelands of post-apocalyptic America. Vic's only companion, a telepathic dog named Blood (voiced by Tim McIntire), helps him search out the only two necessities a young man needs in the wake of nuclear destruction: food and sex. But when Vic follows a young woman into an underground society where the old world traditions are still enforced, he finds the people below ground are just as sinister as those above.
LQ Jones shared with us stories of making A Boy and His Dog over three decades ago, what it was like to work with directing legends like Peckinpah and Martin Scorsese, and how he finds Hollywood is different these days. And while he may be biased, but he's not alone in finding similarities between his film and George Miller's Mad Max series, which followed Boy four years later.
Catch the re-release of LQ Jones' 1975 cult classic A Boy and His Dog (in a brand new print!) this Friday, February 8, at midnight at the Nuart Theater in Los Angeles, where LQ Jones will introduce the film, answer questions, and meet fans. For more information, check out the Nuart website.

What do most people call you?
LQ Jones: It's one of those strange things. I know what you call me from where I knew you. I had one nickname in college, one in high school, one in Nicaragua, one here. In high school it was Mac; in college it was DoDo. In Nicaragua it was Senior Jefe. Here it's LQ. But you can call me anything that pleases you.
Ok, I'll stick with LQ. You can call me Jen. Do many people call you Justus?
LQ: Only if I owe 'em money.
You've had that name for a while.
LQ: Since '54. Why in the hell would you change your name from Justus McQueen to LQ Jones? It doesn't make any sense! But the studio wanted to do it, and I said as long as you make the checks out, what do I care?
But when I did Battle Cry, the author of it was doing quite well. He was very famous, because it was the second best-selling book of World War II. We got to be fairly good friends, and I said the studio wants to change the name - why don't I change it, and as soon as they start using it and as soon as they do, let's sue them! He said, "That's a marvelous idea!" So I changed my name and he went off and wrote Exodus, and I never heard from him again.
Let's talk about A Boy and His Dog!
LQ: A Boy and His Dog has been chosen by a lot of critics as the best science fiction picture ever made. Well, that's BS. But it's a lot better than having them say it's the worst motion picture ever made. But first of all, it won the Hugo. A Boy and His Dog, other than Disney [movies], is the only motion picture ever made to go out two times, worldwide, successfully. One [release] was in '75; one was in '82. Now we're gonna go back out again.
You've seen the picture -- how did you see it?
On DVD.
LQ: You did not see it. A Boy and His Dog used scope. And we used scope like no picture has ever used it before or since. [On DVD] you're not seeing it all, because to put it into the format for television, and eventually DVD, you have to do what they call pan and scan. So you're losing a quarter of the picture!
There are a lot of details one notices more on second viewing...
LQ: I almost got too smart for myself. Because I did not want a picture like today, they tell you A) what you're seeing, B) What you saw, and C) why you liked it. I don't like that -- I like to put it on the screen, and if you liked it, super. If you don't like it? Super. I don't care. Because everything that's there I wanted you to see.
People are not sure, but it is a very intricately designed little picture. Doesn't look like it, looks like you shot it out of a garage. But it's very carefully scripted and shot; in the beginning, if you missed something, you're dead. In the end, if you missed something, you're dead. I've seen it in front of audiences as small as one person; I've seen it with an audience as big as 14,000 people -- in an outdoor football stadium. And I found out, the problem with it is, people did not see and understand enough of it the first time. And on average, it takes about four times to see the picture, to see everything. Probably on average, and I'm very happy with this, half of the people adore it. Half of the people detest it. And I don't care whether it's either one for you because if I can make you mad, then I've earned your money. If I can titillate you, then I've earned your money.
|
Falion writes: on Feb 06 2008 09:17 PM Excellent interview! A Boy and His Dog is one of my favorite science fiction films, so it was great to hear some of the "behind the scenes" stories, and LQ came across as a very genuine person. (Reply to this) |
|
Punishingwombat writes: on Feb 06 2008 11:21 PM I think this came off as a little nuts, but he made this movie so i guess it figures. Who ever called "A Boy and His Dog" the best sci-fi ever? (Reply to this) |
|
acton acton writes: on Feb 06 2008 11:50 PM um my dad gave me this for christmas and well I am a big fan of sci fi from the 60s to somewhat of the present ones and i was truly bored in this film, It may have been great for its time but not this time, its just like a clockwork orange or 2001 space crapecy, I could not stand either of those, who cares about the cinematography if the story and the acting sucks the film sucks, you need all 3 to make a good film, the underground people were just about what everyone in the 60s thought the future would look like its called lueds and cocaine both big back then and everyone was out of there gord. Also the sound, the VO's were terrible and the sound effects just as bad. (Reply to this) |
|
lpbreeze writes: on Feb 07 2008 12:10 AM I tried watching it and got bored. worth reading though. maybe to kill sometime some people will find the movie worth watching. me i watch duck tales (Reply to this) |
|
pitulah writes: on Feb 07 2008 05:55 AM I read the coments posted by different people here and generally I am entertained, if not a little amused. However, as I read to comments about the interview with LQ Jones, I came across a comment posted by 'acton acton'. Please do not leave comments if you have no interest in movies. Your flippant remarks about 2001 and A Clockwork Orange betray your ignorance and lack of understanding of serious cinema criticism. Please forgive me if this comes across as a personal attack. It is not meant to be. It is only a quiet tirade against comments placed by individuals who obviously have no understanding of cinema and its' place in the history of popular culture. I have seen too many comments left on Rotten Tomatoes that extoll the virtues of quick, cheaply made movies and dinegrate the efforts of smaller, more intelligent movies. An open call to all film viewers...Take the time to understand what you are viewing; don't merely accept things, especially film, at face value. We are all better than that. (Reply to this) |
|
Ashron writes: on Feb 07 2008 07:01 AM I will second what Pitulah said. Although I personally did not like 2001, I can appreciate what Kubrick was trying to say with it and accept it as a masterwork of film making, so let's be a little careful about tossing around derisive remarks. However, I will agree with ActionAction that A Boy and His Dog was not all that. I remember seeing it at the midnight movies as a teenager and absolutely loving it. My friend and I probably saw it a dozen times and we even created Dungeons and Dragons characters called Vic and Blood (I know, we're geeks) But I rented it the other day and watched it, and it really doesn't hold up very well. The acting is pretty bad and the editing is atrocious. But hey, it was the 70s, low budget, so what can you expect? (Reply to this) |
|
Jen Yamato writes: on Feb 07 2008 02:22 PM You've also got to give LQ some credit for visualizing the post-apocalyptic world following nuclear war as a barren desert/mudland...it's kind of hard to dismiss the similarities between ABAHD and the Mad Max movies, so maybe he is right, George Miller "borrowed" quite liberally from his film. It is pretty morbidly funny as well. Especially that killer ending. (Reply to this) |
|
acton acton writes: on Feb 07 2008 09:46 PM In reply to this comment (#1559744) um I am a film maker I direct write and edit. I know what a good film is. I said those films were great for their time because that was all that was around. Its like people saying they really enjoy audrey H. all actors in the B/W days did not know how to act but its all that was around. So then it was good. A boy and his dog would be great if that was remade and Since he is still alive have LQ direct it. Make it brighter as a nuclear daytime would look like. I look at this I used to love Space Raiders an early 80's sci-fi by Lucas entertainment, I watched it now and tossed it, the momentem is gone. I'm not insulting I am expressing my opinion not fact(s). (Reply to this) |
|
knowingtoast85 writes: on Feb 16 2008 11:01 PM I thought "A Boy and His Dog" was hilarious and it got me thinking. I went to the NuArt screening a couple of weeks ago, and LQ was there, still lively, anecdotal and irascible. He told us that we'd better like the movie, because whether we did or didn't, it would be stuck in our heads for a long time. To that, I have to say he's right. I understand there are some complaints about the strangely misogynistic undertones in the movie, and they're not unfounded. But LQ and his cinematographer had planned to make a sequel, "A Girl and Her Dog," that would have turned the tables a bit, but the been-there-done-that factor sort of put the kibosh on things. The movie has a lot of subtlety in all the seemingly empty space. This, I would wager, is how it "doesn't hold up." (Reply to this) |
|
ronm writes: on Feb 29 2008 09:47 AM Humm, I'm a bit late getting in on this discussion, but I have to say I agree with Pitulah and others who suggest that, one should poo-poo sci-fi movies like A Boy and His Dog, 2001, A Clockwork Orange, and may I add Logan's Run, and Silent Running, at the risk of exposing your own naivety. What these landmark films had in common was their vision. Today, with our jaded view of what makes a good motion picture, these films may seem lacking. Where's the huge special effects, state-of-the-art CGI, 5.1 surround, and brake-neck pacing that we now expect from blockbuster films. That's not the point with these pictures; the point is the themes, images, and emotions these films delivered in a manner unlike any ever before. These films broke ground in their day. No, they aren't perfect, some have glaring blemishes, but all had that one thing that stuck in your head. I remember feeling a little uneasy because it was unfamiliar. I suppose, if you didn't see them when they were first released as I did, it would be easy to dismiss them as cheesy, quaint, or even boring, and unworthy of special notice. Perhaps some are placed a bit too high on the pedestal, and maybe some don't stir the imagination as well today as they did back in the day when they first pushed the envelope, but that doesn't diminish their importance. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |







