Movies were probably at one point considered to be a major threat to literature but, looking back, the two mediums have a pretty healthy working relationship going on. Directors and actors love to portray a good author, wellsprings of emotion and passion that they are, slaving over little words that build to world-changing proportions. The latest example is Jane Campion's Bright Star, the story of 19th century poet John Keats and his fiery romance with Fanny Brawne, and now that it's out in theaters, why not join us as we thumb through history, discovering cinema's 10 most brilliant portrayals of writers on screen.
Franz Kafka in Kafka
Despite his stature as one of the most influential writers of the 20th Century, Franz Kafka's dense, ambiguous prose doesn't translate well to the big screen (though Orson Welles' moody, darkly comic take on The Trial is a rare exception). Fresh from the success of sex, lies and videotape, Steven Soderbergh tried to get around the problem posed by Kafka's works by crafting a thriller that merged the man's writings with the outlines of his life. The result, Kafka, starring Jeremy Irons in the title role, mixed elements of film noir and German Expressionist cinema with a plot that included thriller and sci-fi elements. At the time of its release, critics bristled, calling the result shapeless and pretentious. In retrospect, Kafka was a noble attempt to adapt the complexity of Kafka's work to the movies, and it hinted at Soderbergh's genre experiments to come.
J.M. Barrie in Finding Neverland
Most know Scottish author J.M. Barrie best as the creator of Peter Pan, whose adventures were first chronicled in a play, then in the novel Peter and Wendy, and ultimately in the animated Disney adaptation of the novel. What many people didn't know, at least until Finding Neverland came out in 2004, was that the character was inspired by Barrie's close relationship to the five sons of Arthur and Sylvia Llewelyn Davies. Barrie befriended the boys and formed an affectionate bond with their mother, even becoming one of the boys' legal guardians after both parents passed away. Finding Neverland depicts this relationship and its influence on Barrie's work, from the moment he first meets the boys in Kensington Gardens to the debut of Peter Pan, or The Boy Who Wouldn't Grow Up, providing a heartwarming depiction of the power of imagination.
Truman Capote in Capote
Years before the huge success of his "non-fiction novel" In Cold Blood, Truman Capote had already staked out a distinctive place in Hollywood. He wrote the screenplays for the cult favorites Beat the Devil and The Innocents, and the movie version of his novella Breakfast at Tiffany's was a huge hit. However, Capote's distinctive speaking voice and mannerisms were so unique that it wasn't until the mid-2000s that anyone dared to mount a full-fledged Capote biopic. Capote starred Phillip Seymour Hoffman in as the writer on his quest to create a new kind of writing with his coverage of a brutal Kansas murder, and Hoffman won praise for his camp-free, three-dimensional portrayal of a great man of letters on the verge of a masterpiece. (2006's Infamous, starring Toby Jones as Capote, explored similar territory.)
Henry Miller in Henry & June
For those who like their smut to have a literary bent, Henry Miller and Anaïs Nin should be required reading. And for those who like racy movies that don't involve pizza deliverymen and insipid dialogue, Henry & June is for you. The first film to get stamped with the notorious NC-17 rating, Henry & June chronicles the scintillating (and artistically fruitful) love triangle between Miller (Fred Ward), his wife June (Uma Thurman), and their good buddy Nin (Maria de Medeiros) in the heady days of 1930s Paris. Miller is hard at work on his legendary Tropic of Cancer, and derives inspiration (and help getting published) from Nin, who in turn is attracted to both Millers. Though it may not be as shocking now as it was upon release, Henry & June remains both an intriguing examination of the artistic process and a compelling erotic experience.
Charlie Kaufman and Susan Orlean in Adaptation
In Hollywood, it's difficult to find anyone more "meta" than Charlie Kaufman, and none of his work exemplifies this better than Adaptation, which is essentially a film about its own creation, the story of a writer attempting to write a story based on the writings of another writer. Whew! Nicolas Cage plays both Charlie Kaufman and his fictional twin brother Donald (who was nevertheless credited as co-writer of the film), and Meryl Streep offers an Oscar-nominated performance as Susan Orlean, the New Yorker staff writer whose book Kaufman was commissioned to adapt for film. As a fascinating piece of self-referential cinema, Adaptation appears to chronicle Charlie's battles with writer's block and low self esteem while simultaneously telling the story unfolding in Orlean's book, The Orchid Thief, until the two narratives collide. There are layers upon layers to peel back here, and for those willing to do so, the film is an insightful look into the creative process (specifically Kaufman's) and the relationships between writers and their subjects (specifically Orlean's).
|
Shiggy writes: on Sep 29 2009 05:47 PM Adaptation and Capote are the best films on this list. (Reply to this) |
|
Rash Hunt writes: on Sep 29 2009 06:07 PM BARTON FINK (Reply to this) |
|
RT-Ryan writes: on Sep 29 2009 06:41 PM Good movie, but he's not a real writer. (Reply to this) |
|
tomwaitsjr writes: on Sep 29 2009 06:43 PM THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD is in my list of top 100 movies of all time. I strongly recommend anyone to get it. Hardly anybody has seen this masterpiece about creativity, madness, and romance. . . BARTON FINK is awesome, but it's about a fictional author, not a real one, though I do think some kind of combination of Faulkner and maybe Fitzgerald shows up (Drunk guy, married to Judy Davis' character). (Reply to this) |
|
Barnaby T. writes: on Sep 29 2009 06:46 PM Nice topic for Total Recall. One problem though, Adaptation's T-Meter should be 91%, not 72%. (Reply to this) |
|
tomwaitsjr writes: on Sep 29 2009 06:53 PM Would QUILLS count in there? and I can't believe you missed this one: BASKETBALL DIARIES. (Reply to this) |
|
Runtun writes: on Sep 29 2009 07:21 PM @RT-Ryan True but John Mahoney does seem to be channeling William Faulkner, one of my favourite writers. On a related note I have heard murmurings of a Philip K Dick biopic in the works with Paul Giamatti as the sci-fi great. (Reply to this) |
|
tomwaitsjr writes: on Sep 29 2009 07:33 PM Runtun, Yah. I heard about the Dick bio-pic, and was very happy to hear about it, but, it's been so long I think it's stuck in developmental hell. All articles about it are old old old. . . http (Reply to this) |
|
JohnnyAza writes: on Sep 29 2009 07:44 PM I've seen The Whole Wide World and found the most interesting fact about Robert E. Howard was that he spoke his stories as he typed them. It was like he was telling the story to one in particular except himself. I found it oddly fascinating. Even tried it out for a while, but it didn't stick. Adaptation was confusing at 1st viewing; had to watch it several times before I understood everything. Nick Cage was brilliant and I seriously thought the Kaufman brothers were real lol The PKD biopic starring Paul Giamatti is interesting. Would definately check it out if it ever makes it to the screen. Quills is an absolute insane thrill ride. I wanna see that movie again. Cheers (Reply to this) |
|
Jeremy Bristol writes: on Sep 29 2009 07:46 PM Well, hell, what about American Splendor (Harvey Pekar)? Or documentaries like "Crumb" and "Dreams with Sharp Teeth" (R. Crumb and Harlan Ellison, respectively). (Reply to this) |
|
King Kubrick writes: on Sep 29 2009 07:59 PM Adaptation was great, but on the bottom wrung of Kaufman's work in my opinion. It really does not say much other than hollywood commercializes artistic vision. Yeah and birds go tweet. Still it's exceptionally well written and a great deconstruction of how hollywood bastardizes artistic vision. The screen writing seminar is particularly hilarious. (Reply to this) |
|
JohnnyJonJon writes: on Sep 29 2009 08:11 PM Meryl Streep didn't win the Oscar for Adaptation, though she was nominated. (Reply to this) |
|
Paints Hz Shirt Red writes: on Sep 29 2009 09:36 PM what about Dr.Gonzo!? He was a writer wasnt he? (Reply to this) |
|
jacog writes: on Sep 30 2009 12:06 AM Jane Austen in Becoming Jane, Beatrix Potter in Miss Potter Not a very well thought-out list, but then - it's a sponsored piece, so it just serves to serve the sponsor. (Reply to this) |
|
MADDAZ writes: on Sep 30 2009 12:33 AM In reply to this comment (#2549450) Yeah I agree. Hunter S Thomas should be on this list. Fear and Loathing and Where the Buffalo Roams should qualify. (Reply to this) |
|
Javier R. writes: on Sep 30 2009 12:38 AM Note to self: Watch ht (Reply to this) |
|
BatsInTheBelfry writes: on Sep 30 2009 12:55 AM Some good movies on here, but I've always thought Shakespeare in Love was one of the most overrated movies of all time. What about Naked Lunch? (Reply to this) |
|
King Kubrick writes: on Sep 30 2009 03:00 AM Just watched Kafka. A very very good film. It actually gave me a new respect for Steven Soderbergh. (Reply to this) |
|
martinscorsese25 writes: on Sep 30 2009 03:26 AM Donald Kaufman is much funnier... LOL... also, don't you just wish Depp would do alot of films much like Neverland... because, those are the kind of films where he REALLY acts... we rarely get to see him in dramatic roles. it is always the quirky weirdoes that he plays. if Depp can still be irressitably excellent on Dramatic roles then i can call him better than Penn, and he can become the "best working actor" today like almost all mainstream audiences are saying. ps. i don't compare Day-Lewis to other actors because he is on a leauge of his own. (Reply to this) |
|
martinscorsese25 writes: on Sep 30 2009 03:47 AM In reply to this comment (#2549404) @King Kubrick all of Kaufman's work is deep(though i have to say, Synecdoche is TOO deep). Adaptation has alot of layers in it that just isnt visible on early viewings. i mean, the difference between Jonze and Gondry is that, Jonze is so good, he makes Kaufman's films look like a normal comedy but smarter. while Gondry makes it more hard to understand that's why we keep watching Eternal Sunshine to get it more... We think Jonze's films doesnt have anything more to offer because they plainly look like all normal comedies but smarter. well, in fact they're about as deep as Eternal Sunshine. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |
















