Wednesday night's screening of The White Ribbon left the Cannes crowds shocked and stunned, and seems to have impressed every critic in attendance, with the film achieving 100% on the Tomatometer after nine reviews.
Directed by festival favourite Michael Haneke, the film follows the trials and tribulations of a Protestant village in northern Germany on the eve of World War I. Shot in beautiful black and white and performed by an incredible ensemble cast, the film has been roundly praised for is sensitive portrayal of some pretty shocking material.
Variety's Todd McCarthy is certainly a fan, writing that the film has "an absolute confidence and mastery of its own cinematic language, and the performances Haneke elicits from his first-rate cast, particularly the children, are eerily perfect."

The White Ribbon
The Telegraph's Sukdev Sandu concurs, stating "this is - by Haneke's normally icy standards - a surprisingly affecting forensic study of social breakdown."
What plot there is in the film revolves around a series of mysterious accidents taking place in the village, and Time Out's Dave Calhoun claims that while the perpetrator of the crimes remains a mystery, that doesn't really matter. "Once the film comes to a close," he writes, "You might be asking the same questions as early on: why are we watching these people? Why do they behave as they do? Who is behind a series of crimes they suffer? But, by then, you've been presented with a portrait of a place that is so rich, so detailed and so full of telling relationships and behaviour that you feel you have gained an understanding of the very essence of these people."

Haneke's film has critics talking Palme d'Or
And while Variety's Todd McCarthy calls it "a difficult film to embrace," he nevertheless states that the narrative "goes beyond its general analysis of humanity to implicitly suggest some tendencies in the German character and culture that could point to certain developments in the subsequent three decades."
Where it stands in terms of winning the Palme d'Or remains to be seen however. The film faces stiff competition from early favourites The Prophet, Fish Tank, Bright Star and the like, although Heat's Charles Gant believes it has a chance. "I think it's a mug's game trying to second-guess what the jury will decide," he says "But Haneke has never won the award before, and it's definitely a strong film."
Related Items
| Movie: | The White Ribbon |
| Celeb: | Michael Haneke |
|
martinscorsese25 writes: on May 23 2009 08:50 AM well... if Tarantino had more time to edit, maybe six months or more... Basterds is easily a Palm D'or winner... also if the film might not have been overhyped, critics would have loved it... the reason these films gets great reviews is because audiences and critics are usually shocked after seeing a great movie, thats why other great movies don't get great recognition is because critics want something that will blow them away... only 'The Dark Knight' achieve that. i imagined when critics saw Pan's Labyrinth... they might have been thinking this before watching... "The director of 'Hellboy'?! Mainstream filmaker in Cannes... hmm,. interesting." then afterwards seeing it might really have shocked them... LOL (Reply to this) |
|
Kidsmoker writes: on May 23 2009 03:38 PM In reply to this comment (#2494472) What are you talking about? Haneke is probably the biggest name at Cannes amongst critics. This is the 5th film he has shown in competition. The Piano Teacher won the Grand Prize in 2001 and Cache (Hidden) won him the best director award in 2005. Just because a film isn't from Hollywood doesn't mean that expectations are low. Haneke's new film probably had the highest expectations of any film there considering the international success (and artistic deviation) of Cache (Hidden). Have you even seen Basterds? How do you know it's "easily a Palm D'or winner"? Also, while del Toro might be a mainstream filmmaker now, he is known in Europe primarily for his eariler films like Cronos (played out of competition in 2001) and The Devil's Backbone. This makes me doubt that the critics at Cannes even gave a damn about his label of a "mainstream" filmmaker especially as Richard Linklater and Sofia Coppola had films in competition that year as well. (Reply to this) |
|
martinscorsese25 writes: on May 23 2009 09:57 PM In reply to this comment (#2495481) oh c'mon... do you really think they expect something big after 'Funny Games'? and besides, Tarantino is very boastful of his works... his been talking about the 'Basterds' for a decade now. expectations are very high when you're talking about a film for decades. please don't act smart saying other directors name... and also, i really don't think critics expect something as beautiful as what they saw when they watched 'Pan's Labyrinth'.. Cronos and The Devil's Backbone isnt as half as good as Pan's... and also, both of those films werent in-competion at Cannes... stop bragging about Cronos dude, it was OUT of competition... Indy 4 was Out of Competition too you know... LOL (Reply to this) |
|
soviet_spy writes: on May 24 2009 04:48 AM In reply to this comment (#2496127) Haneke definitely has more spotlight than Taratino, if that even matters. Besides, "Funny Games" was an English remake of his own film. No one thought his art declined just because he failed to top himself. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |



