Daniel Craig is the new 007, and he is one determined agent. He's grimy and dark, but stylish and sensitive. And he's really good at killing people.
Casino Royale (2006)
I am going to be honest here: the first and only time I saw Casino Royale two years ago, I was underwhelmed by it. Yes, I had certain ideas in mind about what Bond was like, and when Daniel Craig was chosen as the new 007, even I balked and thought, "I can't see how he fits into my perception of James Bond." When my friends all returned from a viewing, however, and told me how much they loved the movie, and how incredible Craig was, I decided I would give it a chance. At the time, I was disappointed, and I don't honestly recall why. I also retained very little from that movie, which is a testament to how little I cared for it. So, when I re-viewed it last night, I was blown away by how wrong I was.
Initially, I completely forgot that Casino Royale was meant to be a reboot of the franchise, so when the opening scene makes mention of Bond just recently being granted "double-0" status, it immediately jogged my memory. Similar revelations would occur later in the film when Bond "acquires" his classic Aston Martin DB5, and when he meets Felix Leiter (Jeffrey Wright) for the first time -- since I finally had some context, I reacted to this meeting with a giddy, "Ohhh, that's Felix Leiter!" This was a giddiness I didn't experience the first go-round, and it would characterize several moments throughout the film for me.
There were some things I noticed in Casino Royale that recalled elements from the series as a whole, and these were again things I didn't pick up on without the full context. First of all, while the early parkour chase scene was incredibly shot and choreographed, it demonstrated a continuance of Bond's habit of recklessness, as he not only destroys an entire construction site in Madagascar, but also storms into the grounds of an embassy and shoots an unarmed man on camera. Next, there's also the disposable mistress-of-a-bad guy who he beds for information and who ultimately gets iced. Then, there's the sophisticated nemesis who's not only asthmatic but also sports a freaky eye that "weeps blood." I don't point these out as flaws; on the contrary, they are dutiful homages to the franchise that reassure us we are indeed seeing James Bond, however different in tone he might be, and I was able to appreciate them in a way I couldn't when I first saw this movie. When Bond puts on a tux for the first time, for example, and his theme music rises in the background, I cracked a warm smile.
Then there's the Bond girl, Eva Green's Vesper Lynd, who plays a crucial role in the film and provides the kind of sexual tension only a few other Bond girls have been able to manage. Her conversations with Bond were some of the most fun dialogue in the movie, and her role was written convincingly enough that when Bond eventually falls for her, I bought it wholesale. The twist at the end adds an even deeper level to her character, making her one of the best Bond girls, period, if not the best.
I also enjoyed M's role in Casino Royale. Every time I thought to myself, "Gee, that was careless of him," or "There goes Bond's libido again," M pretty much echoed my thoughts and spat them directly at Bond herself. She plays the voice of reason in the movie, and she let me know that the writers were aware of many of the things I'd seen in the previous Bond movies and that this new Bond was bucking the system anyway. This only further reinforced the idea that Bond does not live in an alternate universe of loose logic and no consequences; he simply doesn't care, and he's going to do whatever he damn well pleases anyway. In other words, Bond is a badass.
Daniel Craig makes an intimidating 007, but he is not without humor, and Casino Royale isn't all blood and brooding. The action sequences are all pretty impressive, though some are better than others, and they are spaced out nicely by important plot elements that are engaging to watch in their own right. However, I thought Le Chiffre was a so-so villain, and I can understand some of the criticisms I've heard about this movie taking inspiration from the Bourne series. But I don't fault the makers of Casino Royale for wanting to take Bond in a new direction, because it feels more in line with what modern moviegoers are looking for in an action film. Audiences are smarter and more discerning now than ever, so it makes sense to reboot the franchise with material that hits harder. With all of this in mind, be sure to come back tomorrow for my thoughts on Quantum of Solace.
My favorite line: "Now the world's gonna know you died scratching my balls!"
My favorite moment: I loved the parkour chase. I thought it was breathtaking even the first time I saw it, and rewatching it last night was no different.
Other Articles:
- Day 1: Dr. No (1962)
- Day 2: From Russia With Love (1963)
- Day 3: Goldfinger (1964)
- Day 4: Thunderball (1965)
- Day 5: Casino Royale (1967)
- Day 6: You Only Live Twice (1967)
- Day 7: On Her Majesty's Secret Service (1969)
- Day 8: Diamonds Are Forever (1971)
- Day 9: Live and Let Die (1973)
- Day 10: The Man with the Golden Gun (1974)
- Day 11: The Spy Who Loved Me (1977)
- Day 12: Moonraker (1979)
- Day 13: For Your Eyes Only (1981)
- Day 14: Octopussy (1983)
- Day 15: Never Say Never Again (1983)
- Day 16: A View to a Kill (1985)
- Day 17: The Living Daylights (1987)
- Day 18: Licence to Kill (1989)
- Day 19: GoldenEye (1995)
- Day 20: Tomorrow Never Dies (1997)
- Day 21: The World Is Not Enough (1999)
- Day 22: Die Another Day (2002)
- Day 23: Casino Royale (2006)
- Day 24: Quantum of Solace (2008)
|
echa721 writes: on Nov 12 2008 04:36 PM I thought that Craig should've received an Oscar nod for his performance Also this movie probaly should've been nominated for best picture. There are a lot of similarities to the Bourne series. Nice mention about Vesper Lynd, I think she is the best of the 'bond girls'. I can't wait to see your review of 'QoS'!!! (Reply to this) |
|
utkipp1 writes: on Nov 12 2008 04:54 PM "Now the world's gonna know you died scratching my balls!" Greatest... Bond line... ever. (Reply to this) |
|
Shawndorman writes: on Nov 12 2008 05:00 PM Casino Royale is my favorite Bond. No, it's not because it's the newest. It's because it examines the character of Bond in a way no other Bond has dared to do. Daniel Craig is the best Bond because he brings so much depth to the role. Not only that, but the action scenes are explosive and breathtaking without being over the top. Casino Royale was a return to form for Bond, and I didn't realize how much I needed it until I saw the movie. I really hope and pray that Quantum of Solace isn't as bad as it's being made out to be. Looking forward to your review of it tomorrow!! (Reply to this) |
|
reavus4983 writes: on Nov 12 2008 05:03 PM In reply to this comment (#2126493) Agreed--of all of the giddy little laughs I had during CR, that was the one that made me burst. That was a truly bad *** thing to say at that moment. I'm not skeptical of Solace like some people are. It looks like the fast-paced version of Royale, which, in retrospect and occasional repeated viewings, gets boring quickly. I just want to see Bond kicking *** for 2 hours (or a bit less this time), with possibly some character development. All I really hope for is that they actually include the theme song this time, now that he's become the Bond we knew from before. (Reply to this) |
|
bamb0o-stick writes: on Nov 12 2008 05:07 PM I've always found the previous Bond movies to be a little corny. Casino Royale was the one movie that made me want to fantasize about being like Bond. Beating people up in a tux just got a way lot cooler (and stylish). (Reply to this) |
|
ZiGyStRdUsT writes: on Nov 12 2008 05:10 PM In reply to this comment (#2126479) Let's not go overboard. (Reply to this) |
|
jrod1978 writes: on Nov 12 2008 05:13 PM Outside of the opening scenes, I found myself bored with Casino the only time I saw this. After reading your review, I might give it another chance. Thanks. (Reply to this) |
|
indiefilmfan2 writes: on Nov 12 2008 05:16 PM I liked that the humor in Casino Royale was sarcastic rather than tongue-in-cheek. Yeah, there were some obligatory Bond homages, but there were also defiances such as Bond's reaction when asked at the casino how he wants his martini served. I admit to being one of the naysayers after Craig was announced as the Bond. Personally, I was routing for Clive Owen. But I'm glad I was wrong. Overall, an excellent movie and a decent Chris Cornell theme song. (Reply to this) |
|
Nielsen700 writes: on Nov 12 2008 05:18 PM I don't understand why everybody says the Craig Bond isn't funny. There are a lot of good lines in the movie if you ask me. (Reply to this) |
|
John D. writes: on Nov 12 2008 05:23 PM In reply to this comment (#2126500) Hi, The theme tune is in Solace apparently. As CR was a reboot he did not have double "o" status at the start, now he does and deserves the music. I hope they combine some more tech with the grittiness of CR for solace. I love the gadgets of Bond. Thanks for a great series Ryan. Is there anyone on your staff that has not seen the Star Wars saga? It would be great to see what someone thought of that watching them in order. Thanks (Reply to this) |
|
bwozar07 writes: on Nov 12 2008 05:26 PM Come on Ryan, you need to tack on the 1954 Casino Royale with Barry Nelson as 007 on the end of the series... Also I'd love to see more of these series if you have 'virgin' editors: Star Trek, Star Wars, Die Hard, Indiana Jones, Lethal Weapon, Godfather etc (Reply to this) |
|
Geoff O. writes: on Nov 12 2008 05:28 PM I already saw QoS two weeks ago in Britain. I agree with most of what the early reviews are saying. It's fun to watch, but it feels more like a Bourne knock-off but without much of a plot. If you haven't seen Casino Royale, QoS won't make any sense at all. That said, it's a revenge movie, so the whole point is Bond being pissed and taking it out on everyone. I might go see it a second time to see if my opinion changes much. I was floored by how great CR was, and QoS, while decent, certainly lacks the witty snap that pervades CR. The weirdest thing about it is that Bond really doesn't have a relationship with anyone other than M for the whole movie. Only after seeing it do you realize he doesn't really establish anything with anyone. I'll also say I was a bit let down that Solace had some sub-par CG work done to it, which detracted from the visceral feel of the entire piece. (Reply to this) |
|
CoreyT writes: on Nov 12 2008 05:32 PM Craig is the man. (Reply to this) |
|
martinscorsese25 writes: on Nov 12 2008 05:37 PM once you watch Quantum of Solace, the comparison between bond and bourne will be louder than ever... QoS was a good film, mainly because of Craig but there's a problem with the action sequences... the car chases were too blurry... don't get me wrong, i love blurry action sequences, it works well with hand combat, but with car chase, it was kinda irritating... you appreciate how well paul greengrass handles blurry action... cause in bourne films, from start to finish it was handheld, second by second editing and you get pumped up by it.. but in QoS, there we're steady shots, normal editing, good narative, then when action begins, it gets blurry.... i mean that's kinda irritating because it contradicts.... ahh well, i love the film so **** it! and well, you kinda get used to it when you get to the mid point of the film... but at first it was really irritating folks.... but all in all it is a solid film and one of the best bond films! (Reply to this) |
|
martinscorsese25 writes: on Nov 12 2008 05:44 PM well back to Casino Royale, i too love the dialouge in this film... i think it was Paul Haggis contribution to the script that made this the film that it is.. the two other writers were the writers of Die Another Day so it was good that Haggis came and made the script and bond more human... Ryan what about the line "James, i want you to know that if was all was left of you was your smile, and your little finger, you'll still be more man to me than anyone i've ever met." i mean, that's like a candidate for 100 best movie dialouge... also what Craig replies is gem.. "that's because you know what i can do with my little finger." hahahahahahahah LOL (Reply to this) |
|
martinscorsese25 writes: on Nov 12 2008 05:47 PM In reply to this comment (#2126500) they don't include that at all... the real bond starts after QoS... once you finish the film, you'll understand because there is a scene that will tease us. (Reply to this) |
|
Geoff O. writes: on Nov 12 2008 05:47 PM Ah, we can love Paul Haggis all we want, but he also had a hand in writing Solace... (Reply to this) |
|
Geoff O. writes: on Nov 12 2008 05:48 PM Ah, we can love Paul Haggis all we want, but he also had a hand in writing Solace... (Reply to this) |
|
ledawg1138 writes: on Nov 12 2008 05:58 PM I LOVE THIS MOVIE!!!!! I saw not long ago, and I was blown away. By far my favorite Bond and is in my top 25 favorite movies. Blends action, with drama, and humor. (Now the world will know Le Chiffre killed Bond scratching his balls.) As for Le Chiffre, I disagree with you Ryan. He makes a great villain. Second best behind Auric Goldfinger as far as villains go. And Eva Green, stole my heart AND aroused me. Now Ryan, regardless of what you say about the next Bond, I'm seeing it. Ryan, why don't you like Le Chiffre? And don't ignore the question! And, where does this rank on your favorite Bonds? AND, one last thing. Great article.:) "NO, NO! THE RIGHT ONE!" "... weeps blood..." (Reply to this) |
|
Boyo writes: on Nov 12 2008 05:59 PM Ryan, please tell me your not going to give away spoilers for Quantum?!?! I've bought my tickets for Friday night, and after reading some other people give away spoilers, I'm afraid I'll have to wait untill Saturday morning before reading your thought's on the movie. Can't believe it's coming to an end - I've loved reading your reviews! I thought Casino Royale was brilliant, what I really liked about it was that you could see they really thought about the book, as the plot does follow the book quite closely. OHMSS is still my favourite, but it seems we have finally found the formula between book and film. As you say, it could be that audiences are more sophiticated now and are more ready to accept the tone that's in this Bond movie. I do think that if this film was introduced in the 60's or 70's it would have flopped dismally (as Daltons movies did). I really can't wait for Quantum!! Stop with the spoilers people!! (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |








