Aslan = Jesus. Now you don't have to buy a ticket.
.
A long time ago the lions ate the Christians. Nowadays, the lions are the Christians. The lions shouldn't feel bad: I'd get indigestion, too, on that diet.
In case you're wondering what I'm talking about, I'll just clear the air and say it right at the top: the lion is Jesus. This may not make sense now, but trust me, the lion is Jesus. At least that's what Disney is banking on to guarantee its box office gross. (For once the word "gross" seems very appropriate.)
C.S. Lewis' epic fable is about four children who conquer their fears in an enchanted land. How religion figures into the story you will discover below, but know that Disney, through clever marketing, is promoting this movie to church organizations, thus robbing it of its freedom to cultivate fresh messages within its viewers. Instead of people curiously linking the lion to the Messiah on their own, they are having the metaphor hammered into their heads as if it were crown of thorns. It's a huge injustice to the film (but maybe not to C.S. Lewis, an openly spiritual author).
The film begins with four English children: Edmund, Peter, Lucy and Susan. They're displaced during German bombings on London during World War II. They end up in a scary castle in the country that could be home to a famous character from Lemony Snicket. The children eventually find a wardrobe (a fancy word for cabinet, yank) that leads into a snowy wonderland.
The pacing is rather slow as each child steps into the wardrobe to discover the kingdom of Narnia, but it's a magical sequence that begins to introduce the movie's many creatures, including a faun (a half-man/half-goat creature from Roman mythology) who befriends the tiniest child, Lucy. Later there will be a whole Noah-approved menagerie of animals to color the story: fighting rhinos, infantry cheetahs, centaurs, chariot-pulling polar bears and talking beavers.
One by one, the children enter the world and believe in its magic, and also the harsh reality: a white witch (Tilda Swinton) has frozen the land of Narnia and a rogue band of animals has begun to form an army to reclaim the land for goodness with the help of the chosen children. Yes, it's Star Wars, but with zoo animals.
And, as Obi-Wan Kenobi was to Star Wars, Aslan is to Narnia. Brave, valiant Aslan is a majestic lion (voiced by Liam Neeson), whose mane seems to dance without requiring wind. In the course of the movie, he is deified and revered, and also resurrected, which brings the messiah theme crashing into Narnia rather quickly.
Aslan, as a simple movie character, works rather well. He provides the gentle guidance to the children as they face war and the task of becoming warriors, and he narrates much of the story inside fair and just monologues. As a Christ figure, Aslan is a hard sell. Mainly because Narnia is a family film, one with messages that soar over its target audience's heads. Surely children won't see the religious subtext -- and if they do, they're likely to get bored thinking the movie is Sunday school. The only way little ones will do the math (Aslan = Jesus) is if their parents cheat and tell them the answer. And let's face it, children need not be confused with allegorical lion/Christ mumbo jumbo, especially considering the questions that might arise on trips to the zoo.
It's a shame that Christian communities are lining the film's pockets and using Christians to do it. Blame The Passion of the Christ. If Disney would just release Narnia without all the churchy fanfare we could write it off as a film. But now it's scripture, which is an entirely different medium.
At the very least, the film could have been as good as scripture to give it some validity. It definitely has its faults: the children are thrust into their dilemmas too quickly, the final battle sags in ways Lord of the Rings would never dream, and many of the makeup effects look cheap given the film's high-dollar budget.
In the end, though, it holds together fairly well, especially considering it's a family picture. Its marketing strategy aside, Narnia will entertain children, and rather enthusiastically so, I might add. The action is aplenty, danger is rife and the beasts fill every frame. It's a visual keeper, a trove of eye-catching delights that will tickle children of most ages.
If only Narnia were a secular land, one where churches dot the landscape for those who are interested to enter. With Disney pulling the strings, theaters become churches, audiences become congregations and Narnia is The Word.
A long time ago the lions ate the Christians. Nowadays, the lions are the Christians. The lions shouldn't feel bad: I'd get indigestion, too, on that diet.
In case you're wondering what I'm talking about, I'll just clear the air and say it right at the top: the lion is Jesus. This may not make sense now, but trust me, the lion is Jesus. At least that's what Disney is banking on to guarantee its box office gross. (For once the word "gross" seems very appropriate.)
C.S. Lewis' epic fable is about four children who conquer their fears in an enchanted land. How religion figures into the story you will discover below, but know that Disney, through clever marketing, is promoting this movie to church organizations, thus robbing it of its freedom to cultivate fresh messages within its viewers. Instead of people curiously linking the lion to the Messiah on their own, they are having the metaphor hammered into their heads as if it were crown of thorns. It's a huge injustice to the film (but maybe not to C.S. Lewis, an openly spiritual author).
The film begins with four English children: Edmund, Peter, Lucy and Susan. They're displaced during German bombings on London during World War II. They end up in a scary castle in the country that could be home to a famous character from Lemony Snicket. The children eventually find a wardrobe (a fancy word for cabinet, yank) that leads into a snowy wonderland.
The pacing is rather slow as each child steps into the wardrobe to discover the kingdom of Narnia, but it's a magical sequence that begins to introduce the movie's many creatures, including a faun (a half-man/half-goat creature from Roman mythology) who befriends the tiniest child, Lucy. Later there will be a whole Noah-approved menagerie of animals to color the story: fighting rhinos, infantry cheetahs, centaurs, chariot-pulling polar bears and talking beavers.
One by one, the children enter the world and believe in its magic, and also the harsh reality: a white witch (Tilda Swinton) has frozen the land of Narnia and a rogue band of animals has begun to form an army to reclaim the land for goodness with the help of the chosen children. Yes, it's Star Wars, but with zoo animals.
And, as Obi-Wan Kenobi was to Star Wars, Aslan is to Narnia. Brave, valiant Aslan is a majestic lion (voiced by Liam Neeson), whose mane seems to dance without requiring wind. In the course of the movie, he is deified and revered, and also resurrected, which brings the messiah theme crashing into Narnia rather quickly.
Aslan, as a simple movie character, works rather well. He provides the gentle guidance to the children as they face war and the task of becoming warriors, and he narrates much of the story inside fair and just monologues. As a Christ figure, Aslan is a hard sell. Mainly because Narnia is a family film, one with messages that soar over its target audience's heads. Surely children won't see the religious subtext -- and if they do, they're likely to get bored thinking the movie is Sunday school. The only way little ones will do the math (Aslan = Jesus) is if their parents cheat and tell them the answer. And let's face it, children need not be confused with allegorical lion/Christ mumbo jumbo, especially considering the questions that might arise on trips to the zoo.
It's a shame that Christian communities are lining the film's pockets and using Christians to do it. Blame The Passion of the Christ. If Disney would just release Narnia without all the churchy fanfare we could write it off as a film. But now it's scripture, which is an entirely different medium.
At the very least, the film could have been as good as scripture to give it some validity. It definitely has its faults: the children are thrust into their dilemmas too quickly, the final battle sags in ways Lord of the Rings would never dream, and many of the makeup effects look cheap given the film's high-dollar budget.
In the end, though, it holds together fairly well, especially considering it's a family picture. Its marketing strategy aside, Narnia will entertain children, and rather enthusiastically so, I might add. The action is aplenty, danger is rife and the beasts fill every frame. It's a visual keeper, a trove of eye-catching delights that will tickle children of most ages.
If only Narnia were a secular land, one where churches dot the landscape for those who are interested to enter. With Disney pulling the strings, theaters become churches, audiences become congregations and Narnia is The Word.
|
gent23mj writes: on Dec 17 2006 01:55 AM wow, either you knew Lewis's intentions, or are just bitter because of them (Reply to this) |
|
majorbase2 writes: on Mar 03 2007 12:38 AM (Reply to this) |
|
Majaia writes: on Apr 30 2008 02:06 PM "It's a huge injustice to the film (but maybe not to C.S. Lewis, an openly spiritual author)." Did I miss something here?? Isn't the movie supposed to be based on the book? As far as I know, the higher a movie stays true to the book, the higher you critics tend to rate them. But maybe you're a rebel to the cause. The creators of this film were OBVIOUSLY trying to stay true to both the movie AND the author. Do a little research buddy. It seems to me like you're just bitter about Jesus and Christianity in general. You are obviously biased, thus robbing this specific review of objectivity. I recomment the movie to anyone to loves the world of Narnia, C.S. Lewis, Fantasy Films, and people with children. This movie is a less "bloody" version of Lord of the Rings, so to speak. Bad review. Great Movie. (Reply to this) |
|
SuperJuice writes: on May 15 2008 06:16 AM Your review is completely biased, un-balanced, inauthentic, and unobjective. In other words - it sucks. (Reply to this) |
|
tribunal writes: on May 15 2008 05:02 PM You are an unqualified reviewer if you cannot distinguish between story and (light) allegory. Maybe when you pass grade 12 English you can write a more substatntial review, good or bad. (Reply to this) |
|
muggsey writes: on May 17 2008 10:28 AM A paragraph-and-a-half of a movie review, anyone? (Reply to this) |
|
andrewh817 writes: on Jun 01 2008 02:01 PM It was an okay movie but it doesn't come close to any Lord of the Rings or Harry Potters but I'd say it's worth watching once (Reply to this) |
|
Black Unicorn writes: on Jun 22 2008 04:14 AM You are obviously an idiot. Lewis was a devout athiest turned christian from a conversation he had with J.R.R Tolkien in a bar. The christian 'overtones' were his original intention to express his beliefs in a creative and immortal way. This film stays incredibly true to the book in that respect and I suggest that you do some research before you write this off as some attempt by the filmmakers to gain the favour of the christian community. (Reply to this) |
|
skimama writes: on Jul 18 2008 06:58 AM What a biased review! Remind me not to fall for any of your other reviews! (Reply to this) |
|
skimama writes: on Jul 18 2008 08:01 AM (Reply to this) |
|
CoUcH ToMaToE DoUgIe writes: on Dec 13 2008 09:57 PM Michael Lawson= Ignorant & prejudiced critic Narnia was a good movie, too bad your hatred for a certain faith blinds you in judging it fairly. (Reply to this) |
|
Nils P. writes: on Feb 10 2009 10:01 PM So, you gave a bad review to a movie I liked. Big Whoop. But lets dispense with this secular dreck about C.S. Lewis' book being about nothing more than an "epic fable... about four children who conquer their fears in an enchanted land" whose message is hijacked by Disney for churchy profits. Why does Aslan = Jesus? Because C.S. Lewis wanted it that way, wrote a book all about it, and Disney managed to not mess it up. What book did you read? Oh...and I'd get indigestion on a diet of your reviews... (Reply to this) |
|
Erica T. writes: on Apr 25 2009 08:34 PM So what if Ashlan symbolizes Jesus? In what way does that make the film poorer? I feel that your review is bitter and heavily narrow minded. I thought critics were supposed to judge on how well a film was made, not on the religious allegories behind them. And I'm not even a christian. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |





