2.5/4 is not 7/10
And that's the one rating that can fluctuate between rotten and fresh depending on how the review is written. In this case, it comes across rotten more than it does fresh.
2.5 or 4 is 62.5% which equals a red tomato. I agree the review has a negative feel to it overall though. Although, with Travers, 2.5 almost always shows up as fresh on this site. Meanwhile, with Ebert, a 2.5 always shows up as negative.
This movie is brilliant, not for everyone obviously from reading these supposed top critics. This movie will go down as a classic in a similar way the Matrix has ,yet was also initially panned by many critics. This movie resonates with more open minded freethinkers but regardless is beautiful and entertaining and reinforces my opinion that most top critics are too jaded to be trusted. Last time I felt this moved by a movie was Slumdog Millionaire and it did ok.
i think what is astonishing, is not how horrible this film is, but how much effort people - those with nothing to lose or gain from it's failure or it's success, will extend to defend this Howard The Duck / Ishtar of a film.
for me it is more surprising when someone spends energy putting something down when they have nothing to gain from its success or failure. to each their ownâ?¦ Cheers
If people keep praising movies like this, it'll be all we have left. We put energy into putting down bad movies in hopes people will look for substance instead of flash.
Marco Chaudry
THEN HOW COME YOU GIVE IT A FRESH RATING?? -_-
Oct 26 - 12:00 PM
daniel forth
because sometimes art isn't meant for you, but rather to be admired.
Oct 26 - 12:19 PM
Marco Chaudry
Still.
Oct 26 - 01:29 PM