...ironically undone by its star, a preening peacock eager to sow the seeds of self-parody with a well-placed camel punch.
Larsen where you from mate? Are you Norwegian? You must be otherwise you wouldnt be this boring. You are a complete idiot you twat. This movie deserved even an oscar. But wankers like you can not see that.
Aug 30 - 04:11 PM
Try reviewing the film not the actor. You'll find it's a lot easier. By the way this film is a work of art.
Sep 1 - 11:12 PM
Have to concur with the above posters, Larsen's a moron. Probably too young to have seen Conan in it's day, and too stupid to enjoy it now.
Nov 21 - 03:10 PM
Agree with the two above me. Conan has moments of true brilliance while not flawless from start to finish.
How about the fact that the first half an hour of the movie conveyed a story and emotions WITH NOTHING BUT IMAGERY and Basil Poledouris' brilliant score? Ever consider things like this Josh? Tools tend not to. This movie really is art for many reasons but it's sword and sorcery trappings give it a bed rep and people overlook it, it's actually a gritty movie about life. Given that my comments to you are about half the length of your review, it's safe to say you are CUT from the list of credible critics. Bye.
Nov 24 - 09:27 PM