Corman's World: Exploits Of A Hollywood Rebel Reviews
Super Reviewer
Super Reviewer
Super Reviewer
A documentary on DIY producer/director Roger Corman and his alternative approach to making movies in Hollywood.
REVIEW
Super Reviewer
Super Reviewer
Part of what makes his working outside the studio system so important is tackling the material they were unwilling to handle, starting with making films that appealed to the underappreciated youth market in the 1950's. While there was much nudity in his films, he also opened up opportunities for women to fire machine guns. That social conscience would reach its peak with "The Intruder"(which I now want to see) starring William Shatner in his first starring role, about school integration in the south when it was especially timely in 1962. Therefore, a constant refrain in the documentary is that Corman could have made the transition to more prestigious movies(like he did with his Poe adaptations) but that way requires money which leads to compromise which usually means the studios and a lack of control and there are enough cautionary tales on display here to fill a multiplex.
That criticism aside, it's a great film and recommended.
If you're not familiar with Roger Corman or the early exploitation scene I would say CHECK IT OUT just to see where a lot of Hollywood's talent of the last 30 years has started.
The title, EXPLOITS OF A HOLLYWOOD REBEL, perfectly encapsulates Corman's guerrilla style of filmmaking. No permits, no supplies, no time, and no money -- these things were of no concern in the Corman School of learning. Great directors like Ron Howard, Peter Bogdanovich, and Joe Dante were taught to think on their feet -- quite literally, in some cases. Stories of recycled set pieces, run-ins with the cops, and biker brawls come out as Peter Fonda, Bruce Dern, and others recall their crazy experiences both on and off set. In the 50s, Corman fought the studios by delivering pure entertainment for audiences to enjoy, films that fought the establishment with their rebellious teen characters. By the late 60s and 70s, Corman broke new ground with THE WILD ANGELS and THE TRIP, embracing the counter-culture movement in an enlightening new way. CORMAN'S WORLD finally recognizes these bold and often dangerous undertakings, which paved the way for future classics like EASY RIDER.
Featuring archived interviews, classic clips, and tons of new footage taken with a wide range of entertaining personalities, CORMAN'S WORLD is an insightful and engaging documentary that film fans are sure to enjoy. The only place where Stapleton falls short is in humanizing his subject, and showing the man behind the movies. We only see brief glimpses into the real Roger Corman through interludes with the director and his wife. The film is otherwise a finely-edited and extensively-researched tribute to one of the greatest producers of all-time.
*3/4*
Corman at one point speaks about the obscenity of bloated Hollywood budgets and salaries, and indeed I agree it is far more obscene than any content in his movies. This is a lesson which none of his glittering "alumni" felt compelled to address in their interviews, unsurprisingly. So to have multimillionaire directors, the likes of Demme and Howard, who command multimillion dollar budgets, talking about "sticking it to the man" and "independence" was stomach churning. They do have a lot to thank him for though...mostly the fact that his garbage will always make their garbage look really good.
More insidious was the unnecessarily extended commentary about the apparent incongruity between the man and his work, which was an interesting exposure of both the documentarians and the interviewees. That many of these filmmakers have largely perpetuated and strengthened the kinds of myths of masculinity and conformity which obviously fueled Corman's anger and rejection only goes to show how little understanding or consideration they have of his motivation. This documentary was more tragic than celebratory.
Corman is the Marquis de Sade of Pop Culture. Although I'm sure many would take this as a compliment, Sade was not admirable, he was just a shell of a man, crushed by the abhorrent and base nature of his society, deciding to go one further. These men, for all their ironic wit, only add to the nihilism, the apathy, and the suffering of society, and personally I think there are better alternatives.
Richard Matheson paid a moving tribute, the only one worth listening to that showed any insight, the rest of this documentary is swill. A couple of decades ago I used to call my youthful self a film buff; now I am loathed to admit I ever watch/ed movies, and this documentary, particularly the nauseating Oscar ceremony, really spells out why any person of conscience would feel the same.
