Jason Statham Ready to Crank Out a Sequel
Chev Chelios lives.
The closing moments of 2006's Crank may not have seemed like the most perfect setup for a sequel, but where there's a will, there's a way -- and according to Empire, Brian Taylor, Mark Neveldine, and Jason Statham will be reuniting for Crank 2.
Promising that "Crank 2 will pick up exactly where Crank ends," the filmmakers talked up the sequel to Empire, going on to say their studio and leading man are just as excited as they are:
"We're finding that a lot of people were thinking, 'Oh, Crank 2 can't be done'," adds Neveldine. "But we came up with an idea, we wrote the script, and after the studio read it they couldn't believe that we pulled it off. And of course, the best test was giving it to Jason and Jason turned down every other project so he could do this, start this in the spring of next year. He was so excited, he couldn't believe it.
"It's going to be more sexual, more violent -- more of everything," laughs Taylor. "We realise with a movie like Crank, you can't do a sequel and do 60% or 70% of what the original was. You have to go twice as hard. So that's what we're going to do. If we're going to live up to the first one with the sequel -- we're taking it WAY past the point of the first one."
Empire says the sequel is scheduled to start shooting next April, so you can probably safely add it to the list of pictures you'll see in the next year or so, strike or no strike.
Source: Empire
Promising that "Crank 2 will pick up exactly where Crank ends," the filmmakers talked up the sequel to Empire, going on to say their studio and leading man are just as excited as they are:
"We're finding that a lot of people were thinking, 'Oh, Crank 2 can't be done'," adds Neveldine. "But we came up with an idea, we wrote the script, and after the studio read it they couldn't believe that we pulled it off. And of course, the best test was giving it to Jason and Jason turned down every other project so he could do this, start this in the spring of next year. He was so excited, he couldn't believe it.
"It's going to be more sexual, more violent -- more of everything," laughs Taylor. "We realise with a movie like Crank, you can't do a sequel and do 60% or 70% of what the original was. You have to go twice as hard. So that's what we're going to do. If we're going to live up to the first one with the sequel -- we're taking it WAY past the point of the first one."
Empire says the sequel is scheduled to start shooting next April, so you can probably safely add it to the list of pictures you'll see in the next year or so, strike or no strike.
Source: Empire
Related Items
| Celeb: | Jason Statham |
| Mark Neveldine | |
| Brian Taylor |
|
Gimy writes: on Oct 08 2007 05:39 AM not AT ALL a surprise, and...kinda coo news. huge fan of Stathom and almost anything he is in is a decent 1.5 hours of my time. dude is just a kick2ss action star...who needs a plot...EVER! (Reply to this) |
|
Elixor writes: on Oct 08 2007 05:44 AM Crank was great fun and Stathom is a bad ***, but so far it doesn't make sense to make a sequel given the conclusion of the first one. (Reply to this) |
|
arpeggio191 writes: on Oct 08 2007 05:53 AM crank was so bad. i had to turn off the movie half way through cause i could feel myself getting stupider... thus making me think using words like "stupider" were ok. (Reply to this) |
|
TrisTan2007 writes: on Oct 08 2007 06:38 AM CRANK? Not one of my favorite Statham movies. I thought Statham was already dead in the movie. What are they going to do now, make "Crank" a whole bad dream sequence that Statham dreamed of, wake him up and start Crank 2? Or may be, they will clone him. Lol. Crank was an okay movie, a huge adrenaline rush (and high on WTF camera moves that might have spoiled my eyes so bad, I went 20/20 vision to a huge a** eyeglass). I like Statham and I hope this time they don't give him guns -- and hopefully, they will have bunch of clean-shot martial arts where he can show his martial arts talents, like the "Transporter part I". I still have nightmares with his previous movie -- "War" -- where he and Jet Li were wasted midst the never ending gunfights (Statham and Li, and they were playing with guns? Everybody can play with guns, even Freddie Prinz Jr. Could have been equally lethal if he was cast in "War" -- with loaded barrels -- but hey, throwing punches and kicks is totally different thing and Statham, like Li, is good at that). So please please, Crank it up or Crank it down, just give some clean shot martial art sequences like "fight on the grease" in Transporter or "fire hose fight" in transporter 2 -- or just don't waste the money making something that would eventually make me feel like I just wasted my hard earned $10 on piece of s*** like "War" and "Crank". (Reply to this) |
|
Vitamin M writes: on Oct 08 2007 06:52 AM Loved Crank. That thing was an adrenaline rush! But yeah he seemed kind of dead at the end of the film.... (Reply to this) |
|
Mr. Right writes: on Oct 08 2007 07:06 AM How are they going to do a sequel? In the movie, the doctor told him that the poison in him would have put him in a coma. And thats just if they somehow ignore the ending. (Reply to this) |
|
Ender7406 writes: on Oct 08 2007 07:16 AM Wow. Crank was the worst movie I think I saw last year. Which is EXACTLY why I am so pumped to see this sequel. (Reply to this) |
|
Jenkinsbball writes: on Oct 08 2007 07:29 AM Of course he lived!! He only fell out of a helicopter a mile in the sky. A fall like that would kill a lesser man, but, Turkish requires more to die!!! (Reply to this) |
|
Ghost Robot writes: on Oct 08 2007 07:45 AM It was all a dream, and when he wakes up he finds himself in the exact position, but now he knows what to do. (Reply to this) |
|
mjolson20 writes: on Oct 08 2007 09:15 AM sequel? sounds tight but how? (Reply to this) |
|
Exode writes: on Oct 08 2007 12:27 PM I have a feeling it'll be called Maximum Crank, how random. (Reply to this) |
|
bigteddyt writes: on Oct 08 2007 12:51 PM crank was SO bad. making a sequel lessens my faith in the human species... (Reply to this) |
|
wiggins writes: on Oct 08 2007 01:40 PM the grease fight in the transporter has to be the one of the most homo-erotic combat scenes put on screen since professional wrestling was invented. (Reply to this) |
|
eastern2western writes: on Oct 08 2007 01:52 PM If you think that is homoerotic, then you have never seen any of those shaw brother martial art movies. (Reply to this) |
|
aliasjjg writes: on Oct 08 2007 02:09 PM I´m afraid his career will take a fall like his character in "Crank" after cranking out 2 sequels (Crank, Italian Job), working with Paul W. S. Anderson and with that gottverdammten, scheiss, drecks, sau, huren, elendigen, widerwärtigen Saftarsch of a director: Uwe Boll. (Kingdom something or other, based on something called Dungeon Siege or so) (Reply to this) |
|
blinkybrown writes: on Oct 08 2007 02:35 PM Crank was ok for a plotless action film. Certainly better than the Transporter movies, but not as cool as the 80s Arnold plotless action films. That being said, it certainly wasn't good enough for a sequel, but in Hollywood if somebody will pay, a film must be made. (Reply to this) |
|
chaddukes writes: on Oct 08 2007 03:35 PM In reply to this comment (#1176302) "...crank was so bad..." Are you insane? It was one of the first original action ideas to come out in the past 5 years. Jason is the only true action hero we have anymore that seems to relish the role. In a world of Vin's and Rock's and would be action stars that do lame kid movies at the drop of a hat, statham seems to be the only one content on kicking ***. Get a hold of yourself. (Reply to this) |
|
Dread writes: on Oct 08 2007 05:02 PM I hear it's set two minutes after the first. I love these guys. (Reply to this) |
|
Q writes: on Oct 08 2007 07:47 PM Not surprising. They even made Saw 4 now. (Reply to this) |
|
bigpk writes: on Oct 09 2007 01:23 AM I thought at the end his heart was still beating? Anything is possible these days. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |











