Dance with the Devil (Perdita Durango) Reviews
Super Reviewer
It's a story of trying to move on but the main characters are very amoral however there's darker circles than them, which pulls them further down the spiral. In essence this movie is an antithesis of a glamour Mafia movie and I believe represents Mafia dealings in a very dark fashion. In some ways I believe there's a nod to David Lynch with the actor playing the Mafia boss.
The film is not a sick puppy nor is it banal. For those that have followed this director they will read between the lines to discover some salient points of US government intervention out of the states and human traffic - in this case embryos used for beauty products. Like 'clean Madrid' in El Dia de Bestia there were fascist movements in the capital at the time. Iglaisia puts this on the screen as a cultural reminder.
Watching this movie at face value will seem very ultra violent and in some places extremely disturbing. Unlike other cult producers like Tarintino Iglasia uses a loot of cult cultural references to make his films extremely dark and funny (like La Communidad). If you're Latin or Spanish I feel there would be a lot more in this movie for you. Recommended viewing - but not for the faint hearted.
Super Reviewer
Super Reviewer
Super Reviewer
Super Reviewer
The film is the story of Perdita Durango (Rosie Perez), a young criminal who one night meets Romeo Dolorosa (Javier Bardem), a crazed priest of an extreme form of Santeria who makes a life doing jobs for the mob. They fall in love and Perdita comes along in Romeo's latest job: the traffic of human fetuses for the cosmetic industry. On their trip, they kidnap two American teenagers for Romeo's human sacrifices. However, things go wrong as a DEA agent (James Gandolfini) follows them closely and the kidnapped teens try to escape.
Based on Barry Gifford's novel of the same name, the movie follows the criminal couple's adventure in the style of a road trip movie with the two couples (the criminals and their victims) as main characters. I can't tell how faithful the movie is to the novel, but it is definitely closer to Gifford's previous film adaptation, David Lynch's "Wild at Heart" than to the Tarantino films that are often compared to it. The movie is charged with black humor and disturbing violence, and is a brilliant satire of modern society.
Alex De la Iglesia crafts a film that is at the same time disturbing and funny, and he plays with those two very different emotions with very good results. The pacing of the movie is very good although it is true that at times it feels a bit disjointed. Still, De la Iglesia manages to tell an intelligent and different story than what we are used to. On a side note, the edited A-Pix version is missing what is probably the most important moment of the film due to copyright troubles, so to fully appreciate the film, the 125 version is the way to go.
The acting is good for the most part, with Javier Bardem showing exactly why is he considered the best Spanish actor of his generation; his Romeo Delarosa is one of the best performances of his career. Rosie Perez is effective, but at times it feels as if she weren't up to the challenge, something that hurts the film badly, as she is the main character. Harley Cross and Aimee Graham are very believable as the kidnapped teens and show potential for comedy, but the real joy comes from supporting actors Gandolfini and a surprising Screamin' Jay Hawkins.
Personally, I liked the film a lot and it is a personal favorite, but I must be fair and point out that it is not a perfect film. Alex De la Iglesia's main mistake is to focus too much on Romeo Delarosa's character, almost to the point where Rosie Perez almost becomes a supporting actress. The fact that Bardem's acting is enormously superior doesn't really help Perez' performance, but she's hot as hell. On another point, the movie seems to lose steam at the last point, and while it does recover some of its initial power, the edited versions definitely take out this final improvement.
As written above, this is a personal favorite, and while I wouldn't recommend it to everybody (due to its disturbing images), I would definitely recommend it to fans of black comedies, disturbing thrillers and overall bizarre film-making in general
Bardem plays Romeo Dolorosa, a psychotic witch doctor whose hobbies include theft, kidnapping, rape and murder. However a life of pillaging can be a lonely one, so thank goodness he meets beautiful Perdita Durango (Rosie Perez), and the pair become something of a sexually charged, Mexican Bonnie and Clyde. The movie sees them kidnap a pair of American teenagers whom they simultaneously rape, then plan to sacrifice to their religious cult.
This is exploitation cinema at its worst. Everything from the screenplay to the acting to the direction is utter garbage. Rosie Perez stumbles her way through the disastrous dialogue, while Bardem, for whom I have a huge amount of admiration and respect, fares little better. Their characters are so hideous that I was left with no desire to invest in either performance, and even if I'd wanted to they're both so overwrought it would have been a struggle.
Director Alex de la Iglesia does not help matters, opting for ridiculous explosions and increasingly more disturbing scenarios over any real character development or effective storytelling. Even unintentional laughs brought on by how over the top the whole thing is didn't make this movie one that I feel justifies the time I spent watching it, and for that reason I can only advise you to avoid it.
[b][i][u]Throne of Blood:[/u][/i][/b] What can I say? Kurosawa is a master storyteller, and this is just another proof of it. Based in Shakespeare's MacBeth, dropped in the Samurai Japanese setting, the director mixes yet again Eastern and Western culture with perfect results and a movie that is accessible to virtually everyone. I wont go on and on about the great technical aspects, because it is already expected from Kurosawa, and he never fails to deliver. The acting is great, from both Mifune and Yamada who give chilling performances.
If you're appreciate movies, this is one you should not miss.
[b][i][u]Club Dread:[/u][/i][/b] There are more scares than laughs, but it is definetly worth it if you're a fan af Super Troopers. There are memorable characters and some genuine scares, surrounded by insanity and foolishness. Which is exactly its greatest problem. Either it takes itself too seriously, or it makes fun of itself way too much. ultimately, Ebert said it best, you saw the trailer and if you liked it you're gonna like the movie, if you hated it, well you're not gonna be surprised. Meanwhile I really had a good time watching it.
