Enjoyable and even exciting at the start, Dog Day Afternoon degenerates into frustration and tedium toward nightfall -- an experience no less painful for the audience than for the actors.
Wow first Taxi Driver now this? These critics just want to be different . . . wrong, but different. God forbid someone comes along to wreck The Godfather
Let me get this right... you gave Dog Day Afternoon a rotten, but gave Confessions of a Teenage Drama Queen, Clockstoppers, The Animal, The Lizzie McGuire Movie, Snow Day, and Spy Kids 3D a fresh?
You have lost all credibility. I respect difference in opinion, but I don't understand your taste at all...
Change your picture... Though I like most of your reviews; this one compelled me to finally speak my mind. No matter how far I zoom in on my iPhone you still look like a woman with a bad stylist.
Oh except for every gawdamn one Daniel above talked about... Wow didn't know you bashed "taxi driver"... Woooh you've got no fans left, and please with the picture you must've changed the mostrousity by now:(
I don't understand why people are so mean to Dave Kehr. It's his or her opinion (I can't tell if it is a boy or girl), but my opinion is that this movie is so amazing in oh so many ways. Al Pacino is so good. His acting is great, when he twitches, when he talks, when he screams "Attica". It is perfect. Great movie. It is unbelieveable.
The main reason is because the man just tries to be contrarian to every film considered a classic, unlike, say, Roger Ebert, who has posted negative reviews of some classics but tends to actually attempt to justify his criticism and usually notes that the film may go towards others' tastes. Kehr on the other hand just does one paragraph blurbs that consist of absolute nonsense and will find any excuse to trash a popular film.
Max Chittock
The audience? Are you nuts?
Jun 1 - 11:16 AM