It felt like I was back in my childhood watching serial chapters at a Saturday matinee.
what a surprise this critic liked this awful, awful movie. whatever reasoning he has for liking it resides in his ability to use adjectives ~ remove those and there's not much of a review... nor justification.
a typical slick review that doesn't say anything, full of filler and what you'd expect of a critic who does upwards of 365 reviews a year. i've yet to read one with any insight. dissecting his review style and you'll find adjectives heaped upon one another, detailed plot run-downs, and nothing worth saying or that hasn't been said already.
maybe i should be a critic, too?
Jul 26 - 10:10 AM