A corpse in its own right: It's filled with the rotting ideas of far better movies.
Fear Dot Com (2002)
Tomatometer
How does the Tomatometer work ![]()
Reviews Counted:88
Fresh:3
Rotten:85
Average Rating:2.6/10
Consensus: As frustrating as a 404 error, Fear Dot Com is a stylish, incoherent, and often nasty mess with few scares.
Rated: R [See Full Rating] for violence including grisly images of torture, nudity and language
Runtime: 1 hr 54 mins
Genre: Horror/Suspense
Theatrical Release:Aug 30, 2002 Wide
Box Office: $13,138,876
Synopsis: "Do you like to watch?" A woman's voice beckons from the computer. Images flash across the screen - parted lips, bound wrists, flesh. Her seductive tone summons you closer, inviting you... "Do you like to watch?" A woman's voice beckons from the computer. Images flash across the screen - parted lips, bound wrists, flesh. Her seductive tone summons you closer, inviting you in... "Do you want to see more?" If you click "yes" - and you know you want to - you'll be logged on to the internet site feardot.com, and the game begins. What follows is a miasma of hellish images that leave unsuspecting voyeurs suffering from morbid hallucinations and unspeakable terror. When four bodies are discovered among the industrial decay and urban grime of New York City, brash young detective Mike Reilly (STEPHEN DORFF) teams with ambitious Department of Health researcher Terry Huston (NATASCHA MCELHONE) to uncover the cause behind their violent and inexplicable deaths. The only common factor shared by the victims? Each died exactly 48 hours after logging on to feardot.com. Were they being punished for their inquisitiveness? For succumbing to temptation? For indulging their guilty pleasures? Determined to confront and destroy the evil force behind the deadly site, Mike logs on and the clock starts ticking. Now he's got 48 hours to face his own worst fears and solve the mystery, or suffer the fate of the victims before him. Together with Terry, he delves deep into a forbidden universe of contaminated souls and shocking imagery, each step bringing them closer to the horrifying counter-reality of feardot.com - and a life-and-death confrontation with Alistair Pratt (STEPHEN REA), a sadistic murderer who has eluded Mike and the FBI for years. What they discover is as mystifying as the deaths themselves... and more terrifying than anything they ever dreamed. "Time's almost up..." -- © 2002 Warner Bros. [More]
Starring: Stephen Dorff, Natascha McElhone, Stephen Rea
Starring: Stephen Dorff, Natascha McElhone, Stephen Rea
Director: William Malone
Director: William Malone
Screenwriter: Josephine Coyle
Producer: Moshe Diamant, Limor Diamant, Andrew Stevens, Elie Samaha
Composer: Nicholas Pike
Studio: Warner Bros.
Get This Movie
Reviews for Fear Dot Com
Of all the trash I had to watch in 2002, the insipid FearDotCom easily ranks among the worst.
In this case, a viewer's apathy to images of suffering and degradation are not a pointed comment on contemporary desensitization to violence -- it's just the proper response to a really crappy movie.
What little atmosphere is generated by the shadowy lighting, macabre sets, and endless rain is offset by the sheer ugliness of everything else.
There really is no reason to see this film at all. Not even some of the cool, creepy imagery saves it.
Even if FearDotCom wasn't a good five years behind the curve, it would still be saddled with a ludicrous script, nonsensical direction and wince-inducing performances.
As directed by William Malone, the man who nailed the “condemned” sign to the front of 1999’s “The House on Haunted Hill,” “Feardotcom” is essentially a showcase for the humiliation, mutilation and sadomasochistic torture of women.
Build some robots, haul 'em to the theatre with you for the late show, and put on your own Mystery Science Theatre 3000 tribute to what is almost certainly going to go down as the worst -- and only -- killer website movie of this or any other year.
The result is the equivalent to a roller coaster missing pieces of its track.
Once again this shows that whilst the internet is a great way to promote films, its not something which films should base their stories on.
It cannot be enjoyed, even on the level that one enjoys a bad slasher flick, primarily because it is dull. Yes, dull.
The big mystery is how Malone convinces name casts to appear in his semi-competent fare.
The movie's progression into rambling incoherence gives new meaning to the phrase 'fatal script error.'
This is rote spookiness, with nary an original idea (or role, or edit, or score, or anything, really) in sight, and the whole of the proceedings beg the question 'Why?'
Some fine European actors are caught slumming in this piece of glittery trash, including Stephen Rea (with a flat upstate accent), Udo Kier, and Nigel Terry. Now that’s scary.
| Tomatometer Percentage | Movie |
|---|---|
| 36% 36% | Angels & Demons |
| 25% 25% | Four Christmases |
| 68% 68% | Funny People |
| 95% 95% | Star Trek |
| 14% 14% | The Ugly Truth |
| Tomatometer Percentage | Movie |
|---|---|
| 32% 32% | Terminator Salvation |
| 44% 44% | Night at the Museum: B… |
| 86% 86% | A Christmas Tale |
| 60% 60% | Paper Heart |
RT On Current TV
DIRECTV 358 | Comcast 107 | DISH Network 196
What’s Hot On RT
Other News
CloseSponsored Links
Around The Network
- Fear Dot Com at Rotten Tomatoes
- Fear Dot Com at IGN
- Fear Dot Com at AskMen
Fresh Links
Featured

MSN Movies offers a little background on the success of Disney Animation.

TIME takes a look back at the history of vampires on film.

Techland examines the visual splendor of Peter Jackson's upcoming film.

AOL put together a list of 10 recent news items that would be perfect as TV Movies.

Hollywood.com's C. Robert Cargill explores how remakes and reboots have warped our thinking.
Promos

Get the latest Tomatometer updates on upcoming movies!



Top Critic


