This intensely derivative mishmash owes its creepiest images and conceits to other films.
Fear Dot Com (2002)
Tomatometer
How does the Tomatometer work ![]()
Reviews Counted:88
Fresh:3
Rotten:85
Average Rating:2.6/10
Consensus: As frustrating as a 404 error, Fear Dot Com is a stylish, incoherent, and often nasty mess with few scares.
Rated: R [See Full Rating] for violence including grisly images of torture, nudity and language
Runtime: 1 hr 54 mins
Genre: Horror/Suspense
Theatrical Release:Aug 30, 2002 Wide
Box Office: $13,138,876
Synopsis: "Do you like to watch?" A woman's voice beckons from the computer. Images flash across the screen - parted lips, bound wrists, flesh. Her seductive tone summons you closer, inviting you... "Do you like to watch?" A woman's voice beckons from the computer. Images flash across the screen - parted lips, bound wrists, flesh. Her seductive tone summons you closer, inviting you in... "Do you want to see more?" If you click "yes" - and you know you want to - you'll be logged on to the internet site feardot.com, and the game begins. What follows is a miasma of hellish images that leave unsuspecting voyeurs suffering from morbid hallucinations and unspeakable terror. When four bodies are discovered among the industrial decay and urban grime of New York City, brash young detective Mike Reilly (STEPHEN DORFF) teams with ambitious Department of Health researcher Terry Huston (NATASCHA MCELHONE) to uncover the cause behind their violent and inexplicable deaths. The only common factor shared by the victims? Each died exactly 48 hours after logging on to feardot.com. Were they being punished for their inquisitiveness? For succumbing to temptation? For indulging their guilty pleasures? Determined to confront and destroy the evil force behind the deadly site, Mike logs on and the clock starts ticking. Now he's got 48 hours to face his own worst fears and solve the mystery, or suffer the fate of the victims before him. Together with Terry, he delves deep into a forbidden universe of contaminated souls and shocking imagery, each step bringing them closer to the horrifying counter-reality of feardot.com - and a life-and-death confrontation with Alistair Pratt (STEPHEN REA), a sadistic murderer who has eluded Mike and the FBI for years. What they discover is as mystifying as the deaths themselves... and more terrifying than anything they ever dreamed. "Time's almost up..." -- © 2002 Warner Bros. [More]
Starring: Stephen Dorff, Natascha McElhone, Stephen Rea
Starring: Stephen Dorff, Natascha McElhone, Stephen Rea
Director: William Malone
Director: William Malone
Screenwriter: Josephine Coyle
Producer: Moshe Diamant, Limor Diamant, Andrew Stevens, Elie Samaha
Composer: Nicholas Pike
Studio: Warner Bros.
Get This Movie
Reviews for Fear Dot Com
What we get in FearDotCom is more like something from a bad Clive Barker movie. In other words, it's badder than bad.
It misses the big picture, the story is impossibly lame, but you can't say it doesn't have style.
This is a grim, ugly exercise that has nothing to say about the dangers of cyberporn.
The only upside to all of this unpleasantness is, given its Labor Day weekend upload, FearDotCom should log a minimal number of hits.
A vile, incoherent mess...a scummy ripoff of David Cronenberg's brilliant 'Videodrome.'
The only thing you have to fear ... is being trapped in a theater showing this dot-bomb.
The only thing scary about feardotcom is that the filmmakers and studio are brazen enough to attempt to pass this stinker off as a scary movie.
The screenplay is a mess, and yet the visuals are so creative this is one of the rare bad films you might actually want to see.
Nonsensical, dull "cyber-horror" flick is a grim, hollow exercise in flat scares and bad acting.
The biggest fear I have is being tortured by having to watch this movie until my eyes and nose start bleeding.
Despite the up-to-the-minute trappings, there's nothing here that's newer than rotary-dial phones.
My greatest fear is watching a film that's so bad that it literally sucks the life right out of you, and I think this one came pretty close.
Expect to be reminded of other, better films, especially Seven, which director William Malone slavishly copies.
| Tomatometer Percentage | Movie |
|---|---|
| 44% 44% | Night at the Museum: B… |
| 32% 32% | Terminator Salvation |
| 36% 36% | Angels & Demons |
| 95% 95% | Star Trek |
| 25% 25% | Four Christmases |
| Tomatometer Percentage | Movie |
|---|---|
| 88% 88% | Inglourious Basterds |
| 78% 78% | The Hangover |
| 49% 49% | Taking Woodstock |
| 26% 26% | The Goods: Live Hard, Sell Hard |
| 47% 47% | The Girl From Monaco |
RT On Current TV
DIRECTV 358 | Comcast 107 | DISH Network 196 | More...
What’s Hot On RT
Other News
CloseSponsored Links
Around The Network
- Fear Dot Com at Rotten Tomatoes
- Fear Dot Com at IGN
- Fear Dot Com at AskMen
Fresh Links
Featured

Techland lists the best Sci-Fi films of this decade.

Moviefone takes a look back at the biggest stinkers of the past 10 years.

The Me and Orson Welles star answers reader questions on TIME.com.

Hollywood.com's C. Robert Cargill offers his thoughts on what the best decade for film was.

In the AV Club's "Scenic Routes," Mike D'Angelo reminisces about the Tim Burton film.
Promos

Get the latest Tomatometer updates on upcoming movies!



Top Critic


