News » Columns » Weekly Ketchup » Weekly Ketchup: Captain America vs. Agent Smith

Weekly Ketchup: Captain America vs. Agent Smith

Plus news about a possible Wizard of Oz reboot.

This week's Ketchup features casting news for The First Avenger: Captain America and the Wachowski Brothers' secret project, as well as a biopic about Vince Lombardi, new takes on The Wizard of Oz and the legend of King Arthur and sequels for Alvin and the Chipmunks, Diary of a Wimpy Kid and Planet of the Apes.


FRESH DEVELOPMENTS


#1 THE FIRST AVENGER: CAPTAIN AMERICA - THE HUMAN TORCH VS AGENT SMITH?

The casting process is still ongoing to find the young actorwho will play Steve Rogers, AKA Captain America, in not just The First Avenger: Captain America, but also in The Avengers and up to 7 other sequels or other Marvel Studios projects. Of the original list, several are now out of the running: John Krasinski (The Office), Chace Crawford (Gossip Girl), Scott Porter (Friday Night Lights), Patrick Flueger (Brothers) and Michael Cassidy (Privileged). The two that remain from that group are Mike Vogel (Cloverfield) and Garrett Hedlund (Tron: Legacy), and they are now joined by someone who has experience in the Marvel Universe. Chris Evans, whose performance as Johnny Storm, AKA the Human Torch, was arguably the best thing about the Fantastic Four movies, is now also a strong possibility for the role. This writer thinks that Chris Evans is the best candidate to be officially mentioned yet, and if Evans does take the role, many of the doubts I've had about the project would be alleviated. Joe Johnston's (Jumanji, The Wolfman) involvement as director is still bothersome, unless he is indeed replaced, as recent reports have suggested). One factor that may be problematic for Chris Evans signing on is the news this week that he has been cast in What's Your Number?, an R-rated 20th Century Fox comedy starring Anna Faris (the Scary Movie franchise). What's Your Number? is based upon the Karyn Bosnak book 20 Times a Lady, and is about a woman who thought she'd find the perfect guy by the time she'd slept with 20 (!) men. What's Your Number? is scheduled to start filming in May, which does indeed conflict with the filming schedule for The First Avenger: Captain America, which is expected to start filming in April. Another new name to also add to the list is Wilson Bethel, who starred in HBO's Generation Kill, and also currently appears in the soap opera The Young and the Restless. I'm guessing he's one of the "young" ones, unless they're all young and also restless... I don't know, I've never watched the show. While all that is still going on, a character that appears to be much closer to being firmed down is the film's main villain, the Red Skull. Hugo Weaving, who fans should know well from his roles as Agent Smith in the Matrix movies and Elrond in the Lord of the Rings trilogy, is in advanced talks to play the German super agent that has always been Captain America's archenemy. One factor that is probably of particular interest is that Hugo Weaving recently worked with Joe Johnston as a supporting character in The Wolfman.


#2 ALICE IN WONDERLAND + $116 MILLION = THE WIZARD OF OZ IS NEXT

People expected that Disney and Tim Burton's new take on Alice in Wonderland would probably do quite well, but a $116 million opening weekend probably was far beyond most people's expectations (Avatar "only" opened to $77 million). Warner Bros apparently is seeing that the combination of a classic family-friendly fantasy tale about a young girl in a visually stunning world can add up to big box office numbers. So, the studio is moving ahead with two different projects that adapt L. Frank Baum's The Wizard of Oz as modern adaptations. First there is a project in WB's New Line Cinema division called just Oz (not to be confused with the HBO cable series, obviously). Oz is being produced by Temple Hill, the production company behind the Twilight franchise. The Oz script was written by Darren Lemke, who cowrote the upcoming Shrek Forever After, and is also working with the studio on their Jack the Giant Killer, to be directed by Bryan Singer. The second project goes in a darker direction, and was written by Josh Olson (A History of Violence, cowriter of Batman: Gotham Knight). Olson's darker story features Dorothy's granddaughter, who travels to Oz to fight the new evil forces there. That darker project is being produced by Basil Iwanyk (Clash of the Titans), and Todd McFarlane (Spawn) may also be involved in some capacity. In addition to the success of Alice in Wonderland, another noted factor in Warner Bros' interest in starting a new Oz franchise is that with Harry Potter reaching the end of its arc, the studio is looking for a new tentpole franchise that will do well with that segment of the audience. Meanwhile, Universal is also still developing their movie version of the Broadway musical hit Wicked, which is also based on L. Frank Baum's characters.


#3 GUY RITCHIE WANTS TO TRY PULLING EXCALIBUR FROM THE STONE

Last year, the news broke that Bryan Singer was working with Warner Bros on a planned remake of Excalibur, John Boorman's masterpiece (in my opinion) retelling of the legend(s) of King Arthur. Now, Guy Ritchie (Snatch) is also talking to WB (where he made Sherlock Holmes) about directing a King Arthur movie which could also be a remake of Excalibur, although what that means for Singer's project is unknown. Last week, it was reported that British comic book writer Warren Ellis (The Authority, Transmetropolitan) had been writing a King Arthur script for Guy Ritchie, but Ellis is not mentioned in this latest story. Instead, the screenwriter now working on the King Arthur script is John Hodge, who frequently collaborated on Danny Boyle's early films (Trainspotting, Shallow Grave, The Beach, etc) and most recently wrote The Seeker: The Dark is Rising (curious note: see Rotten Idea #2). Hodge's script "aims to be a re-imagining of the legend of Arthur, believed to have been a 6th century king who defended Britain against Saxon invaders," and will also draw heavily from Sir Thomas Malory's Le Morte d'Arthur, which was also the basis for John Boorman's Excalibur. Meanwhile, there is yet another King Arthur project in the works, as Sylvain White, the director of Warner Bros' upcoming The Losers is in talks to direct Pendragon, a more romantic take on the key Camelot characters, and also to focus on them during their younger days (got to get that Twilight audience!). Pendragon is based on Phoenix Pictues and New Regency, and would likely be distributed by 20th Century Fox. Pendragon was written by Lee Shipman and Brian McGreevy, both of whom do not yet have any produced movies to their credit. By itself, Pendragon would be a Rotten Idea, but it just made more sense to thematically include it with Ritchie's project, which is not Rotten.


#4 CAESAR AND THE APES ARE GOING BACK TO THE FUTURE

20th Century Fox is moving ahead with its long planned prequel to Planet of the Apes with the hiring of a director for Caesar: Rise of the Apes. Rupert Wyatt directed the 2008 Sundance film The Escapist (no connection to The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier & Clay, sadly), and this is his opportunity to start working for the studios, apparently, along with being attached to direct the planned Ice Truckers movie, which is also at Fox. The script was written by Amanda Silver (The Hand That Rocks the Cradle) and Rick Jaffa, who also worked with Silver on The Relic and Eye for an Eye. Based on just that story, the details would end there. However, CHUD apparently has an inside connection for Caesar: Rise of the Apes, because they have a lot more detail about exactly what is in the script. First off, you should know that Caesar was a major character in two of the later movies (Conquest of the Planet of the Apes and Battle for the Planet of the Apes), which were essentially prequels to the original Planet of the Apes. Caesar: Rise of the Apes sounds like both a prequel and a remake of elements of Conquest..., and the writers have stuck in a ton of little details that reference the original films. I almost started listing all of the details (some of which are quite cool), but since they are sort of spoilers, I will just refer you to CHUD's post for more on that.


#5 MORE DETAILS REVEALED ON THE WACHOWSKI BROTHERS' SECRET PROJECT

Last year, we heard from political blogger Arianna Huffington that she was working with the Wachowski brothers on some sort of secret movie project about war in the future. Andy Wachowski and his sister/brother Lana/Larry Wachowski probably need no introduction. But, just in case they do, the Wachowski brothers directed a little movie called The Matrix, its sequels and Speed Racer, and their production credits also include V for Vendetta and Ninja Assassin. Now, former pro wrestler and Governor of Minnesota Jesse Ventura has revealed to Howard Stern that he has also filmed scenes for the movie, and what he says tells us a lot more about the Wachowski's secret project. Let's just look at exactly what Ventura said, "Arianna was there, and they had her looking like Cleopatra. What they did... Do you remember what John Travolta looked like in that horrible film Battlefield Earth? They put multicolored dreadlocks on me all the way to here. They gave me this crazy beard that was hanging down pointed, looked like Travolta, right? And they put a third eye in the middle of my forehead. Because what this is, is this is a hundred years in the future, and they wanted me to talk about the current war in Iraq and how I felt about it. And so I got to vent, looking like this maniac in this whole outfit." Okay, so it sounds like the movie is about a war in Iraq 100 years in the future, and Ventura either plays an alien or some sort of mutant. Freaky!


#6 HUDSON HAWK GETS A META PREQUEL WITH LEONARDO DA VINCI AND THE SOLDIERS OF FOREVER

Warner Bros has picked up a treatment that turns the definitive Renaissance Man, Leonardo da Vinci, into an action adventure hero. Leonardo da Vinci and the Soldiers of Forever portrays Da Vinci as a member of a secret society who becomes involved in a supernatural adventure that pits him against Biblical demons in a story involving secret codes, lost civilizations, hidden fortresses and fallen angels. Imagine a movie that combines Raiders of the Lost Ark, Sherlock Holmes and The Da Vinci Code, and you might be in the right direction. The real Leonardo, of course, was an inventor, mathematician, engineer, architect and the painter of the Mona Lisa and The Last Supper. The Warner Bros project came from an idea by producer Adrian Askarieh (the upcoming Jonny Quest and Kane & Lynch movies), who wrote the treatment, and is now looking for a writer to turn it into a script. This news comes after last week's announcement that Warner Bros is developing a similar project with director Francis Lawrence (Constantine, I Am Legend) about the adventures of Marco Polo.


#7 SHOW ROBERT DENIRO A GOOD LOSER, AND HE'LL SHOW YOU A LOSER

ESPN Films, with cooperation from the NFL, has announced plans for Lombardi, a biopic about legendary Green Bay Packers coach Vince Lombardi. The film will focus on the years in which Lombardi rebuilt the Packers from a minor team into the most successful football team of the 1960s, becoming five-time champions during Lombardi's tenure as head coach (1959-1967). In addition to Lombardi, we can expect some of the classic Packers to be featured characters, including Paul Hornung (HB), Ray Nitschke (LB), Forrest Gregg (OT) and Bart Starr (QB), the last two of which went on to head coach the Packers themselves. As a Wisconsin native, the idea of a Vince Lombardi movie is especially close to home, and the man delivered so many great quotes that the script is nearly already half written by Lombardi himself. The screenwriter who will be figuring out how to patch all those Lombardi quotes together is Eric Roth, whose filmography includes biopics like Ali and The Good Shepherd (as cowriter), as well as sweeping generational stories like Forrest Gump and The Curious Case of Benjamin Button. The actor who will be portraying Vince Lombardi (as well as producing) is also a natural choice: Robert DeNiro. NFL VP of Programming Charles Coplin said of DeNiro, "There are few actors who could accurately portray the fire, passion and grit of Lombardi, and we're thrilled to have Robert De Niro on our team." ESPN has acquired the rights to Lombardi's story from his estate and son Vincent Lombardi, Jr and the rights to the 1968 book, Instant Replay by Dick Schaap and former Packer Jerry Kramer. In other DeNiro news, Universal's plans for a sequel to Midnight Run continue to develop as the studio has hired screenwriter Timothy Dowling (cowriter of Role Models) to pen a script in which bounty hunter Jack Walsh (DeNiro) returns in an adventure that pairs him with a younger comedic foil. It sounds like Charles Grodin will not be returning for Midnight Run 2.


#8 KENTUCKY FRIED AMAZON PYTHONS ON THE MONDO TUBE

Relativity Media (Zombieland, Pineapple Express) has announced that they started production in January on an untitled comedy project in the tradition of sketch comedies like Kentucky Fried Movie and Groove Tube. The ensemble comedy features sketches that have already been filmed by Peter Farrelly (Dumb & Dumber), Brett Ratner (Rush Hour), Bob Odenkirk (Let's Go to Prison), Griffin Dunne (Practical Magic) and Elizabeth Banks (her directorial debut), with other directors yet to be announced. The ever growing cast includes Elizabeth Banks, Gerard Butler, Kieran Culkin, Hugh Jackman, Johnny Knoxville, Christopher Mintz-Plasse, Chloe Moretz, Liev Schreiber, Seann William Scott, Tony Shalhoub, Emma Stone, Matt Walsh, Patrick Warburton, Naomi Watts and Kate Winslet. There's no word yet about how the sketches all tie together, but here's how producer Charles Wessler describes it, "We all sat down and came up with what we think is a hilarious through-line for the movie... given the amount of pot I had smoked, at least I think it is hilarious." Well, there you go, if that gives you an idea of the kind of movie they're aiming for. Filming of the as-yet-untitled comedy will wrap up in May.


ROTTEN IDEAS OF THE WEEK


#2 AND ON THE 8TH DAY, GOD CREATED STEREOSCOPIC 3D, AND IT WAS... GOOD?

Paramount Pictures is developing a $30 million, 3D retelling of the creation story as told in Genesis, the first book of the Bible. In the Beginning will focus on the story of Adam and Eve, and it's not yet known how far into the Book of Genesis the movie will get (but probably not too far, if the focus is the creation story). Also included in Genesis after Adam and Eve are their sons Cain and Abel (who probably will be in this movie, I would guess), Noah and his Ark, Abraham, Lot, Isaac, Jacob and Joseph. It's quite a cast of characters (and I'm probably forgetting someone, at that). In the Beginning was written by screenwriter John Fusco, whose filmography is particularly western-themed, including both Young Guns movies, Hidalgo and Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron. Fusco also wrote The Forbidden Kingdom, however, so he has covered territory (way) east of the Mississippi before. The director of In the Beginning will be David L. Cunningham, who has worked mostly in television (The Path to 9/11 and the 2005 remake of Little House on the Prairie), but he did direct The Seeker: The Dark is Rising in 2007. The focus of this $30 million mini-epic will be "family and faith-based audiences that flocked to The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe." The Chronicles of Narnia is being named dropped because In the Beginning is being produced by Cary Granat, who used to head Walden Media, the production company behind the Narnia movies. The reason this is one of the Rotten Ideas this week is not so much anything to do with the idea of Adam and Eve getting their own movie. Instead, my curiousity is raised by the $30 million price tag on a 3D movie (though I guess My Bloody Valentine was probably even cheaper), and the iffy resume of director David L. Cunningham.


#1 ALVIN AND THE CHIPMUNKS 3D... HOPEFULLY THE NEXT ONE WON'T BE IN 4D

This announcement should surprise absolutely no one who pays attention to box office numbers, but 20th Century Fox is moving forward with plans for Alvin and the Chipmunks 3D. There are no details yet about the writers, director or premise of this third movie yet, but it does have a release date of December 16, 2011. That date puts Alvin and the Chipmunks 3D right up against Steven Spielberg's The Adventures of Tintin: The Secret of the Unicorn, which also features CGI animated characters in 3D. You can expect that one of them will eventually move from that date. Alvin and the Chipmunks 3D isn't the only Fox sequel to be announced this week, however. Brad Simpson, the producer of the upcoming Diary of a Wimpy Kid has revealed that "our screenwriters" (not named, but presumably the same people who wrote the first movie) "are working on a sequel right now, 'Rodrick Rules,' which would be based on the second book." Diary of a Wimpy Kid is based upon a children's book that is now the first of a series of four books, with a fifth one expected later this year. Rodrick Rules focuses on the main character Greg's rocky relationship with his older brother Rodrick, who is in high school. The future of Diary of a Wimpy Kid 2: Rodrick Rules depends upon how well the first movie does when it is released on March 19, 2010.


For more Weekly Ketchup columns by Greg Dean Schmitz, check out the WK archive, and you can contact GDS through his MySpace page or via a RT forum message.

bluestar50

bluestar50 on 03-12-2010 07:14 PM

Ugh, just what we don't more of, is another Alvin and The Chipmunks movie. In 3D? What else is new these days? It seems like every movie getting released is in 3D. Another Planet of the Apes sounds like a good idea. Hollywood, please don't do anymore remakes to The Wizard of Oz. Two words: The Wiz. Lastly, I say bring on a remake of Excalibur.

Robert C.

Robert C. on 03-13-2010 08:36 AM

Three words: "Return to Oz" (1985), Disney's attempt at a sequel became a big box office bomb.

mjprogue

mjprogue on 03-12-2010 07:38 PM

While I'm not a fan of 3-D (really is just a waste of time and money) another alvin movie is better news than many of these other bulletins.

Both the prior ones were fun flicks...sorry there childishness makes it hard for grown men to take them seriously (probably because those men take themselves TOO seriously) but they really are fun.

But really...someone thinks another anthology movie is a good idea? They are NEVER good ideas...DaVinci action hero? Really? Anything by the Wachowskis? Come to think of it has a brother directing duo ever made a movie of better than mediocre quality?

Well I guess the others have potential, although I have no presonal interest in Lambardi (or football in general) the movie probably won't suck.

Although I can also say I'm disappointed by the Red Skull choice...Weaving might be a fan boy's dream come true...but I just don't get it...maybe because Matrix sucked and as good as the Rings trilogy was, I just can't take any actor seriously after seeing him dressed as an elf...

dethburger

dethburger on 03-12-2010 08:26 PM

Please explain how 3D is a waste of time and money.

The producers of Avatar,Up and Alice in Wonderland would beg to differ.

misterkyle1901

misterkyle1901 on 03-13-2010 09:35 AM

Hmm, okay I don't think that The Matrix was the greatest movie ever, but it was pretty solid, and for you to say it sucked and praise Alvin and the Chipmunks in the same post....
I dunno, I just think credibility is not on your side.

I wish someone would do something about the Genesis movie. Are the religious too lazy to read now or something? It would be great if someone did that movie that focused on the philosophy, or in myth-like fashion, cause there is story there. But that's not going to happen. Are they going to say "based on a true story" in the previews? How do you advertise this? And who is going to play God? Morgan Freeman can't exactly reprise the role.
Sorry if I've angered anybody.

Playboy Slim

Playboy Slim on 03-13-2010 11:25 AM

Ignore the obvious troll. He's obvious...wait, that's not how you say it...

Trey B.

Trey B. on 03-13-2010 02:35 PM

Someone up top put "Come to think of it has a brother directing duo ever made a movie of better than mediocre quality?"

I'm not the first one to put this but: How about the Coen Brothers? Fargo? Blood Simple? The Big Lebowski? No Country for Old Men?

And Hugo Weaving is awesome.
And Sherlock Holmes, while not as good as I had hoped it would be, was not "ruined", it was still entertaining and a decent flick.

And why is 3D a waste of money? On action films, scifi, horror, fantasy, and anything but straight comedy or drama, it seems like 3D is something that will make movies even more enjoyable.

Christ, alot of you people have no idea what you're talking about.

Jon B.

Jon B. on 03-13-2010 10:13 PM

Someone up top put "Come to think of it has a brother directing duo ever made a movie of better than mediocre quality?"

I'm not the first one to put this but: How about the Coen Brothers? Fargo? Blood Simple? The Big Lebowski? No Country for Old Men?

I tried saying just that last night but I couldn't post up a god damn comment.

Trey B.

Trey B. on 03-13-2010 02:37 PM

Someone up top put "Come to think of it has a brother directing duo ever made a movie of better than mediocre quality?"

I'm not the first one to put this but: How about the Coen Brothers? Fargo? Blood Simple? The Big Lebowski? No Country for Old Men?

And Hugo Weaving is awesome.
And Sherlock Holmes, while not as good as I had hoped it would be, was not "ruined", it was still entertaining and a decent flick.

And why is 3D a waste of money? On action films, scifi, horror, fantasy, and anything but straight comedy or drama, it seems like 3D is something that will make movies even more enjoyable.

Christ, alot of you people have no idea what you're talking about.

NathanSexplosion

NathanSexplosion on 03-12-2010 08:16 PM

great. guy ritchie (that snatch) ruined sherlock holmes. now let's ruin king arthur too!

The.Watcher

The.Watcher on 03-12-2010 08:29 PM

Ugh. Ritchie and Arthur is a horrible idea.
Holmes and RocknRolla sucked so hard I couldn't finish watching either of them.

Enough with Oz - Alice wasn't that good.

Chris Evans is a good choice, as is Weaving. But they should really replace Joe Johnston - he sucks.

BLaCKWoLF

BLaCKWoLF on 03-12-2010 08:57 PM

Captain America - The inclusion of Chris Evans is an interesting one, I thought he was brilliant in Sunshine and really showed that he does have a lot more to offer than the 'goofball' character he played as Johnny Storm (although he did play and suit that particular character very well). Hugo Weaving's involvement in this film/ franchise could not make me any happier, he is an amazing actor. Enough said.

Wizard of Oz remake - Interesting, very interesting. This is one of those classic films that are better suited never being touched or remade. However, I kind of like the idea for the second project written by Josh Olson, the premise of Dorothy's granddaughter could be pretty good if it all comes together.

RocknRolla & Sherlock Holmes have restored my faith in Guy Ritchie and the story for the 'reimagining' of the often romanticized tale could be pretty cool. However I am really not looking forward to the 'Twilightization' of the timeless and legendary story of King Arther, Guinevere and Lancelot.

Playboy Slim

Playboy Slim on 03-12-2010 09:11 PM

Good for Cap. Everything else? Ehhh...

And will the comment friggin' ADD!!!

August M.

August M. on 03-13-2010 07:12 AM

Great, another Chipmunk movie. :(

Nikolai S.

Nikolai S. on 03-13-2010 07:22 AM

This is such a shock! That is such my sarcasm! Everytime they need a bad guy to have a **** kicked out of him they get this guy and everytime they need a muther ****er in a CGI suit they get Gollum monster guy

http://tinyurl.com/yab4qo7

King Thor

King Thor on 03-13-2010 08:10 AM

Chris Evans seems like the best choice out of all the names that have been suggested. Of course Hugo Weaving will be amazing.

I definitely liked Sherlock Holmes, it was a good movie, so I wouldn't mind seeing what Ritchie could do with King Arthur.

FUCK YOU ROTTEN TOMATOES

FUCK YOU ROTTEN TOMATOES on 03-13-2010 09:25 AM

F--k yeah on Hugo Weaving as the Red Skull!

@gm1200

"Come to think of it has a brother directing duo ever made a movie of better than mediocre quality?"

The Coens have made some pretty damn good movies.

Steve R.

Steve R. on 03-13-2010 11:18 AM

Well the 3rd chimpmunks was inevitable, and kids seem to like it, so let them have it. It's weird though I thought this last one the "squeakwel" was already in 3-d.

And I'm a big fan of the Diary of a Wimpy Kid series; the books are very funny for adults and kids, but the previews make it seem very unfunny and I'm a kinda concerned that it won't translate well.

Skelerax V.

Skelerax V. on 03-13-2010 04:01 PM

I really hope they end up casting Hedlund as cap, dude is an absolute chameleon so I'm pretty sure he'd end up the living embodiment of steve rogers as long as they get rid of the pathetic director and push it back a bit, it's scheduled for a few months after Thor and no cast yet?
I'm suprised they haven't canned johnston already! This film is part of a larger investment leading into the avengers and they hire the director of jumanji? I thought Marvel studios was smarter than this.

3D is not groundbreaking or revolutionary, it's a gimmick and an old one as well as being a subversive anti-piracy method (a cam of that is enough to invoke a brain aneurysm) and the sooner it returns to the bin of obscurity the better.
And for those poised to leap on me yes avatar was very impressive, certainly not as a movie but more in a "jingle keys, mesmerise child" sort of way, but it's success does not mean the public at large is gonna jump on the bandwagon and submit themselves to wearing irritating glasses every time they go to the movies, they will for a while, but then the bubble will burst and their fickle nature will once again show hollywood that the words "moderation" and "enough" should not be delegated exclusively to the use of animal tranquilisers. That's ok hollywood just keep throwing all your eggs in that basket till somebody smacks you in the head with it.

I saw one of the production crew from avatar claim that film has evolved from silent movies to black and white to colour to 3D the other day, I felt physically ill. Doesn't the film industry have enough mania yet? Reboot mania, PG13 mania, twilightization mania and now 3D mania, just.... stop.

/rant

Dean W.

Dean W. on 03-13-2010 06:07 PM

Planet of the Apes prequel, well it was done twice, as in the 2 sequels to the original, but Ceasar was one of the best characters and they were made 40 years ago. So it should be interesting, after all it is one of the most enduring series in hollywood history, and deservedly so . Those movies are great!

mjprogue

mjprogue on 03-13-2010 07:05 PM

Ok so Big Lebowski was a great movie...every other one you listed was mediocre at best or (No Country) a complete travesty which never should have been made.

As for 3D...it is absolutely a gimmick...I have yet to see a movie where it was anything but an add on to suck extra money out of the public. Avatar was close, but the experience was really no better than in a 2-D house. Sure the studios think its great...people pay extra to watch it...but it is a waste in the sense that it doesn't add anything to the moviegoing experience.

And yes...I can say Chipmunks was good and Matrix wasn't with no reservation. Chipmunks was a VERY well done kids movie. Anywhere near my favorite? No way...but really good FOR WHAT IT WAS. Matrix on the other hand was the laziest kind of Sci-Fi (of which I am a huge fan). Pretty effects and kick-@$$ fight scenes do not make a good movie...I expect my sci-fi to have some actual thought put into the story...and maybe the slightest bit of credibility. Matrix had neither...though I will admit it was kind of fun to watch if you completely ignored the plot and dialogue...sorry that isn't enough movie for me.

And no I'm not a troll out to disagree with everyone...I just happen to not care if you folks do disagree...if I wanted everyone to agree with me about movies, I would talk to people in real life instead of on a board populated by elitist movie hounds who think a movie must be good if it won an Oscar (No Country)...really, in the real world pretty much nobody liked that movie. It sold lots of tickets because of the hype...but nobody reports on the number of walkouts it also got...or the amount of disgust of those who stayed through the end. And since movie theatres usually do passes instead of refunds, the movie still got to keep most of the money from those walkouts...unfortunately.

Throw An Onion

Throw An Onion on 03-13-2010 08:22 PM

@gm1200

Coraline, Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs, Up, Fantastic Mr Fox, are all good kid's movies. Alvin and the Chipmunks wasn't even semi decent. The script was bad (even by kid's movie standards), the cg was gimmicky, the acting was lazy, the direction was mediocre at best, and even the music was annoying. No Country for Old Men contained brilliant acting, superb direction, and amazing writing. If you didn't understand the film that's fine. Just don't call it a poor quality film while praising the merits of Alvin and the Chipmunks. Preferring one too the other is fine, just don't mix up which one is of higher quality.

Matanuki

Matanuki on 03-14-2010 05:44 AM

Amen, Throw. Amen.

Jon B.

Jon B. on 03-13-2010 10:14 PM

Pray tell, why was No Country For Old Men a travesty?

Skelerax V.

Skelerax V. on 03-13-2010 11:33 PM

If your opinions are genuine then I feel sorry for you like I feel sorry for any "special people", I'm not even going to go into what's wrong with proclaiming alvin & chipmunks a masterpiece and bashing two movies of such depth and quality in the same breath.
I would hope for your sake you're just a troll, but if you're not then it's certainly handy that you don't care if people disagree with you, because everybody does.

Matanuki

Matanuki on 03-14-2010 05:43 AM

You prefer your sci fi to have actual thought put into the story? You sure? You just said the Matrix "sucked".... And speaking of thought, No Country was a "travesty"? Well, aren't you a treasure trove of contraditions today. lol.

By the way, it might surprise you but us folks commenting on here who liked No Country, we live in that real world you mentioned.

And no offense but I gotta agree with the above -all your praise for the Chipmunk franchise, especially in light of the things you're saying about these other films, is a quite a credibility killer on these boards.

nerdbanner

nerdbanner on 03-14-2010 11:07 AM

GM1200...

No good Brother movies?? Seriously?? COHEN BROTHERS have "O Brother Where Art Thou" and "Raising Arizona," and most of the movie watching community worth their salt TOTALLY disagrees with you on "No Country For Old Men." One Oscar Nomination, could be over-looked, but time and time again, the movie community commends these two with NUMEROUS nominations for numerous movies for numerous categories with numerous awards groups... not just the Oscars.

and "Dumb and Dumber" was NOT a mediocre comedy and neither was "There's Something About Mary" ... a brother team.

And if you want to use that GOOD FOR WHAT IT WAS excuse (lame,) then "Speed Racer" was the PERFECT live-action adaption possible based on this show. They made a live-action version of a campy bright 60's Japanese show... and FOR WHAT IT WAS... was perfect. Maybe you just don't like cheezy 60's foreign shows.

Matrix is NOT a Sci-Fi !!! KUNG-FU MOVIE!!!! The sci-fi elements were just a setting. This is MOST DEFINITELY a live-action Anime with STRONG Chinese Kung-Fu Movie elements... heck, they even had Woo Ping!

Sorry GM1200, but you missed the mark. Relax and enjoy the movies FOR WHAT THEY ARE. (pfffffft.)

Matanuki

Matanuki on 03-14-2010 03:28 PM

The Matrix is not a sci fi?..... You had me until you dropped the ball on that one, nerdbanner.

Dave J.

Dave J. on 03-15-2010 01:24 PM

gm1200

I have no idea how old you're, but your tastes are whacked!! You're either a young dad who has kids and praises kids films through their eyes or just don't have the time to watch films in general. It's fortunate that they're all types of films for every single demographic even the ones that once liked juvenile kids films when they were little ONLY to grow older to realize that those same kids films do not seem so great anymore!!!

Henry Gordon Jago

Henry Gordon Jago on 03-13-2010 08:50 PM

If WB is looking to use Oz as a follow-up franchise to Potter, then they should follow that strategy: more-or-less faithful adaptations of the books, one at a time. As classic as the 1939 film is, the only way it's worthwhile to revisit Oz is to completely ignore Judy Garland and go back to the source material.

Patrick D.

Patrick D. on 03-13-2010 10:18 PM

First, the announcement of Hugo Weaving as the Red skull has already guaranteed Captain America 1 ticket. Evan's is an interesting choice but I think it could work.

Second, I love the original Wizard of Oz. I also felt the sequel "Return to Oz" was a very underrated film and I think "The Wiz" is a classic as well. Point being, I love the Idea of the Wizard of Oz, remake or sequel, coming back to the big screen. However, I don't want to see Tim Burton doing it. He did well with Alice but if I had my choice it would be Peter Jackson or a director of similar style.

Rapid Fire:
Excalibur - Cool
Deniro as Lombardi - Good Choice
The Rest - Whatever.

fredo r.

fredo r. on 03-13-2010 10:36 PM

I'm going to throw a name for the role of Cap and,it's a name I believe has already been tossed around in here... Jensen Ackles. He's known but not super known..."yet". Cap can make him that big star just like the one on Caps chest.
Anyone else like the idea?

fredo r.

fredo r. on 03-13-2010 10:37 PM

I'm going to throw a name for the role of Cap and,it's a name I believe has already been tossed around in here... Jensen Ackles. He's known but not super known..."yet". Cap can make him that big star just like the one on Caps chest.
Anyone else like the idea?

Matanuki

Matanuki on 03-14-2010 05:46 AM

Love the Ackles, my friend. But I still think Aaron Eckhart should be Cap. Evans, however, is definitely a suitable alternative.

MADDAZ

MADDAZ on 03-13-2010 11:40 PM

Good news about Captain America, but thought I might pass on spme news about Predators. Theres a sneak peek of the movie on youtube and the Predators movie web site and it looks very cool. I know, I know that this tread aint about Predators but seeing as there aint much to yahoo about some of use might enjoy the heads up.

nancy m.

nancy m. on 03-14-2010 12:58 AM

My friends say that when they move, it seems that it is one of the worst things that they experience. Really, if you did plan well your move it could really be a mess and full of hassles.

There are many things to consider in choosing the best moving company for you. Visit the site below to know more!

http://www.truckrentals.net

What's Hot On RT

Critics Consensus
Critics Consensus

Journey 2 Not Worth the Trip

Luis Guzman
Luis Guzman

What are his 10 best movies ever?

<em>Amazing Spider-Man</em>
Amazing Spider-Man

See the all-new action-packed trailer!

The Avengers!
The Avengers!

Five new Marvelous pictures

Help | About | Jobs | Newsletter | Critics Submission | API | Licensing | Blog | Developers | Mobile