News » 12 Days of Friday, Day 12: Friday the 13th (2009)

12 Days of Friday, Day 12: Friday the 13th (2009)

Editor Alex Vo watches a Friday the 13th movie daily until the reboot.


This analysis of Friday the 13th is generally spoiler-free. The same can't be guaranteed for my (or other's) remarks in the comments section.

Day Twelve: Friday the 13th

This is it. Last stop. Off the bus, everyone: Camp Crystal Lake, back where we started. We got rustic cabins and canoes, a few houses and barns, Crystal Lake itself, and a campfire to set up. Sit around, roast some marshmallows, and let's tell a few scary stories.

Less a reboot than a greatest hits remix of the first movies (I'd argue it goes all the way up to The Final Chapter as this features a besieged family house), Marcus Nispel's Friday the 13th opens with five teens searching for rumored crops of wild marijuana and their unfortunate run-in with baghead Jason. (Sleeping bag kill alert!) Six weeks later, Clay Miller (CW-perennial Jared Padalecki) is combing the Crystal Lake area for his sister, who is among the missing. But apparently Clay's getting a little too close to camp for Jason's comfort and he begins preying on partying teenagers and hicks in the area.

The obvious question first: If you and your friends defy the Tomatometer (the horror!) and watch Marcus Nispel's Friday the 13th , are y'all going to have a serviceably good time? Yes.

Next question: Is this the movie fans of classic Friday the 13th -- burned for years with lousy sequels, retcons, and general franchise ineptitude -- deserve? Yes.

But do they also deserve a little more? I think so. I think anybody does.
Friday the 13th hits the modern slasher minimum -- glossy production values, some sex, some decent kills, and a nice helping of gore. This is a competent, if totally uninspired, movie and describing it as such surprises me considering the director. Come on, Nispel remade the freakin' Texas Chainsaw Massacre -- a project that seemed doomed from the beginning, yet he delivered with a tense little flick. How hard could it be to bring back Jason? Well, frankly, it feels like Nispel is holding back. The movie could've been a little more gruesome. A little more shocking. A little more confident in its exploration of the Voorhees mythos. We get only flashes of brilliance, slivers of backstory here and there. Because this is a movie obviously with sequels in mind, there's no sense of completeness, and while I respect the movie's decision to keep the Jason character open, we've already been down this route; the series spiraled completely out of control because writers and directors were afraid to make any definitive statements on the character. This was your chance.
Though we don't get insight into the why or what of Jason, the movie does present a new angle on how he kills. Jason is portrayed now as a predator -- he sets up traps around the forest, uses people as bait, and proves his bow and arrow isn't there just for decoration. The movie's creepiest scenes come when we see Jason unguarded, walking around his encampment with bodies slung over his shoulder. His careful workmanship carrying corpses around is monstrous yet eerily humanizing.

Derek Mears plays Jason, mostly modeled after the Richard Brooker Jason of Part III: fast, agile, while approaching indestructibility. Mears makes the most of what he has to work with, able to communicate that there is thought process beneath the mask in addition to the wild aggression of an animal defending his territory, though Nispel is mostly satisfied in keeping Jason within slasher convention as the guy who shows up at the worst possible time. We don't see Jason shoot the bow and arrow. We just know the arrow came from him. And, at one point, Jason teleports off-screen onto a rooftop. I believe a man who has lived in the woods for 30 years can do that. But how great would it have been to see him actually do it?

As seen in Massacre, Nispel knows how to bring out the worst in small settings, so I was eager to see him get down and dirty when the dwindling number of survivors decide to hole up in the family house. Unfortunately, all Nispel does is let his characters hit levels of stupid that can only be described as stratospheric. Considering the movies I've seen the last two weeks, that's saying something.
The movie offers several hypotheses of what makes Jason tick, though none thoroughly explored. If he wants to be left alone, as one woman intones, why does he begin attacking people unprovoked? Is he a psychopath? He heals almost instantly -- is he human? Is he a supernatural being, resurrected by the death of his mother? He seems to be stockpiling the bodies. For what purpose? Considering the series tendency to go completely insane, it's understandable the filmmakers wanted to lay down a multitude of story options they can pick and choose for later sequels. But focusing on the now, such a tactic leaves one slightly muddled and dissatisfied.

Look, if you're out for pure, shut-your-brain-off thrills, you're generally going to get it. I don't think any of the deaths here will end up on future Best Kills list (a knife impaling a poor girl's skull, however, is rather cringe-worthy), but the movie as a whole is polished and efficient. But if you seek something new that you haven't seen from a Friday the 13th movie, or from just being a fan of horror, keep waiting. It's been years. What's a few more?

Friday the 13th Vital Stats:

  • Body Count: 13.
  • Survivors: 2. Sorta.
  • Number of Jason-approved weapons: 10. Bear trap, sleeping bag, machete, sharp pokey thing, bow and arrow, knife, screwdriver, axe, decorative deer antlers, tow truck.

My final rankings for the series:

  • Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter.
  • Freddy vs. Jason.
  • Friday the 13th (1980).
  • Friday the 13th Part III.
  • Friday the 13th (2009).
  • Friday the 13th Part 2
  • Jason Lives: Friday the 13th Part VI.
  • Friday the 13th Part VII: The New Blood
  • Jason Goes to Hell: The Final Friday
  • Friday the 13th Part VIII: Jason Takes Manhattan
  • Friday the 13th Part V: A New Beginning
  • Jason X

I'm steadfast in my belief in that The Final Chapter approaches brilliance. A marriage of technical elegance, fun characters, and gothic horror. I'm actually eager to watch this again sometime in the near future. Freddy vs Jason is great big bloody fun. I'll likely watch this again within a few years. The original is quaint and charming. Part III is infectious in its gleeful stupidity. This reboot and Part 2 are similar in that they're serviceable if somewhat generic. And the rest of the list starts with mild disinterest, gradually plummeting into total abhorrence.

I was eager to watch these movies to track the series' gradual evolution from murder-mystery to monster slasher. I had seen most of the movies and subsequently forgot everything about them, but what did remain was this smoldering fondness for the Jason character. The same fondness I think a lot of people have for him, even if they aren't self-confessed fans of the movie. Did we need a reboot? I think so -- the franchise had simply taken on too much water to continue on and we want our silent maniacs to live on forever. Not to become artifacts of an era. It's a relief to know that a man (or zombie or ghost of retribution or whatever he is) who has made a home in the woods still has relevance as an icon, not matter how much things change or how much the world moves away from him.

And that ends this marathon. Readers and commenters, thank you for following along.

Schedule of Fridays:

-apocolyptic-

-apocolyptic- on 02-13-2009 01:07 PM


Very well written and informative article. Have been reading them and actually went out and bought my first Friday the 13th movie.
I now own part 3 in 3-D.
Kudos to you man, and a belated Kudos to Ryan for his James Bond reviews.
hopefully you guys can continue to do more.

askingseven

askingseven on 02-13-2009 01:10 PM

Thanks Alex. I enjoyed these articles very much. And I'm excited about holding my own FT13 marathon soon.

Darren W.

Darren W. on 02-13-2009 01:45 PM

I say it was predictable at most. Just used all the tatics of the first 4. But still didn't give the fans what they wanted IE how he survived drowning. no mention of a father figure. just teens getting slaughtered without mercy. I was a lack luster attempt to remake a cult favorite.

tomwaitsjrHAPPYICONOCLAST

tomwaitsjrHAPPYICONOCLAST on 02-13-2009 02:00 PM

Great Job Alex!


If anyone can write down how Jason gets killed, or not, in this film Please post SPOILER and let me know!

thanks.

Aaron S.

Aaron S. on 02-13-2009 02:19 PM

Kick ***. I'll definitely have to give most of these another try, and check out the new one. GFJ, man.

The Great One

The Great One on 02-13-2009 02:26 PM

Great job Alex...I'll never forget you ranked Jason Lives 7th though!!!

chris p.

chris p. on 02-13-2009 03:10 PM

2. Sorta wtf does that mean only half of the survivor got awa?

Kai Sacco

Kai Sacco on 02-13-2009 03:22 PM

Great marathon man.

The reason why your articles on F-13 are so good, is because you know how to look at slasher movies. You can't be too harsh on them because they're not made to win Oscars. They're just pure brainless fun. And I'm glad you understood that.

Again, great article / marathon.

RT-Ryan

RT-Ryan on 02-13-2009 03:29 PM

Awesome job, Alex. Just wanted to put that out there.

James G.

James G. on 02-13-2009 03:49 PM

I really enjoyed this Friday marathon. Lots of insight to share with my friends(on your behalf) when we sit down, get drunk, and laugh our asses off to these movies. Thanks again Alex!

ZigBallistic

ZigBallistic on 02-13-2009 04:19 PM

Sweet, this sounds like a fun movie. I wans't expecting shakespeare, just something exciting to watch and it sounds like they delivered that at least.

jrod1978

jrod1978 on 02-13-2009 04:31 PM

First off, Thanks Alex for the great write ups on the F13 series. It's was great to remember these movies for better or for worse. As for the new movie, I'll probably end up renting it.

Playboy Slim

Playboy Slim on 02-13-2009 05:37 PM

Well, you survied the Friday movies. And enjoyed some! A few. My consenus on the series (I've seen (Friday the 13th Part 1/Jason Takes Manhattan/Jason X/Freddy vs Jason) is it's an awful series, with an undeniablely great villain. The only one I enjoyed was "Freddy vs Jason".

One last thing, a bear trap? Deer antlers? I gotta see that!

jokerboy1991

jokerboy1991 on 02-13-2009 07:54 PM

Good job Alex... Saw this tonight, and I liked it! It was cliche with bad dialogue and predictability but I had a great audience and it was a fun movie. I would even say its the fun-nest Friday the 13th movie I have seen. I would give it a 7/10. Also just to let you know I hated The Hitcher remake and I didn't like the Texas Chainsaw remake, but this was fun!

jokerboy1991

jokerboy1991 on 02-13-2009 07:57 PM

Also I was kind of hoping for a more fun horror movie and not a gruesome one like Texas Chainsaw so, I was fine that it wasn't all nasty. Also the movie had a good look to it like TCM, good cinematography. If your going to see it, see it on a saturday night with a packed theater with your popcorn and soda.

BatsInTheBelfry

BatsInTheBelfry on 02-13-2009 08:53 PM

I for one completely hated the Texas Chainsaw remake. But Friday the 13th wasn't bad. It could have been better, but it could have been a lot worse.

My rankings

Part 6
Part 4
Freddy v. Jason
Part 3
Friday the 13th
Friday the 13th (2009)
Part 2
Part 7
Jason X
Jason Goes to Hell
Part 8
Part 5

RamALamADingDong

RamALamADingDong on 02-13-2009 08:55 PM

I'll be seeing this one tonight at a midnight showing. Just couldn't get to the midnight yesterday. From what I've read so far it sounds pretty much like I expect it to be.

My order of the movies would be:
Friday the 13th (1980)
Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter (1984)
Friday the 13th Part 2 (1981)
Friday the 13th Part III (1982)
Jason Lives: Friday the 13th Part VI (1986)
Freddy vs. Jason (2003)
Friday the 13th: A New Beginning (1985)
Friday the 13th Part VII: The New Blood (1988)
Friday the 13th Part VIII: Jason Takes Manhattan (1989)
Jason Goes to Hell: The Final Friday (1993)
Jason X (2001)

Eric F.

Eric F. on 02-13-2009 10:22 PM

Fantastic retrospective, and a honest, fan's review of the new one. Thanks so much!

DoomRulz

DoomRulz on 02-13-2009 10:40 PM

Excellent articles my friend, very well done. I have not seen any of the Friday movies (no, really), but seeing all the posters for this reboot piqued my curiosity and having seen it last night, I enjoyed it! It was dumb, formulaic, with sexy girls, dumb jocks, pointless nudity, riddled with cliches, but I walked out of the movie theatre doing this: :D :D :D

Now I'm going to go and watch the original, along with your top 5!!!

brandon s.

brandon s. on 02-13-2009 10:51 PM

What's the point? What's the appeal of watching some big dude in a mask hack and slash a bunch of terrible teenage actors? There's no tension- its just gore punctuated by bad acting and a total lack of satire within that. I remember seeing a few of these movies about 15 years ago when I was a kid (some of the ones featured at the TOP of this list) and all I remember was a bunch of yawn worthy **** happening and acting so bad it made me cringe. I mean, I can understand the appeal of some low-budget horror (Halloween was fantastic- it had REAL tension, suspense and didn't rely lazily on gore,) but there simply isn't any real artistic or even popcorn worth in any of these "jason" movies or in any of those "nightmare" ones....its just a "set 'em up, knock 'em down" scenario....if I wanted that I could just go play a video game, I wouldn't have to sit through all the terrible dialogue.

What's Hot On RT

Critics Consensus
Critics Consensus

Journey 2 Not Worth the Trip

Luis Guzman
Luis Guzman

What are his 10 best movies ever?

<em>Amazing Spider-Man</em>
Amazing Spider-Man

See the all-new action-packed trailer!

The Avengers!
The Avengers!

Five new Marvelous pictures

Help | About | Jobs | Newsletter | Critics Submission | API | Licensing | Blog | Developers | Mobile