Gangster Squad

Wise decision. The only reason to see this movie is to see some of our favorite actors on screen. Otherwise, so not worth seeing. I paid $10.50 to see this movie in which I was only mildly entertained.

Jan 13 - 08:53 PM

Jan 13 - 08:53 PM

Jan 13 - 08:54 PM

this guy is stupid, and tarantino is making the killer crow....isnt he ?

Jan 11 - 05:52 PM

Yeah, but before that he wants to do a gangster movie.

Jan 12 - 09:36 AM

oh shit, i gotta look that up, thanks

Jan 12 - 11:31 AM

No problem lol

Jan 12 - 01:31 PM

i looked it up, and there really wasnt much. just a statement on how he wanted to make a 30's gangster film. i would really like to see how that could turn out if it is his next project, pray everybody !

Jan 12 - 02:31 PM

Yeah, that's what I heard too. I was hoping you would be able to find more information, but that's ok. I'd love to see how the film turns out.

Jan 12 - 03:20 PM

Jan 12 - 08:58 PM

He will. Tarantino's next movie is a gangster epic.

Jan 11 - 01:10 PM

Alex Aston

I find it pretentious that the critics put violence as a negative in the general consensus.

Jan 11 - 06:04 AM

Mike Andersen Del Percio

I don't think that [most] critics regard violence as a negative. It's when a movie substitutes violence for a progressive story line that is held as a negative; and rightly so. There are many movies which are loaded with violence that the critics praise. Such as Django for instance. Django is more violent than this, yet the critics loved it. The distaste for the movie comes from the awful writing, directing etc. The idea of this movie is spectacular and had the potential to be great, instead they turned it into a comic book, shoot-em-up popcorn flick.

Jan 11 - 09:39 AM

Alex Aston

You see, that consensus I have no problem with, I just find it odd that the site added excess violence as a negative for a film, especially a gangster movie.

Jan 12 - 01:34 AM