Critic Review - Los Angeles Times

Basically, the Joes are not bad, it's just that they could have been much better with a little less conversation, a little more action.

August 7, 2009 Full Review Source: Los Angeles Times | Comments (6)
Los Angeles Times
Top Critic IconTop Critic



Jason Poras

I truly feel bad for Los Angeles to have their primary source of educated information coming from someone who recommends this piece of waste. You call yourself an art critic? How could you recommend this? What part of this movie was worth paying for? the star cast? more action -- please say your kidding. It's reviews like this that cost me $12, maybe if you were a writer for fox news, but the LA Times?

Aug 7 - 10:47 PM

Tim G.

Tim Green

What do you mean "action"??? It filled the entire film,........... moron!!!

Aug 7 - 11:57 PM


Jason Poras

Yes Moron if you read the review you would see that her critique of the movie is that it needed more action. Apparently their weren't enough submarines and stormtroopers

Aug 8 - 09:56 AM


Jordan Piltz

Well, considering it has a 61% user appears that you're in the minority in disliking the movie, P.W.

Aug 8 - 11:07 PM

Matthew S.

Matthew Shelby

That's terribly funny how clueless this snippet makes Betsy sound. Moar action indeed.

Aug 9 - 04:19 AM

Stan V.

Stan Valentin

It`s mindless, it`s entertainment and it has lots of action. For a real movie critic it is probably garbage but I have a feeling it was made for ordinary "Joes" and that`s why I give them a salute.

Nov 22 - 12:12 AM

Find us on:                     
Help | About | Jobs | Critics Submission | Press | API | Licensing | Mobile