Critic Review - Chicago Sun-Times

The stunning text of The Godfather is replaced in Part II with prologues, epilogues, footnotes, and good intentions.

October 23, 2004 Full Review Source: Chicago Sun-Times | Comments (8)
Chicago Sun-Times
Top Critic IconTop Critic



Ben Noe

I agree completely with this Review.

Both the Michael and Vito storylines were great, but they didn't match up in style or meaning making the film very hard to watch all the way through.

Sep 25 - 11:12 PM


Galen Mountfort

I also agree with the rating, I think this is a good but very overrated film. However Ebert may have changed his opinion on it as he included it in some sort of publication on great films, perhaps he felt the need to conform which is quite atypical of him.

Jan 21 - 04:16 PM

Sarfaraz Abbasi

Sarfaraz Abbasi

Sir, always love your reviews.

Mar 21 - 12:27 AM

James McKinnon

James McKinnon

This. Is. Dookie.

Jan 1 - 11:10 PM

Gory Donnaccelli

Gary Shannon

Geez, this guy only gives the movie 3/4? What a douche, every real movie fan would have given this a flat out perfect. Piece of shit.

Jan 31 - 07:07 PM

Christian Vales

Christian Vales

I don't think it's better than the first either definitely drags on. I like that it has a different tone for Vito and Michael...and it is an excellent film for sure....but it is very slow at some points. I do have an attention span btw in case that is where you were going with your reply....if you replied =)Great film none the less.

May 20 - 08:41 AM

Dave M.

Dave Mart

This film is superior to the original in every way. GP2 is perfect, with nothing wrong on it.

Aug 13 - 11:43 AM

١r­ur Bj÷rnsson

١r­ur Bj÷rnsson

Mr. Ebert said it best in his Great Movies review:

Then why is it a "great movie"? Because it must be seen as a piece with the unqualified greatness of "The Godfather." The two can hardly be considered apart.

Aug 11 - 09:11 PM

Find us on:                     
Help | About | Jobs | Critics Submission | Press | API | Licensing | Mobile