After two gritty films from Timothy Dalton as 007, Pierce Brosnan resurrects the series from a 6-year sleep with 1995's GoldenEye. I liked the film, and I felt it was tightly produced. Read on for more.
GoldenEye
The opening of GoldenEye sets a rather thrilling tone for the rest of the movie, and it continues the trend of incorporating mind-boggling stunts at the outset of each Bond film. The leap off the edge of the dam is exhilarating, and Bond's subsequent break-in to the weapons facility is convincingly executed. Now that we're officially in the mid-90s, the production quality is top notch and, unlike many of the previous entries, holds up relatively well compared to the action we see today.
Pierce Brosnan exudes the same kind of charisma that Roger Moore did, except that Brosnan is a little smoother and a little less stiff. All traces of the Dalton Bond seem to have disappeared here, and the first quarter of GoldenEye definitely felt like a return to the old Bond formulas. In fact, in the traditional chase scene wherein Bond meets Famke Janssen's Xenia Onatopp, we see him driving his classic Aston Martin DB5. And with Onatopp, we also have a return to the suggestive female names.
Later on, we're introduced to the new M, played by Judi Dench. Allusions to her "predecessor" are made in passing, and the villain, Janus (Sean Bean), a former MI6 agent himself, mentions the fact that the "new M" is a woman. I think this was an effective transition from one M to another (even though I noticed the original M had been missing, apparently due to his death), and since Judi Dench is so good in the role, it didn't bother me at all.
In fact, the acting all around is pretty solid in GoldenEye. Onatopp is a little excessive at times, and Alan Cumming as a super hacker was strangely unconvincing (you'd think he'd fit perfectly in a role like that), but I really felt everyone else delivered. Even Izabella Scorupco, who plays Natalya Simonova, eventually proved herself, after the first half of the movie had me thinking she'd be another one of those disposable Bond girls we hardly remember. There's also another new Moneypenny, and while she's fine in her 5 minutes on screen, the attempts to recreate the sexual tension that existed between Lois Maxwell and Sean Connery or Roger Moore fell far short. They weren't clever or witty so much as cold and even a little acerbic.
The sinister plot at the heart of the story is somewhat unimportant, but Sean Bean and Famke Janssen make a mean pair. Onatopp's rather unique "skill" was humorous to me; I pictured her threatening to squeeze the life out of Professor X and screaming, "Call me... the Thighmaster!" And Sean Bean, well, he's yet another one of those guys who just looks like a "bad guy;" I think it's his beady, scheming eyes. When he got shot in the opening scenes, and then his name was the first (aside from Pierce Brosnan's) to pop up in the opening credits, I knew right away that he would be the central villain. But he was convincing enough to make his ridiculous motives sound genuine, unlike, say, Drax, who just looked like he spent a lot of time reading Marie Claire and snacking on popcorn chicken.
In general, the action was put together very well, I thought. There were moments of utter chaos that harkened back to the recklessness of Roger Moore's Bond, particularly in the tank chase, but for some reason, I reveled in the mass destruction. The set pieces were highly impressive, and the fistfights were choreographed well, especially when compared to the early 007 films. I think these were elements that really blossomed with the Dalton films, but here it's quite apparent that a lot more money was being spent on hardware (tanks, choppers, etc.) and special effects.
Overall, I thought GoldenEye was a tightly crafted Bond movie. I've obviously learned by now to suspend my disbelief to enjoy these movies, so I had few qualms with continuity or logic here. The story, while not the most creative, was pushed along at a pretty even pace, which kept me engaged for the most part. And seeing Brosnan operate as Bond really shed light on precisely how grim Dalton was in the role, which is not to say that was a bad thing at all. I think it's fascinating to see what each actor brings to 007, and I look forward to what else Brosnan can offer.
My favorite line: "No, you're supposed to die for me." -- Perhaps Janus had some encounters with Goldfinger during his MI6 days.
My favorite moment: Bond and Simonova are trapped inside a stolen chopper as missiles are about to destroy them. In a desperate effort to escape, Bond starts swinging his head furiously, attempting to press buttons with his forehead. Eventually he finds the Eject button, but I found the imagery hilarious.
Other Articles:
- Day 1: Dr. No (1962)
- Day 2: From Russia With Love (1963)
- Day 3: Goldfinger (1964)
- Day 4: Thunderball (1965)
- Day 5: Casino Royale (1967)
- Day 6: You Only Live Twice (1967)
- Day 7: On Her Majesty's Secret Service (1969)
- Day 8: Diamonds Are Forever (1971)
- Day 9: Live and Let Die (1973)
- Day 10: The Man with the Golden Gun (1974)
- Day 11: The Spy Who Loved Me (1977)
- Day 12: Moonraker (1979)
- Day 13: For Your Eyes Only (1981)
- Day 14: Octopussy (1983)
- Day 15: Never Say Never Again (1983)
- Day 16: A View to a Kill (1985)
- Day 17: The Living Daylights (1987)
- Day 18: Licence to Kill (1989)
- Day 19: GoldenEye (1995)
- Day 20: Tomorrow Never Dies (1997)
- Day 21: The World Is Not Enough (1999)
- Day 22: Die Another Day (2002)
- Day 23: Casino Royale (2006)
- Day 24: Quantum of Solace (2008)
|
fargo_viper writes: on Nov 08 2008 07:06 PM VEGETA, NOOOOO!!!!! (Reply to this) |
|
Alex M. writes: on Nov 08 2008 07:16 PM hey! first bond movie that came out when i was born (1993) and it's one of my faves especially the game have you tried the game yet ryan? it's like the halo before halo (Reply to this) |
|
KingSigy writes: on Nov 08 2008 07:23 PM I definitely love Goldeneye. It's such a fantastic movie. I'm not sure if I'd say Brosnan's role is a return to the campy old, but it's certainly less serious than Dalton's movies. I definitely put Goldeneye as Number 3 in the entire series, just because of how amazing it was for the time and how well it holds up today. Look out for the next 3 Brosnan films though, they are bad. (Reply to this) |
|
ck100 writes: on Nov 08 2008 07:24 PM Looks like the we finally found a Bond movie that lived up to the hype (for the most part) for Ryan. Glad to see he enjoyed this one overall. As I said in my post for LTK, this movie is really a Timothy Dalton movie with Pierce Brosnan in Dalton's shoes. That's probably why this movie feels similar to Dalton's two movies. After all, I think the script for this one was written under the assumption Dalton was coming back (which he did not) Anyway, Brosnan establishes himself nicely in the role and I think overall he did a good job as Bond. He was kind of a mix of Connery and the good parts of Moore. The action is pretty taut and I think a lot of credit goes to director Martin Campbell (who later directs Casino Royale). I liked Sean Bean as Alec Trevelyan and I think he's probably the best of Brosnan's villains. Of course the girls are lovely and you can't help but enjoy Xenia Onatopp and her "special skill". :P It's nice as we get to the 90's Bond movies we get some ladies that aren't just eye candy. They have skills and attitude to match wits with Bond. You have to be fair to Moneypenny since a new actress is established. Their relationship gets a little more time in the next few entries. I think Judi Dench makes an effective "M" and what I like about these later Bond movies is you see more of the relationship between "M" and Bond. I mean who can forget her comment to Bond about being a "sexist, mysognist dinosaur"? Unfortunately, this is as good as it really gets for Brosnan as Bond. I think this movie is the high point of his turn as Bond. His next three movies, while not bad, get too bogged down in gadgetry and silliness which hurt these movies. It's like going from the Dalton and Connery route back to the Moore route again. But still, Brosnan is good and there are things in each of the next three movies that do give some merit. Anyway, like with FYEO, it's nice that Bond got to start off a decade with a bang. (Reply to this) |
|
RT-Ryan writes: on Nov 08 2008 07:53 PM I've noticed that the first movie that each of the new Bonds (even Lazenby, whose "first" bond was also his last) have done has turned out to be pretty good. I loved Dr. No, On Her Majesty's Secret Service, Live and Let Die, and The Living Daylights. Now, GoldenEye gets added to that category, as I found it to be pretty enjoyable. Alex, I didn't really play the GoldenEye game, but I remember how it was all the rage back then, and I do know several people now who still absolutely adore that game. I suppose that also does contribute a bit to the love of the movie as well. KingSigy, you're right. I wouldn't say GoldenEye is a straight up return to the Moore days, because it does feel like a Dalton Bond with a lighter tone. I think that strikes a pretty good balance, and it helped to keep the movie fun. (Reply to this) |
|
ploodie writes: on Nov 08 2008 07:56 PM I seem to be in the minority - I like GOLDENEYE least of the Brosnans. I never can put my finger on it - it just seems too long! The sequence when the first Goldeneye goes off and send all those toy jets into the toy buildings is extremely painful to watch. And Brosnan seems a little too stuffy in the role. I liked him alot better in the next two. TOMORROW NEVER DIES had my favorite action of the Brosnans - especially the remote car - and WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH had Sophie Marceau - need I go on!? I try to pretend like DIE ANOTHER DAY doesn't exist. Ryan - you know, you're going to have to play the game EVERYTHING OR NOTHING as it features the faces and voices of Brosnan, Dench, and John Cleese (who replaced Q in the later films) - I mean, if you're going to include the Sellers version of CASINO ROYALE, then come on!! (Reply to this) |
|
dukeboy26 writes: on Nov 08 2008 08:05 PM Goldeneye!! Defenitely one the best. Though someone said to be prepared because Brosnan's films only get worse? I don't know about that. In my opinion The world is not enough is my favorite. Very good story and a callback to "On her majesty's secret service". I'm really enjoying reading your reviews as you see the originals for the first time. (Reply to this) |
|
Shahid N. writes: on Nov 08 2008 08:11 PM Being an avid follower of the series, I have always thought that GoldenEye was much overrated 007 flick. Brosnan, although a decent actor, always looked someone from a cologne advertisement and not the cold blooded assassin Bond has been depicted in the Fleming novels. Dalton and Craig were the closest, ofcourse no need to mention Connery, afterall he was the one who built such a strong following for the series. And whats wrong with the new team of directors and producers, why have the cut down on playing the iconic Bond theme in the movie?? Its so disappointing, This happened in GoldenEye and the same thing has happened in Quantum of Solace, you dont get to hear this adrenaline pumping theme till the very end!! I hope they dont continue this trend. (Reply to this) |
|
ledawg1138 writes: on Nov 08 2008 08:14 PM Wait, wait, wait! Judi Dench is M? She was excellent in "Casino Royale" which is a reboot or not? Why would they use the same person in the same role in a reboot? I'd see "Goldeneye". (Reply to this) |
|
Joe T. writes: on Nov 08 2008 08:24 PM As someone who started watching Bond in 1983 after reading the novels first, and then having loved Timothy Dalton's Bond, I was a bit disappointed with "Goldeneye". I enjoyed the actors and the action scenes. But I was sad to see the silliness creep back in. And it didn't take long -- that car instructor scene had me squirming in my seat! And that tank scene could have been picked up off the cutting room floor of a Roger Moore movie. No, Ploodie is not alone -- I rank "Goldeneye" lower than the next 2 Brosnans. However, I did enjoy "Die Another Day" despite the silly CGI moments. I'll save my comments for that one's Comments section. But I will say that "Tomorrow Never Dies" is probably my favourite Brosnan film for its wonderful Bond girl and spectacular stunts but mostly because Brosnan delivers a couple of Flemingesque (?) moments which only made me wish even more that Dalton was still playing 007... (Reply to this) |
|
ironmanstarks writes: on Nov 08 2008 08:26 PM GoldenEye is very good, but I don't know why his other movies get so much hate. Tomorrow Never Dies had the best action of any Bond flick, and I thought World is Not Enough had a great, classic Bond story, plus my favorite theme song. (Reply to this) |
|
indiefilmfan2 writes: on Nov 08 2008 08:39 PM GoldenEye was the first Bond I saw in theaters so it has a special place for me. The video games actually parallel the Brosnan movies in that GoldenEye was exceptional and then EA took over and basterdized the franchise. I have fond memories of GoldenEye on N64. 4 player Library with proximity mines all the way! Or slappers only license to kill. (Reply to this) |
|
BatsInTheBelfry writes: on Nov 08 2008 08:52 PM Great movie, ranks as number 4 on my personal Bond list. Sean Bean really was one of the best villains of the entire series. Tomorrow Never Dies gets an unjust reputation, IMO. It's not great, but is still a good movie. After that though, the train really starts derailing. Keep going Ryan, you're almost there. By the way, are you going to make a list of your favorite to least favorite Bond film after this, or is that a little too nerdy for you? (Reply to this) |
|
Sputnik99 writes: on Nov 08 2008 09:00 PM Reading your review makes me want to just dig out my old N64 and play a few hours of Goldeneye! Man that game was incredible! The movie is fun. I loved the tank battle. And I really enjoyed the addition of Brosnan over Dalton. It was like Bond got the stick pulled out of his butt or something, and really loosened back up. I am a lover of Tomorrow Never Dies. Tons of action and fun. Go James! (Reply to this) |
|
golrush007 writes: on Nov 08 2008 09:12 PM This film is great despite having numerous plot holes and things that don't make sense. Like when he bungees off the dam, enters the chemical plant, then comes out the other side to find himself on a runway at the top of a mountain range, when the dam was clearly at the bottom of the mountains. . . Nonetheless, I feel it is Brosnan's highpoint - the music is a letdown though. Martin Campbell has to be given credit for restarting the franchise twice, and with great success. Also, Derek Meddings who died shortly after the film was completed did fantastic model work. The comment about toy planes crashing into toy buildings seems a little unfair to me - I though that was very well done. (Reply to this) |
|
sunsaz writes: on Nov 08 2008 09:15 PM This was the movie that got me into the Bond franchise, so it'll always hold a place in my heart. Undisputedly the best Brosnan Bond film. (Reply to this) |
|
ck100 writes: on Nov 08 2008 09:17 PM In reply to this comment (#2120068) I think the reason the first movies of each new Bond have been pretty good (personal opinions varying of course) is that the movies want to make a good first impression. I mean with a new actor you really have to sell him to the audience as a worthy successor to the predecessor. The way to sell them is with inspired Bond elements of good action, compelling story, hot babes, nifty gagedtry, etc. First impressions mean a lot so that's why the filmmakers are a little more inspired with these first entries than with subsequent ones. I think I can take a guess as to what movies Ryan liked and disliked the most so far: Bond movies Ryan liked the most so far: Dr. No On Her Majesty's Secret Service Live and Let Die The Living Daylights Goldeneye Bond movies Ryan liked the least so far: Diamonds Are Forever Octopussy Never Say Never Again (Reply to this) |
|
bondfreak writes: on Nov 08 2008 09:30 PM I love the villain in tomorrow never dies, his motives are great, the rest of the movie is all acion, girls and bond (Reply to this) |
|
martinscorsese25 writes: on Nov 08 2008 10:54 PM In reply to this comment (#2120070) Sophie Marceau is freakin hot... she's like Monica Bellucci, they have a certain kind of sexiness in them (Reply to this) |
|
martinscorsese25 writes: on Nov 08 2008 10:56 PM In reply to this comment (#2120070) the problem in this movie was the lack of musical score... David Arnold hasnt yet came on board and dazzle us with his musical score... (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |










