The Harry Potter franchise gets its sixth film adaptation next week, and early buzz on the wizarding saga is... fantastically fresh! As Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) and Co. experience the first tremors of teenage love -- and all the hormonal shifts that come with puberty, (Hog)warts and all -- the battle between good and evil is also heating up. Can Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince and returning helmer David Yates withstand the series' growing pains? By the looks of things, Half-Blood Prince not only might maintain the franchise's track record of Certified Freshness, it may also conjure up the best reviews of the entire series. As a wizard might say, "Merlin's Beard!"
As critics continue to chime in with reviews of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, a quick glance at the early Tomatometer not only shows that initial reactions are overwhelmingly positive, but also that they indicate that Certified Fresh status might be right around the corner. (A film needs a minimum of 40 reviews counted, at least five of them by Top Critics, for Certified Fresh consideration.) Half-Blood Prince would land in very good company; all five of its movie predecessors have earned the Certified Fresh distinction:
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (2001), 78%
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (2002), 82%
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004), 89%
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2005), 88%
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2007), 77%
But what exactly are the critics saying about Half-Blood Prince? Read on for a survey of Tomatometer reviews so far.
IT'S GORGEOUS: Thanks to director David Yates, director of photography Bruno Delbonnel (Amelie), and composer Nicholas Hooper (who also worked with director Yates on Order of the Phoenix), Half-Blood Prince has a technically gorgeous look and feel.
"Among the always outstanding production values and top-drawer visual effects, special note should be made of series newcomer Bruno Delbonnel's exceptionally atmospheric cinematography and Nicholas Hooper's emotionally churning score, which contains only the slightest trace of John Williams' original themes." -- Todd McCarthy, Variety
"Not only has [Yates] made the film look gorgeous, but he has a much surer grip on the special effects, deploying them in the service of big set pieces that actually flow with the rhythms of the story, as well as a better understanding of what his younger cast can do." -- Alistair Harkness, Scotsman
THE HARRY POTTER KIDS ARE GROWING UP: Teenage life brings not only heightened dangers for Harry, but much darker themes, following J.K. Rowling's increasingly mature books. Death, loss, longing, and love -- along with plenty of make-out sessions, thanks to the hormones raging at Hogwarts -- making this an appropriately more adult, if still PG-rated, affair.
"Half-Blood Prince feels like the most grown-up Potter film yet when it comes to the menace of the bad guys. They're everywhere, and they're casually evil. While the death of Cedric Diggory in Goblet of Fire was a stunner, Half-Blood Prince carries a constant presence of malice, and it feels like any kid could be killed at any moment." -- Devin Faraci, CHUD
ON THE ACTION, OR LACK THEREOF: Writer Steve Kloves has excised at will from Rowling's source material, omitting at least one major showdown from his script. The result: fewer set pieces, although critics note that the few that are included are thrilling.
"There are surprisingly few action sequences ... But those there are - a chase in the corn between Harry and the Death Eaters, the scene in a forbidding cave where Harry and Dumbledore seek to unravel Voldemort's secrets - crackle with a chilling sense of threat." -- Sarah Crompton, Telegraph UK
RUNTIME, SHMUNTIME: At two hours and 33 minutes long, Half-Blood Prince is a real bladder tester. But with so few set pieces, can plot development and movie magic keep things clipping along?
"Despite its 153-minute running time, Yates's film proceeds at a cracking pace." -- Nick Curtis, Evening Standard
"By the time we get back to the actual plot, almost two hours have passed, and by then, you might have completely given up on caring who the titular "half-blood prince" is. That makes it the first time in the series you really start feeling the movie's length before the two-hour mark due to the amount of needless filler." -- Edward Douglas, Coming Soon
THE CAST: DOES SOMEBODY SMELL OSCAR? Harry Potter's central trio of young actors have developed serious chops throughout the series, and seem to only get better as they age. Critics also love Half-Blood Prince's supporting cast of returning and new players, including some of the British Isles' best thespians. One new addition in particular has some critics already predicting Oscar buzz.
"If this were any movie but part six of a series, I'd say [Jim] Broadbent does 'Best Supporting Actor' level work here. It's a master class in how to make the most of every moment onscreen without ever once overpowering the film around him." - Drew McWeeny, HitFix.com
IS HALF-BLOOD PRINCE ONE OF THE BEST HARRY POTTER FILMS YET? Director Yates is also at the helm for the final two Harry Potter films, The Deathly Hallows Pt. 1 and 2, and has set up Half-Blood Prince as an effective precursor to the coming conclusion of the series. That many critics count Half-Blood Prince among the series' best bodes well for its final film chapters.
"A comfortable second in IGN's opinion, the depth and scale of the drama raising it above the level of the one-dimensional early films, and the sensitivity with which these heavy themes are handled a marked improvement on the more callous Order of the Phoenix. It doesn't reach the magical heights of Alfonso Cuaron's truly spellbinding Prisoner of Azkaban, but Yates is fast approaching that territory, which bodes well for his helming of the final instalments." -- Chris Tilly, IGN UK
"We can already sense the two-part seventh and final saga on the horizon, and the whole less-frenzied affair is tonally and emotionally suggestive of a post-battle re-grouping before a final cinematic assault." -- Wally Hammond, Time Out
Read more early reviews of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, which debuts worldwide on July 15. To revisit all five previous Harry Potter films in advance of Half-Blood Prince, watch along with our Editor in Chief, Matt Atchity, as he Deconstructs Harry, one film a day.
Related Items
| Celeb: | Jim Broadbent |
| Daniel Radcliffe | |
| Rupert Grint | |
| Emma Watson | |
| David Yates |
|
Bigbrother writes: on Jul 10 2009 06:55 PM Interesting if this movie can hold up it would mean Yates has both the best and worst reviewed movies in the series. (Reply to this) |
|
fargo_viper writes: on Jul 10 2009 07:03 PM Dumbledore still sucks wand? (Reply to this) |
|
S M. writes: on Jul 10 2009 07:09 PM I am actually really excited for the release of this movie... really hope it wont let me down... (Reply to this) |
|
felix T. writes: on Jul 10 2009 07:30 PM good news there. (Reply to this) |
|
Zachary P. writes: on Jul 10 2009 07:44 PM In reply to this comment (#2525469) Good point, never thought of that. Hope he can pull some aces from his sleeves for Deathly Hallows! (Reply to this) |
|
celia h. writes: on Jul 10 2009 07:50 PM I realy can't wait to see this movie! All the reviews are just making the wait even more harder! Only 4 Days left to go!! (Reply to this) |
|
GST writes: on Jul 10 2009 08:00 PM Really excited about this, I meant to read books 4 5 and 6 before I saw this, but failed. I guess I'll just read them all (some of them again) before Deathly Hallows comes out. But wow, OSCAR BUZZ? Didn't think I was going to hear that. Hopefully it can stay in the 90s on the tomatometer. I cant stress it enough though, I'm so excited! I'll be seeing it on Wednesday, hopefully. (Reply to this) |
|
Alejandro P. writes: on Jul 10 2009 08:28 PM David Yates maybe made the least good movie of Hrry Potter ( Order of the Phoenix) but I really expect this movie seeing this good reviews (Reply to this) |
|
arendr writes: on Jul 10 2009 08:54 PM Wow, I think Order of the Phoenix is the 2nd best, right after Prisoner of Azkaban. (Reply to this) |
|
bryce w. writes: on Jul 10 2009 08:59 PM Prisoner of Azkaban is definitely the best. It was really the first film in the franchise that branched away from the childlike innocence of the first 2. After watching the film I immiditately loved it because of how much darker it was than Sorcerer's Stone and Chamber of Secrets. After that is Order of the Phoenix. I believe Yates can make this a great film and I believe he can (Reply to this) |
|
Magic is Might writes: on Jul 10 2009 09:20 PM POA is probably the worst since it ruined the story and screwed over the other movies because of plot points left out. (Reply to this) |
|
JettaJameson writes: on Jul 10 2009 09:25 PM I have been waiting for Tuesday to come for SO LONG. It's finally here!!! Like someone else said, the swesome reviews are making me want to see it even more. I will be there Tuesday at 12. (Reply to this) |
|
jason913 writes: on Jul 10 2009 09:36 PM Judging from the critics' responses, and how much I like this book, I'm even MORE excited for this one than the other films in the series. Yates don't fail us now! (Reply to this) |
|
ledawg1138 writes: on Jul 10 2009 10:19 PM This film won't stay this high, but it will stay positive. (Reply to this) |
|
ledawg1138 writes: on Jul 10 2009 10:50 PM In reply to this comment (#2525544) Then again, I said the same thing about "Star Trek". (Reply to this) |
|
War Journalist writes: on Jul 10 2009 10:58 PM Holy s***, Oscar buzz?! Sweet. Of course I've liked all of the movies up to now about the same. They all had chunks missing. I really didn't like POA because it felt TOO angsty to me. And GOF, I hated the massive plot changes, and then the altercations to the maze. As for OotP, I kind of liked it, but it didn't really focus enough for me. I've missed Peeves. I MUST see this Tuseday night/Wednesday Morning. (Reply to this) |
|
Chris B. writes: on Jul 11 2009 01:01 AM Even the worst Harry Potter movie is a good movie in general. I liked all the Potter movies about the same. To be honest, the first movie is still my favorite. I don't think I've ever been this excited for a Potter movie since the first one. (Reply to this) |
|
martinscorsese25 writes: on Jul 11 2009 02:18 AM I saw the Sectumsempra scene from Half-Blood at Letterman. Bruno Debonnel might get the first Oscar nomination for Cinematography in a Potter film. also, Yates seems to be getting good, and i mean REAL GOOD. he staged it very well. way better than those poorly shot Room of Requirment scenes from Order. i still can't comment on the effects, cause i havent seen it. and the score too, cause i havent heard it. but the cinematography, OMG!. just the way Yates move the Camera there. it's just done with great craftmanship. this gives me good hopes for Deathly Hallows. i always thought that Yates really isnt something special, but now, with all this buzz, and with the Scene i saw from Letterman, i think he will prove me wrong. i remember when they screened it during those secret screenings, it was getting negative reviews. mainly because of the hogwarts fight being cut, and scenes being added. personally, i don't mind those things. Prisoner of Azkaban thought me that changes can be good for a film because it is a FILM not a book. a Potter film will be good if it is well crafted. that's what we got from Azkaban. all things, top notch. Directing, Cinematography, Score. and i think that's what we will be getting in Half-Blood lastly, i'm sad Bruno Debonnel won't be back for Hallows. he really is the right cinematographer for HP. also, John Williams won't fullfill his promise that he'll come back. Hooper will surely get the job for sure because he's a collaborator of Yates. there are music in Order that i didn't like. his opening score isnt pleasant to the ears. his room of requirement score is TOO whimsy and quirky. he over did it. and the death of Sirius score isnt really tearful. i think he should have used Sirius score from Azkaban. well, it is what it is. I think with all the buzz, its safe to say that DH is in good hands. still, it's sad that we will never get to see what Cuaron/Williams part 2 combo will offer. and Emmanuel Lubezki(who was too busy at the time to shoot PoA), a collaborator of Cuaron, and one of my favorite cinematographer, will not shoot a single Potter film (Reply to this) |
|
Gaveen G. writes: on Jul 11 2009 07:28 AM one thing is sure,this movie will break the box office records (Reply to this) |
|
Redbeard writes: on Jul 11 2009 07:31 AM I'm actually more concerned for Deathly Hallows. For this film it seems they had a very good idea of what to keep in and what to cut out. For the last ones they seem to want to cram in every character from the books, as if to keep every fan sattisfied. It could seriously damage quality of the film. Honestly, why do the bill and fleur wedding if you could just as easy replace them with Tonks and Lupin. David Thewlis and Nat Tena just deserve the screentime. Why the hell am I already worrying about this anyway... never mind me. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |
















