RottenTomatoes.com
Log In | Register | What is RT?
Check out the new RT Community
  • Home
  • Movies
  • DVD
  • Celebrities
  • News
  • Critics
  • Trailers & Pictures
  • CommunityBeta
  • Features
  • | Columns
  • | Guides
RT Search Powered by Google
help icon Enhanced RT
searches on Google
Click here to turn on enhanced search results from RT on your Google searches.
 
News
RT Interview: David Yates on Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
The director on Harry's sixth year.
by Joe Utichi | July 15, 2009
Discuss Article
Page | 1 2

RT Interview: David Yates on Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

When David Yates was hired to direct Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, fans took one look at his TV-heavy resume and panicked that he wouldn't be able to bring the same scale to the franchise that previous directors Mike Newell (Four Weddings and a Funeral), Alfonso Cuaron (A Little Princess) and Chris Columbus (Home Alone) had managed with aplomb.

If the resulting feature didn't settle those minds -- and it largely did -- then Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince most certainly will. Yates is only the second director to return to Potter, and while Chris Columbus struggled to find a unique voice to bring to his second Potter, Chamber of Secrets, Yates doesn't seem to have had any such problem with Half-Blood Prince. On its day of release the film is one of the best reviewed of the year, and certainly the best-reviewed Potter film. RT sat down with David Yates on set to learn more.

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
83%
Template Image
Fresh
I can't imagine how intimidating it is to take the reins of a Harry Potter film, but you've done it once and it was an incredible success. How does it feel coming into your second Potter film?

David Yates: It's great fun, actually, and I enjoyed it so much last time which is why I came back. We had some guests on set about two weeks ago and the first thing they said after they'd had a tour around the studio was that they couldn't believe that it was a film set and everyone seemed to be smiling all the time. There's a really positive atmosphere here, so it's a great working environment; everyone feels very committed to their particular craft and what they're doing. There's a terrific vibe and while you're creating, and working and trying to deliver story, that atmosphere really helps.

I'm having probably even more fun on this one than I had on the last one. The last one was quite intense because of the scale of it; these are big films to make, and they just inevitably require you to multitask a bit, and I think I've gotten used to that multitasking approach to directing. Which is now, for me, quite an adrenaline rush; I think I really enjoy having two or three sets going at any one time.

I've got a terrific second unit director called Stephen Woolfenden who I worked with on Order of the Phoenix and we have a very close working relationship. We're like twins, really. Traditionally second unit directors go off and do their own thing, but Stephen and I work really closely together and that's terrific.

I've also brought a new D.O.P. called Bruno Delbonnel who shot Amelie and A Very Long Engagement. He's French and he's got a really good sense of humour. So we're having a good time so far!

What does he bring to the film?

DY: It'll be warmer than the last film. Order of the Phoenix was dealing with teenage angst and it was dealing with that period in life where you start to rebel a wee bit and you're struggling against authority and all of that, while this film is much warmer and much more romantic. It'll have a much richer and more romantic feel to it than Order of the Phoenix which was a bit darker and bit more intense.

Is it fair to say there's more character as well?

DY: There is. The sixth book essentially deals with the politics of romance. We're tuning into the spirit of all of that and because the characters are all getting a little bit older and the actors are all getting a little bit older, there are more nuances, I think, in the relationships. There's a lot more character development in this one.

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
With Daniel Radcliffe and Bonnie Wright.
You've added a couple of scenes to the film that aren't in the book.

DY: Yes. In the sixth book Jo talks about the Death Eaters attacking, kidnapping and striking terror into communities and she plays that idea backstage in the book. You read about it but you don't experience it. We wanted to bring that experience to the fore for the audience so they kind-of felt what it was like and they could actually see what the Death Eaters were doing. We've introduced two moments in the film where we see the Death Eaters do what Jo actually described them doing, but off the page as it were.

In the book Jo describes the collapse of a Muggle bridge. We never see it but she relays it. I just thought it'd be really cool to see that, again just to make the audience feel what the Death Eaters are doing to the Muggle world. It's such a cool thing to experience and it's quite frightening. So again we just took it straight from the book, the notion of it, and we've just put it into our story at the beginning. None of our principal characters will be involved.

The other scene is at the beginning at the railway station; traditionally these films have always opened at the Dursleys' and there's a pattern, the audience is used to that. Steve came up with this notion of breaking it. You sit down, you see the WB sign, you hear the tinkly-tinkly stuff and then, oh, it's the Dursleys. It's that comic Dursley bit at the beginning and then we'll get on with the story. Steve came up with this notion that after Order of the Phoenix Harry's in this quite intense, dark place and he's riding the trains to free his brain a wee bit and he meets this really attractive waitress who he really likes. You immediately set up the notion that suddenly these characters are a bit more sexualised if you like, they're aware of the opposite sex. Their hormones are kicking off and I thought it was a really charming, lovely idea.

But the scene in which the new Minister of Magic visits the Muggle Prime Minister didn't make the cut?

DY: Scrimgeour isn't in this particular film, no. We struggled to keep him in. It's great scene in the book where he goes to see the Prime Minister. We loved that and it was in and it was out and it was in and it was out again.

We have brought Quidditch back, because I love Quidditch. I wanted to get Quidditch in the last film but we were so overstuffed with things that it was really hard. There's a moment where you're making a film where you want to go, "We want to do this, this, this and this," and fiscal reality and schedule reality kicks in and so we were determined to get Quidditch back this time. And it's a really fun Quidditch sequence. Kind-of comedy Quidditch!

From what I understand Dan isn't as thrilled as you are about the return of Quidditch!

DY: [laughs] Dan's not particularly pleased with Quidditch [being back] because he has to sit on this broom for five hours a day! If you've ever sat on one of these brooms, and I've never, it just looks incredibly uncomfortable. They're not the most seat-friendly contraptions.

Continue on to page 2 as Yates talks about character development, franchise energy and how to bring things to an end.

Next Page >>
Bookmark and Share
Page | 1 2
Comments (1-20 of 35 posts) | Reply
jokerboy1991
jokerboy1991 writes:
on Jul 15 2009 09:20 AM

Good interview, The Half Blood Prince was great! Its probably the best in the series so far. All the actors were great of course, a lot of them also had more to do this time- Draco and Snape. It was also a really beautiful looking film and the story moved a long really quickly. The focus on the romance worked for me and it was pretty funny at times and even sad. I dont care whether it was a great adaptation, I'm more interested in seeing a great movie instead. I am sure some fans will be complaining what parts of the book were cut out.


(Reply to this)
whitey_mcwhite
whitey_mcwhite writes:
on Jul 15 2009 09:24 AM

I saw Half Blood Prince last night, and I have to say that it surpassed Prisoner of Azkaban in my mind (I'm sure some will disagree with me because Prisoner of Azkaban had overall better material, but I actually think this one was better in all other aspects, and this is my favorite book in the series) as the best movie in the series. It's surprising that a TV director has surpassed greats like Mike Newell and Alfonso Cuaron in this series, but you can't judge a director by the medium he works in! I can't wait to see what he does for the last two installments and beyond!

(Reply to this)
Adamtimtim T.
Adamtimtim T. writes:
on Jul 15 2009 09:54 AM

I just seen the film quite recently and to be quite honest I wasn't satisfied.
Although I never read the book,I am surrounded by family and friends who read the book,and my friend(who has read the book)thought it was quite bad.And I had to agree with him,the acting didn't feel right and the character development went on for a bit long on Harry's part I was expecting huge amounts from what my friends say but sadly I wasnt feeling the film,although it was a very nice looking film I found myself deeply unhappy at the end.


(Reply to this)
Harrison H.
Harrison H. writes:
on Jul 15 2009 10:06 AM

I saw the movie last night and I thought it was fantastic. I really like the direction of David Yates, he knows characters are important, and not to have magic for the sake of magic. And finally since he's doing The Deathly Hallows, the continuity of the films will be spot on.

(Reply to this)
Katie H.
Katie H. writes:
on Jul 15 2009 10:06 AM

I absolutely disagree with all of the above. This movie was so removed from the beauty of the book, one can only feel that Mrs. Rowling has been untrue to her own work. Beginning the movie at the Dursley's is classic and necessary. The scene with the Prime Minister sets the stage for what is to come, provides background for those who haven't read the books, while not forgetting the grand magical aspect of the two worlds colliding. Every Potter movie up til now has taken the pages, brought them to life, and left readers bewildered at seeing their imaginations placed on the big screen. As a movie alone, a piece of art, it was outstanding; but, as a movie in the Potter canon, it was a grave disappointment. One can only hope that the Deathly Hallows will be done justice by being split into two movies. Perhaps the extra two-three hours will keep from the utter distruction of the next plot.

(Reply to this)
whitey_mcwhite
whitey_mcwhite writes:
on Jul 15 2009 10:11 AM

In reply to this comment (#2527008)
How can character development go on too long? And personally I thought the acting was spot on. For the first time I was completely happy with Gambon's performance, he was Dumbledore in this movie. I think this was the best acted movie in the series because everyone just completely embodied their characters and this was exactly how I felt it should be. Also, the last three movies did kind of feel choppy in their editing to me, this one didn't have that feeling. It never felt rushed or like they were trying to cram too much in, it actually had room to breathe. I also think this is the best they've done at capturing the feeling of the books, and adding in the romantic entanglements, and how Yates approached the Quidditch game, did something that the other movies had a hard time with: it gave these kids a sense of normalcy. It actually felt like they were school kids and when they reached the more intense moments they actually felt intense, you felt like people's lives were in danger, and you felt the break in the normalcy of the other scenes.

(Reply to this)
Hamboner
Hamboner writes:
on Jul 15 2009 10:14 AM

So it comes down to the classic case of "It's not enough like the books for me to like it."

Fair enough, it's understandable to want a loyal adaptation but this movie came out better than I could have possibly expected (especially since Order of the Phoenix fell short of the previous 2 films IMO).

One thing though... shouldn't Dumbledore's wand be in his grave, not on his desk?


(Reply to this)
whitey_mcwhite
whitey_mcwhite writes:
on Jul 15 2009 10:17 AM

In reply to this comment (#2527019)
Katie H.: That's why you need to learn to separate the books from the movies. The movies should be able to stand on their own, and this one does more than a marvelous job at that. It's not necessary to start the book at the Dursley's, how does that get us to our end result? What purpose does it serve? And I also think showing us the destruction of the Millenium Bridge was more pertinent in showing us the state of the muggle and magical worlds since the return of Voldemort.

If it was outstanding as a movie, then it did it's job.


(Reply to this)
Harrison H.
Harrison H. writes:
on Jul 15 2009 10:22 AM

In reply to this comment (#2527025)
Well they didn't exactly have a grave for Dumbledore now did they. It shouldn't matter though for Deathly Hallows. I think it's fair to say Yates knows what he's doing.

(Reply to this)
jokerboy1991
jokerboy1991 writes:
on Jul 15 2009 10:32 AM

In reply to this comment (#2527019)
Beginning the movie at the Dursley's is classic and necessary.
- Why is that necessary for the movie though? What would a scene with the Dursley's added to the story. Nothing, it just would have been lazy fan service.

The scene with the Prime Minister sets the stage for what is to come, provides background for those who haven't read the books, while not forgetting the grand magical aspect of the two worlds colliding

- Well didn't they show the two worlds colliding? There were plenty of enough magical aspects. I was with people who hadn't read the book and they didn't have a problem with there being no background provided by Fudge on what's to come.

These dont sound like real problems but just flat out nit-picks. Some people want a great movie while others would rather prefer just a great adaptation.


(Reply to this)
Logan A.
Logan A. writes:
on Jul 15 2009 10:46 AM

HP6 was fantastic! The sets, and the cinematography was beautiful, and the ending truely moved me. Im a huge fan of the book, having just re-read it before the movie came out and I have to truely say, its a movie, it is it's own thing. they cant make a spot on adaptation of the book or else we'd have a 6 hour movie of boredom. sorry to say it buts its true. Yates did a great job at moving the plot along and the actors have matured so much from even the last movie in their acting capabilities.

(Reply to this)
Magic is Might
Magic is Might writes:
on Jul 15 2009 11:30 AM

I dont know about you guys but i thought the beginning was really good. Just showing harry there in a daze while everyone is photographing him you really get the sense that his godfather just died and he does not know what to do. Daniel's acting in this movie was amazing. The little things are what sold it, his little fight with Ron over the book, his giddiness after taking the potion, his sense of uncomfortableness when Ron is telling him about his love of Romilda. He did a great job. So did the Lavender character you got a really good "hand that roocks the cradle" creepiness out of her. My favorite scene was when they were making the potions and you see everyone struggling and at the end they all look like they just went thru war while Harry is all clean and happy. Little things like that made this movie for me.

(Reply to this)
Magic is Might
Magic is Might writes:
on Jul 15 2009 11:33 AM

The only real complaint i had was that i wished that they showed the funeral at the end. That could of been a real EPIC scene.


(Reply to this)
Jordan K.
Jordan K. writes:
on Jul 15 2009 12:06 PM

I understand they can't have everything in the movie, as that would be mad, but why would they take out the part where Harry finds out its Snapes fault his parents are dead? To me, that seemed like an important part. As for a repetitive battle at Hogwarts, well now we'll have a repetitive attack at the burrow unless they cut that out. Other than cutting out that important detail, the movie was decent, I liked it better than the PoA

(Reply to this)
Jordan K.
Jordan K. writes:
on Jul 15 2009 12:07 PM

Also Ron stole that show, which was great

(Reply to this)
Staci M.
Staci M. writes:
on Jul 15 2009 01:48 PM

I thought the movie was ok. I am a fan of the book and I knew that the movie would not be exactly like it, but I was still left disappointed. I thought the movie was lacking something. The book showed a lot of emotion and I just didn't feel it in the movie. Parts of the movie made me laugh and I thought the acting was better, but at times I felt the movie was moving too slow and that they should have explained other scenes better, like the horcruxes. I wish they would have shown the memory with Voldermort returning to hogwarts to teach. I think thats important for the last movie, but maybe the will find another way for Harry to find the Ravenclaw horcrux.


(Reply to this)
Logan A.
Logan A. writes:
on Jul 15 2009 04:01 PM

In reply to this comment (#2527124)
Wow, i didnt even think about the second attack on the burrow!

(Reply to this)
Geoff O.
Geoff O. writes:
on Jul 15 2009 04:11 PM

Best Potter movie, by far. I think the most notable area of growth, as stated previously, has been how much the actors really embraced their roles. The little things certainly lent the movie an air of plausibility (I know we're already dealing with wizards, but for the sake of argument). From the first scene with Harry being snapped by reporters and ushered out by Dumbledore, the timing and pacing were perfect. Someone already mentioned other great little things - fighting over the book, high fiving, "Hi!" to the kids in the doorway after taking Felix (not to mention the great part with Slughorn - 'Harry!', 'Profeeeesoooor!' - I was dying).

Cinematography beat Cuaron's, I'm afraid. This was a very solid film and didn't feel rushed or forced at all. So many other Potters have felt choppy because of aforementioned reasons. This flowed so very, very well as a movie, and I felt genuine sympathy for the characters.

Tom Felton and Alan Rickman were outstanding, though.

Also, I agree that this was the best acting for Dumbledore. Gambon finally nailed it.


(Reply to this)
Redbeard
Redbeard writes:
on Jul 15 2009 04:48 PM

Just came back from the theater and I totally agree with Geoff O, although I must honestly admit that I always like the newest film best when I first see it. Still, I think this one has a good chance at actually staying on top. It was so rich, beautiful, funny and moving. The pacing was much slower this time around and it works like a charm (no pun intended).
I love how Hogwarts actually felt much bigger this time around. I always had the feeling they used parts of hogwarts for every film. (the first two films played in different classromes and hallways, PoA was at the grouns mostly, GoF fire took part in courtyards, OotP was in the courtyards and the grounds and at the grand staircase) But this film combined all those elements, and a little more, wich made it feel very rich and compleet. (even though the grand staircase and the defense against the dark arts-classroom weren't actually featured this time.)
It's actually quite different from the book, but funny thing is, for the first time, I'm not bothered at all. I could find pleasure in seeing this film and reading the book in totally different ways.
And yeah, Gambon ruled!


(Reply to this)
Bigbrother
Bigbrother writes:
on Jul 15 2009 06:31 PM

Just got back from HBP and I agree this is probably the best movie of the series. Is it that best Harry Potter story or best adaption. No. There is probably more cut and tweeked in this movie than any of the others and if you're looking to nitpick the absences you'll find fertile ground, but viewed on its own merits this is a cinematic masterpiece or at least a cinematographic masterpiece. I did think the narrative didn't quite mesh in places, but great performances by Jim Broadbent, who is definately doing his own thing rather than trying to translate the literary Slughorn. Fortunately he does this better than previous free spirits Michael Gambon who does give his best performance to date as Dumbledore and Helena Bonham Carter who once again seems a bit too goofy as Bellatrix LeStrange for my taste's. Also delivering are Alan Rickman, given a bigger stake as Snape and the young cast who have all really come of age as actors. Also, still love Evanna Lynch as Luna Lovegood and really hope she finds other roles after this series is over. I'll comment more in depth as the movie settles and I can consider the individual scenes.

(Reply to this)
Read More Comments
Page | 1 2
Post Your Comment
You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register.

Related Links

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
  • Pictures
  • Posters
  • News
  • Forum

Related Articles

  • RT on DVD: Harry Potter returns, Bella heads to Adventureland (4)
  • Warner Bros. Takes the Summer Crown Opens in new window (4)
  • Submit to the RT Show and Earn a Cool $100 (1)
  • Box Office Guru Wrapup: Harry Potter Has Magical Opening (84)
  • Friday Harvest: Harry Potter, Halloween II, and more! (19)
  • David Heyman Talks Harry Potter Opens in new window (4)
  • Critics Consensus: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince is Certified Fresh (65)
  • Box Office Guru Preview: Prince's Magic to Reign Over Multiplexes (40)
  • Total Recall: Best Movie Wizards (150)
  • Growing Pains: When Child Stars Become Adults (4)

Most Discussed

  • Box Office Guru Wrapup: New Moon Shatters Records (162)
  • Critics Consensus: New Moon Wanes (129)
  • Tomatometer Watch: Will Twilight's New Moon Dazzle? (97)
  • Total Recall: Star-Crossed Lovers (75)
  • Weekly Ketchup: Idris Elba cast in Thor, more Spider-Man 4 rumors (53)
  • Five Favorite Films with Werner Herzog (50)
  • Total Recall: John Travolta's Best Movies (38)
  • Friday Harvest: New Moon, Avatar, and more! (32)
  • RT on DVD & Blu-Ray: Angels & Demons, Funny People, and Superman (13)
  • "I Don't Hate Women": Lars von Trier on Antichrist (4)

Latest News

  • "I Don't Hate Women": Lars von Trier on Antichrist (4)
  • Total Recall: John Travolta's Best Movies (38)
  • RT on DVD & Blu-Ray: Angels & Demons, Funny People, and Superman (13)
  • Box Office Guru Wrapup: New Moon Shatters Records (162)
  • Weekly Ketchup: Idris Elba cast in Thor, more Spider-Man 4 rumors (53)
  • Ho, ho, ho! It's RT's Great Big Gift Guide! (0)
  • Friday Harvest: New Moon, Avatar, and more! (32)
  • Critics Consensus: New Moon Wanes (129)
  • Total Recall: Star-Crossed Lovers (75)
  • Tomatometer Watch: Will Twilight's New Moon Dazzle? (97)

Latest Interviews

  • "I Don't Hate Women": Lars von Trier on Antichrist (4)
  • Eric Bana talks Love the Beast - RT Interview (8)
  • Fight Club Sound Designer Reflects on Film's 10th Anniversary (19)
  • James Schamus talks Taking Woodstock - RT Interview (6)
  • John Hurt Talks Harry Potter, Quentin Crisp and Alien - The RT Interview (15)
  • Terry Gilliam Talks Doctor Parnassus (18)
  • Wes Anderson Talks Fantastic Mr. Fox - RT Interview (8)
  • Wolverine Creator Len Wein Talks About the Film (28)
  • Gavin Hood Talks Wolverine; Possible Sequel (28)
  • Duncan Jones talks Moon, Sam Rockwell, and Mute (14)

Latest Features

  • "I Don't Hate Women": Lars von Trier on Antichrist (4)
  • Fight Club Sound Designer Reflects on Film's 10th Anniversary (19)
  • Five Favourite Films with Ang Lee (34)
  • 10 Movies That Changed The (End Of The) World (32)
  • Ho-ho-horror! 10 Scary Christmas Movies (39)
  • 12 Facts About 2012 (135)
  • Terry Gilliam Talks Doctor Parnassus (18)
  • Five Favourite Films with 24's Carlos Bernard (33)
  • Six Horrible Part Sixes (32)
  • Christopher Smith's Favourite Cult Horror Films (14)

Sponsored Links

 
 
About| Site Map| Help| RT To Go| Contact Us| Critics Submission| Linking to RT| Licensing| Movie List| Games| Celebs List| Newsletter
IGN Logo

IGN.com | GameSpy | Comrade | Arena | FilePlanet | GameSpy Technology
TeamXbox | Planets | Vaults | VE3D | CheatsCodesGuides | GameStats | GamerMetrics
AskMen.com | Rotten Tomatoes | Direct2Drive | Green Pixels


By continuing past this page, and by the continued use of this site, you agree to be bound by and abide by the User Agreement.
Copyright 1998-2009, IGN Entertainment, Inc. About IGN | Support | Advertise | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | Subscribe to RT's XML feed! IGN RSS Feeds
IGN's enterprise databases running Oracle, SQL and MySQL are professionally monitored and managed by Pythian Remote DBA
Certain product data ©1995-present Muze, Inc. For personal use only. All rights reserved.