Opening

74% World War Z Jun 21
78% Monsters University Jun 21
61% The Bling Ring Jun 21
58% Maniac Jun 21
100% A Hijacking Jun 21
67% Unfinished Song Jun 21
100% The Attack Jun 21
—— The Haunting of Helena Jun 21

Top Box Office

56% Man of Steel $116.6M
85% This Is the End $20.7M
50% Now You See Me $11.0M
71% Fast & Furious 6 $9.6M
38% The Purge $8.3M
34% The Internship $7.1M
62% Epic $6.3M
87% Star Trek Into Darkness $6.3M
11% After Earth $4.1M
78% Iron Man 3 $3.0M

Coming Soon

—— How To Make Money Selling Drugs Jun 26
—— White House Down Jun 28
—— The Heat Jun 28
56% I'm So Excited! Jun 28
Hell's Angels

Hell's Angels (1930)

tomatometer

No Score Yet...

Average Rating: N/A
Critic Reviews: 4
Fresh: 3 | Rotten: 1

audience

57

liked it
Average Rating: 3.4/5
User Ratings: 2,275

My Rating

Movie Info

No one was surprised in 1929 that aviation mogul Howard R. Hughes would produce a paean to World War I flying aces like Hell's Angels. Given Hughes' comparative inexperience as a moviemaker, however, everyone was taken slightly aback that the finished film was as good as it was. The very American Ben Lyon and James Hall play (respectively) Monte and Roy Rutledge, a couple of British brothers who drop out of Oxford to join the British Royal Flying Corps. Several early scenes establish Lyon and

Dec 7, 2004

Cast

ADVERTISEMENT

All Critics (16) | Top Critics (4) | Fresh (13) | Rotten (3) | DVD (3)

The machine guns are real machine guns, the bombs are real bombs, the drum of motors is the drum of genuine motors. But the actors themselves are false, puny, inadequate, the only real automatons in a world of vital steel.

April 29, 2013 Full Review Source: The New Republic
The New Republic
Top Critic IconTop Critic

It's no sappy, imbecilic tale.

March 26, 2009 Full Review Source: Variety
Variety
Top Critic IconTop Critic

The end result is barely adequate. But it does feature a spectacularly elaborate World War I dogfight, and an equally fine Zeppelin sequence. And of course there's Harlow.

February 9, 2006 Full Review Source: Time Out
Time Out
Top Critic IconTop Critic

These air scenes, with the crashing of flaming planes, have never been matched on the screen.

January 28, 2006 Full Review Source: New York Times
New York Times
Top Critic IconTop Critic

Like a James Cameron movie, it's epic with great action sequences, but weak when it comes to the performances.

September 12, 2010 Full Review Source: Three Movie Buffs
Three Movie Buffs

The two spectacular set pieces are as much the audience's reason for viewing the film as it was Hughes' reason to make it

May 22, 2007 Full Review
rec.arts.movies.reviews

Though the film was better than could be expected, it was still done in by its uninteresting love triangle story.

November 8, 2006 Full Review Source: Ozus' World Movie Reviews
Ozus' World Movie Reviews

Should be judged in context but even then it's a bit high on the melodrama and low on subtlety.

July 6, 2005 Full Review Source: Empire Magazine
Empire Magazine

The 1930 film has some major weaknesses -- most of the expository scenes, especially a creaky beginning -- but there's enough stunning stuff in it to make it worth seeing.

April 13, 2005 Full Review Source: Reel Times: Reflections on Cinema
Reel Times: Reflections on Cinema

Jean Harlow's screen debut isn't much to look at, to be honest. The air battles, however, are another story.

February 22, 2005 Full Review Source: Filmcritic.com
Filmcritic.com

Despite being mauled by critics for its ludicrous story, Hell's Angels has undeniable grandeur in its aerial sequences.

May 24, 2003 Full Review Source: Film4
Film4

Simply superb.

August 9, 2002
Fantastica Daily

Spectaculat spectacle. Lame drama. Interesting early James Whale

August 7, 2002
Mountain Xpress (Asheville, NC)

Hell's Angels (1930) is known for Howard Hughes' direction, and 18-year-old blonde bombshell Jean Harlow's first major role and big break into film

January 1, 2000 Full Review Source: Tim Dirks' The Greatest Films
Tim Dirks' The Greatest Films

Audience Reviews for Hell's Angels

I'll give you all a memory of Martin Scorsese's THE AVIATOR, for those sane souls who have seen it. Think back to the first forty minutes, in which Howard Hughes, the biographical subject portrayed by Leonardo DiCaprio, was going crazy over his 1930 production, HELL'S ANGELS: hand painting the completed film, ordering Air Force planes down to the precise bolt he preferred, hiring and firing...you get the picture. I was hesitant to watch this film after being informed of how insane this guy was. I knew I couldn't expect much, as this was Hughes's first feature film as director, and he had to have been caught up in some of his other careers, such as entrepreneurism and aviation. How wrong I was. It all goes to prove that as long as you don't go over the top, obsessing over a film production has to lead to a mighty outcome. Okay, there was one thing that this billionaire DID go a bit far with: hand painting the film here and there, an effect that only worked in one or two scenes of this early use of color. Other than that, I couldn't name one flaw to you if it depended on my life. The plot, premise, acting, and characters are all so well-done.

Maybe the historical value also makes HELL'S ANGELS worth a watch. It remained for quite a while the most expensive film production. The budget would approximate to almost $100 million in today's currency. Contrary to popular belief, even GONE WITH THE WIND, from nine years later, failed to exceed this whale of an amount of money. If we adjust for inflation, we'd see this would be one of the better ways to put money to use. Lots of today's big-budget pieces have been strictly visual action hounds such as TRANSFORMERS, JOHN CARTER, and PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN. In so many ways, it makes us long for a time 80 years ago when even madmen like Howard Hughes had some sense.

READ MORE ABOUT THIS SPLENDID PICTURE:
http://themoviefreakblog.wordpress.com/2012/04/22/review-hells-angels/
February 18, 2012
spielberg00

Super Reviewer

Of interest more as a historical landmark than a great film. The aerial scenes are very impressive especially those in rudimentary color but the acting of the leads keeps the film from being remarkable. An 18 year old Jean Harlow is very green as a high society jezebel but holds the screen with the magnetism of a star plus it is the only chance to see what she looked like in color which in a strange way makes her more real even if the color is garish. The same can not be said of her co-stars. Both Hall and Lyon have moments that register however by and large they are stiff and dull, you have to wonder how much better this would have been with Gable & Spencer Tracy or James Cagney in the leads. John Darrow is good as Karl but his part is small. It's easy to see why this was a big hit on release just as talkies were dawning but now it is more of an artifact of time and place that a compelling viewing experience.
April 29, 2011
jjnxn
jay nixon

Super Reviewer

    1. Helen: Would you be shocked if I put on something more comfortable?
    – Submitted by Chris P (2 years ago)

Discussion Forum

There are no discussion threads for Hell's Angels yet.

What's Hot On RT

24 Frames
24 Frames

Pictures from a zombie nation

Blue Jasmine
Blue Jasmine

Woody Allen in San Francisco

<em>The Hobbit</em>
The Hobbit

See the Desolation of Smaug trailer!

Summer Scorecard
Summer Scorecard

Where does This Is the End rank?

Help | About | Jobs | Critics Submission | API | Licensing | Mobile