Hell's Angels (1930)
Average Rating: 7.1/10
Reviews Counted: 16
Fresh: 13 | Rotten: 3
No consensus yet.
Average Rating: N/A
Critic Reviews: 4
Fresh: 3 | Rotten: 1
liked it
Average Rating: 3.4/5
User Ratings: 2,275
Movie Info
No one was surprised in 1929 that aviation mogul Howard R. Hughes would produce a paean to World War I flying aces like Hell's Angels. Given Hughes' comparative inexperience as a moviemaker, however, everyone was taken slightly aback that the finished film was as good as it was. The very American Ben Lyon and James Hall play (respectively) Monte and Roy Rutledge, a couple of British brothers who drop out of Oxford to join the British Royal Flying Corps. Several early scenes establish Lyon and
Nov 15, 1930 Limited
Dec 7, 2004
Cast
-
Ben Lyon
Monte Rutledge -
James Hall
Roy Rutledge -
Jean Harlow
Helen -
John Darrow
Karl Arnstedt -
Lucien Prival
Baron Von Kranz -
Frank Clarke
Lt. Von Bruen -
Roy Wilson
Baldy Maloney -
Douglas Gilmore
Capt. Redfield -
Jane Winton
Baroness Von Kranz -
Evelyn Hall
Lady Randolph -
William B. Davidson
Staff Major -
Wyndham Standing
Squadron Commander -
Carl von Hartmann
Zeppelin Commander -
Ferdinand Schumann-Heink
1st Officer -
Stephen Carr
Elliott -
Pat Somerset
Marryat -
William Von Brincken
Von Richthofen -
Hans Joby
Von Schleiben -
Marian Marsh
Girl Selling Kisses -
Leo Nomis
Pilot -
Harry Semels
Anarchist -
Maurice Murphy
Pilot -
Al Wilson
Pilot -
Roscoe Turner
Pilot -
Frank Tomick
Pilot -
Lena Malena
Gretchen -
ADVERTISEMENT
All Critics (16) | Top Critics (4) | Fresh (13) | Rotten (3) | DVD (3)
The machine guns are real machine guns, the bombs are real bombs, the drum of motors is the drum of genuine motors. But the actors themselves are false, puny, inadequate, the only real automatons in a world of vital steel.
It's no sappy, imbecilic tale.
The end result is barely adequate. But it does feature a spectacularly elaborate World War I dogfight, and an equally fine Zeppelin sequence. And of course there's Harlow.
These air scenes, with the crashing of flaming planes, have never been matched on the screen.
Like a James Cameron movie, it's epic with great action sequences, but weak when it comes to the performances.
The two spectacular set pieces are as much the audience's reason for viewing the film as it was Hughes' reason to make it
Though the film was better than could be expected, it was still done in by its uninteresting love triangle story.
Should be judged in context but even then it's a bit high on the melodrama and low on subtlety.
The 1930 film has some major weaknesses -- most of the expository scenes, especially a creaky beginning -- but there's enough stunning stuff in it to make it worth seeing.
Jean Harlow's screen debut isn't much to look at, to be honest. The air battles, however, are another story.
Despite being mauled by critics for its ludicrous story, Hell's Angels has undeniable grandeur in its aerial sequences.
Simply superb.
Spectaculat spectacle. Lame drama. Interesting early James Whale
Hell's Angels (1930) is known for Howard Hughes' direction, and 18-year-old blonde bombshell Jean Harlow's first major role and big break into film
Audience Reviews for Hell's Angels
Super Reviewer
-
- Helen: Would you be shocked if I put on something more comfortable?
Discussion Forum
There are no discussion threads for Hell's Angels yet.
What's Hot On RT
Pictures from a zombie nation
Woody Allen in San Francisco
See the Desolation of Smaug trailer!
Where does This Is the End rank?
Featured on RT
- Video Interviews with Cast & Crew of Monsters University 0
- Digital Multiplex: 21 & Over, Quartet, and More 1
- RT on DVD & Blu-Ray: Jack the Giant Slayer and Quartet 23
- Box Office Guru Wrapup: Man of Steel Sets June Record 101
- Weekly Ketchup: Man of Steel Sequel In the Works 197
- Five Favorite Films with Joss Whedon 127
- Bonus Footage of the Cast & Crew of Man of Steel 1


Top Critic
Maybe the historical value also makes HELL'S ANGELS worth a watch. It remained for quite a while the most expensive film production. The budget would approximate to almost $100 million in today's currency. Contrary to popular belief, even GONE WITH THE WIND, from nine years later, failed to exceed this whale of an amount of money. If we adjust for inflation, we'd see this would be one of the better ways to put money to use. Lots of today's big-budget pieces have been strictly visual action hounds such as TRANSFORMERS, JOHN CARTER, and PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN. In so many ways, it makes us long for a time 80 years ago when even madmen like Howard Hughes had some sense.
READ MORE ABOUT THIS SPLENDID PICTURE:
http://themoviefreakblog.wordpress.com/2012/04/22/review-hells-angels/