Critic Review - BrianOrndorf.com

Creates a tremendously unsettling aura of sadism instead of chunky, schlocky merriment. Why should I be punished just because Davies and Eisener weren't hugged enough as kids?

April 8, 2011 Full Review Source: BrianOrndorf.com | Comments (11)
BrianOrndorf.com

Comments

Worker M.

Worker Man

This critic is right. The nihilism in this film is not ment to be fun. If you find it fun something is wrong with you. Its funny because the type of nihilism on display here just was not around in cinema at the time this movie is suppose to be paying homage to. If you say i like it because it reminds me of "back in the day", get out of here. There were no films like this back in the day, lol. I am so tired of hearing that about films like this.

Apr 8 - 10:52 PM

dan t.

dan teasdale

Your a fucking retard Worker M.

Apr 18 - 09:34 PM

Zane B

Chum Chum

do you have something in your ass?

Apr 27 - 03:55 PM

SS

Prem P

This movie is so idiotic, unfunny, just the most completely unentertaining film in every way. Showgirls meets The Doom Generation meets Caligula--only the script is worse than all of those (if that's even possible). Kudos to you for being only one of two critics thus far who isn't acting like a hipster d-bag by saying this crap is entertaining. Think that's the worst part, the filmmakers passed off this crap as "satire"--and the critics are falling for it. Well they fail at whatever this was supposed to be: satire, comedy, exploitation, everything.

Apr 16 - 07:33 PM

hobo-with-shotgun

Doobie Brother

um, its an expose on a lot in society. this small "hell town" is a representation of whats wrong with america. someone is out to speak the truth? why, go label him as a terrorist who will result in the death of your babies. the whores beating up the body with clubs? take that as what people will do in order to live the good life. look at the film beyond the simplicity of a hobo running rampant with a shotgun and youll understand some things. otherwise, go back to watching chronicles of narnia.

Apr 22 - 02:55 AM

Bushleaguer28

Brian Priestley

Here we go again - the whole "you dont like something that most do therefore you must be a dumbass argument." It gets so old on here . . . its called an opinion and his is no worse than yours just because you disagree. If someone dislikes something you do who gives a shit? His disliking the movie didnt in any way hinder your enjoyment of it so why do people care so much.

I havent seen this so im not referencing this specifically but the "it does what its supposed to do" argument is idiotic. Something can do what its trying to do, and if it does it poorly or what it was trying to do in the first place was bad that doesn't still somehow make it quality.

Apr 22 - 03:48 PM

Wil H.

Wil Huff

Are you really surprised? The vast majority of posters on this site are complete idiots who are willing to personally insult a critic in defense of a movie THAT THEY HAVEN'T EVEN SEEN.

Apr 25 - 02:49 AM

You need an editor

Jonathan Hart

Lol, this comments section is on FIRE!

Apr 26 - 01:27 PM

toomasio

Thomas Sutherland

lol yeah fan boys really can't let opposite opinions go.

This comment section is more entertaining than the movie itself.

Apr 27 - 01:53 PM

WS S.

WS Shannon

@toomasio coming from somebody who actually review movies that they have not seen

Apr 29 - 06:16 PM

Adin R.

Adin R

Umm....kinda missed the point there guy.

Apr 30 - 11:24 PM

Find us on:                     
Help | About | Jobs | Critics Submission | Press | API | Licensing | Mobile