ROTTEN TOMATOES: Lindsay Lohan Strips Down, Cleans Up Razzies, Lands Role in Jack Black Project Comments

Lindsay Lohan Strips Down, Cleans Up Razzies, Lands Role in Jack Black Project

by Jeff Giles | February 25, 2008

Summary

Say what you will about her script choices and off-screen behavior of late, but Lindsay Lohan has never been a slouch when it comes to getting her name in the news -- and to prove it, we've got not one, not two, but three Lindsay-riffic news items for you. Back to Article

(1-28 of 28 posts) | Reply

gerke writes:
on Feb 25 2008 05:19 AM

pretty as hell but not so smart in making choices. too bad, she has potential to become a classic (in looks and acting) hollywood actress.

(Reply to this)

AquaFina writes:
on Feb 25 2008 05:27 AM

Lindsey is gorgeous, but those pictures are just sorta creepy.

(Reply to this)

MarkMortimer writes:
on Feb 25 2008 06:24 AM

In reply to this comment (#1601665)
LMFAO

(Reply to this)

Gimy writes:
on Feb 25 2008 07:00 AM

woah woah woah fellas...take off the beer goggles! i'm sorry but have you guys been outside in the past 10 years? she's not even "average" in terms of looks. i cannot, for the life of me, understand the s3x appeal in this chic. AT...ALL. go to ANY college, even the all girls religious colleges...and you can find 1,000 chics that look as good if not better. i don't get the "lindsay is hot/pretty/gorgeous!" talk. she is sorta pretty, like all women, WITH MAKEUP. i've seen better bodies on a .69 cents a year porno website for the elderly. its obvious the drugs she snorts is contagious...because she has WAY too much of the public high on her average talent and looks. she's equal in HOTNESS to Cher...the lovely Courtney Love and the always "classic beauty"...Amy Whinehouse. a chubby out of shape crazy Britney actually looks better than her, and THATS sad. at least you know the white powder on britney's nose is from scarfing down a donut though...

(Reply to this)

Matanuki writes:
on Feb 25 2008 08:00 AM

In reply to this comment (#1601783)
At last, Gimy, we've found something that we are in COMPLETE agreement on. Between her and Paris Hilton, I just don't know what the hell these dudes are looking at when go on and on about how "gorgeous" these chicks are. I mean, damn, man, not even professional photography can hide all those disgusting freckles all over Lohan's misshapen body. Yuck!

(Reply to this)

smi1ey writes:
on Feb 25 2008 09:14 AM

she has nice jugs... that's about it. she was cute in the parent trap remake. that's about it. ;)

(Reply to this)

mouse_clicker writes:
on Feb 25 2008 09:21 AM

She looks terrible in those pictures, and has looked terrible since she lost a ton of wait. I thought she was gorgeous just before she became the coke whore. I'd say around Mean Girls, when she was just a little chubbier (ironically more like Marilyn Monroe then), but she looked HEALTHY, and that's way hotter than the starvin marvin look she has going now.

-Eric

(Reply to this)

WebAddict writes:
on Feb 25 2008 09:41 AM

[quote](The link's at the bottom of the article, and if you somehow haven't seen the photos yet, here's your warning: Obviously NSFW.)[/quote]
What does NSFW mean? I could only come up with really dumb abbreviations for it.

No Sex For Wilson
Nude Screenshots Fat Witches

I'm going to assume it means "Not Safe For Work"

(Reply to this)

tomwaitsjr writes:
on Feb 25 2008 10:04 AM

No Sex for Wookies?

(Reply to this)

Bigbrother writes:
on Feb 25 2008 10:39 AM

In reply to this comment (#1601909)
Come one man Freckles can be sexy. Don't hate on the gingers.

(Reply to this)

rgallitan writes:
on Feb 25 2008 11:57 AM

Just goes to show there's no such thing as bad press.

And don't be hatin' on the freckles people. Sure, they aren't as cute on the lower body as they are on the upper, but she's got it all so it's a wash. Still, I have to admit that this shoot doesn't exactly play to her strengths.

(Reply to this)

tomwaitsjr writes:
on Feb 25 2008 12:20 PM

the lower body is the only reason to ever so much as talk to one.

Otherwise, it is a known fact that for every year you are dating or married to a ginger, you lose 1 inch of penis.

And that's right, eventually it WILL go inverted on you.

So avoid them at all costs.

-Tom=

(Reply to this)

Schumacherh8ter writes:
on Feb 25 2008 01:01 PM

She was hot when she had meat on the bones. Now she's about as sexy as, say, a rake. Also, "I Know Who Killed Me" is one of the worst films I've ever had the misfortune of seeing. The only films worse than it are the "Rollerball" remake and "Batman & Robin".

(Reply to this)

dipitlow555 writes:
on Feb 25 2008 01:01 PM

um...yeah i love Lindsay enough to say that this article is wrong! she won the 2 for playing Aubrey and Dakota for Worst ACTRESS! Not Supporting Actress! Eddie Murphy won the award for Worst Supporting Actress for "Norbit". Lindsay Lohan wasn't even NOMINATED for Worst Supporting Actress, but Julia Ormond was nominated for Worst Supporting Actress for playing Lindsay's mom in "I Know Who Killed Me".

(Reply to this)

sharpless writes:
on Feb 25 2008 01:04 PM

I'm really sick of Lindsay in just about every capacity, but damn if she doesn't look good naked. Also, damn if she doesn't look terrible in a blonde wig.

(Reply to this)

~*Admiral Snowstorm*~ writes:
on Feb 25 2008 01:14 PM

NSFW - Not Safe For Work, more commonly known as NWS, which means Not Work Safe.

Lindsay Lohan making a small comeback? Color me surprised. I look forward to seeing the subsequent meltdown that is bound to follow.

(Reply to this)

Tlincali writes:
on Feb 25 2008 01:32 PM

Plenty here sure do like to talk trash about others looks. So you all must be some really hot studs? Ripped and super sexy yourself? All the right looks?

(Reply to this)

Matanuki writes:
on Feb 25 2008 01:35 PM

In reply to this comment (#1602177)
LOL. Yeah, SOME freckles ain't bad. It can be cute and add to sex appeal. But so many freckles that all her skin is overwhelmed? Man, she looks like a fu ckin' cheetah!

(Reply to this)

Cmedic79 writes:
on Feb 25 2008 01:45 PM

I'd pee in her but

(Reply to this)

Bigbrother writes:
on Feb 25 2008 01:54 PM

In reply to this comment (#1602495)
She's like a sex panther. 60% of the time it works everytime :)

(Reply to this)

Bigbrother writes:
on Feb 25 2008 01:54 PM

In reply to this comment (#1602500)
Somebody had to say it. Way to step up man.

(Reply to this)

arendr writes:
on Feb 25 2008 02:08 PM

Saw the Lohan pics last week--damn, that is the most embarrassing shoot I have ever seen (and I work in celeb photography). She looks nothing like Marilyn and the wig is pathetic. Not to mention she looks hideous. As a straight male, I don't understand guys drooling over her. She's not attractive.

(Reply to this)

Hamboner writes:
on Feb 25 2008 02:18 PM

She looked really vulnerable in the photo shoot, but still kinda strong. The bad wig, to me, is meant to keep you in mind that she wasn't playing Marilyn in the pictures, she was evoking her. To me, that is terrifying because they are playing off public perception that she is going to die in a few months. It is kind of like shock art, sexy sexy shock art that makes you feel bad for being turned on by it.

I still think she is beautiful. Observing her nubility reminds me of how young she is... it's easy for everyone to forget. It also makes me sad because I don't think she'll age very well... but I guess we'll see about that.

(Reply to this)

arendr writes:
on Feb 25 2008 02:32 PM

In reply to this comment (#1602682)
I can't believe you're justifying an obvious lack of foresight by the magazine. In my opinion, it is an embarrassment for them. The bad wig is bad because they got low production value. Simple as that. It's really poorly produced, and she's a bad choice.

And I don't think she's going to die in a few months. I have no idea where you got that.

(Reply to this)

Product_of_You writes:
on Feb 25 2008 11:50 PM

The Razzies are silly; they just take bad movies and nominate everyone involved. While I Know Who Killed Me was a terrible movie Lohan certainly didn't deliever bad acting. And Jim freakin Carey nominated for worst actor. Give me a break. So what Number 23 wasn't a great movie... it certainly wasn't because of Carey. He delievered just fine.

(Reply to this)

diggyzazz writes:
on Feb 27 2008 09:20 AM

Lindsay's jugs are big and bouncy, even if the nips are tiny. A few freckles never hurt a booby, or a bum cheek, as far as I am aware. Power to her, I say, even if she has freckles on her labia majora.

(Reply to this)

CoUcH ToMaToE DoUgIe writes:
on Feb 27 2008 03:22 PM

Woah, mamma... even with her career in the dumpster and her

alcholism ready to resurface anytime now, she still finds time to look

absolutely freakin... pretty hot;) hey, she's still got impressive yabbos

but its truly frightening when you look in her face you see a lost girl ready

for a tragic ending. Unlike worthless trash, like paris and britney, i have

always like Lindsay but i do believe there may be no hope for this girl lost.

Still, the saddest person must be Hugh Hefner realizing he can't capitalize

on peddling her naked body.

(Reply to this)

CoUcH ToMaToE DoUgIe writes:
on Feb 27 2008 03:32 PM

oh, and almost forgot to congrat Lindsay for her razzie record

performance!! Bravo, Lindsay, way to represent Long Island and now you join

other such legendary actress like sharon stone, halle berry and demi moore

in such rare awe inspiring disasters involving the butchering of the art of

acting. Keep up the horrific work and Jack Black, buddy, what the hell are

you thinking??? she might always have impressive breasts, but Jack it's not

worth it!!! Hey, if you want to put her into Tenacious D music video then go

right ahead, man I approve of that not seeing her act anymore!! I mean how

can i stand seeing jack black and lindsay lohan act together? please, i can't

take the torture!!

(Reply to this)

Related Links

I Know Who Killed Me

Related Articles

Most Discussed

Latest News

Latest Interviews

Latest Features

Sponsored Links