In the House Reviews
Super Reviewer
Super Reviewer
Super Reviewer
Super Reviewer
'Rear Window' meets 'Cyrano de Bergerac' in Ozon's brilliantly crafted psycho-thriller. Like Jimmy Stewart in Hitchcock's film, Germain becomes obsessed with a developing story which may or may not be true. The difference here is that Germain has the ability to manipulate the narrative himself, or does he? Though he takes the role of Cyrano to Claude's Christian, it's the young man who is really pulling the strings, manipulating his teacher's desire to find that one talent who makes his teaching job, and thus his life, worthwhile. Claude uses phrases and observations designed specifically to appeal to Germain's contempt for mainstream society. The teacher and his art-dealing wife literally drool as Claude describes his friend's mother (Seigner) as possessing "that distinctive odor of the middle-class woman".
Film-makers influenced by Hitchcock are two a penny (especially in France) but few seem to translate the humor of Hitch's movies into their own. Ozon's film is packed with laughs, most courtesy of Scott-Thomas, whose character seems an amalgamation of 'Rear Window's Grace Kelly and 'Vertigo's Barbara Bel Geddes. Like the former, she struggles to get her lover interested in her own passions. (Some of the film's best jokes come at the expense of the pretentious "art" she deals in, including such "masterpieces" as a swastika made of dildos). At one point, with the best intentions, she tries to involve herself in her husband's obsession, only to provoke his ire. The scene recalls Bel Geddes ill-judged unveiling of the tasteless painting which destroys her relationship with Stewart in 'Vertigo'.
Ozon uses sharp humor, combined with every cinematic trick in the book, to give us a wildly entertaining movie which feels like the bastard love child of Woody Allen and Claude Chabrol. Once you enter this house, you'll be in no rush to leave.
Slickly shot, the opening upbeat instrumental tune brings viewers instantly to the scenario of a joint action between a high school teacher (Luchini), a has-been below-bar writer and his finest pupil (Umhauer). With mutual assent, Umhauer (comes from a broken family and has to tend his maimed father all by himself) is encroaching one of his classmates' (Ughetto) domestic domain using the practical stalking horse - remedial lessons after school for the latter, whose perfect bourgeois life represents everything he is craving for, mostly a sensual middle-aged mother (Seigner). So he is writing down everything as a serial, detailing (fictional or not) what is happening inside the model family, and the teacher promises to read it, correct it, advice him how to become a real writer.
Obviously from the very first chapter, Luchini has been intoxicated by the story (after a serial of disasters from the retrograded youth, Umhauer's writing could never be more fetching), so is his wife (Thomas), a middle-class gallery owner who is in a dire situation and might lose the gallery if her new collection fail to please her new boss, twin sisters played by an unrecognisable Moreau. As we all fully aware, things will go haywire, and the reverberations will boomerang on someone, and in this case, it is Luchini himself, his life will disintegrate eventually.
Borrowing Umhauer's confession of using the present tense in his works, the film per se contains a certain present vibrancy which is extremely audience-friendly, engaging with a hefty gush of dialogs among its main characters (Luchini with Umhauer, Luchini with Thomas, and Umhauer's self narrative), whether it is florid edification, or common conversations, all fittingly satirise the banality and futility of the status quo one is facing or trapped, like it is said in the film, literature and art cannot teach a person anything, we learn by simply living our lives.
"Falling for your best friend's mother" is a gimmick always has its broad market, especially for a motherless young boy in his puberty, the otherwise corny infatuation here has been ingeniously conflated with a voyeuristic angle for Luchini/Thomas and all its viewers, with its ambiguous credibility, it plays out appositely under Ozon's helm, leaving every on-looker chewing on what has happened and anticipating the twist.
Speaking of the twist, whose concoction is not so fully-developed, but anyhow it is a pleasant achievement, one's seemly stable life can be undermined into a tailspin just like that, it is cinematic, but also cautionary.
Luchini embodies his character with wry self-knowledge, loquacious cadences, swankily entering my top 10 BEST LEADING ACTOR race. Umhauer is the opposite youngster, scrawny, reserved but occasionally glistens with a sinister grin, a very well casting choice. Thomas has really found her way in her French-speaking realm and Seigner, enclosed by a perpetual aura of ennui even during the squabble with her hubby (Ménochet), by comparison, underplays herself and looks like she needs a good rest.
The film ends with a fabulous mise-en-scene, various characters occupied by their own business (a protruding one involving two gun-shots), and we (like Luchini and Umhauer) occupy the front row, relish the privilege of peeping other peoples' lives, colourful, vivid but never satisfied.
Germain (Fabrice Luchini) is an unhappy high school literature teacher, frustrated by his dull-witted students. He asks a class to write an essay about what they did last weekend, and is mostly appalled by their efforts. But one essay, from a quiet 16-year-old boy named Claude Garcia (Ernst Umhauer) stands out a mile, because of the quality of the writing and the tale's sinister overtones.
The essay explains Claude's obsession with the seemingly perfect family life of his classmate Rapha (Bastien Ughetto). Claude has no such domestic idyll to go home to; he's the son of an unemployed, disabled father and an absent mother. His assignment paper tells how he befriended Rapha and then infiltrated his family by offering to help his classmate with his worst subject, maths. It also describes Claude's stirrings of desire for Rapha's attractive mother Esther (Emmanuelle Seigner). Germain is both fascinated and appalled, and can't resist setting up one-to-one tuition sessions with Claude which centre on further instalments of his story about Rapha's family. But where is the division between truth and fiction? As the film continues, that distinction blurs both for the characters and for the audience.
There's a strong tonal resemblance to the best latter-day Woody Allen films here, an influence apparently acknowledged by a scene in which we see some of the protagonists queuing to see Allen's film 'Match Point'. Germain is a very Allen-esque character, even down to his physical appearance. There are plenty of literary references, and some ribald fun at the expense of modern art. The scenes set in the struggling art gallery run by Germain's wife Jeanne (Kristin Scott Thomas) reward close attention: some of the works on display are hilarious. The whole movie is a highly entertaining comic cautionary tale about the power of stories and the perils of compulsive fascination.
