Average Rating: 5.2/10
Reviews Counted: 150
Fresh: 55 | Rotten: 95
In Time's intriguing premise and appealing cast are easily overpowered by the blunt, heavy-handed storytelling.
Average Rating: 5.3/10
Critic Reviews: 37
Fresh: 15 | Rotten: 22
In Time's intriguing premise and appealing cast are easily overpowered by the blunt, heavy-handed storytelling.
liked it
Average Rating: 3.3/5
User Ratings: 47,848
When Will Salas is falsely accused of murder, he must figure out a way to bring down a system where time is money - literally - enabling the wealthy to live forever while the poor, like Will, have to beg, borrow, and steal enough minutes to make it through another day. -- (C) 20th Century Fox
Oct 28, 2011 Wide
Jan 31, 2012
$37.6M
20th Century Fox
All Critics (150) | Top Critics (37) | Fresh (55) | Rotten (95) | DVD (1)
Niccol's 'In Time': Prescient allegory of urgent timeliness about the current economic woes.
Clever and unsettling.
The film is beautifully shot in chilly blues and grays by cinematographer Roger Deakins, and Los Angeles locales are well chosen for futuristic effect. Most of the time, however, I found myself glancing at the clock on my own wrist.
Niccol's zippy direction, joined to a sleek, rich production design, keeps the movie spinning like a shiny toy.
A movie so consistently flat-footed, with pauses between lines of dialogue so vast, that you begin to wonder if the whole thing might be a psychological experiment of some kind.
Nothing more than a clumsily executed preach-a-thon.
Starts out great, almost like a pseudo sequel to Niccol's other sci-fi drama Gattaca, but slowly unravels into a mindless chase picture that never really captures any real depth or meaning.
Nothing remarkable about this futuristic adventure that reminds me a bit of "Logan's Run." Paul Chambers, CNN.
Andrew Niccol continues to be the go-to guy for using smartly executed science-fiction/fantasy concepts in the service of expressing ideas rather than bang-up action.
The movie doesn't ask much of them, acting-wise, as it devolves into a chase film and doesn't spent any time examining all the thorny moral quandaries that it brings up.
Prophetically arriving at about the same time as the Occupy Wall Street protests, the film couldn't be more relevant; unfortunately, it's also ham-handed.
h skhnothetikh akribeia kai oi sygkrathmenes aisthhtikes pinelies me tis opoies employtizei ayto poy exei apofasisei na kanei, de se afhnoyn na peis thn tainia toy Niccol xasimo xronoy akribws, alla oyte kai gia quality time mporeis na thn peraseis
Timberlake's charisma can't carry this but it's hard to think of anyone who could.
Like a 99 Percenter in the making, Will is stunned to hear from Henry that -- oh my god! -- the system of doling out time is rigged.
Nobody should waste a minute of their life on this baloney.
Niccol's metaphor gets silly fast.
This Bonnie and Clyde couldn't have less on screen chemistry if Clyde was the orangutan from Every Which Way but Loose.
This alternate world's hollowness drains the movie, blanching the noir. Cheesy, corny moments pop up throughout. Grinds its potential down into a clockwork chase movie.
...the movie's failure [is] especially disappointing given the enduring success of 1997's Gattaca.
In Time is the sort of middling sci-fi movie that you might come across a few months from now while looking for something to stream from the Internet.
The plot is too loose and the action too slack to keep the audience fully gripped. Timberlake and Seyfried are supposed to be the ones looking fretfully at their wrists to see how much time they have to go, not the viewer.
When time really is money, it's hard not to keep looking at your watch. Fortunately, viewing this film won't have you looking at yours.
... it works pretty well if you don't look too closely ...
An interesting, literal 'living on borrowed time' premise doesn't quite live up to its ambition but cool film work and Justin Timberlake keep things interesting.
It's such a shame that a brilliant idea, with good characters and a great cast can end up like this. It seemed too floaty and flitted between scenes sometimes with no real reason. I felt like it wasn't as developed as it could have been and there were quite a few inconsistencies like how it took them a long time to
September 20, 2011Super Reviewer
Andrew Niccol's In Time is a unique Sci Fi action film. Set in a Dystopian society where time is literally money, the rich can live for centuries, the poor have to work for time. The concept of this film is terrific, and I thought it was a refreshing take on the whole Dystopian genre. The film is underrated, and though
February 20, 2012
Super Reviewer
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 83% | Puss in Boots |
| 94% | Moneyball |
| 59% | Real Steel |
| 84% | Contagion |
| 83% | Puss in Boots |
| 68% | Tower Heist |
| 90% | Martha Marcy May Marlene |
| 33% | London Boulevard |
| 17% | The Son of No One |
Puss in Boots and J. Edgar
50 best-reviewed Best Picture nominees
Ranking the 75 best animated movies ever!
Download the official PDF!