Matrix > Inception

I loved Inception, but it's source material, Matrix, was far better:

1. better world and backstory (a virtual world with sentient programs. oblivious humans plugged in for energy. insect-like machines city in post apocalyptic world with giant power plants and artificial egg sacs)
2. more diverse and complex characters (morpheus, agent smith, tank, the oracle, trinity)
3. better action (do i have to explain?)
4. better dialogue (more philosophical and insightful on various things)
5. better storyline (inception was simply about planting an idea a rich guy's head, the Matrix was about the One fulfilling his quest to his superpowers in order to free the humanity from the oppressive machines)
6. much cooler costumes
7. a jolting mid-point twist

It's a shame the Matrix sequels did not capitalize on the "Matrix within a Matrix" like Inception did with dream with a dream. I believe the Wachowski brothers had that idea in mind, but they chose not to use it, because they wouldn't be able to conclude it as a trilogy, and it would warp the entire storyline they had structured out.
Tom S.
12-29-2012 03:01 AM

Thread Replies

Please log in to participate in this forum.

Epaksa Sagawa

Epaksa Sagawa

Much of Inception's source material stems from the anime, Paprika. See it for yourself, and you'll see how much Nolan borrowed from it.

May 11 - 05:37 PM

Diego Unchained

Diego Unchained

The Matrix, in turn, borrowed heavily from far better films like Total Recall. And for the record, the original Matrix was merely okay, and the every copy of the sequels should be crammed into the pit from The Dark Knight Rises so we never have to see them again.

Apr 14 - 05:45 PM

Michael Bevington

Michael Bevington

This.

May 9 - 12:40 PM

Hunter Primm

Hunter Primm

Are people comparing these films because they are both very thematic? I see no other similarities with these movies.

Apr 7 - 05:59 PM

Hunter Primm

Hunter Primm

I think it's a tie. I think both movies are spectacular and I love them both to death. Tie for my favorite sci-fi movie. No real reason to compare them, though.

Apr 15 - 03:02 PM

Danny M.

Danny Malone

I've been seeing a lot of people comparing these two films but I don't see the similarities. I'm by no means knocking The Matrix, but I don't see it as being as wildly inventive as everyone seems to think it was. I'm glad they decided to capitalize on the theme but it is one people have pondered for ages. I remember being a child and thinking, "What if I'm just someone's dream?" I thought Inception was completely original. Even if you enjoyed The Matrix more, I feel it was a less inspired work. It might be more memorable, but definitely not more original. Personally I loved them both, but I enjoyed Inception more. Some of that is bias as I'm a huge DiCaprio fan as well as a huge Christopher Nolan fan. I will however admit that the whole red pill blue pill thing will be permanently embedded into our generation...

Mar 3 - 11:52 PM

Christopher Spencer

Christopher Spencer

this

May 10 - 08:42 AM

Alex M.

Alex Maverick

They are two completely different stories. This is why.
1. In Inception, they are in their sub-conscious. Matrix- the images are being planted into their brains by a machine.
2. Inception is not a post-apocalyptic story.
3. The world is not run by computers in Inception.
4. The action doesn't look like a video game.
5. No one is trying to save the world.
6. No one has superpowers.
7. Inception has no awful sequels (Yet).

Jan 19 - 08:18 PM

The Master of Movies

The Master of Movies

I found inception more interesting and fun. The matrix was fun but it's sequels were....wait it has sequels

Apr 28 - 07:37 PM

Tom S.

Tom Smith

FYI: the ">" on the title means ">". I dont know what happened

Dec 29 - 03:03 AM

Help | About | Jobs | Critics Submission | API | Licensing | Mobile