Al Gore Wins Nobel Peace Prize
Ex-VP's Inconvenient Truth helped pave the way.
That giant bang you heard last week was the sound of Sean Hannity's head exploding.
The catalyst for the explosion? The announcement that Al Gore, in conjunction with the United Nations panel on climate change, had been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for their work on global warming education. As Variety reports, Gore's Laurie David-produced documentary, An Inconvenient Truth, was a catalyst. From the article:
In awarding the prize to both Gore and the U.N. panel on climate change, the Nobel committee alluded to "An Inconvenient Truth'' when it noted that Gore's "strong commitment, reflected in political activity, lectures, films and books, has strengthened the struggle against climate change. He is probably the single individual who has done most to create greater worldwide understanding of the measures that need to be adopted.''
"Inconvenient Truth'' producer Laurie David said, "Do I think the film was a piece of this? Yes.''
"I think the award was a result of not just one film, a powerful film,'' but of Gore's "more than 30 years of hard work on this issue.''
Of course, not everyone agrees with the film's message; its $49 million box office gross and overwhelmingly positive reviews have been a source of irritation for various right-wing pundits and industrial lobbyists, who claim Truth is based on hysterical extrapolations rather than sound scientific data. Variety's report recounts a recent battle over the film's inclusion in British school curriculum:
The film has become part of the regular curriculum in countries around the world, but its content is still stirring up controversy, with critics charging that it is partisan. British High Court Judge Michael Burton, ruling recently on an effort to ban the film from U.K. schools, said "Truth'' was "broadly accurate.'' He said it could be shown in schools if "guidance notes'' are included that draw attention to nine different errors made in "the context of alarmism and exaggeration.''
John Lesher, president of "Truth'' distrib Paramount Vantage, said the movie "was created relying on the best scientific evidence available. While the judge highlighted a handful of points he took issue with, the ruling that the film can be screened in U.K. schools verified that the central message of the film is true.''
Source: Variety
The catalyst for the explosion? The announcement that Al Gore, in conjunction with the United Nations panel on climate change, had been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for their work on global warming education. As Variety reports, Gore's Laurie David-produced documentary, An Inconvenient Truth, was a catalyst. From the article:
In awarding the prize to both Gore and the U.N. panel on climate change, the Nobel committee alluded to "An Inconvenient Truth'' when it noted that Gore's "strong commitment, reflected in political activity, lectures, films and books, has strengthened the struggle against climate change. He is probably the single individual who has done most to create greater worldwide understanding of the measures that need to be adopted.''
"Inconvenient Truth'' producer Laurie David said, "Do I think the film was a piece of this? Yes.''
"I think the award was a result of not just one film, a powerful film,'' but of Gore's "more than 30 years of hard work on this issue.''
Of course, not everyone agrees with the film's message; its $49 million box office gross and overwhelmingly positive reviews have been a source of irritation for various right-wing pundits and industrial lobbyists, who claim Truth is based on hysterical extrapolations rather than sound scientific data. Variety's report recounts a recent battle over the film's inclusion in British school curriculum:
The film has become part of the regular curriculum in countries around the world, but its content is still stirring up controversy, with critics charging that it is partisan. British High Court Judge Michael Burton, ruling recently on an effort to ban the film from U.K. schools, said "Truth'' was "broadly accurate.'' He said it could be shown in schools if "guidance notes'' are included that draw attention to nine different errors made in "the context of alarmism and exaggeration.''
John Lesher, president of "Truth'' distrib Paramount Vantage, said the movie "was created relying on the best scientific evidence available. While the judge highlighted a handful of points he took issue with, the ruling that the film can be screened in U.K. schools verified that the central message of the film is true.''
Source: Variety
Related Items
| Celeb: | Al Gore |
| Laurie David |
|
TortillaSoup writes: on Oct 15 2007 05:50 AM I wonder which private jet he'll use to retrieve said award. (Reply to this) |
|
Gimy writes: on Oct 15 2007 05:59 AM dude should run for prez again, he's already won once... (Reply to this) |
|
GameDesigner writes: on Oct 15 2007 05:59 AM I guess Al managed to stay in the spotlight a little longer. True, the world is getting "warmer".. how much is man-made and how much is the natural cycle, nobody knows. But one thing is certain. Since Mr. Gore made a lot of his money in the tobbaco industry, it's safe to say that while he claims to worry about enviromental pollution, he doesn't spend too many sleepless nights worrying about the damage he's contributed to the human body through smoking. (Reply to this) |
|
TheSoliloquist writes: on Oct 15 2007 05:59 AM This most recent recipient shows just how much of a sham the Nobel Prize has become. Since Jimmy Carter won, it's safe to say that this "Peace" prize goes to any irrational liberal who touts an overtly exaggerated documentary as fact. They might as well have given the award to Michael Moore. What a shame. (Reply to this) |
|
Shatter24 writes: on Oct 15 2007 06:11 AM Al Gore is out letting people know about a problem that is being generally ignored by the public. Things are going to get worse (they have already started with more severe hurricanes, less snow and rain in some areas, the seasons starting earlier and ending later), and then all naysayers will be hard pressed to disagree w/ the fact of what we are doing to the environment. Its much easier to say "I don't know why its happenning" instead of doing something about it and about our own behaviors. We can only live in ignorance so long. Al Gore deserved this. He isn't going to run for president based on it (though he's more popular now than ever before). He just believes it, believes in it, and is trying to help make the world better. Let's not tear this man down for partison reasons, just respect the work he's done and leave it at that. Who know Al Gore would be popular and a Nobel Prize winner and Bush would be highly unpopular and in an unpopular war w/ no end in sight? Maybe Bush should have given Gore the election seven years ago? (Reply to this) |
|
crudebob writes: on Oct 15 2007 06:11 AM In reply to this comment (#1192594) Outside of George Bush, Glen Beck/Rush Limbaugh fans and the General Handgrenades of American society, the world is applauding the Nobel Committee for giving the award to Al Gore and would applaud even louder if they could find a reason to give such an award to Michael Moore. Giving Moore an award would be worth it just to see that moron Glen Beck self destuct on television. (Reply to this) |
|
blank blank writes: on Oct 15 2007 06:34 AM they should have given me the nobel peace prize... because i defeated EXC (Reply to this) |
|
0LDB0Y writes: on Oct 15 2007 06:34 AM I think Bruce Willis and Jake Gyllenhaal should win the Nobel Peace Prize for their outstanding role in Armageddon and The Day After Tomorrow. (Reply to this) |
|
drtruebl writes: on Oct 15 2007 07:35 AM In reply to this comment (#1192633) Both those movies and Gore's were equally fictitious. (Reply to this) |
|
arendr writes: on Oct 15 2007 07:39 AM In reply to this comment (#1192594) Have you paid any attention to the work that Jimmy Carter has done since he left office? How many homes have you built for poor people. (Reply to this) |
|
jeremyd4 writes: on Oct 15 2007 07:48 AM that's the whole reason he said it drtruebl... (Reply to this) |
|
insanemansam5 writes: on Oct 15 2007 08:07 AM In reply to this comment (#1192594) "This most recent recipient shows just how much of a sham the Nobel Prize has become. Since Jimmy Carter won, it's safe to say that this "Peace" prize goes to any irrational liberal who touts an overtly exaggerated documentary as fact." Irrational views like what? that we should build and repair housing for the poor. I'm no fan of Jimmy Carter's politics but there's no denying that the man has done a lot of good for the world. As for Gore, regardless of what you think of him, was he really the most deserving Peace prize nominee? Was there really no one else nominated who has done more to advance civilization than Gore? Maybe, I just don't understand how this thing works though, was he the only one who won the prize or did he just win the prize for one category? (Reply to this) |
|
Crenshaw writes: on Oct 15 2007 08:12 AM It's time to play Spot the Looney. Already a lot of choices. (Reply to this) |
|
arendr writes: on Oct 15 2007 08:19 AM Seems like any mention of Al Gore brings out some ridiculous statements on this site. (Reply to this) |
|
SpasticNed writes: on Oct 15 2007 08:20 AM GORE: Nearly all of his documentary has been discredited by the highest court of England. They said the majority of the work was clearly politically motivated and contained not only misleading information but information that is completely unfounded. The most respected meteorologists in the world laugh at his claims and reject his notions outright. The sky is not falling, people. UN (Reply to this) |
|
Baccus83 writes: on Oct 15 2007 08:24 AM In reply to this comment (#1192594) Are you dim? Jimmy Carter started Habitat for Humanity, one of the greatest and most important NFP organizations. HH has changed the lives of countless people, and you have the nerve to say that he doesn't deserve a "peace" prize? Come on, whatever you may think of him as a president, he deserves a lot of credit for HH. As for Gore - I'm happy he won. He does at times seem a little self-important, but if there's anything worth being a little irritating about, it's global warming (Reply to this) |
|
xenogears writes: on Oct 15 2007 08:28 AM They where absolutely right to give him the award and micheal moore should get one next for Sicko. Another great and eye opening documentary. And for all the haters of micheal moore out there if his movies are so off bass, why is everything he says in them coming to pass. (Reply to this) |
|
xenogears writes: on Oct 15 2007 08:29 AM They where absolutely right to give him the award and micheal moore should get one next for Sicko. Another great and eye opening documentary. And for all the haters of micheal moore out there if his movies are so off bass, why is everything he says in them coming to pass. GORE FOR PRESIDENT '08!!!!!! (Reply to this) |
|
Bigbrother writes: on Oct 15 2007 08:37 AM In reply to this comment (#1192774) I gotta agree, I thought the Nobel Peace Prize was for people who spread you know...peace. Climate change is important and all, but does it really meet the criteria for the Nobel Peace Prize? Hopefully next year it'll be awarded to the guy who steps up and stops the slaughter in Darfur or Myanmar. Is there a Nobel Prize for meterorological issues? That would probably be better and lets face it the Nobel Peace Prize has been a sham since it's inception it was started and named after the guy who invented dynamite. P.S. just my two cents, but I'm sitting here in England and it's still rainy and foggy. No climate change to report here unfortunately :(. (Reply to this) |
|
Eldorado writes: on Oct 15 2007 08:53 AM All you knobs proclaiming what was in his movie to be myth, and that global warming is fiction need to get your heads screwed on straight How can you be so ignorant to not comprehend the fact that polluting our air, water and land is a BAD THING?? His whole movie was about cleaning up our irresponsible ways, did you miss the part about higher risk of lung related cases due to smog etc? Less available clean drinking water? Hey, do you enjoy going to our beaches and swimming in stinky smelly water?? Seriously people.. WAKE UP!! And to those that dispute the facts, instead of just saying stupid one liners such as ' Both those movies and Gore's were equally fictitious.' How about you show us your greater intelligence and post some facts that you yourself has come up with, in detail, to dispute his movie?? And no, posting to someone else's article does not exist.. your mind is already set to not believe any of this, so someone else can make up a lie just as good and you will believe it We will all find out soon enough who was right.. 20/20 hind sight is a b*tch... (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |








